At the moment we have no investors. You can check it https://etherscan.io/address/0x5ea45217883d06bceef2c747e558b1a25eca1b97

We are negotiating with venture funds and private investors.

The hypocrisy, projection, excuses and blatant lies runs rampant. You continue to quote me out of context, while leaving our key pieces of discussion that you will not touch.

I will say this again, there's a reason why Universa continues to lose followers on Twitter and Telegram group. There are reasons why domain name was lost (and no not because of what they stated, that's their cover-up story) and why UTNP is still used instead of UTN. There are reasons why you continue to exclaim development is working, but in-fact all the platforms are exactly the same as they were a year ago. No matter what small tweaks have been done, 1.5 years have passed by, and the mainnet is exactly in the same shape as it was 1 year ago.

If i had a time-machine, and went back 1 year ago. I TRULY PROMISE YOU GUYS, i would not notice 1 difference about Universa, aside from their seized domain names and some GUI improvements on their beta. The backend stuff is a different story, but who fucking knows? All we have is text and pictures, nothing that can proove anything. Everything Universa has is hearsay, coming from the team only. We can't actually verify anything, we can't see anything, all we know is what they've told us from "business relations to development". It's fucking madness the lack of transparency. Get a fucking grip, and your heads out of your ass. Universa's blockchain is no longer a new-kid on the block with machine guns, it's a dying old-man.

And no, despite your best attempts to slander me cunt, I've been following this scamcoin for over a year. I know every development update, every piece of information that has gone out since day 1. I was never here for the price, i was always here for the tech. There's only 1 reason i mention markets, because the project is dying and the market is dead along with it. It's not healthy for any crypto to be in a state like this, despite your continued best efforts to depict yourself as one who understands how cryptocurrencies function. Unlike the picture you try to paint, you're only source of traffic is this thread. This is why you are so heartbroken every-time someone gives critical judgement.



There's reasons why Universa is dead and that's for what i've stated many many many times, but not once have you ever quoted it? Lack of transparency, lack of community, lack of updates, lack OF REAL INTEGRATIONS OF THE BLOCKCHAIN and most of all, lack of respect for people. The only thing this project rides on, is the false hope AB gives with his "NDAs" imagine that, everyone is putting their trust into 1 man that signed a paper that he can't even tell us or follow through with anything. A fucking joke, truly a fucking mockery. Who believes this? No one does, only a handful of paid-shills who are manipulating a handful of people.

There are 100s of projects that have REAL DEVELOPMENT and REAL PARTNERSHIPS and have USABLE TECH and ARE NOT SPECULATIVE, but Universa is not one of them. Sadly, this project is run by incompetent Russians, who've walked away with 28million USD on hookers, blowjobs and cocaine.

Sad reality really. I wish this project had something I could talk positively about, but unfortunately, there's nothing anymore. One year ago Universa was like a gem and even more so during its ICO, crypto evolves at an alarming rate though. Unfortunately, this project is run by idiots who are blindfolded and virtually nothing has changed.

That's the reality of it all. BTW Ampirebus, choke on my dick. You have no community, this thread is all puppets. Stop pretending you piece of shit.

Yes, we are planning a listing on the exchange soon.

We were forced to reschedule the listing date due to large listing fees.  Follow our news. Soon we will present a new Notm Concept 2.0

Stay tuned, we have some exciting news coming soon. 

The Athero team has gone away and last 2 months never showed theirselves to us. Their telegram channel still closed for chat.. I believe that this project turned scam for sure.. I also never believe that the Athero project raised $20 millions. All best ICO review sites gave very high point to Athero and they misslead us as well. I want them to be more carefully!

We need their response on that allegation, but since they are not active here anymore I don't think we will get some explanation.
It's very serious as if it's true, they could leave the market easily and we holders will be at big loss here, but I don't really believe easily since at the current price, it's still above ICO price.

How can the token price of a project that won Ethereum Hackathon dropped by 99% from its ICO price?

As Bankex foundation won the ETH Hackathon last year and promoted themselves as “the first plasma protocol implement case”, many investors think this is a solid ICO to invest on. However, many issues happened during and after the token sales of Bankex, making many investors lost their confidence. In this article, we will discuss many, but not all, mistakes made by Bankex foundation, showing that even though a team have solid technology foundation, the market would not favor them if they are not trustworthy and have bad public relationship to its community.

1. Abnormally long public sales period

The Bankex ICO began on November 28 and ends on December 28. At the meantime, the ETH price increased from 472.9 to 737.02, which is nearly 55% increases in USD value. Thanks to that, in the first two weeks, the team nearly received enough USD for the project already, but instead of ending the token sales quickly, they did nothing and only end the token sales 2 days earlier. Thus, they received $70,600,000 USD, which exceed their USD cap by 150% while many token were not sold.

2. 5 exchanges promise

During token sales, many admins in Bankex Chinese telegram group mentioned about the token would be listed on 5 exchanges soon after the token sales ended. After the token sales, this information spread to English telegram group as well. In the first week of January, this statement altered and changed into “BKX token would be listed in January. We have committed five exchanges.”

This kind of statement mislead investors during the token sales, many of them thought they could sell their token in few weeks and underestimated their time costs in participated Bankex ICO

On 28 January 10:22 am UTC +8, in Bankex telegram group, the admins there will be “good news regarding the listing information” in 2 hours. And when the time came, they announced that there would be a Facebook live on 9:30 pm UTC +8 where Bankex Managing Director Constantine Kurbatoff would provide “exchanges information”.

While the way of “announcing an announcement” received many negative attitude, many investors were expecting Bankex team would provide the information about what 5 exchanges would Bankex get listed on.

However, in the live, Kurbatoff stated “the team has filed everything in December, and now is up to the exchanges to decide the listing.” The truth is, the team only sent documents to exchanges, without any conformation from exchanges, they told their investors “committed five exchanges” and would “definitely listed in January”. The team redefined committed, definitely and January. This is definitely a false promise.

3. Announced first but fail to get shortlisted in Binance voting competition

On 8 February, Bankex team tweets this:
Again, the team announced too soon before having any confirmation from counterpart, making them look like a joke when the truth revealed.

4. Listed on OKEX, circulation supply and advisor token problem

Information about Bankex on OKEX
On 26 February, the team stated that the coin would be listed on OKEX tomorrow (27 February). And people discovered that the circulation supply of Bankex token is 120m according to OKEX information, while the token sales only released 80m token, and telegram group admins kept telling the community the circulation supply was 62.2m. Bankex team accused that is the fault of OKEX.

When the trading started, the price of token pumped to 0.002599 ETH then dump to as low as 0.00088 ETH, which is normal price action for many ICO.

However, with the crash in token prices, investors tried to find the reason behind the reason of the crash, and some of them realized an advisor, whose token should be locked for a year, transferred his/her token on OKEX exchange without any announcement.

TxHash: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x26e346aa8336ab004e12dcda4a24cae72e5597acb3c44e25c42d37bb7afd8102

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x315f12f1db61306e9a607d07bc452b154182db8ac02a81f708e05a9edff2a2b7

This create panic to many investors and they tried to find a proper reply from the team, so the problem raised in Bankex telegram group. Instead of having proper response instantly, the telegram admins ban everyone who raised the advisor token issues. On next day, they claimed that the advisor didn’t sold any of the token, but they didn’t provide any proper reason regarding the transfer of token.

Only after a week, in an article “How to get listed on exchange” written by Bankex COO Dima Dolgov said the advisor transfer his/her token for testing, but the best time to response the doubt has gone.

In conclusion, the team keep repeating their mistake and always fail to response to community in time, leading many doubts among investors. So, this is reasonable for the price to dropped by 67%. While many of solid projects are underdeveloped by Bankex team, including App coin, Media coin, Movie coin, that’s a shame to have this kind of bad public image after all these mistakes. Bankex team is definitely a bad example to all the solid projects to the ICO spaces, and let’s hope similar silly mistakes would not be made in other projects as well.



https://medium.com/@jordanwong_70450/how-to-make-a-shitty-ico-even-if-you-win-ethereum-hackathon-using-bankex-as-example-968de0b8475b

IOTA one from many big project in crypto world
a good news coming from this project
Jaguar Land Rover, Britain’s largest auto manufacturer said on Monday it is testing software will allow drivers of its cars to earn the IOTA cryptocurrency as a reward for sharing data. and the software called "Smart Wallet"
read more here my friend :
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-crypto-currencies-jaguar/jaguar-land-rover-planning-to-allow-helpful-car-drivers-to-earn-cryptocurrency-idUSKCN1S40UD

regards

Thanks for the question, we can work with any country as the platform eases the process of points based applications and reduces the cost significantly.   

We are essentially taking the place of immigration professionals in the application process and this automation is what accounts for the reduction in costs. 

Legalization is not an issue as we are not directly affiliated with individual governments preserving the countries independence in these matters.

The application process is where we exist, the middlemen between the applicant and government.  This is a very large and lucrative market space to be in and a space that is in desperate need of updating.

I think the W12 team's strategy is wrong, because if all tokens are unlocked together then the price will be a severe dump, different if now the token has been opened, it's very good

No big announcement as far as I know, Just small updates here and there! I just hope they announce some big partnership, That would cheer up MTH holders, Also price will go up a bit.