it is still not even the btc price it was at the first week of launch, this is never a good sign to see in a coin. -50% by tomorrow or next day. look at the graph, it tells a lot. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-sv/ devs and early miners or collectors instant dumped first week, holders and people getting in late slowly dumped over time. Now the growth is artificial and will fall off, there will be no support. |
|
|
|
It's a fact: CSW is a scammer.
You will be sued next. Sue me, csw is a scammer moron, who needs to be knocked the fuck out, same with mark karpeles. |
|
|
|
|
That 5 btc you stole from someones email or this list and bought a car with, those were funds were for a kids heart transplant and college fund, you will verify yourself as that boy you stole from, you don`t need to trust me. It is the only way to show you responsibility for your actions.
|
|
|
|
nevermind I don`t need to know because taking something that is not yours is wrong, do to others how you would like to be done. This shit is stealing, not a lottery it is not much better, it is worse.Your actions will be locked into the blockchain of time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NT427lPhkXs everything is recorded timestamped into time, actions and thoughts, and you will live the life from the ones you steal from, you will steal from yourself LOL!  |
|
|
|
Trust me, it is 100% that your private key is publicly known and is in this database. No, it isn't. This database is generating keys on the fly as each page is loaded. If it were to generate all keys, it wouldn't even be able to generate a tiny fraction before the heat death of universe. Hell, you couldn't even count the number of keys (just short of 2^256), let alone generate them or check for a balance, before our sun burnt out. The chances of winning a lottery are in the range of 1 in 10^6 or 10^7. Given that 2^256 is approximately 10^77, you are more likely to win the lottery more than 10 times in a row than you are to stumble upon your private key on this website. Whether the system computes them or recalls them from memory is totally pointless. ALL the private keys are accessible via that URL. Why do you somehow think you are more protected because the system generates the keys rather than recalls them? The dumbest fucking argument ever. this one has 500 btc how do I get it? https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/17ZSCZgCmnjotqTpwYW3bdugAkNxxT2hYb |
|
|
|
Which industries do you think will get disrupted by Decentralized Blockchain Technology the most? In terms of real world use case applications of Decentralized Blockchain Technology, which ones would you say will have the greatest positive impact in the world.
another big one is medical industries and healthcare. |
|
|
|
Probably #4 because he thought of copyrighting the satoshi whitepapers way before craig wright did.  Yah you can`t trust patent offices tho, a lot of them will take others papers clone them with a earlier date, change a few words and state they had the earlier claim because they changed the date. Blockchain is needed in this field for copyright. |
|
|
|
Looks like Craig Wright is having fun on showing off his dirty finger in that picture even I know its edited. When it comes to who is Satoshi, my guess is Pablo Escobar as his son earlier filed for the bitcoin trademark before Craig Wright did, so he can be in that conversation . On a serious note you can have N number of speculation on who the real creator is, unless someone signs a message from the genesis block, no one can claim that spot. Just because someone has satoshi`s keys does not mean they are satoshi. |
|
|
|
A bit hard to identify: the black one may be onyx, black tourmaline? The other looks like silver. The another dark one seems a normal stone with iron concentration. And the 4th one I really can't distinguish it from a common stone. I need a better cam |
|
|
|
Yes, these colorful and sometimes very crazy personalities are LEAST likely to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto. You should have included the name of Julian Paul Assange the famous Australian journalist and computer programmer who founded WikiLeaks in 2006 as BitiLeaks made the claim that he is actually the one we are looking for...maybe this is just another joke. Soon, the list can be expanding as the search for the real bitcoin founder goes on and on. 1. I mean if you want a serious list of what I think, rogue coder or coders for the IMF. A aware person or persons saw the light and released it to the public instead of giving it to the bankers. 2. Could be the FED/CIA/NSA, I don`t know. (bankers would of been thinking about money) 3. Hal Finney (I mean he was the first person to get some right?) (would explain the not coming back thing) R.I.P 4. Adam Back and the cool dudes/duddettes at blockstream 5. Some smart Asian person or people (it just makes sense with how much is mined in china, yes I know power is cheaper there), Maybe a Canadian Japanese person I don`t know. I know one thing, they had at least a college or university level "education". I don`t know I think Satoshi is still alive. I just have a heart feeling, my heart is never wrong. I really hope this person is not being held captive like Julian Paul Assange, that is some bullshit. All these monsters are going to pay, I Promise. |
|
|
|
None of the above. I suspect Dave Kleiman was Satoshi Nakamoto, but unfortunately he is deceased. If he were alive, perhaps he'd clarify the issue to resolve the concerns about imposters.
Yah it sucks, I really hope Satoshi is not dead. I don`t expect anything from the person or persons but like if they are still alive they should really direct the world. We are not going to live forever anyways in this temporal realm. I don`t know perhaps if Satoshi is not dead they fear death. I can assure you, when you pass you won`t even realized you passed, there is nothing to fear but fear itself. I don`t even want like a face or gender. I would even accept the fact it is Koko the Gorilla and be cool with it. I just want someone who can be a real leader. I know the whole point is we don`t need leaders and we all should be leaders, but if you look around you in almost all species there is many mammals that lead the pack, the first bird in the V shape of Canadian Geese flying, the silver back Gorilla, The leader of the pack in a wolf gang, The front elephant leading the rest to water... etc etc. The leaders we have today in almost all of the nations kind of suck ass let`s be real, Trump used 100million on golf trips so far, think about how many farms could of been created to feed the working class for free. I think almost everyone would vote Satoshi as their political leader in a heart beat, even without a face, name or address, The people could agree on the blocklaws by majority. https://twitter.com/ThugLifeBlazer/status/1133533529919377410I know how to tie this into bitcoin if it makes sense to you. |
|
|
|
How big will the blockchain core wallet be to download in 2025? To have the full chain on my computer?
First of all, there's no such thing as "blockchain core". There is the Bitcoin blockchain. Bitcoin Core is the most commonly used node software for Bitcoin. Over the last 30 days, the average block size has been 1.188 MB, let's call it 1.2 MB to make calculations easier. There are about 1.792 million minutes between now and the end of 2025. Assuming blocks every 10 minutes (this is not necessarily a safe assumption because blocks are actually produced faster than that, though I don't know the exact number off the top of my head), there will be ~179200 blocks found between now and then. At 1.2 MB per block, that's an additional 215040 MB of block data, which is 215 GB. According to my node, the blockchain is currently 207 GB (this ignores the indexes, databases, and other data necessary to make a node work with just the raw blocks), so 207 + 215 = 422 GB. Thus by the end of 2025, the Bitcoin blockchain will be around 422 GB in size, assuming no block size increase or decrease. Why not, since every block is a save point, the way I see it. If people want to become full nodes they only have to start from the last block? the last check point,
What you are proposing is not safe. By starting from the last block (or even just a recent block), new nodes will be unable to verify the entire blockchain and thus they cannot be sure that they are not using some chain produced by an attacker. They now have to trust that the person who gave them their starting point is honest. This is additional trust and reduces the security of such nodes. Furthermore, too recent of a block can result in issues when blocks are reorged, i.e. orphan blocks. or is there a way to compress this data and if the compress data matches they can download the entire chain in like 1gb.
Because the blockchain contains a large amount of random data, it is not very compressible. Lossless compression algorithms do not perform very will with random data. What stops someone from making a trillion addresses before they update their chain? won`t there be collisions in the future? How does the bitcoin wallet know if it is not connected that I created trillion^256 addresses before it rolls out? I can make wallets offline right?
No, there won't be. Firstly, addresses aren't registered with the blockchain or anything like that. When you generate an address, you typically don't check whether it has been used before by someone else because the probability of that is so so tiny that it is basically 0. It's practically impossible to accidentally produce two of the same addresses (barring things like bad RNGs). The number of possible addresses is so large that if you generated a trillion addresses per second it would take you over 38000 years just to have a 50% probability that you have found a collision. Furthermore, you would have generated so many addresses that whatever collided is almost definitely going to be an address that you had generated, not someone elses. The number of addresses is just so unfathomably large that the human mind cannot comprehend such numbers. There are so many possible addresses that a collision is basically impossible. Additionally, by 2025, everyone will probably be using some other address scheme at that point which allows for even more possible addresses. oh sorry I mean bitcoin core, well I want to be safe that is the whole point of this. Is there no way to stop duplicate addresses from being generated, why not like a address within a address or just like a doubler like 1BDvQZjaAJH4ecZ8aL3fYgTi7rnn3o2thE(1) 1BDvQZjaAJH4ecZ8aL3fYgTi7rnn3o2thE(2)? it is blockchain after all no? and yah in the future we will have to add unlimited address gen or something, bitcoin might be around a lot longer then most of us can foresee. I expect the aliens on planet D93-F3JN to use this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fchC0Dscm9I They won`t like fiat. Anyways, nice to hear from a smart person, can I ask you something off topic, how do you feel about this simulation? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7TLFyK_3Pk |
|
|
|
|
How big will the blockchain core wallet be to download in 2025? To have the full chain on my computer?
According to Blockchain.info, the Bitcoin blockchain was 149 GB at the end of 2017. It's 157.8 GB at time of writing. This represents “the total size of all block headers and transactions.
So how big by end of 2025? anyone have a guesstimate?
Why not, since every block is a save point, the way I see it. If people want to become full nodes they only have to start from the last block? the last check point, or is there a way to compress this data and if the compress data matches they can download the entire chain in like 1gb.
Sorry I am a noob when it comes to coding, so this may not make sense to you.
I think on bitcoin.org there should be like a download from the last block
What stops someone from making a trillion addresses before they update their chain? won`t there be collisions in the future? How does the bitcoin wallet know if it is not connected that I created trillion^256 addresses before it rolls out? I can make wallets offline right?
I think I know a fix to this or a few ways actually.
|
|
|
|
Until someone does something better than Executive Order 11110, JFK keeps the crown.
Well I mean he did give his life for this country, so I am comfortable with him being #1 in recent history here... but Trump is working out to be a close second. In terms of roasting people Trump is certainly number 1. Also if its about pissing off liberals, trump is also numero 1. I doubt any other president ever faced the amount of hatred that Trump receives for no reason. The man is a banker shill, has no balls. |
|
|
|
I don't know much about other guys that has rule America government and I know little about their performance but Trump will ever remain one of the greatest president Americans ever produced and internationally, outside the trade war with China and other European countries I think he has done very well. Yah great guy, could of made 2000 self sustaining farms with his golf trip money and fed billions for the next 100 years. So the working class does not need to worry about food. |
|
|
|
Which industries do you think will get disrupted by Decentralized Blockchain Technology the most? In terms of real world use case applications of Decentralized Blockchain Technology, which ones would you say will have the greatest positive impact in the world.
Banking Government Banks are for those who cannot be their own bank (bitcoin already solved this) Government is for those who cannot govern themselves, laws are for the obedience of fools. The next few things will be Courts, Internet, Inventory, Supplies, Patents, Filesharing, Anticheats, AI, Databases... Etc trying to make a list for them here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141142.0 |
|
|
|
Question (not so much) stupid: Satoshi is male or female?
I would think he/she are a "I", I am an I. I or You is the only gender pronoun needed. I just deleted 50 gender pronouns. |
|
|
|
|
Satoshi, What 3 toppings do you pick on your pizza? Go
1. Green Pepper, Onion, Mushrooms (the best)
Let me guess you are a
1. Pepperoni, Bacon, Green Pepper (my 2nd fav)
person
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
