Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 08:33:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 »
881  Economy / Economics / Re: Capital Gains & Other Income on: February 01, 2013, 09:11:53 PM
Bitcoins does not earn interest or other capital gain. That just like having dollar bills in your mattress. There is speculative gain, but that is a zero sum game, some looses some wins.

To earn capital gain, you have to either buy capital goods, work factors and produce and sell the result, or do the same through ownership in a company that does the same, or lend out your bitcoins.



It doesn't need to be interest bearing to incur a capital gain.  Zero sum is also irrelevant.  Options are zero sum and you need to pay gains on options.  It also does not have to be a tangible asset, capital gains must be paid on intangible assets (goodwill, patents, etc.).

If I'm not mistaken, anytime the amount realized on the disposition exceeds the purchase price, it's a capital gain.  

Edit:  To put it another way, if Bitcoin is a currency then like any other Forex trader, gains made would be taxable.
882  Economy / Economics / Capital Gains & Other Income on: February 01, 2013, 08:15:59 PM
It's well known that Bitcoin is used as a currency for many illegal activities.  Before we go down that road, so are all other currencies but it got me thinking about other reasons why Bitcoin may be adopted by lets just say, less than honest individuals.

I read an article in Forbes recently that the wealthiest of the wealthy in the US make their income not off of wages, but off capital gains.  In other words, the rich get richer because they own "stuff" not because they're necessarily productive.  And capital gains are treated more favorable, taxwise, than ordinary income.

But what happens if you're able to eliminate capital gains tax altogether?  Is this where Bitcoin steps in?  A wealthy individual, private equity fund, whatever, comes in and purchases X Bitcoins at $10 and sells at $20.  The second those BTC's are converted back to fiat, the gain is taxable.  But who reports the gain to the IRS?  I don't think MtGox does.  And yeah MtGox =/= Bitcoin but they're the largest exchange so I'm just using them as an example.  Wouldn't it be fairly easy for someone to hide their capital gains this way? 

Now lets look at gambling.  If I go to Vegas and hit a jackpot, they gave me the cash on the spot but they also gave me a 1099.  If I were to win the same equivalent amount at say, SatoshiDice, there's no 1099.  Presumably because you're winning in BTC's but that's easily convertible back to fiat not to mention you're relatively anonymous so they wouldn't be able to identify you let alone know what country of origin you're from.  This may further expand as larger gambling operations come online and accept Bitcoin.

To be clear, I'm NOT advocating cheating on your taxes just as I wouldn't advocate buying on silk road, etc.  But the fact remains there are some who can and will do it.  The rich are always looking for tax loopholes.  Maybe they found one in BTC and it is helping propel its price.  Or maybe it's yet to be widely discovered and could potentially propel the price in the future.  Thoughts?
883  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What items, not readily available, would you like to see offered for Bitcoin? on: February 01, 2013, 06:55:56 PM
Tech from Japan, or Asia in general, a lot of the stuff is never sold in Europe or the US because of market protective trade restrictions.

 

Which means it could still be confiscated by customs right?
884  Economy / Economics / Re: How to determine the price of something in Bitcoin? on: February 01, 2013, 02:17:47 AM
If bitcoin is to succeed, bitcoin prices have to reflect all the advantages of using bitcoin - there is no reason that bitcoin prices need to be fixed directly to the US dollar.
The bitcoin price needs to be attractive enough for the customer to prefer to use their bitcoins over using their dollars.

Would you sell me a $50 Amazon gift card for 1 BTC?  If there's no reason to fix directly to the USD, lets make a deal.

Quote
I realize that this is just market forces - but there seems to be very little sign of this amongst merchants (perhaps because they are converting their bitcoins to fiat immediately).

For the most part you have to convert your bitcoin to fiat immediately.  As a business you still need to pay your suppliers, personnel expenses, utilities, etc.  Like it or not, this is overwhelmingly done in fiat.

Quote
A merchant who really wants raw bitcoins has a big advantage over a merchant who wants fiat (directly or via immediate bitcoin $ conversion) and they should reflect that in their prices.

Only if they have the luxury to hold the coin.  Most businesses need to use their cash flow to pay operating expenses, service their debt, etc. 
885  Economy / Gambling / Re: Looking for 100 Beta Testers to Try BitMillions.com - Get ฿ 1 to play for FREE! on: February 01, 2013, 01:59:51 AM
I'll do a review.

1GKv7EnAABx9wk1CnE6Xqa2rATm17JHtQS

Edit: Thought I had 500 posts, guess not.  Offer still stands if you want.
886  Other / Off-topic / Re: Fuck bitcoin and bitcointalk forum on: January 31, 2013, 02:57:43 AM
I've decided to withdraw my support of bitcoin

SELL! SELL! SELL!!!!
887  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker on: January 30, 2013, 11:58:28 PM
Quote
[13:56] <@jgarzik>    [MHS av] => 66909.04
[13:56] <@jgarzik>    [Found Blocks] => 0
[13:56] <@jgarzik>    [Getworks] => 20
[13:56] <@jgarzik>    [Accepted] => 7957
[13:56] <@jgarzik>    [Rejected] => 15
888  Economy / Speculation / Re: Buy, sell, or hold? on: January 30, 2013, 10:14:06 PM
i do understand the conversation that took place earlier about "selling" essentially being equivalent to "shorting" but most professionals don't view it that way.

It's not even close.  If you are caught on the wrong side of a naked short you are looking at huge losses.  
On the other hand, if you missed the train on an upmove after you just sold your bitcoins you don't have any losses, you just don't have the profit you otherwise would have had.

Serious question, not trying to be a smartass:

If borrowing the shares is required to call it shorting, why does the term naked short mean?  I thought a naked short was shorting without actually owning the asset to begin with, and therefore "regular" shorting would be shorting when you do start out owning the asset.  Am I mistaken?

naked shorting is when you don't even have to borrow the share from a long to put on the short.

WTF, how is that supposed to work?

example:

i'm an account holder at Fidelity.  suppose, in aggregate, they have 100 customers who hold 100,000 shares of Apple.

i am a short seller.  for simplicity let's say i have enough money in my account to allow me to borrow and sell those 100,000 shares to buyers looking to go long.  if Fidelity is an ethical firm, they won't allow me to do that with any more than the 100,000 shares held at the firm, even if i want to short 150,000 shares.  if they aren't ethical, they might allow me to naked short the extra 50,000 shares.

in other words, sell what they don't have.

So if you made too much profit, they would have to pay up themselves to cover the difference?

not sure what you mean.  you actually have to have your own USD's initially in your account to be allowed to short shares.  if you have a margin acct like me (allows leverage), you must hold around $1 of your own money for every $3 in share value that you short.

if the short trade starts going against you (shares go UP in value instead of DOWN like you were betting) then you have to wire in more USD's to keep the ratio in line.

But what if you are right?... If they (broker) let you(short seller) sell 50k more shares than they(broker) had, they(broker) have to pull profits out of their ass(Bernanke) to pay you.

He has a margin account, it's just an extension of credit. 
889  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: There has to be a better way (getting USD to BTC) on: January 26, 2013, 01:17:36 AM
i still can't understand why ppl don't emphasize intl wiring more.  for me, its a flat fee of $40 and this is the only way i've ever done it.

if you wire $50K to gox, that's only a fee of 0.08%.

The reason I've never used it is MtGox says Int'l wires take 2-5 business days to reach them, which is just plain stupid.  Back in the day, Dwolla was fine to use so I never really explored anything else.  Looks like things have changed and maybe wire is the best method but I still can't believe a wire would take as much as 5 business days.  That's like sending a package overnight delivery and UPS coming back saying, "okay it should arrive sometime in the next week."  

Edit: Oh 2-5 business days to reach them PLUS up to another 24 hours to clear.  Absurd.

i've wired multiple times in the morning and have had the money available that nite; like 7 hours.

See that's a lot more reasonable.  I don't know why they quote such absurd timelines, maybe just to cover their ass.  I may try a small amount wire and see if I get similar results as you. 
890  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: There has to be a better way (getting USD to BTC) on: January 26, 2013, 12:14:00 AM
i still can't understand why ppl don't emphasize intl wiring more.  for me, its a flat fee of $40 and this is the only way i've ever done it.

if you wire $50K to gox, that's only a fee of 0.08%.

The reason I've never used it is MtGox says Int'l wires take 2-5 business days to reach them, which is just plain stupid.  Back in the day, Dwolla was fine to use so I never really explored anything else.  Looks like things have changed and maybe wire is the best method but I still can't believe a wire would take as much as 5 business days.  That's like sending a package overnight delivery and UPS coming back saying, "okay it should arrive sometime in the next week."  

Edit: Oh 2-5 business days to reach them PLUS up to another 24 hours to clear.  Absurd.
891  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: There has to be a better way (getting USD to BTC) on: January 25, 2013, 10:26:53 PM
Tried to use Bitinstant and Dwolla would not allow the transfer until my photo ID is verified.  I think this will be the last time I use Dwolla esp with the apparent suspensions going on.
892  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: There has to be a better way (getting USD to BTC) on: January 25, 2013, 08:58:42 PM
Look into Localbitcoins.com

Their markups are reasonable (for the convenience of having your coins within days, or even hours), and if you're dealing with a good seller, they'll have enough BTC on-hand to meet any of your needs. And they can do the ACH and slow transfer stuff behind the scenes (like a buffer).

Anyways, check it out. I use it a lot to sell and make contacts with buyers.

There's 1 person about 5 miles from me but he's asking for $22USD/BTC....

Thanks though, I think I have a number of options to look into.  Maybe once I accumulate enough I can sell locally and get some of those ridiculous spreads down.
893  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: There has to be a better way (getting USD to BTC) on: January 25, 2013, 08:54:07 PM


. . . I also don't think I can do the option where you walk into select stores and pay via cash (none of the stores look familiar to me so I don't think there are any in the state).

As far as I know, there is no CVS in Alaska, Colorado, Idaho, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, or Wyoming, but what state does someone have to live in for Walmart to not look familiar?

Yeah that was my mistake, I had looked at Bitinstant about a week ago and was going off memory.  I had forgotten about the Walmart option. 
894  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: There has to be a better way (getting USD to BTC) on: January 25, 2013, 08:52:24 PM
Have you tried bitinstant.com ?

I looked at it but I don't really get how it speeds up the process.  In my case, I have funds in Dwolla that want to go to MtGox, how is their transfer faster?  Do I still need to wait until Dwolla verifies my photo ID?  The cash deposit to BTC looks interesting but it doesn't say what the exchange rate is and I honestly don't know how reputable these guys are.



Insisting on Dwolla and MtGox is how you ensure there is no better way.

There are lots of other options that are faster, cheaper, or both.

Personally, I prefer bitfloor since I can quickly send them p2p payments from my ING checking account. (BTW if you want an ING account, PM me your email and I'll send you an invite so we both get a free bonus).  Bitinstant is good too, although a bit pricey.  localbitcoins.com is great if there is someone near you who is willing to sell.

I was never insisting on using Dwolla or MtGox, nor did I say there is "no better way."  The whole point of the thread was looking for alternate options.  And thanks for the bitfloor suggestion.  I already use a few online checking accounts, I'm not sure if I want to set up another but if I do, I'll PM you.
895  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: There has to be a better way (getting USD to BTC) on: January 25, 2013, 07:31:39 PM
Thanks for the suggestions, I figured there were other options out there just didn't know which were the best.  

As for the local exchange, I'll look into it, maybe I can start something going.
896  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: There has to be a better way (getting USD to BTC) on: January 25, 2013, 07:13:36 PM
Have you tried bitinstant.com ?

I looked at it but I don't really get how it speeds up the process.  In my case, I have funds in Dwolla that want to go to MtGox, how is their transfer faster?  Do I still need to wait until Dwolla verifies my photo ID?  The cash deposit to BTC looks interesting but it doesn't say what the exchange rate is and I honestly don't know how reputable these guys are.



Do not use DWOLLA.

http://codinginmysleep.com/dwolla-begins-suspensions/

Thanks for the article.  Interesting.  Okay then we're back at square one.  What are the alternate options?
897  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: January 25, 2013, 07:11:01 PM




KABOOM AGAIN

Apple just totally getting Bitch-Slapped.

Yeah my shorts (actually put options) are paying off nicely.  I may cover soon, I know you're thinking in the $300s but I have to dig a little more as I'm not entirely convinced.  Hope to post something a little more in depth later. 
898  Economy / Speculation / Re: Could deals like this be real and if yes explain the recent big buys and sells? on: January 25, 2013, 07:05:40 PM
Maybe it's time to encouraging the WWF to start accepting bitcoin donations?

I dunno... Hulk Hogan is getting a little long in the tooth, not really sure how much help he'd be  Grin
899  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: There has to be a better way (getting USD to BTC) on: January 25, 2013, 07:01:02 PM
Have you tried bitinstant.com ?

I looked at it but I don't really get how it speeds up the process.  In my case, I have funds in Dwolla that want to go to MtGox, how is their transfer faster?  Do I still need to wait until Dwolla verifies my photo ID?  The cash deposit to BTC looks interesting but it doesn't say what the exchange rate is and I honestly don't know how reputable these guys are.

900  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / There has to be a better way (getting USD to BTC) on: January 25, 2013, 06:51:29 PM
Bear with me, I took about a year hiatus from Bitcoin so I'm probably a little unfamiliar with some of the changes but dear God the amount of hoops I have to jump through to get $$$ to Gox is ridiculous.

This has been my journey over the last few WEEKS.

1.  Already had an established Dwolla account linked to my bank from prior fundings to MtGox.
2.  Try to fund, MtGox says they need to verify me.  Send a picture ID and another form of verification.  Alright, anti-money laundering I get it, that's fine.  Send requested information.  About a week to week and a half later am finally verified.
3.  Start transfer from my bank to Dwolla on Jan 18th.  Funds will not clear until the 25th, SEVEN days later.  Okay there's a US holiday in there but still, way too long for an ACH.
4.  Finally today, weeks into the process, I'm ready to send funds to MtGox via Dwolla (which is giving me a disclaimer that it may take up to 24hrs to credit).  Oh nope sorry, now Dwolla needs a copy of my photo ID because the receiving party has requested it, blah blah blah.  Seriously?  I just spent over a week verifying myself with them and now I have to do it again?  Another 1-2 business days.

Please tell me there are better options.  I don't want to do an international wire due to the high fees.  I realize once I'm verified by everyone on the planet the process will be shorter but it's still going to take about a week between Dwolla releasing funds and then MtGox verifying.  I can't do the local bitcoins thing, no one in my area.  I also don't think I can do the option where you walk into select stores and pay via cash (none of the stores look familiar to me so I don't think there are any in the state).
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!