if exchanges are charging 0.0005 bitcoin to a high amount over 0.0012 bitcoin which is $20 and above. They are misleading people to pay high fee when it is not. I guess they only use a small portion of the fee as a network fee and keeps the rest as their own fee. But yeah, they should mention that whenever a user withdraws their fund. Separate network fee from their own fee so users can better understand how the fees work. People should avoid exchanges that overcharge in fees. Some exchanges charge only 2000 sat for withdrawals, and that's still more than enough to pay transaction fees! As long as people keep using those exchanges, it's in the exchanges best interest to keep fees high and discourage users from withdrawing real Bitcoins. You can get your transaction confirmed within the next block even if you pay less than $1. For the record: $0.10 is more than enough too for a transaction with 1 input. |
|
|
|
So basically the story is my phone got fucked up. So reset my device/phone.
Becouse of this i lost all my data, email password 2fa access. Asking the obvious: what happened to your backups? But now one thing they got fucked up. Asking me for wallet transaction from wallet to stake account.
Not even one proof they want diffrent proofs flike "btc, doge, trx" and more
Man as I lost all my data access ofcourse I lost my wallet too. Stake didn't fuck up, you did. How can you not have a backup of your wallet? For most wallets a 12 word seed phrase is enough, so you don't have to rely on your phone to keep working. cock sucking stake support This isn't helping your cause. Im done really. They ain't helping me to remove 2fa so I can login back. That's kinda the point of using 2FA. Social engineering can answer many of the questions they asked, but a signed message can't be faked. I would have my doubts too if someone says they are the owner but can't sign a message to prove it. And when there's doubt, they shouldn't give you access to the account. |
|
|
|
I don't think theymos was an admin when Satoshi was around. Theymos was a clueless Newbie  I thought BitCoin only generated in 50 coin increments, but I got 50.44 here. |
|
|
|
Satoshi, is that you? I use telegram Hung0788 Nah.  My hunch was right  |
|
|
|
I have lost contact with you
~
I do not know if you have tried to contact me Satoshi, is that you? |
|
|
|
What a shame that you accidentally lost a bunch of your paper wallets Loyce! You'll need to be more careful in future. Here's hoping you find them again in 10 or 20 years' time. I don't think that's going to do much good. For the wealth tax for instance they can go back 5 years, and if funds are abroad they'll go back 12 years. With Bitcoin, I assume they'll argue funds aren't in the country. The tax fine can be up to 300% of the normal tax, plus of course interest. The best way to avoid taxes is moving to a more tax friendly place, but I'm no where near rich enough for that. |
|
|
|
But, if you want to talk about things really going dark, then there is Coinone and pretty soon I guess all of South Korea That's crazy! The reason is the usual: Coinone said it needs to ensure that customers are not using crypto for illegal activities such as money laundering. But they still allow cash withdrawals there, right? So the entire "illegal activities" argument doesn't hold. Didn't South Korea have one of the highest Bitcoin adoption rates in the world? Call me paranoid, but could it be they're protecting other financial interests trying to discourage the use of Bitcoin? This is a case where you simply can't withdraw funds other than an exchange that does KYC That makes it basically a stock broker, not Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
Apparently certain countries such as The Netherlands implemented a new rule/requirement. You cannot withdraw your coin from an exchange to an address they do not KYC. I wrote this yesterday: As far as I know, this hasn't chanced since. So unless there's a Dutch official source, I assume a "KYC address" is not required. For what it's worth: I trust Bitonic (both with money as well as for knowing regulations). If they'd be active here, I would leave them positive feedback. |
|
|
|
As Loyce has pointed out above, the Netherlands tried to implement such address verification nonsense. In a way I'm surprised taxes don't ask for this information yet. They want to know your total balance of everything, and specifics for each bank account, but they're not asking about Bitcoin addresses yet. That's probably because their system can't handle it, but at some point they'll no doubt be that intrusive. It's already a security risk having to disclose what you own, especially considering how many tax employees would be able to access this data. I am disappointed Trezor aren't fighting this instead of implementing it. Hense the kuddos to Bitonic, they fought this in court and won. Unlike many other companies, they don't like having to violate their customers' privacy. It is absolutely crazy that the community as a whole is OK with this kind of insane privacy invasion. Not only the Bitcoin community, it's the same everywhere: barely anyone cares about privacy. |
|
|
|
I'm talking about "Best Bounty Manager". Maybe add another title? As I wrote last year: that's the problem with Voting like this: it's more of a Recognition award than an award for actual accomplishments. When it comes to "bounty managers", I expect the most active one to get most votes, while the campaign manager who rejects spammers won't be loved. Then again, bounty spammers usually don't have Merit so they can't vote. |
|
|
|
Is it the reason you store lots of personal merit? You got me, I've been planning this for years! There should be an Award for the user most mentioned in all categories combined |
|
|
|
The 2 merit sent by LoyceV to Xal0lex for this post on April 1, 2019 hasn't been recorded on loyce.club. This is correct: I did indeed Merit that post on April 1, but theymos rewinded all Merit sent to that post on that day. All Merit still visible on Xal0lex' post (including 2 from me) was (re)sent on April 2: Loyce.club is missing a merit transaction between transactions number 2751 and 2752. As it should be  Maybe, that merit transaction is being missed in theymos' data too and that's the forum which is showing a wrong number. LoyceV, can you confirm this? Due to the big size of the data, I couldn't load it. That file has grown too big for any browser to open. I used merit.all.txt: 1554228779 2 5124304.msg50302752 459836 1068464
1554219308 1 5124304.msg50302752 1291828 1068464
1554198383 1 5124304.msg50302752 2221613 1068464
1554196972 2 5124304.msg50302752 1582324 1068464
1554191410 1 5124304.msg50302752 34692 1068464
1554186838 1 5124304.msg50302752 786044 1068464
1554179014 1 5124304.msg50302752 1762404 1068464
1554174603 1 5124304.msg50302752 2003859 1068464
1554171042 20 5124304.msg50302752 553678 1068464
1554170414 9 5124304.msg50302752 234771 1068464
1554170256 1 5124304.msg50302752 137773 1068464
1554167038 50 5124304.msg50302752 35 1068464 I use theymos' weekly data dump merit.txt.xz, and add it to my merit.all.txt. Every week I replace the last 113 days by the latest 120 days, so that any changes (such as undoing Merit) theymos made within the last 120 days are updated in my files too. BPIP uses near real-time data from the forum, so that changes aren't registered. I'd say you've solved the mystery, I'm impressed you found back the culprit from years ago! |
|
|
|
Something to keep in mind is that sometimes a pool will be paid directly to include a transaction with a small fee. From what I've seen, that fee is not "small": I'm not sure if they share the revenue from those "sales" with the mining pool users though. English is hard. I misread a word: "with a small fee" is obviously not the same as "for a small fee". I'm pretty sure that viaBTC provides a limited number of requests per hour for very small fee transactions to be included in their next block. Services like this may result in smaller rewards for any single block but may help encourage and incentivize the use of Bitcoin overall which can result in higher fees and overall higher revenue in the long term. My assumption is they use the free transaction acceleration to "advertise" their paid service. |
|
|
|
I don't want to influence people's votes too much, but I was wondering how many users would nominate EZ0010 for one of the awards I was thinking more or less the opposite: theymos deserves the Fail of the Year award for sending Bitcoin to the wrong address Even though obviously it can happen to the best, it can still serve as a warning to thoroughly check each transaction before sending. Usually that warning is for Newbies, but it turns out experienced users need to be reminded once in a while too. can I leave out some categories? That's what I did last year. new users especially seem to build up certain users as gods for a lack of a better term Boy was I wrong as a Newbie! I will try to be very flexible and make a few exceptions to the rules (for example, if the user gets 50 merit after they voted). I would have expected the opposite to avoid abuse. I'm just thinking I have enough sMerit to send 50 Merit to at least 30 users who vote in my favour  |
|
|
|
Please check this guy's post, not only is he interesting, he also has an avatar! He is new and does not have a copper membership! He joined 9 years ago, hence the "grandfathered" avatar. |
|
|
|
I noticed a tiny inconsistency: BPIP shows I've sent 29185 Merit, the forum shows 29183. Suchmoon is off by 9, El duderino_ is off by 1, Ratimov's sent Merit count is correct. Not a big deal of course |
|
|
|
The Passport also doesn't play well with normal rechargeable (Li-Ion) cells, since these start at 1.3V and from my testing that's approximately where Passport stops working due to too low voltage. Did you mean NiMh cells here? Li-ion produces 3.7V. Or am I missing something else? They explicitly recommend Lithium cells ~ they are very uncommon and expensive. The ones that came with my Passport lasted for probably 4h; while Alkalines last maybe 15 minutes or 30 tops. I didn't even know Lithium AAA batteries exist. I think a better solution would have been if the device fits 3 batteries. With some voltage regulation, anything between 3.6 and 4.5V can be brought down to 3V, so that standard AAA batteries can be used until they're completely drained. From your pictures it looks like that would mean a slightly wider device. 4x rechargeable constant voltage (builtin charger): 25€ I didn't know these exist! It looks like a great solution, but won't solve the "10-20 years time" problem. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks ahead for your perfect timing! I'll be early, got to put the kids in bed.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
