[BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action]

[suchmoon]

Hey hey!

Just wondering here... are banned accounts prior to the creation of BPIP displayed as such? Or they simply show as "inactive"? There's a particular case I had to check and it showed as "inactive", so that got me wondering.

Thanks!

No, accounts banned prior to BPIP's existence (~2018-ish) will not be shown as banned.

[1714194380]

1714194380

[1714194380]

1714194380

[condoras]

I just visit the site and I notice that the copyright is expired? Copyright © 2016-2020 BPIP
Probably is nothing and you will fix it, but I saw it and wanted to inform you. And Merry Christmas to all!

[dataispower]

From my heart i first present my merry Christmas to everybody, i notice that BPIP is the shortest way of noticing someone that have being ban and also notice somebody that delete the many posts or Change email so  recently and easily, what i want to know can't another method or app be created for checking scam signature campaign and not really for our profiles because i know quite ok that bpip is for bitcointalk users profile

[LTU_btc]

From my heart i first present my merry Christmas to everybody, i notice that BPIP is the shortest way of noticing someone that have being ban and also notice somebody that delete the many posts or Change email so  recently and easily, what i want to know can't another method or app be created for checking scam signature campaign and not really for our profiles because i know quite ok that bpip is for bitcointalk users profile

I'm not really sure how tools like BPIP can help to find scam signature campaigns. Actually, scam sig campaigns isn't that often thing there and biggest red flags for it is no escrow and campaign managed by newbie, user without reputation or with negative trust. If you talking about altcoin campaigns and bounties, probably not much can be done and people join it at their own risk.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

also notice somebody that delete the many posts or Change email so  recently

1. Bpip does not keep track of posts personally deleted by a member since it does not archive them like Loyce.club or ninjastic.space. Only stats of posts deleted by mods are shown.
2. bpip doesn't track email address changes but rather password changes.

what i want to know can't another method or app be created for checking scam signature campaign and not really for our profiles because i know quite ok that bpip is for bitcointalk users profile

The simple answer is, it's not possible.

[Newlifebtc]

From my heart i first present my merry Christmas to everybody, i notice that BPIP is the shortest way of noticing someone that have being ban and also notice somebody that delete the many posts or Change email so  recently and easily, what i want to know can't another method or app be created for checking scam signature campaign and not really for our profiles because i know quite ok that bpip is for bitcointalk users profile

I'm not really sure how tools like BPIP can help to find scam signature campaigns. Actually, scam sig campaigns isn't that often thing there and biggest red flags for it is no escrow and campaign managed by newbie, user without reputation or with negative trust. If you talking about altcoin campaigns and bounties, probably not much can be done and people join it at their own risk.

Maybe he misunderstood BPIP to another thing, to find scam signature campaign can't be find with BPIP and noticing scam campaign is not from the participants the person that will not so easily is the manager, for everybody to know research will be made from online to know the company

[Timelord2067]

How often does the "flag" information get updated?  There are three recent Flags, however, the information hasn't updated for those three in days.

Thanks.

[examplens]

is it just me or there really is a problem with the security certificate?



I guess it can be the reason why bpip chrome extension does not work properly.

[dkbit98]

This is expired certificate for Bpip website, but it can still be used if you click accept the risk and continue.
I think they use free Let's Encrypt, so it's easy to renew it.

Code:

Peer’s Certificate has expired.

HTTP Strict Transport Security: false
HTTP Public Key Pinning: false

Certificate chain:

-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----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-----END CERTIFICATE-----
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
MIIFFjCCAv6gAwIBAgIRAJErCErPDBinU/bWLiWnX1owDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAw
TzELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxKTAnBgNVBAoTIEludGVybmV0IFNlY3VyaXR5IFJlc2Vh
cmNoIEdyb3VwMRUwEwYDVQQDEwxJU1JHIFJvb3QgWDEwHhcNMjAwOTA0MDAwMDAw
WhcNMjUwOTE1MTYwMDAwWjAyMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEWMBQGA1UEChMNTGV0J3Mg
RW5jcnlwdDELMAkGA1UEAxMCUjMwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEK
AoIBAQC7AhUozPaglNMPEuyNVZLD+ILxmaZ6QoinXSaqtSu5xUyxr45r+XXIo9cP
R5QUVTVXjJ6oojkZ9YI8QqlObvU7wy7bjcCwXPNZOOftz2nwWgsbvsCUJCWH+jdx
sxPnHKzhm+/b5DtFUkWWqcFTzjTIUu61ru2P3mBw4qVUq7ZtDpelQDRrK9O8Zutm
NHz6a4uPVymZ+DAXXbpyb/uBxa3Shlg9F8fnCbvxK/eG3MHacV3URuPMrSXBiLxg
Z3Vms/EY96Jc5lP/Ooi2R6X/ExjqmAl3P51T+c8B5fWmcBcUr2Ok/5mzk53cU6cG
/kiFHaFpriV1uxPMUgP17VGhi9sVAgMBAAGjggEIMIIBBDAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMC
AYYwHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMBMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYB
Af8CAQAwHQYDVR0OBBYEFBQusxe3WFbLrlAJQOYfr52LFMLGMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaA
FHm0WeZ7tuXkAXOACIjIGlj26ZtuMDIGCCsGAQUFBwEBBCYwJDAiBggrBgEFBQcw
AoYWaHR0cDovL3gxLmkubGVuY3Iub3JnLzAnBgNVHR8EIDAeMBygGqAYhhZodHRw
Oi8veDEuYy5sZW5jci5vcmcvMCIGA1UdIAQbMBkwCAYGZ4EMAQIBMA0GCysGAQQB
gt8TAQEBMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4ICAQCFyk5HPqP3hUSFvNVneLKYY611TR6W
PTNlclQtgaDqw+34IL9fzLdwALduO/ZelN7kIJ+m74uyA+eitRY8kc607TkC53wl
ikfmZW4/RvTZ8M6UK+5UzhK8jCdLuMGYL6KvzXGRSgi3yLgjewQtCPkIVz6D2QQz
CkcheAmCJ8MqyJu5zlzyZMjAvnnAT45tRAxekrsu94sQ4egdRCnbWSDtY7kh+BIm
lJNXoB1lBMEKIq4QDUOXoRgffuDghje1WrG9ML+Hbisq/yFOGwXD9RiX8F6sw6W4
avAuvDszue5L3sz85K+EC4Y/wFVDNvZo4TYXao6Z0f+lQKc0t8DQYzk1OXVu8rp2
yJMC6alLbBfODALZvYH7n7do1AZls4I9d1P4jnkDrQoxB3UqQ9hVl3LEKQ73xF1O
yK5GhDDX8oVfGKF5u+decIsH4YaTw7mP3GFxJSqv3+0lUFJoi5Lc5da149p90Ids
hCExroL1+7mryIkXPeFM5TgO9r0rvZaBFOvV2z0gp35Z0+L4WPlbuEjN/lxPFin+
HlUjr8gRsI3qfJOQFy/9rKIJR0Y/8Omwt/8oTWgy1mdeHmmjk7j1nYsvC9JSQ6Zv
MldlTTKB3zhThV1+XWYp6rjd5JW1zbVWEkLNxE7GJThEUG3szgBVGP7pSWTUTsqX
nLRbwHOoq7hHwg==
-----END CERTIFICATE-----

[PawGo]

This is expired certificate for Bpip website, but it can still be used if you click accept the risk and continue.
I think they use free Let's Encrypt, so it's easy to renew it.

Exactly.
It only shows that they do not use autorenewal script, which is recommended for Let's Encrypt as their validity period is short.
Maybe they should ask hosting company to enable it if they do not have enough privileges to do it.
https://techmonger.github.io/49/certbot-auto-renew/

[ibminer]

Thanks for the notifications, I had ping'd suchmoon last night about a few other things, one of them being a certificate error I was getting, which is probably related to this cert.. although, I honestly didn't make the connection it would be tied to the certificate on the site, but it should just be a certificate renewal. I'm sure he'll get it resolved as soon as he can. Apologies for the disruption.

[ShowOff]

-snip-

I also had the same problem all day where the site required me to set the correct time even though this had never happened before. I thought this just happened to me, but it turns out that other people have experienced the same thing.

Thanks for the notifications, I had ping'd suchmoon last night about a few other things, one of them being a certificate error I was getting, which is probably related to this cert.. although, I honestly didn't make the connection it would be tied to the certificate on the site, but it should just be a certificate renewal. I'm sure he'll get it resolved as soon as he can. Apologies for the disruption.

Thank you for the improvements you will make next because I think bpip.org has become an important part so far among forum users.

[suchmoon]

I apologize about the screw up. The certificate is supposed to renew automatically. Not sure what happened there, looking into it now.

Edit: site should be ok now. Still not sure what caused the renewal to fail - I just ran the script manually and it worked.

[examplens]

I apologize about the screw up. The certificate is supposed to renew automatically. Not sure what happened there, looking into it now.

Edit: site should be ok now. Still not sure what caused the renewal to fail - I just ran the script manually and it worked.

Yes, everything is back to normal now. Both, site and browser extension.
I have similar problems with a free security certificate. I think they still can't be renewed automatically, it must have to be manually renewed. Usually, it happened 365 days after activation. So, you're probably safe until 25 Jan. '23

[LoyceV]

I noticed a tiny inconsistency: BPIP shows I've sent 29185 Merit, the forum shows 29183. Suchmoon is off by 9, El duderino_ is off by 1, Ratimov's sent Merit count is correct.
Not a big deal of course

[suchmoon]

I noticed a tiny inconsistency: BPIP shows I've send 29185 Merit, the forum shows 29183. Suchmoon is off by 9, El duderino_ is off by 1, Ratimov's sent Merit count is correct.
Not a big deal of course

Interesting. If BPIP number was lower I'd say we missed some merits but not sure how we could have more. I'll check if there are any duplicates.

[hosseinimr93]

Interesting. If BPIP number was lower I'd say we missed some merits but not sure how we could have more. I'll check if there are any duplicates.

I compared the number reported by BPIP, the number reported by loyce.club and the number reported on forum's statistic with each other.

The forum says that LoyceV has sent 29,183 merit so far.
Loyce.club says that LoyceV has sent 29,031 merit until end of January 20, 2022. Given that LoyceV has sent 152 merit after January 20, 2022, Loyce.club and forum are actually showing a same number.
BPIP says that LoyceV has sent 29,185 merit so far.

I expected the problem to be from BPIP and I tried to find a duplicate merit transaction on BPIP.
Interestingly, I found a merit transaction on BPIP that doesn't exist on loyce.club.

The 2 merit sent by LoyceV to Xal0lex for this post on April 1, 2019 hasn't been recorded on loyce.club.


BPIP

Loyce.club is missing a merit transaction between transactions number 2751 and 2752.


loyce.club

Maybe, that merit transaction is being missed in theymos' data too and that's the forum which is showing a wrong number.
LoyceV, can you confirm this? Due to the big size of the data, I couldn't load it.

[suchmoon]

Maybe, that merit transaction is being missed in theymos' data too and that's the forum which is showing a wrong number.
LoyceV, can you confirm this? Due to the big size of the data, I couldn't load it.

I think those merits were later rolled back (because it was an April Fool's thread) and don't appear in forum's merit dumps.

[LoyceV]

The 2 merit sent by LoyceV to Xal0lex for this post on April 1, 2019 hasn't been recorded on loyce.club.

This is correct: I did indeed Merit that post on April 1, but theymos rewinded all Merit sent to that post on that day. All Merit still visible on Xal0lex' post (including 2 from me) was (re)sent on April 2:

Merit received by Xal0lex (Trust list) from January 24, 2018 until January 21, 2022 (source)

  258. Tue Apr  2 20:12:59 2019: 2 (519) from LoyceV (Trust list) (history) for Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org
  257. Tue Apr  2 17:35:08 2019: 1 (517) from TheBeardedBaby (Trust list) (history) for Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org
  256. Tue Apr  2 11:46:23 2019: 1 (516) from FontSeli (Trust list) (history) for Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org
  255. Tue Apr  2 11:22:52 2019: 2 (515) from DdmrDdmr (Trust list) (history) for Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org
  254. Tue Apr  2 09:50:10 2019: 1 (513) from fronti (Trust list) (history) for Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org
  253. Tue Apr  2 08:33:58 2019: 1 (512) from markiz73 Banned! (Trust list) (history) for Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org
  252. Tue Apr  2 06:23:34 2019: 1 (511) from Alex_Sr (Trust list) (history) for Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org
~
  250. Tue Apr  2 05:10:03 2019: 1 (509) from DireWolfM14 (Trust list) (history) for Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org
  249. Tue Apr  2 04:10:42 2019: 20 (508) from Mr. Big (Trust list) (history) for Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org
  248. Tue Apr  2 04:00:14 2019: 9 (488) from suchmoon (Trust list) (history) for Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org
  247. Tue Apr  2 03:57:36 2019: 1 (479) from BayAreaCoins (Trust list) (history) for Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org
  246. Tue Apr  2 03:03:58 2019: 50 (478) from theymos (Trust list) (history) for Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org

Loyce.club is missing a merit transaction between transactions number 2751 and 2752.

As it should be

Maybe, that merit transaction is being missed in theymos' data too and that's the forum which is showing a wrong number.
LoyceV, can you confirm this? Due to the big size of the data, I couldn't load it.

That file has grown too big for any browser to open. I used merit.all.txt:

Code:

1554228779      2       5124304.msg50302752     459836  1068464
1554219308      1       5124304.msg50302752     1291828 1068464
1554198383      1       5124304.msg50302752     2221613 1068464
1554196972      2       5124304.msg50302752     1582324 1068464
1554191410      1       5124304.msg50302752     34692   1068464
1554186838      1       5124304.msg50302752     786044  1068464
1554179014      1       5124304.msg50302752     1762404 1068464
1554174603      1       5124304.msg50302752     2003859 1068464
1554171042      20      5124304.msg50302752     553678  1068464
1554170414      9       5124304.msg50302752     234771  1068464
1554170256      1       5124304.msg50302752     137773  1068464
1554167038      50      5124304.msg50302752     35      1068464

I use theymos' weekly data dump merit.txt.xz, and add it to my merit.all.txt. Every week I replace the last 113 days by the latest 120 days, so that any changes (such as undoing Merit) theymos made within the last 120 days are updated in my files too. BPIP uses near real-time data from the forum, so that changes aren't registered. I'd say you've solved the mystery, I'm impressed you found back the culprit from years ago!

[LoyceV]

I just realize that maybe the change of the email address is not registered in the seclog

Correct.