I think if they do not get big achievements, it will be a very bad ending for them. They already took so much trouble to reach to this point, and their income will be much lower for a long time. Which means that they need to win the league and also go further in the UCL instead of being eliminated from the UCL and then from Europa as well.

This is why if they could be like at least semi finals of UCL and win the league and the cup type of team, then they would be fine, because that difference would be bigger than the last years situation and the tv rights combined. This is why they made a good decision if they end up having great results all season, for many seasons in a row.

The thing is, when you have a protest, it is always about every person, but there is no roadmap to fixing it. I mean think about it this way, let's say you have a president that failed to make the country better and you guys are doing horrible, that's actually quite a few nations explained.

80% of the people protests, and they make the president go away, and now you are rid of the person who destroyed your nation. What's next? That's the problem, that's why it would never be fixed, we need to make sure that there are organizations and people who would take over and actually do well with the people, and there are rarely any in most protests and that's why it never gets better.

Yeah, that kind of hardcore mafia like loans are not the way out to be first. I get that some people do not have any other option, it is either homelessness or getting some loan and "hope" that things will turn around and you will do better.

We even have that in the lending sections here, people who get something between 100 bucks to 1k dollars, maybe that looks like a small amount to you but the world is filled with nations who have 100-1k per month living average, so you could get like 5 months out of the way with 1k dollars if you could get it, and during that 5 months they hope that they could find a way to make money and repay that back. This is the "last resort" type of thing for these people, not for everyday normal people.

Seneca could be one of the most famous Stoics of his time as well (what's up with romans and stoic ideas? lol) and he had similar sayings about this as well. If you do not achieve that balance then you are going to be chasing one too much and end up with going too imbalanced and would result with something wrong.

The best thing in life is the moderation, if you do not live your life on that balance then you are going to lose your balance and fall. Gambling is the same, if you do not gamble at all then it's fine, if you gamble with just free faucet stuff then you will not find it enough, and if you gamble millions then you will be upset when you lose, so find that right balance.

I think we can't understand if they will be bad or not from just one game. I mean City is a big big club so losing to them means nothing, but it was also one of the earliest games they had with this same roster, probably not even any other so far, could be very first. Hence, I believe that we should probably consider this as nothing, so all in all we are talking about something that is rarely ever a good or bad thing here just because it was one game.

They built a team that is much much better than their opponents in the league for sure, they were already better, and they became even better and took that gap to a higher level. So I guess we will have to wait and see.

That's true, if there is a person who would love to learn more about it, then it would be much simpler to talk to them because they would be interested even before you start to talk and they would listen and learn a lot better that way. However, we are talking about something that is much better in the long run if we could do something that would teach everyone, like a blog.

We have A LOT of websites that talk about bitcoin of course, but if we could make things simpler, like seriously simple, with images to show how things are done, then we could talk about not only what bitcoin is, but what you could do in the crypto world as well and that would get a lot of clicks. Faster and better than just talking to one person.

Yeah, I remember those days too, I was here on V2 update on Primedice when they managed to stop the macro faucet abusers. At the end of the day they got partnered with others as well, Stunna is not doing this all by himself anymore.

Well, technically speaking he was never doing it himself, he had lawyers and staff and many other things working for him and with him, so he wasn't just a single person but he was the owner at least as far as we know. After that, he became partners with others and I do not know the deal, but that's when things started grow to an insane size. I believe that Stake is doing everything they should do the best way possible and I like them because of that, they always do the right thing.

Even when using both, one of them would be to make sure that offside wouldn't happen anymore, and everyone could make sure things are smooth, while the other one would be used to repeat the action and see if it was a correct one or not. I mean think about it, if the goalkeeper touched the striker and that's why it's a penalty, or didn't touch?

This has nothing to do with the new tech, but it has everything to do with VAR,, and that is why we are going to see both of them at the same time. Hopefully we are going to end up seeing plenty more people who will understand the difference between the two, and this will definitely a good testing ground and spread to every other league if it works well.

I could tell you how much, it’s about 280 bitcoins. I didn't sign the NDA and yet I know it because some idiot in a project I used to work for told me, when he signed the NDA, and that means he is in trouble if Binance ever comes at him, but it doesn't matter to me lol. In the end we are talking about a HUGE amount.

This was of course during the bull run of last year, not this year and I think it's something that we are not willing to pay if it was our own project but when you do, you see the benefits of it. If betfury thinks they are profiting from it then they shouldn't be questioned, it's their money and let them do whatever they want with it and if they are happy about it, then they are doing it right.

He won it before as well, and Bayern basically got the "best African player currently" for 30 million, that's as cheap as it gets, and not like they got him from some second division team, they got him from Liverpool. I guarantee you that Liverpool doesn't need this money, they could literally give him for free, or just donate that 30 million and they would be fine. Sure money is money but they are making so much each year that it wouldn't be a problem for them at all.

This is why Bayern basically got him for free. They lost Lewandowski so it would be something very important to keep Mane of course, but Mane wouldn't be able to score 40 goals a year like Lewa did, this is still great, but not enough.

This is getting a bit silly. I mean I get it, they got some money this year and that's understandable, but going for Laporte? I mean let's be honest here, Barcelona made some debt, and they ended up making even bigger risk, if they end up winning UCL for like 3 years in a row or something then yeah they would be awesome there is no doubt about that.

But, if they win nothing at all, then it's going to be horrible for them, it's going to cost them a ton of problem. In any case, they really needed a defender and that is why I believe that we shouldn't really be considering this as a good thing, but at the very least we are going to see a good Barcelona this year.

This is why they are going to lose a ton of money in the future and will never recover as well. They have spent all the money they got so far and that is why they will keep being bad for the longest time since they never really learned their lesson. Think about it, we are talking about a situation where Barcelona ended up having a bit of a money problem right? They made wrong moves and spent a lot of money and that caused them to be in a big loss? Well what are they doing right now? They are literally going to end up with the same thing, they ended up spending soooo much in just one off-season when they should have saved a lot of money in such an important year.

If we are talking about some cup, then you could be "lucky" because we are talking about something that is rare but at the end of the day it's a league and not a cup. Which means that we shouldn't really be considering Milan to be "lucky" for winning the league, their players are as good as any other player and they should be proud of getting those players and getting that league title.

I mean think about it, they won a league, they played 30+ games and you can't just be lucky for that many games. Sure you could be lucky for a while but that's about it, you can't be lucky for dozens of games in a row. Hence, they were good, and they could still be good this year.

We shouldn't pressure them to do it all at once, because development takes time. That's actually not quite accurate, the development part of it doesn't take "that" much time, it is making sure everything perfectly is the hardest part.

The 80-20 rule works in development perfectly, like you could "nearly" finish it all, and then take even more time to actually finish it. I have been part of game developments where developers were playing the game for like another 6 months before they could release it, ready for us, but not the market type of thing. This is why just let blackjack.fun do their own thing and if they are doing fine then it is going to be released.

First of all, we are going to see ALL teams have a hard time, ferrari, red bull, mercedes, all of them would have a hard time. It will not be about which team does best, it is going to be about which team does the least worst. I do not know if that makes any sense, but basically everyone will get worse, but whichever gets worse less than the other ones will win this.

The question will not be pace or anything like that, it is going to be about reliability. If we see a new winner, it is going to be about how other cars had to stop, and that's the problem, if a car gets DNF that leaves other people having a bigger chance. I am waiting on a shocking Norris win eventually, and maybe this could be the one? I don't know.

That's the risk both teams take when the deal falls through last time. I mean if he played amazingly then he would have been a lot higher and would cause Chelsea to pay more, whereas if we are talking about just him playing badly, it allowed them to pay for a lot lesser. This could happen with a few players this year, for example it could have happened major time for Mbappe, we know that right?

This means, PSG got a 180 million from Real Madrid, and they rejected it. If Mbappe went with Real Madrid this year without contract, then it would be something quite harsh for PSG because they ended up losing him for free. Hence, it's always a risk you take.

I would say on contrary. If you have only 100-200 then it would be wiser to keep your money in the trusted stuff and just try to buy more and more, that way you could increase it a bit better without much trouble, why risk it when you have so little already? You can't afford to be a risky investor with that kind of money.

On the other hand, if we are talking about someone with tens of thousands of dollars, then it would make sense to invest into it like you wouldn't mind, like putting 200 bucks into some risky stuff because you have 20k+ more dollars and losing 200 wouldn't hurt. That makes a lot more sense doesn't it? People who can afford to lose, end up losing?

These people come from a background of a good amount of money. You do not become an F1 driver by having parents who are poor, even Lewis Hamilton who cries like they were dirt poor, had a dad 10x richer than mine, not even remotely close.

Hence, I am sure that he got a good English lesson from teachers, even tutors that came to their house to teach him English. Sure as you grow up you listen to English songs, and I am not American or from any nation that speaks English, and yet I grew up with eminem and do not swear when I speak English. It means it's a bit of a personal decision and if he is warned, he should be careful, there is no legit excuse for it at all.

I know that Ronaldo wants to leave, but it doesn't make sense to just leave to a club he would still be unhappy. I mean think about it, if he moves from a club he would be unhappy, to a club that he will be unhappy, isn't it better to stay in the old one that he was unhappy with? At least he knows there and he could try to change that, but the new one would be disappointment because he moved there to get happy and failed. He is acting as if this would solve all his problems, but it won't.

Only thing it would serve would be him scoring some more goals at UCL, which obviously he cares a ton, but makes no sense why he cares about it this much, he should care about just enjoy playing at this age.

You can't know what’s going to happen. It’s clear to me that people are going to be shocked at results no matter what happens. There will be plenty of people expecting bitcoin to be dropping and if it goes up those people would be shocked. And if not, there are a lot of people who think it should go up (including me) and if it goes down then we all would be shocked. So, there isn't really a single guaranteed result there, we all will be shocked no matter what happens.

This is why it's smarter to make it up to the point that we are beyond those risks and shocks, and finally have something. At least we would know what happened, instead of be worried about it.