One more proof that they should be deported. Nothing is normal here. They act like savages and nobody does nothing to stop this. Should go in jail for at lest 10 years..like example so they know what ll happen to them. They feel protected there and that nobody can say them nothing and they see police not doint anything.
And deported to where my dear sir? Where they come from? And how will you make them stay? They already put their life on the line so you can't make them stay away. Why would they do? We're responsible for their despair in a great part, time to take those responsibilities. Lol, that's very easy. You deport them to the country they CLAIM to be from. Syria, isn't it? (of course it's not really Syria...tough...) And when they come back you do it again? :/ And you put a soldier every 100m of borders just to be sure they don't pass again? :/ Hey, don't knock it. 100 km of border takes 1,000 men. Add support staff, you've got 1500-2000 employed. Just think, they can sit in a hut or trailer and play video games all day long. And get paid for it. And every now and then get out the bull horn and tell the immigrants to stay back. Sure of your figures? And that mean 1000 men able to shoot at the refugees who are going to pass the border anyway... Not your average soldier. This one must let his brain at home! I'm also sure that you let people in your country, first you do it in a way where you can check whether they have criminal backgrounds. And today you'd check whether they have terrorist backgrounds. Otherwise the entire ISIS army could disband, move to Europe, and regroup with no resistence whatsoever. Due to thinking like what you exhibit. Now who is "leaving brain at home?" |
|
|
|
Would lean towards the something else "eon99"!  He can tap into people and exploit frustrated folks but he can do barely anything he says he would do. Just look at Obama's current environmental package being stalled into the ground. Trump can huff and puff but the same result will await him if he becomes POTUS. Huh? Republicans control the House and the Senate. Trump would easily pass reasonable conservative bills. Obama's environmental package was nothing but illegal Executive Actions. |
|
|
|
Meh. I think there is just a too big cultural difference between USA and EU. I don't feel the fun in the video, not at all. It's rather horrible in fact. .... Not at all horrible. Wild pigs are a serious problem here, doing tremendous damage to farmers crops. There are no political sides to this issue. Wild pigs populations have to be controlled. Period. |
|
|
|
Nothing to do with Jewish either.
USA gave them this piece of land. Nobody else. Don't forget it's the Westerns that created this in order to feel a bit better about the ww2 genocide.
israel established settlements after taking the land from jordan in 1967, nobody gave it to them. A concept of spoils of war exists, but not for Jews? Bah. |
|
|
|
... God is a bit more patient with mentally retarded people.  I'm sure he is since they are his main customers. BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM!!!!!! Can I give you a point af_newbie? xD Wait...Please don't tell me he made them in his own image? |
|
|
|
Maybe some of them have gone through some worst experience with muslims and I don't see everyone hating Islam as I am surrounded with many muslims but they have respect for their and others religions too.
yeah, and maybe about the news they heard about muslims, that is why there are people who associate terrorist with muslims, Very true. It's how the media endorses Islam. Nowadays when you see people wearing turbans, it's almost automatic for you to associate them with a negative vibe almost anxious and threatened feel. Around here most people wearing turbans are Hindu, not Muslim. |
|
|
|
If guns would be accessible to everyone, the world would be a much safer place. Everyone should have the ability to defend themselves againsts aggressors.
Right! Military and police are people. The only difference they have is, they have better training in using guns, and they have more guns. If military and police who are people just like us have guns, why not the rest of us? Military and police kill more people than the rest of us could ever think of killing. i dont agree with you.. armed forces that you have mentioned before are educated on using guns professionally so they can control their using of gun better than an ordinary person thats why only armed forces must have right to carry a gun or something...Bah. Most police shoot one box a year for practice. That's not much training. Soldiers, the greatest number of them never touch a gun after basic training. Others carry one for years and never use it. Some of the antics of these "trained professionals" are priceless. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP6UvNgbqIA |
|
|
|
One more proof that they should be deported. Nothing is normal here. They act like savages and nobody does nothing to stop this. Should go in jail for at lest 10 years..like example so they know what ll happen to them. They feel protected there and that nobody can say them nothing and they see police not doint anything.
And deported to where my dear sir? Where they come from? And how will you make them stay? They already put their life on the line so you can't make them stay away. Why would they do? We're responsible for their despair in a great part, time to take those responsibilities. Lol, that's very easy. You deport them to the country they CLAIM to be from. Syria, isn't it? (of course it's not really Syria...tough...) And when they come back you do it again? :/ And you put a soldier every 100m of borders just to be sure they don't pass again? :/ Hey, don't knock it. 100 km of border takes 1,000 men. Add support staff, you've got 1500-2000 employed. Just think, they can sit in a hut or trailer and play video games all day long. And get paid for it. And every now and then get out the bull horn and tell the immigrants to stay back. |
|
|
|
Are you kidding? This IS what ISIS is doing in Syria to the Syrian people. Murdering, pillaging, raping, eradicating those who they think are infidels.
It's awful.
And your facts on the US are terrible incorrect. Yes, there was a lot of fighting and killing but there wasn't rape, there wasn't forced marriage, there wasn't mass murder. Please get your facts straight or lose the passive aggressive approach toward your distaste for the US.
Its not really my thought, I do not hate the US, but your telling me native Americans weren't murdered? conquered? from their own country? Edit and women weren't raped? It's history. All of the world murdered and conquered. The US is a great country, ISIS land is hell. i agree with you .. god save the us.. isis are full of bastards.. I have known a fair number of native americans. I don't know any that would put historical events in the terms you have (bolded above). The white man came, and the Indians got horses. They liked horses. The white man brought them guns. They liked guns. The white man brought liquor. They liked liquor. (IT WAS REALLY BAD FOR THEM AND STILL IS.) Many Americans today are part Indian. I find your comments offensive (lol, not that it matters...) |
|
|
|
you guys not that clever it is different between islam and wahabisim salafi go and do more search cuz i did and i unertood more. i find islam a pace a friend of mine is muslim shia ( well not big difference but he is a kind person and i find him peacer than my fella friend some same religion. so there is a big difference and yes there are bad and good people and its in every country religion where there are bad and good mates/ daesh ideology is wahabism and other organisation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wahhabismhttp://www.differencebetween.net/language/difference-between-sunni-and-wahabi/I'm confused. I agree completely that violent Islam stems from Sayyad Qutb, and that is an offshoot of Wahhabism. But in your opinion is Wahhabism not Islam? |
|
|
|
And why it wouldn't have been this easy?
They were taken by force when they were vulnerable, at work, drunk, just in the street...
If they were armed it wouldn't have changed a thing. Police wasn't coming to you and ask you to come. They were seeing you, getting you in range of fire and threatening you with a rifle then asked you to kneel and they controled you and maybe deported you.
You took your gun you would be dead before able to fire.
My point isn't nick picking.
It's that armed population wouldn't change a thing because when the dictator is in control it's too late. The people have to fight BEFORE. When dictatorship is here the only solution is revolution. And weapons don't change a thing because when it's revolution time it always works, cause soldiers are always too few.
Just because you imagine it in your pacifist mind doesn't make it reality. The fact is that armed populations are not only less likely to be attacked by totalitarian governments, but YES, it would have changed something. Some of those people coming to round up civilians would be killed and they would be forced to consider if it is worth giving their life for a dictatorship. Not everyone is drunk, sleeping, or otherwise vulnerable all at the same time. It has already been well established people will give their life for freedom, so this is not a question. BTW exactly how are unarmed people's supposed to have a revolution? Revolutions do NOT always work, why would you even say such an idiotic thing? What is stopping that artillery from being placed upon unarmed revolts? Nothing. At least if the people are armed they have the ability to RESIST, and make some of the people perpetrating the abuse pay with their lives. What's fun is how what I say is just "idiotic opinion" and what you say is the truth while non of us having anything to support our claims. I don't think it would help the population because an authoritarian government comes into power thanks to the support of the population then can be thrown out only if a massive part of the population revolts and if they do then the military (which are PART of this population) supports them. Not saying I have the truth, just giving my point of view on this subject. Anyway you're really a tiring person. Because I say Bible is as violent as Coran you assume I'm just crying and defending Islam. Because I say I don't think weapons would help to defend against the government you assume I'm a pacifist. Well if you're so good at assuming, no need to even come here to debate, just assume someone is discussing with you. If someone took our guns away, we wouldn't be able to do fun stuff like this anymore. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sx66ys4JG5o |
|
|
|
I am here to just say one thing? Why do YOU hate people? and you should really give a valid reason not a shitty one that says 'Because Jews, Because Christians, Because Atheists'
and Yes, I am a people's person for those who ask, just tell me, come out of your shell and say why you HATE people like myself, and I could be here to clarify things to you, or not...
Also here is something that most muslims mistake about people's person like me is that "Christianity or Buddhism hate other religions" for this I say, Christianity or Buddhism does not hate ANY religion, but they suggest to 'invite' them to Christianity or Buddhism or Judaism, as slowly, and peacefully, even if they refuse, you can try and try, until it's their choice, you stop. and for all the wars that happened, it's because this other religion decided to come into war on Christianity or Buddhism or Judaism.
If you need anything clarified, I may not be here to answer you, don't be scared, I won't be offended by anyone, also haters, you can reply, I won't care Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink  In other news -> islam doesnt hate anybody.. hate is forbidden in islamic culture.. islam loves everybody.. |
|
|
|
Don't judge the other while totally forgetting your own crap.
Stop trying to deflect the conversation away just because you don't like what's being talked about, I'm sick to death of people who think they can just throw accusations at people or derail the conversation whenever they have to confront uncomfortable truths about what they believe. My point was that it's not a relevant argument as the Coran is as shitty as the Bible. So it doesn't prove anything cause both books are more or less equally horrifying. It's not to "deflect the conversation". It's just to put some perspective in it... Take your weak politically correct ass out of here. I promise you you will not have a good time. Also take your paid signature spam flooding this section with you. People here have very little tolerance for social justice warriors. There is no shortage of people bashing other religions. Take your triggers, your outrage, and your hurt feels somewhere else, like twitter. They cater to your brand of fascism there. Of course there you don't get paid for posting...
Wtf is wrong with you guys? I'm not saying anything else than "the infamy of Coran is not a real argument as you got the same in the Bible"...
I'm not crying, not defending Islam, not trying to bring justice or any shit like that! Where did you see my "outrage, and your hurt feels"?
Just saying that Christians are the same shit than Islam.So in your glorious opinion Tecshare, The only one who should be allowed to post are the one with the same opinion than you that's it? P.S. Here. You're happy now? I deleted the double post so you can stop crying about "spam". Cause "spam" is not an argument. i find it 3 times less easy to read but you won't be able to cry about that! But Christians simply ARE NOT the same shit as Islam. We don't have something like.... www.thereligionofpeace.com...for Christians, now, do we? Christians don't have 27,000 terror attackes since 9/11 attributed to them. So pray tell us, what, exactly, comprises the difference? |
|
|
|
trump will win every state, the others should go home
you are wrong .. trump will be loser of this elections.. because he isnt suitable for being president.. Suitable for being president? LOL, as if Obama was.... |
|
|
|
Number is not the most important. Quality is Difference of numbers is irrelevant, think about how we could turn the tables with just a few nuclear missiles well launched Numbers are all that matters now. Take the example of Kosovo. Kosovo was a historic Serbian heartland, where the epic battle for Europe was fought between the armies of Prince Lazar of Serbia and Sultan Murad I of Turkey in 1389. Serbs inhabited there for thousands of years. However, from the 18th century AD onward, Muslims started immigrating to Kosovo. As a result of the higher birth rates, they finally outnumbered the Serbs in the 1950s. What happened after that is history. Well, if it does happen that's not really important. I don't give a fuck about the end of white race to be honest. It won't happen in a few years so if the next century sees the end of whites, well why not? Why should I care? ^^ I have no idea what a "white race" is. No clue. |
|
|
|
I personally think looking at the upper stratosphere temperature is more logical, since radiative balance as the net sum of in flows and outflows occurs...at the upper stratosphere. So if you would like to argue for the use of another temperature measure, then you will have some trouble substantiating "the more CO2 we have the more energy is being absorbed."
I'm not sure if I understand you. You think CO2 is not absorbing infrared radiation? Good question. Sorry I was not clear. CO2 absorbs certain specific spectra due to it's dipole movements and vibrations, etc. That is one of a great many things that absorb, emit and so forth. The net of all of these is outgoing radiation from the planet. The essential question of "global warming" is whether net outgoing is decreasing relative to net incoming energy, by how much, and whether man is affecting that balance. Satellite temperature measurements of the upper atmosphere obviously closely measure these issues. Ground based temperatures measure such things loosely, if at all... This is why I mentioned that if one wishes to consider/argue the effect of man on "global warming," he MUST use satellite measurements. It then happens that satellite measurements show no warming in 20 years (maybe it's still 19, I don't recall). This indicates that net radiative planetary energy balance is unchanged for 19-20 years. And what does THAT imply? For one thing it defeats the "central CO2 hypothesis," which teaches that the climate has a high sensitivity to CO2. Increase CO2, and temperatures increase. It's wrong to look for simple explanations, though. But here is something I don't understand. The graphs show an increase. I mean they DO! Unless we don't have the same definition of increase of course but... Well as an engineer with a good formation in statistics I feel like I do ^^ Alrighty. Then you yourself can step through applying the formulas to the raw satellite data and proving for yourself that there is no significant trend. But do me one favor - after you've proved that, get mad. Get mad at people that fed you propaganda and lies. Not me - I'm just a guy that pointed out that bit of math. I can't change it, it is what it is. And it isn't this - this is a con game. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8E42mIvjzRwWell OK gonna do that this weekend in my spare time. But considering the data I've found, if what you say is true, well first I'd be really surprised, and then I'd like to know what statistical treatment they went through to give such results. Any idea of where you can find this raw data? I'd ignore the chart on "ocean heat content." Nobody had a clue as to ocean heat content until this decade. Rest of charts look okay. Here is a simple reference on the UAH satellite data. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UAH_satellite_temperature_datasetFrom this discussion you have the methods of interpreting the satellite data. http://www.remss.com/measurements/upper-air-temperatureFrom this you can click on a graph and go to the time series measurement tool http://images.remss.com/msu/msu_time_series.htmlAny of those have a "download data" button. |
|
|
|
....
Sure. And I said that I found it cynical, not stupid or wrong ^^
Cause well, it DOES help a political party to have a part of the population devoted to them...
I don't know if the number of migrants is enough to really have a weight though, cause even if all the media are in a crazy state I don't think they're so numerous.
Sure it's enough. Just put them where you need them, to swing a vote. |
|
|
|
Destroy them it's the only way. They are sadists and insane, and they are hiding behind religion. Today is arrested woman of one of leaders of ISIS
Unfortunately, ISIS is only the latest in hundreds of incarnations of radical Jihad, going back decades. Today it is a new phenomena, though. It is an Internet and cellular phone based radical Islam. This does not have a central "Head" of an organization which if it is cut off, the organization dies. It's necessary to combat, and beat them in the world of ideas. This means showing them why it is wrong to hate Jews, why it is not okay to cut off hands and feet, and why it is a bad idea to stone women to death. I am of the opinion that the radical grows from the moderate, which is already quite radical by Western standards. These people believe that "Islam is perfect," by the way. Failures occur in people that try to follow Islam, but not in Islam itself. |
|
|
|
Islam is not a cancer but the people who view it negatively are the cancer and a real threat.
Why? So the people who publish this website, www.thereligionofpeace.com, ARE THE REAL THREAT? Are you fucking kidding me? +2 Wow, upsidedown75 is a jihadi or a 'moderate' Muslim. LOL Let's hear what he has to say - he's made a claim, I am interested in how it may be explained. |
|
|
|
Islam hates all non muslim people and calim that is their right and obligation to kill them or force accept islam. They consider life on earth like must suffering and that real life is on heaven with all those woman and so.
So the fat geezers of Islam with money grab all the wives, four each. Young men are left with goats, boys and women from outside the faith, or the option of Jihadic Death, and seventy two whiney bitches in hell forever. What a bunch of insane choices! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
