Bitcoin Forum
June 29, 2024, 10:44:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 [452] 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 ... 606 »
9021  Other / Meta / Re: Remove VOD from the Default Trust List - clear case of neg for calling out abuse on: March 26, 2015, 07:35:27 AM
Not a lie?  I'm actually protected by the staff?     Roll Eyes

You referenced a post from this thread as your reference for why you posted your trust rating for me, but your original trust rating was posted BEFORE THIS THREAD, otherwise why would I open a topic abut your negative rating if you had not made it yet? Just because you deleted it and reposted it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Can you tell me why the negative rating was left BEFORE I stated this so called lie about you? If you weren't referencing something in the future what exactly were you referencing. Funny how your explanation just gets tagged on later as you make it up as you go along to justify your abuse of the trust system.

 I am curious how exactly this thread itself is justification for the negative trust rating you left for me when the entire purpose of this thread is to point out your negative rating for me and how it is abusive. This is clearly nonsensical and circular logic.

Your original negative rating for me:
Once again VOD has gone too far and has now left me negative trust because he did not like the fact I criticized his abuse of the trust system. In order to prove he does not abuse the trust system he has abused the trust system to leave me a negative rating:

Vod 16: -0 / +9(9)   2015-01-06  0.00000000    "Constantly posts lies about me in an effort to have me removed from the default trust list. Honest discussion is one thing, but he just posts BS with absolutely no basis.

Not trustworthy."

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=15728


Your reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg10060458#msg10060458
9022  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How Social Justice Warriors Are Creating An Entire Generation Of Fascists on: March 26, 2015, 06:57:27 AM
I came across this video and found it very relevant to the OP of this thread, and how scam accusations work around here. In general he is arguing the insanity of limiting people's speech to limit offense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oSxdZcCNlM
9023  Other / Meta / Re: Remove VOD from the Default Trust List - clear case of neg for calling out abuse on: March 26, 2015, 03:06:31 AM
Not a lie?  I'm actually protected by the staff?     Roll Eyes

You are still on the default trust list even after exhibiting repeated abusive behavior...

You do not agree with my opinion, that does not make it a lie, even if it was a lie, that is not a legitimate use of a negative rating from some one on the default trust. You even admitted it here yourself when you changed it from a negative to a neutral the FIRST time you did this.


VOD clearly didn't remove those ratings because he "realized the error of his ways" or something, he did it because the community finally stepped up and called him on his bullshit, even if the staff made sure they were looking the other way.

Actually, no.  I removed the ratings for you and tak because I realized I shouldn't use negative feedback for personal gut feelings.
9024  Other / Meta / Re: Remove VOD from the Default Trust List - clear case of neg for calling out abuse on: March 26, 2015, 02:57:56 AM
I don't see the connection between TECSHARE supposedly lying about Vod being protected by the staff regarding his status on the default trust list and scamming. I don't even see the connection between TECSHARE supposedly lying about Vod being protected by the staff regarding his status on the default trust list and getting Vod removed from the default trust network.

Because it is not a lie, Vod is just looking for any of the flimsiest of pretexts to have an excuse for using his position on the default trust to settle his little petty personal annoyances.
9025  Other / Meta / Re: Why is the trust changing so much? on: March 26, 2015, 02:55:26 AM
Tecshare, there are other forums out there where you can go and be as trusted as a god.  Just have to leave your comfort zone.   Undecided

No one wants to be a god around here but you Vod.
9026  Other / Meta / Re: Remove VOD from the Default Trust List - clear case of neg for calling out abuse on: March 26, 2015, 02:39:37 AM
I am still waiting for you to provide ANY substance to your rating Vod. Your constant excuses and diversions when asked for a reference are quite transparent. You can not do it because you know very well you left it as a form of retribution, not because I did anything scammy.

Found one on the 8th page of this thread.  There are dozens floating around.

The lack of action here by the staff is clear evidence of his protected position regardless of how much he abuses the trust system.

Tecshare, Badbear removed me from his trust list.  I do not have a protected position on default trust.  Stop lying about me.

I'll go add the reference to the trust now and put this to rest.  Smiley
Ok, you go ahead and do that. Dozens, that's funny, yet you resisted so hard to provide even a single example. I wonder why.

Since when is "lying" a justified use of the trust system from someone on the position of the default trust list? How exactly does this make me a scammer even if your almost nonexistent pretenses were true?
9027  Other / Meta / Re: Remove VOD from the Default Trust List - clear case of neg for calling out abuse on: March 26, 2015, 02:35:40 AM
I am still waiting for you to provide ANY substance to your rating Vod. Your constant excuses and diversions when asked for a reference are quite transparent. You can not do it because you know very well you left it as a form of retribution, not because I did anything scammy.

Found one on the 8th page of this thread.  There are dozens floating around.

The lack of action here by the staff is clear evidence of his protected position regardless of how much he abuses the trust system.

Tecshare, Badbear removed me from his trust list.  I do not have a protected position on default trust.  Stop lying about me.

Ok, what lie did I make about you? Please tell me exactly what is untrue about that statement? You are still on the default trust list, one person removing you does not change that.
9028  Other / Meta / Re: Remove VOD from the Default Trust List - clear case of neg for calling out abuse on: March 26, 2015, 02:29:04 AM
I will ask you once again, please quote the EXACT WORDS that you claim I supposedly used when lying about you. You left me a negative rating, why is it that you can not substantiate the one and only claim you make in it?

I'll tell you again - you've posted I'm protected by the forum admins at least a dozen times - go find one and quote it. 

Excuse me, but YOU are the one making the claim, and you have NOT EVEN ONCE made a direct quote from me about you that is a lie. The burden of proof is ON YOU, you made the claim. Your little diversionary games are very transparent.
9029  Economy / Reputation / Re: PSA: How to remove cancer from the trust list on: March 26, 2015, 02:27:06 AM
The real cancer aren't who is in the default trust, but the scammer and dishonest person. They should get fu*k out from this forum, because bitcoin is not for them. TECSHARE if you don't trust him put '~' before his username , simple ?

Excluding him from my trust does not remove his fraudulent rating from my trust page, nor does it check his abusive behavior using his position on the default trust. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.0
9030  Other / Meta / Re: Remove VOD from the Default Trust List - clear case of neg for calling out abuse on: March 26, 2015, 02:23:16 AM
Excluding Vod from my trust does not erase the fraudulent negative trust rating he left me

I didn't leave you fraudulent negative trust.

BOOM - just like that your entire wall of text loses it's credibility.

Go find a forum you'll enjoy instead of harboring all this hate towards everyone on default trust.   Undecided
Vod, please quote the supposed lie I made about you (the reason you left in your trust rating). The trust system is for outing scammers. You claim I am a scammer but you provide no reference or even substance to this claim. It is clear you abuse the system as a form of personal retribution.

BOOM - its just that easy to deny reality. At least I can explain myself. You have nothing but snarky sound byte replies.

Can you do me a favor and quote it yourself?  Something about me being protected by the forum administrators?

Not going to be bothered looking for it AGAIN when you'll simply ignore it and ask for it again in a couple weeks.   Undecided

So, let me get this straight, you are now demanding that I quote a lie that YOU claim I made that does not exist?
You can not even provide a reason why you left me a negative rating, because there is none (except to use it to settle your personal squabbles).


I will ask you once again, please quote the EXACT WORDS that you claim I supposedly used when lying about you. You left me a negative rating, why is it that you can not substantiate the one and only claim you make in it?
9031  Other / Meta / Re: Remove VOD from the Default Trust List - clear case of neg for calling out abuse on: March 26, 2015, 02:13:23 AM
Excluding Vod from my trust does not erase the fraudulent negative trust rating he left me

I didn't leave you fraudulent negative trust.

BOOM - just like that your entire wall of text loses it's credibility.

Go find a forum you'll enjoy instead of harboring all this hate towards everyone on default trust.   Undecided
Vod, please quote the supposed lie I made about you (the reason you left in your trust rating). The trust system is for outing scammers. You claim I am a scammer but you provide no reference or even substance to this claim. It is clear you abuse the system as a form of personal retribution.

BOOM - its just that easy to deny reality. At least I can explain myself. You have nothing but snarky sound byte replies.
9032  Other / Meta / Re: Remove VOD from the Default Trust List - clear case of neg for calling out abuse on: March 26, 2015, 02:08:09 AM
Stop all these bullshit, if you don't trust Vod then put before his name "~" and stop to post and post again in this thread. Totally bullshit, you are acting like kids (not you Vod, I am talking about the OP and the numerous topics in the forum).

Excluding Vod from my trust does not erase the fraudulent negative trust rating he left me, which he previously changed to a neutral under public pressure here. Since he did not like me pointing out his actions towards the key sellers on the forum were abusive, and time has passed, he feels he can get away with abusing his position on the default trust to retaliate against me again because he doesn't like my speech. He is clearly abusing the default trust, ironically in an attempt to try to stop me from pointing out his abuse of the default trust. All of this is detailed in this thread. He has already had a "second" chance in regard to his abuse of the trust system to settle his personal vendettas, and a little time has passed so he feels he can get away with it again. It is the same repeated cycle of behavior with him.

As far as you accusing me of acting like a child, perhaps everyone would like to see the PAGES and PAGES of PMs between you and another trader that bombarded my inbox with bickering over terms where I served as escrow and you could not even be bothered to ask questions BEFORE entering into an agreement and involving a 3rd party. I believe you are here attacking my character because I would not comply to your demands in that case.

Do you people believe that Vod is going to keep his position in default trust if he keeps controversial ratings coming? It's now up to one person, if tomatocage removes him from his trust list he's out.

I personally wouldn't really like to see Vod out of default, but I feel like it's going to happen one day if he doesn't cool off a little bit.

With all of the key seller ratings aside, what about the negative trust rating that Vod left for me is controversial at all? When he originally left it for me, he did it as a form of retribution in an attempt to silence me from pointing out his abusive behavior. Since then people have put pressure on him to change it to a neutral, because as it stood before it was considered abusive and without substance. Now that I have pointed out his excessive  behavior relating to the Microsoft key retailers, suddenly he changes it back to a negative again. He did this solely because I am pointing out his abusive behavior, not because I engaged in any type of scamming behavior. This is abuse of the trust system, especially from someone on the default trust list. In most cases any complaints against Vod are almost universally dismissed without any examination, simply as scammers complaining about being outed and trying to get revenge. In my case he can not simply cast me as a scammer, but he feels he can abuse the trust system to try to make me look like one any way.  

I have been trading here for over three years and I have around 100 positive feedback ratings and I have honored EVERY SINGLE AGREEMENT I entered into demonstrating myself to be a model of honorable trading practices here. Between Vods abusive negative rating and Theymos personally excluding me from the entire default trust tree*, regardless of who within it adds me to their trust list, I now have a +18 trust score.   Does that sound appropriate for a trust system ranking a trader who has had 100 positive ratings and been fronted thousands in value only to honor every agreement made over 3 years of trading? The trust system, as it currently stands, is little more than a way for abusive and controlling individuals ranking highly in the default trust to extort honest traders by exploiting their hard earned reputations as a form of manipulation. Rank high in the trust, then you take that ranking away. Anyone else can be dismissed as a sock or a scammer.


*I was excluded from the entire default trust (not the default trust list) by Theymos for not complying with his demand to remove a rating he did not approve of, yet in the same breath him and all of his minions claim that trust ratings are not moderated. If I am punished for not removing a trust rating with an exclusion by the ADMIN that cascades down the entire default trust, nuking my previously earned trust ratings, how exactly is the trust not moderated? This is just yet another double standard practiced by the staff around here where there are 2 sets of rules, rules for them and theirs, and rules for everybody else. There are no official rules posted anywhere here for a reason, because if they did, they might have to obey them personally.
9033  Economy / Reputation / Re: PSA: How to remove cancer from the trust list on: March 25, 2015, 01:07:53 PM
Tomatocage must answer the real question: Are you removing Vod from your trust list or not?

He is not removing me over this event.  He may remove me in the future though, who knows?

Maybe tone it down with the controversial ratings and you'll probably stay in his list. The recent events brought enough turmoil in the forum, I'm sure you wouldn't want to cause something aimilar again given that it would risk your position in the trust list.

We have been through this with Vod already repeatedly. He abuses his position on the default trust, he modifies his ratings under public pressure, then a few weeks later he is doing it again and replacing those modified ratings with negatives again. He has already demonstrated complete disregard for the default trust over and over. Hes had second, third, fourth, fifth, and so on, chances. Vod needs to be far away from any position of authority.
9034  Other / Meta / Re: Why is the trust changing so much? on: March 25, 2015, 12:53:12 PM
Well, in whatever case, you won't see me butt-hurt complaining like Tecshare does about having someone ~ my name.   Smiley

I accept that my actions have responsibilities and I respect each person's right to modify their trust list as they see fit.  

Yes, what a tiny inconvenience it is to have the highest ranking person in the trust system exclude you from pretty much everyone's trust no matter who includes you, because the exclusion cascades down the default trust list, destroying my already earned trust score. If regular people wanted to remove me, that would be fine, but added me as the very first trust exclusion as retribution for not obeying his commands in regard to him demanding I remove a trust rating (which is not moderated of course, he says!).

You want to know why the trust is changing so much? Just examine your own behavior.
9035  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: [SOLVED]Tomatocage - You are a on: March 23, 2015, 11:25:04 PM
1. You're completely incorrect. This is the college's MSDN account. They pay for a limited amount of keys for a limited amount of products. I have a personal MSDN account, and also manage one for my employer.

2. It's theft.

Why do you seem to always stick up for the scammers? Very odd behavior.

You mentioned you have a personal MSDN account. How exactly do you know these users don't have their own and that they paid the fee themselves? Just assuming that they stole them from colleges is not appropriate.

What scammers do I always seem to stick up for? I guess I am a stickler for people having a fair debate and not just summary execution of neckbeard mob justice at any speculation posted. This behavior is also destructive to legitimate sellers that get harassed and drives people away from Bitcoin.
9036  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: [Vod] I need an explanation from him on: March 23, 2015, 11:08:37 PM

You skipped over the parts that were incorrect such as the keys being "illegal" and labeling the retailers scammers. Also, he ASSUMES that Symantec will not issue refunds, he could not possibly know this.

I'll let the courts decide on the legality of running a network to enable pirated software. I'm sure they won't punish it as badly as say, running a network to enable selling drugs. Labeling these "sellers" as scammer is spot on. What they're selling is not only worthless (a key that you're not allowed to use / if you use it you're pirating software and very likely breaking the law). The assumption that symantec is not going to refund is a based on Vod's experience and symantecs behaviour. While it cannot be asserted until it happens, I am fairly confident that assumption is spot on.

What courts? I asked you for statutory law backing up your claims of "enabling piracy" and breaking a TOS contract, but you seem to be unable to produce them. Yet you sit there talking about courts in this hyperbolic manner as if Microsoft really cares. If they did they wouldn't be available. Simple as that. A scammer is someone who steals from someone they are purportedly engaging in trade with. Just because you find the sellers activities to be morally objectional as a 3rd party does NOT make them a scammer. If they were ACTUALLY scamming, there would be VICTIMS making COMPLAINTS, which are glaringly absent in this situation. People seem to want the product and have kept returning for more. Assumptions about refunds are nothing more than that, assumptions. Vod doesn't have magical psychic abilities from his day long torrents of negative rating people, and without some sort of due process or structure then wtf is the point of ANY of this?

Vod have changed his neutral feedback to a negative one on TECSHARE's trust. I don't get how TECSHARE is untrustworthy as a result of that though.  Huh

Yep. Funny how negatives seem to come out for anyone who is critical of his behavior. Just another demonstration of his disregard for his position on the default trust. Notice there is no reference and he refuses to actually quote any supposed lies he says I made about him. In short the negative rating is for being openly critical of his abusive behavior.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg10848601#msg10848601

That's how it works though. Vod doesn't trust symantec because symantec is involved in software piracy. Symantec is screwing over their customers by making them believe they get a lifetime, guaranteed licence while all they get is as-is, guaranteed to fail product key unless symantec renews their MSDN subscription, which is highly unlikely.
You are confused. Please read again. This is a reference to the negative trust rating Vod has now left me for daring to challenge him on this subject in yet another lame attempt to try to silence people who are critical of him by further abusing his position on the default trust.

I am sorry if I misread that. However, it is still how trust works. You and Vod have a spat for ages, so it's only logical that Vod doesn't trust him. I reckon you wouldn't do business with Vod either, though you choose not to publish your distrust in Vod's feedback.

I had no problem with VOD until he initially left me a negative trust rating for openly discussing his abusive behavior towards other users and pointing out it is an example of how some users get preferential treatment on the forum to abuse the rules freely, but others are punished for the most minor single incidents.

His original abuse of the default trust directed at me in an attempt to silence my discussion of his abusive behavior: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.0

When you occupy a position on the default trust there are additional standards that the administrator, staff, and mods have applied to such a position repeatedly in the past. Several people have been removed from the default trust for MUCH less than what Vod has been up to. People have been removed for of using the default trust in EXACTLY the way Vod is using it.

Why is it that Vod is allowed to use the default trust as he pleases over and over because "trust is not moderated", but other users are removed for doing this ONCE? The trust ratings say right in the description that it is to be used if you "believe the person is a scammer", his personal opinion of me is not an appropriate use especially considering his position on the default trust. Also my extensive history here as a legitimate trader also proves any claims of me being a scammer to be a complete fabrication. His claim is that I "lied" about him (which is not scamming BTW), he has no reference for it, and he can't even tell me what I said that was a lie. The trust system has just become a series of tools to protect insiders and scammers while extorting anyone else who tries to use it in any way that they don't agree with. Vod has no business being on the default trust, or in any position of authority.
9037  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: VOD's new lie. He's one fucked up asshole! on: March 23, 2015, 10:21:47 PM
To begin with this is NOT a scam accusation thread. If you haven't noticed OP there are rules for posting in this section and you are completely ignoring them.
It's not a place to posts spam threads, to call other members names, but describe actual situations in which someone scammed or attempted to scam you. You weren't scammed by Vod and you already made threads about your dispute. This whole thing between you two should be either in "reputation" or "off topic".
I think the thread was moved here by a moderator.
9038  Economy / Services / Re: Money Drop For The Homeless on: March 23, 2015, 10:04:18 PM
I wouldn't support this not because I'm against giving money to the homeless and supporting them to get off the streets but if you give directly there's a very high chance that money will end up funding drugs/alcohol. If you want to donate money to support homeless people then I'd recommend giving it through the more formalised and proper channels which is more likely to help the homeless people.

This is the problem you face. Rather use the money to buy items /food yourself and get the drones to deliver it to them. Not drop it over them.
I like this idea.
9039  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How Social Justice Warriors Are Creating An Entire Generation Of Fascists on: March 23, 2015, 06:53:52 PM


You know that the nazis were socialists right? Your definition is an oversimplification at best, and confirmation bias at worst.



Yes i know so whats your point?

You guys confuse definitions, saying fascist is not what it is. There are fascist elements now in big corporations becuase they work together with government, that is what fascism means.

On the other hand here is another group of equality: feminist, social justice, all sorts of equality bullcrap, and they are very leftists, hardcore socialists.

So basically in current society we see a battle between big corporations (fascists) and leftist equality agitators (socialists), whom battle for their own agendas.
This one is correct. The Nazis were fascists in practice and "national socialists" in name Only.  This is basic shit folks, learn your terms if you're going to include yourselves in the conversation. Fascism is the collusion of governments with businessmen. It is a form of tyranny because the government is not operating in the interests of the people it is supposed to serve, but instead operating in the private interests of the political elite. Capitalism compels selfish men toward this end.

Any earnest student of history should by now see clearly that democracy and capitalism are fundamentally incompatible with one another.

Since you are so sure of yourself on this point, and you questioned the definition of the word fascism, lets explore that definition.

1 often capitalized :  a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

(this sounds a whole lot like socialism in the past to me)

2 :  a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control <early instances of army fascism and brutality — J. W. Aldridge>

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism


We can get into even more detail and examine the well known "14 points of fascism"

1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism  Found in socialist nations of the past?: CHECK

From the prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel pins, the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the regime itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always obvious. Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity were common themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually coupled with a suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on xenophobia.

2. Disdain for the importance of human rights  Found in socialist nations of the past?: CHECK

The regimes themselves viewed human rights as of little value and a hindrance to realizing the objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever use of propaganda, the population was brought to accept these human rights abuses by marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted. When abuse was egregious, the tactic was to use secrecy, denial, and disinformation.

3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause
 Found in socialist nations of the past?: CHECK

The most significant common thread among these regimes was the use of scapegoating as a means to divert the people’s attention from other problems, to shift blame for failures, and to channel frustration in controlled directions. The methods of choice—relentless propaganda and disinformation—were usually effective. Often the regimes would incite “spontaneous” acts against the target scapegoats, usually communists, socialists, liberals, Jews, ethnic and racial minorities, traditional national enemies, members of other religions, secularists, homosexuals, and “terrorists.” Active opponents of these regimes were inevitably labeled as terrorists and dealt with accordingly.

4. The supremacy of the military/avid militarism
 Found in socialist nations of the past?: CHECK

Ruling elites always identified closely with the military and the industrial infrastructure that supported it. A disproportionate share of national resources was allocated to the military, even when domestic needs were acute. The military was seen as an expression of nationalism, and was used whenever possible to assert national goals, intimidate other nations, and increase the power and prestige of the ruling elite.

5. Rampant sexism  Found in socialist nations of the past?: indeterminate

Beyond the simple fact that the political elite and the national culture were male-dominated, these regimes inevitably viewed women as second-class citizens. They were adamantly anti-abortion and also homophobic. These attitudes were usually codified in Draconian laws that enjoyed strong support by the orthodox religion of the country, thus lending the regime cover for its abuses.

6. A controlled mass media Found in socialist nations of the past?:  CHECK

Under some of the regimes, the mass media were under strict direct control and could be relied upon never to stray from the party line. Other regimes exercised more subtle power to ensure media orthodoxy. Methods included the control of licensing and access to resources, economic pressure, appeals to patriotism, and implied threats. The leaders of the mass media were often politically compatible with the power elite. The result was usually success in keeping the general public unaware of the regimes’ excesses.

7. Obsession with national security  Found in socialist nations of the past?: CHECK

Inevitably, a national security apparatus was under direct control of the ruling elite. It was usually an instrument of oppression, operating in secret and beyond any constraints. Its actions were justified under the rubric of protecting “national security,” and questioning its activities was portrayed as unpatriotic or even treasonous.

8. Religion and ruling elite tied together Found in socialist nations of the past?: Socialism is usually hostile to religion of all kinds

Unlike communist regimes, the fascist and protofascist regimes were never proclaimed as godless by their opponents. In fact, most of the regimes attached themselves to the predominant religion of the country and chose to portray themselves as militant defenders of that religion. The fact that the ruling elite’s behavior was incompatible with the precepts of the religion was generally swept under the rug. Propaganda kept up the illusion that the ruling elites were defenders of the faith and opponents of the “godless.” A perception was manufactured that opposing the power elite was tantamount to an attack on religion.

9. Power of corporations protected
Found in socialist nations of the past?: CHECK Since corporations are run by the state they are protected.

Although the personal life of ordinary citizens was under strict control, the ability of large corporations to operate in relative freedom was not compromised. The ruling elite saw the corporate structure as a way to not only ensure military production (in developed states), but also as an additional means of social control. Members of the economic elite were often pampered by the political elite to ensure a continued mutuality of interests, especially in the repression of “have-not” citizens.

10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated
Found in socialist nations of the past?: CHECK

Since organized labor was seen as the one power center that could challenge the political hegemony of the ruling elite and its corporate allies, it was inevitably crushed or made powerless. The poor formed an underclass, viewed with suspicion or outright contempt. Under some regimes, being poor was considered akin to a vice.

11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts
Found in socialist nations of the past?: CHECK

Intellectuals and the inherent freedom of ideas and expression associated with them were anathema to these regimes. Intellectual and academic freedom were considered subversive to national security and the patriotic ideal. Universities were tightly controlled; politically unreliable faculty harassed or eliminated. Unorthodox ideas or expressions of dissent were strongly attacked, silenced, or crushed. To these regimes, art and literature should serve the national interest or they had no right to exist.

12. Obsession with crime and punishment  Found in socialist nations of the past?: indeterminate

Most of these regimes maintained Draconian systems of criminal justice with huge prison populations. The police were often glorified and had almost unchecked power, leading to rampant abuse. “Normal” and political crime were often merged into trumped-up criminal charges and sometimes used against political opponents of the regime. Fear, and hatred, of criminals or “traitors” was often promoted among the population as an excuse for more police power.

13. Rampant cronyism and corruption Found in socialist nations of the past?: CHECK

Those in business circles and close to the power elite often used their position to enrich themselves. This corruption worked both ways; the power elite would receive financial gifts and property from the economic elite, who in turn would gain the benefit of government favoritism. Members of the power elite were in a position to obtain vast wealth from other sources as well: for example, by stealing national resources. With the national security apparatus under control and the media muzzled, this corruption was largely unconstrained and not well understood by the general population.

14. Fraudulent elections Found in socialist nations of the past?: CHECK

Elections in the form of plebiscites or public opinion polls were usually bogus. When actual elections with candidates were held, they would usually be perverted by the power elite to get the desired result. Common methods included maintaining control of the election machinery, intimidating and disenfranchising opposition voters, destroying or disallowing legal votes, and, as a last resort, turning to a judiciary beholden to the power elite.


http://www.ellensplace.net/fascism.html


As you can see Socialism and Fascism have many overlapping features and the two ideologies are quite compatible with each other, especially when you consider Socialism is the degradation of Democracy into the path to Fascism. As far as your site "crimethinc.com", I have seen these people recruiting at youth events such as music festivals and even purchased a couple of their books to look at them closer. They push complete propaganda garbage, and have very little if any substance.
9040  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: [Vod] I need an explanation from him on: March 23, 2015, 08:34:19 AM
Quote
This user is selling Microsoft product keys they get from MSDN subscriptions1. This is not allowed2. Microsoft does not sell product keys without Certificate of Authenticity3.

All it will take is a single person to report his illegal purchase of a Microsoft key (even someone who intentionally buys just to report)4, then Microsoft can trace it back to the original MSDN subscription that generated that key.5

ALL keys generated from that MSDN account will then become invalidated (i.e. stop working)6 and symantec will NOT give you your money back7.

This is a scam8. Do not purchase keys from this account!9

I don't see any major fault in this feedback. It seems spot on.
You skipped over the parts that were incorrect such as the keys being "illegal" and labeling the retailers scammers. Also, he ASSUMES that Symantec will not issue refunds, he could not possibly know this.


Vod have changed his neutral feedback to a negative one on TECSHARE's trust. I don't get how TECSHARE is untrustworthy as a result of that though.  Huh

Yep. Funny how negatives seem to come out for anyone who is critical of his behavior. Just another demonstration of his disregard for his position on the default trust. Notice there is no reference and he refuses to actually quote any supposed lies he says I made about him. In short the negative rating is for being openly critical of his abusive behavior.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg10848601#msg10848601

That's how it works though. Vod doesn't trust symantec because symantec is involved in software piracy. Symantec is screwing over their customers by making them believe they get a lifetime, guaranteed licence while all they get is as-is, guaranteed to fail product key unless symantec renews their MSDN subscription, which is highly unlikely.
You are confused. Please read again. This is a reference to the negative trust rating Vod has now left me for daring to challenge him on this subject in yet another lame attempt to try to silence people who are critical of him by further abusing his position on the default trust.
Pages: « 1 ... 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 [452] 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 ... 606 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!