How big will be price for first three projects again?
Probably not much different from the price at Liqui trading market, if it will be traded on other exchanges will probably have a good price, rather than the price in trade Liqui .. Correct. The price on Liqui does not make any sense and the volume is too low
|
|
|
unfortunately the market is only 10% distributed, so by the time 100% is out, which is rather soon, we will be way over priced at 40mill market cap, we need s new exchange, one with liquidity, no one can trade on the current exchange.. price jumps around wildly
Agreed. Need high volume. When very low volume/liquidity, the price does not make any sense.
|
|
|
Dev, did you requested to be listed on any exchange? or is it still too early? Thanks,
|
|
|
Not all of the advertised features will be available for genesis block. In fact the system will be relatively barebones at initial launch. It's work in progress with focus on the eventual 3rd gen scalability whose implementation has taken most of our resource in the past months, and still does.
The release is important. You don't need to generate a lot of features in the beginning. But it will be nice to have a road map and date for each future features. Let's wait and see how the market will react. Good luck
|
|
|
The price wont be just a 3K sat we are seeing a 1 usd value in the long run, i would not mind waiting for a long time to get listed in an exchange. Though the project is really undervalued at the present price because of the low funding received and I will advice investors not to react to the dumper's price when the tokens become officially listed on the exchange. I won't go for $1 valuation but anyone selling below 10ksat is a give away price Agreed. Hopefully will be listed on a good exchange
|
|
|
Currently we're finalizing the Asset Exchange implementation and its UI. We still expect to scrap the current testnet with a new mainnet-like temporary testnet for final tests and adjustments any time. The BTC gateway automation and all its related software are left for last, for which we'll have to see how far we get before the estimated Wed 18th night launch. We really want to launch the genesis on that date and need to make the necessary compromises so that launch and HEAT trading from the client can be arranged, whether full functionality of the related BTC wallet microservices is achieved by then or not.
Web site cosmetic makeup will be online any day before launch.
FY2016 is over and accountants are furnishing the Ltd company's balance statements and financial reports in the next weeks, in time to be available for the 2nd funding round planned for Q1 2017. Investor prospects of course require proper financial reports, and these need to be in line to prove a sustainable business model and budgeting. That's part of the transparent structure that was planned since the inception of Heat Ledger Ltd - having to comply with the regulations regarding company reporting can also be used as a benefit for the seed round (cryptocurrency) investors. It's somewhat unusual that official reports from a cryptocurrency operation are actually required by law, so in our setup we consider that an advantage for the investors to genuinely being able to see how and at which pace the received funds are being used. It also involves more complex accounting tasks than running sole proprietorship and "having expenses sheet" for instance, so the reports need to be prepared with the effort required and will be provided in due time.
I'll be posting a schematic outlining the various phases of the funding details (HEAT tokens, options, shares) soon for clarification regarding the rights and opportunities embedded with the receiving of the HEAT tokens.
Great news. Hopfully you will release the source code before asking for a 2nd funding round
|
|
|
7-10 days to go before mainnet launch. As described earlier, we'll venture towards more than the current three 3rd party exchangers - C-CEX, Alcurex, Openledger - and decentralized AE after genesis. Like all partnerships, it's difficult and especially with exchanges understandably not reasonable to work with projects who don't yet have an existing product (blockchain). At this point for outsiders it may be hard to see all the forthcoming utility and viability of the HEAT chain, which will only be proved by the tech itself of course. However when you examine the FIMK technology perhaps to check out or references of technical prowess, you'll quickly notice surprisingly positive things such as its mainnet has been successfully running for 2.5 years without significant trouble. Additionally you should notice the large effort put in during the several years of development, and the features it has. It can be reasonably argued at this day the 2.5 years old FIMK is still within the world's top 30 coins regarding technology and features. Technically, not commercially. Disruptors quoting copy-paste job, shitcoin etc. don't have the slightest idea what they're talking about. Examine it, or ask someone who knows java and angular and you'll see it's factually on the level I'm talking about. From business development and commercialization's point of view, we've had a bunch of big shots test driving FIMK, but withdrawing from proceeding because of both the unappealing non-profit nature of the project and the early stage of blockchain business that's been perceived too risky. Times have now changed, blockchains are fully relevant and our business development model is fixed. Our masterplan is to take the ideas realized by that high quality tech, work on tech dev extra 6 months to make the core again leading edge technically (scalability) and make that succeed with the completely revamped - and unusual in the cryptocoin scene - business infrastructure. Despite the unfortunate extra delay of 2 months that plan is intact and on the verge of materializing. Back to Sunday shift.. Great news. Keep up the good work
|
|
|
Sam123 is correct. Aeternity will eventually be it's own blockchain. Aeons will temporarily be on the ethereum blockchain during Aeternity's development.
I think I understand what they mean by escrow. They want it to be like a dominant assurance contract. We could do more than escrow. If we fail, we could give their money back plus interest.
If the tokensale is priced in bitcoins or eth then the exchange risk for a one year period is big.
I feel like all this money is a distraction, and we will have an easier time writing the code if we can't spend the money till we are done.
Great. Good luck
|
|
|
A year dev-time for such a project is not long and we try to be faster, but software is just software. The most important thing will be to build up the community. Together we can build it faster. Join our testnet and mine a few coins!
By the way, æternity (pre)tokens will be tradable immedeatly via a smart contract on Ethereum! Traders will trade.
Also looking for exchange partners, to partner up for the decentralized asset exchange smart contracts, which will make batch trading finally trustless.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. æternity blockchain will be running independent on Ethereum. Only the token (temporary) will be tradable on Ethereum during the æternity development. Correct? Thanks,
|
|
|
I saw too something about Clarity on Lithium... but i thought is a coincidence...
Same here. I thought there was another project called Clarity somewhere in Crypto space.
|
|
|
You seem to be trying to import a Moonstone wallet into Extreme portal Correct. I fix it Thanks,
|
|
|
This is one of the few projects to watch for 2017.
|
|
|
What is the point of the freedistribution dashboard if it is not processed through it? I am just curious. I confirm the transaction is recorded in my wallet but the freedistribution dashboard records no transactions. I got confuse too Nevermind. I got the answer. Thanks,
|
|
|
What is the point of the freedistribution dashboard if it is not processed through it? I am just curious. I confirm the transaction is recorded in my wallet but the freedistribution dashboard records no transactions. I got confuse too
|
|
|
Does anybody know why Wallet Maintenance on bittrex (since yesterday)?
|
|
|
|