My guess is you made a backup, then another backup and another backup. That creates 3 different wallets, partially with the same addresses. If you ever changed the password of the wallet, new addresses in that wallet were not in your old backup.

Congrats! Forgetting about your wallets for 7 years is a great way of HODLing

I got that, but the user can argue he found that image somewhere online and copied it. If text on pictures can lead to plagiarism claims, memes can lead to bans too.

That's why
And privacy of course, I'm not hosting things at home.

I found a good offer for my other project, with 15 TB monthly bandwidth. It would be great if that same host offers storage servers in the future.
These used to be my little side projects, but I already have 2 (virtual) servers running for it now. Things tend to get out of hand quickly

I don't think so: images are excluded from plagiarism bans. So it's looks like loophole.

It looks like the Little Mouse doesn't mind:

I reported the spam, my report is marked as "Good", but nothing happened. Maybe a Mod locked the thread, but I can't know that.

That won't work without having a large VPS. I don't want to be seeding it from my own PC.

That takes a few months. Been there, done that
I could spin up a pay by the hour VPS, but I'm not really looking forward to upload 600 GB just for a one time download.

Alpha testing their system for hyperinflation

Nope. Large storage space turns out to be either expensive or annoying. I found 2 affordable hosts, but the first one doesn't accept Bitcoin, the other asks for my ID.

The daily search for Who Wants To Go To Jail!

Interesting law that Purple Paint Law. I'd expect laws like this to be relics from the 1800s, so it's surprising to read the latest implementation was just 10 years ago.
As a non-American hiker, I understand gates, wires and "no trespassing" signs. But until yesterday, I would not have guessed purple poles hundreds of meters apart mean "dare and we shoot"! Any other laws I need to know about if I ever visit Texas?

Tesla's stock is dropping and the narcissist cries for attention again. Nothing new, so why give him the attention he wants?

Importing a private key is not considered sweeping.

That's sweeping

It doesn't matter, but it doesn't hurt to wait either. After so many weeks, being thorough is good
I'd say confirm the balance in Ledger Live before you continue.

No, you can just create a New wallet each time.

Don't believe everything you read online. According to that link I am #4 most generous giving merit. Hiding in plain sight, I am also one of the biggest sMerit holders of the forum.

If you know 27-ish posts that deserve 50 Merit, please post them in Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source

You must be new to the internet
I checked your post and it's a textbook example of spam:

Sweeping is actually a good way too, maybe even easier than mine

Warning: DO NOT ever enter your Ledger seed words into Electrum (or websites, email or cloud storage)! Only use those words on the hardware wallet itself.

I don't know Exocus, I can only give you instructions or Electrum. It's safest to do it offline:
But since you have your private keys on an online computer already, you might as well just import it into Electrum. Note that there are many fake and compromised Electrum wallets out there, make sure to use the real site: https://electrum.org
It's as easy as this: New Wallet > Import Bitcoin addresses or private keys > make transaction to your Ledger. I'd say start with the smallest fund, send it all (click Max), and pay about $0.10 in transaction fees.

You should make sure you have your Ledger seed words safely stored first, and you should thoroughly check the address (character by character) on your Ledger screen before making the transaction.

Find which addresses hold coins, get some Fork dust on BCH/BSV/BCH-A to enforce replay protection, move your funds, shred the drive
BSV "Electrum" clone is weird, I prefer Coinomi. And I definitely don't trust the software.

I didn't know this is the current default, but I can now indeed confirm it. That's a weird choice!

I would expect Bitcoin Core to notify the user the wallet is further behind than the pruned blocks.

@tothemoon10: if you have to redownload the entire blockchain without pruning, you may want to increase Bitcoin Core's dbcache first. Assuming 16 GB RAM, change dbcache (click Settings > Options > database cache) to 4096. This should speed up the syncing process.

This makes it even more look like "opportunity makes the thief". When there's more money involved, I'd expect more accurate accounting, not less.

In May and November last year 1BTC was donated. Those were worth $9k and $16k at the time. I can imagine it's suddenly a lot more work to distribute a lot of money than it was with $30 at a time when this thing started. I can also imagine it's also a lot easier staying honest with $30 than it is when someone hands you 3 annual salaries. That doesn't mean you're a thief, but in my opinion it does mean you have to work extra hard to make sure nobody gets any reason to doubt anything you did! By not doing that, all we can do is guess and speculate, and that's entirely due to your lack of transparency.

It used to say it in the title: $1 Is A Big Thing For Them. I've seen the pictures of shopping carts with groceries. However, 2BTC can buy many hundreds if not thousands of full shopping carts. Where are those pictures?
Until the first 1BTC was donated, the pictures of this charity looked really good, and look like all the money was well spend. But this was much less than 1BTC, probably even less than a tenth of that. Which means I'd expect at least ten times more items to be donated later on.
Then:
After this, there were still pictures posted, but none of it looks like it came even close to spending 1.6BTC. But I can only guess, as no amounts are specified.
The spreadsheet is not publicly accessible:

Also good to know: when cabalism13 announced to pull funds out of escrow, 0.55387486BTC worth 18,308.30USD was moved.

This didn't age well:

At this point even the donation addresses were no longer public.

It's partially on a local board, which makes it even harder to get the full picture.

My guess: never. Why else didn't anyone keep track of all transactions?
Although I must say this sounds promising from crwth:
Then again, 1.5 years ago he wrote this already:

---

---

It wouldn't hurt to include the full 2.12264434BTC in the spreadsheet, so all numbers can be verified in the overview.

Full disclosure: I censored my own post in my archive, because I messed up quoting myself and didn't intend to share the address publicly.