The input no, the actual TX yes.

While this is true if it is known to all the nodes, a TX may not be known to all nodes. The one in question does not show on blockchain.info [1], blockr [2] nor on blockexplorer [3] which makes me think that very few nodes know about it. While the explorers are not important I also think the miningnodes do not know about it, thus it would be impossible to confirm.


Not if the client you are using "forget" it still can spend the input. Since the -rescan did not work, OPs bitcoin-core still has no idea it is actually able to spend the input of the missing TX.


But it was well propagated, wasnt it? It would not advice panicking either, but I also think that just waiting is not enough.


I have read in the past that sometimes once is not enough. As I wrote above I dont think waiting is the way to go in your case. I personally would try at least one more -rescan because it does not take that much time. If that fails the next thing I would do is to launch with -reindex. This will take more time as you are rebuilding the data in the chainstate folder, which holds the information about your unspend outputs (see [4]).


[1] https://blockchain.info/address/1A5iCBMXPJF7esUssyaaeLpTocoyW2EK6n
[2] http://btc.blockr.io/address/info/1A5iCBMXPJF7esUssyaaeLpTocoyW2EK6n
[3] https://blockexplorer.com/address/1A5iCBMXPJF7esUssyaaeLpTocoyW2EK6n
[4] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Data_directory

Its probably lost in limbo. If the client that initially broadcasted it forgot about it and the blockchain explorers did not pick it up, its very likely that only a very few clients even know about this TX.

Its just a little lower and the Watchlist is very powerfull. You can watch entire boards [1] and will find every new topic in your watch list.



[1] https://bitcointalk.org/watch_board.php

You do not -rescan from console, but you launch bitcoin core with it.

In any case shut down any running bitcoin-core first.

in Windows you hit Win + R, enter c:\program files\bitcoin\bitcoin-qt.exe -rescan and hit ok.
for Linux you open a terminal, enter bitcoin-qt -rescan and hit enter.
I assume MacOS will work similar to Linux.

No, use Watchlist like everybody (not entirely true) else so you can use "unwatch".

Danke für den Link / das Zitat. Ist ohnehin ein bisschen dämlich sowas so groß an die Glocke zu hängen. Wenn zu viele davon wissen sind die Passwörter nichts mehr Wert wenn die Hashes erstmal geknackt sind.

I only used GuiMiner with my GPU (which apparently is working for you) never with external hardware.


Glad I could help

Nennt sich hidden service. Anleitung gibts hier https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-hidden-service.html.en

Sowas wie nen DNS brauchst Du nicht.

In Germany its "Postbank" that suspends (or has been) accounts if you deposit to big exchanges. Its allways best to exchange bitcoin with cash.

CPU (central processing unit) is the thing in your machine that does all the work. The GPU (graphical processing unit) is pretty much the same but specialized on graphics and thus better for certain tasks than your CPU. E.g. for rendinger computer games, hashing or mining bitcoin.


The S1 however is special purpose hardware (called ASIC) that is very good at a single task. This one is good at hashing sha256/mining bitcoin, it can not mine any other coin that is not also using sha256. E.g. it can not mine litecoin, because litecoin uses scrypt.


Thats basically the number of tasks your machine has completed.


Yes MHash/s is the speed, but 17 MHash is something your CPU or an old/mobile GPU would get[1]. The S1 should be hashing @ ~180 000 MHash/s or 180 GHash/s. Thats why I asked whether you are sure that you are mining with the S1. Does the Guiminer actually know about the S1 and is it able to use it?


[1] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison

Are you sure thats for the s1 sounds more like CPU/GPU mining.

It does not relate to the PD campaign, but to the "PD ref link in your signature" campaigns which are run -or at least attempted to run- by others.

Nö, 100% safe is eh nix und denen ist vor ner Weile noch die Nutzerdatenbank geklaut worden[1]. Das betrifft dich als neuen Nutzer dort jetzt natürlich erstmal nicht, aber generell sollte man das immer im Hinterkopf behalten. Nutze die Seite selber nicht, aber 2fa (am besten per App/SMS, 2fa über Mail ist selten gut) ist ein muss wenn Du planst dort länger Coins zu lagern/zu handeln. Ein anständiges Password sowieso.


Richtig, es gibt die Gefahr des Hacks, des Mitarbeiters der lieber reicher krimineller ist als armer Angestellter, aber auch wenn alles gut geht ist das nicht so einfach mit den Kursgewinnen. Meistens zahlst Du eine gewisse Gebühr pro Handel, die musst Du erstmal wieder reinholen.


[1] http://pastebin.com/KaWsDgdq Zitat :

I like the idea. I said it earlier and I will say it again: you have to cut campaigners. The reason the PD signature is frowned upon by some members of the forum is because of the low quality posts of some of those having it. With the amount of people that are currently enrolled it is not possible to check them all as thoroughly as needed. Less campaigners means less work to check their post quality means less room to slip through with bad posts. At the same time those that you have to let go can work for themselves with the referal link. There are even some attempts to form groups of people that use the same referal link. I personally think the reason behind that might be the award for reaching all achievements, but they might as well be legit effords to spread referral bonuses. This might also work in a positive way elsewhere: on other forums, homepages, blogs, etc.



Stunna asked for feedback, hes going to get it. No need to complain about it. What are you afraid of anyway? Either you can stick with PD or not. Either way no big deal. There are other ways to make a little BTC on the side with your signature.
I doubt Stunna will raise payment that much for those that he deems worthy to continue. .002 would be double what a Sr. gets now per post. There is no reason to double the rate. There is only one other campaign paying (yes they didnt pay out yet, but they have enough in escrow) more currently and its full. And their payment is only a little higher.
Hand picked campaigners do not allow for "shill accounts" (I assume you are talking about alts here) because their posting behaviour would in most cases be very obvious. E.g. only posting 1 out of 4 weeks, but still beeing informed.
People complaining about spam is not the problem IMHO, people get banned for spam is a problem if they have your signature. It sheds a bad light and while they say: there is no bad publicity, that is not true here.

Nope, only theymos (or can bad bear now too?) will restore your account and only if you can prove that its yours. Mind sharing the signed message?

No its not, its .0001 per kb and you are below 1 kb.


1511 however is over 1kb and the fee should have been .0002

There is also the age of the input that you spend, but I just assume that neither of you used mature coins. It would have made the TX go through faster anyway.

No, the fee is fine.

.0001 per kb. Size is <1kb.


Thats probably due to bad propagation. If the miners do not know about your TX, they can not put it in a block.

Depending on the client it will just stop broadcasting the TX (or not) so it will be forgotten (or not) and you can make a new one (or not).

I hope this will be true. Good luck.

https://github.com/blockchain/My-Wallet/blob/master/mnemonic_words_v3.html

65591 different words, but AFAIK the mnemonic is dependent on your password. Did you use similar passwords?