|
Gaan we weeeer. Bitonic koopt atm. in op 285 euro.
|
|
|
|
We all know tradefortress is not a scammer
Noooo we don't, please stop licking his arsehole. If he was a scammer , why would he refund a large amount of it ? He could just dissappear forever. Because of this exact reason. Now people won't suspect him as a scammer, but as someone who is trying to fix stuff. It's quite clever, because there will be still a lot of Bitcoin left for him after "trying" to refund a "large" amount of it. |
|
|
|
Well, having a build in option to create such a transaction would be better for users with less knowledge about that stuff. You know how Armory does it right?
Easier than this? Tools > Create transaction > From CSV text
1rdymachKZpA9pTYHYHMYZjfjnoBW6B3k,0.01
1rdymachKZpA9pTYHYHMYZjfjnoBW6B3k,0.16
1rdymachKZpA9pTYHYHMYZjfjnoBW6B3k,1.35
Even that could be to hard for some people. Adding something like this would help (I mean the "+ recipient part", of course):
 |
|
|
|
amaze win
such bet
wow
I saw your picture and then read this. It made me laugh. +1 for you. |
|
|
|
It would be nice if there was a graphical interface for this (maybe like Armory does it).
You can use the Tools > Create transaction > From CSV to send to many addresses at once. I know and that is what I would use (or console, depends), but having a graphical interface to create a sendmany transaction would help users that have less knowledge about creating Bitcoin transactions. how would that differ from the CSV input window? Well, having a build in option to create such a transaction would be better for users with less knowledge about that stuff. You know how Armory does it right? |
|
|
|
It would be nice if there was a graphical interface for this (maybe like Armory does it).
You can use the Tools > Create transaction > From CSV to send to many addresses at once. I know and that is what I would use (or console, depends), but having a graphical interface to create a sendmany transaction would help users that have less knowledge about creating Bitcoin transactions. |
|
|
|
Is there any reason why Electrum (and Bitcoin-qt) doesn't support sendmany?
Merge pull request #187 from nelisky/sendmany merged to 1.9 branch
It would be nice if there was a graphical interface for this (maybe like Armory does it). |
|
|
|
|
Ik zie de prijs bij Bitonic inderdaad omhoog kruipen, haha. (Ja, ik weet het. Geen goede vergelijking, maar ik vind het nu eenmaal interessant om te weten hoeveel ik zou krijgen als ik het nu, zonder enige omwegen, verkoop).
|
|
|
|
Ik snap eerlijk gezegd niet waarom mensen online wallets gebruiken als je iets hebt als Electrum. Misschien niet zo fancy, maar het werkt en daarbij is het stabiel, snel en redelijk makkelijk te gebruiken. Mensen die Bitcoin aan het grote publiek beschikbaar willen maken zouden zich eens over Electrum moeten buigen en het zo gebruikersvriendelijk moeten maken als mogelijk. Enige wat er dan nog kan gebreuren is dat iemand je wallet steelt en daarvoor kun je gewoon een sterk wachtwoord eisen. Maakt niet uit of ze het dan ergens opschrijven, zolang het maar niet direct naast je computer ligt. Maar goed, ik snap je punt wel. Als je zo gaat kijken dan zou ik ook niet blij worden met al die hacks. Gelukkig (of helaas) zit ik niet zo in elkaar. Ik kijk wel wat er komt, alles wat ik heb is profit en als het weg is, tja, dan was het leuk zolang het duurde.  |
|
|
|
|
Ik krijg het gevoel dat je best negatief bent ingesteld BadAss.Sx. Natuurlijk zal de prijs dalen als er een hack gebeurd, maar ik betwijfel dat het echt erg zal zijn (kijk maar naar SilkRoad, binnen 2 dagen waren we er boven op). Ja, hacks gebeuren, net als banken die worden beroofd, mensen die worden opgelicht, portemonnees die worden gestolen en pinautomaten die opgeblazen worden.
|
|
|
|
A tray icon, yeah! Not having one annoyed the hell out of me, haha. I still don't like the design of the new menu's, but oh well, everything seems to work now and that is the most important thing.  |
|
|
|
I must admit that you guys are doing a great job! It must be stressful to launch such a big update. You did a lot better then SatoshiDICE did with their "SatoshiDICE Tribute"-update, haha.  |
|
|
|
ok... seems to be a security problem, too many restrictions on IPs I'll fix tomorrow, for now it is sufficient that open the site by adding www. www.virtualcoin.bizThat seems to work  |
|
|
|
I cleared my cache and tried again and I still see: Errore nella connessione a MySql: I am trying to reach the following address: http://virtualcoin.biz/ You could try clearing CloudFlare's cache, but I doubt that that helps. |
|
|
|
Verified for awesomeness (and only 12x12).  bad idea, you can simply write ✓ and ✔ (U +2713 and U +2714) without the need of an image ^.^ thats too easy to "fake. if ppl getting used to trust this symbol, they'll recognize "trust" when they see the symbol at other places... i mean, lol, i already seen things like "✔ verified" on location-field in userprofiles here on bitcointalk. (you're evil if you think someone would do this just to gain trust on newbies to scam them easier) imho it should be a symbol you cannot easy write with your keyboard. I already saw someone that had "Verified ✔ "" on the location field. |
|
|
|
|
Why not use the UTF-8 version? Just look under my picture, ghehe.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a correct API key, but I keep getting the error that I use an invalid account. I think I will have to disable the PB faucet, until all these problems have been fixed.
|
|
|
|
The only thing I see is this: Errore nella connessione a MySql: |
|
|
|
Final question for now: How can I increase the time an API key is valid?
I apologize for asking so much questions and being so annoying.
There is no way to increase the time. What exactly is the issue? We might find a solution for it. Really? Because, well the API states the following under " Sign in": "- key API key which can be used to authenticate user without handling cookies. Valid depending on profile configuration." and it states the following under "Create an account": "- key API key which can be used to authenticate user without handling cookies. Valid depending on profile configuration." I have noticed that my API key changes randomly (sometimes it's valid for a few hours, other times just for 5 minutes) so I have to keep requesting a new key once the scripts get an error back that my account isn't valid (meaning the key is not valid anymore). That isn't user friendly for my users, so that is why I asked if it was possible to extend the time that an API key is valid. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
