I'm not entirely sure but I guess It's a normal thing because while being logged in, there are some checking that you really need to do and that could require a database connection which will make the loading a little bit slower.
An example to give  is the trust profile, If you are logged out then you don't really see it on the trust of users, while checking a section too, you have to check If you have already seen the threads or not, If you didn't they are in bold otherwise they are normal and that check is not done while being logged out.

It's impossible to know the private keys for a watch-only address unless you imported the private keys (If that's even possible). Blockchain.info no longer allow you to export private keys for the new HD wallet addresses, there is a way but It's not really newbie friendly , you should check it out though.

Btctalk name : MadGamer
Rank : Hero Member
Current post count : 825 (this one included)
BTC Address :  3BTRdmD66cjb7tqy4G6QEKksywfvjx843P
Wear appropriate sig : Yes

People have different opinions on this one and the battle is currently between SegWit and Bitcoin Unlimited. I'm starting to have my doubts honestly and I don't think we will end enabling any of them , at least not for the meantime.

I believe that most of the Chinese pools are against SegWit because SW facilitate implementing the Lightning network and LN will basically make transactions Offchain and If that ever happens and all transaction become offchain , It will no longer be profitable for the miners , I could be wrong though.

Exodus.io looks very good, I guess you should check the roadmap to have a better idea of the future releases. It looks very promising with more coins and hardware wallets support , they have a lot of plans for the new year. I also suggest checking the thread on bitcointalk , If you are looking for something where you actually control your private keys then there is no better alternative for this wallet.

The thing with those services is that they are legit but sometimes you are simply dealing with professional scammers who targets newbies , not to mention that some accounts with high feedback and positive trust are being sold and bought on the forums In order to scam people for large amounts. It's a matter of your personal choice at this point but I'd go with LocalBitcoins because It has more userbase and exists for a longer time.

The project is being developed for 10 years now and they entered to the Alpha phase not a long time ago , I personally find it a very interesting and I think It's going to be successful , the beauty of it is that It's not only for storing your data but It could be used for encrypted chatting , having SAFE websites that are supposed to be more secure then the Tor network and much more. I have my concerns about the governments standpoint but hopefully everything goes as planned.

I never used any of them but from the look of it and posts I've seen , both Santander UK and Fidor Bank should be bitcoin and crypto friendly. It's better to contact both of them and make sure though.

It has been reported a few days ago by a member here that It's not working and If you have noticed , It's the case for AUD , CAD , GBP , CNY and many others . It's probably better to find an alternative for now.

jim618 was the developer behind Multibit but once he sold it to KeepKey things are not as used to be. I suggest opening an issue on their GitHub Repo and waiting for a response but I doubt you will get a fast one , or you could explain your situation to the community and hopefully we could help because since Multibit HD is decentralized , I don't think there is something developers could do that the community can't unless It's too technical.

It's possible to use your full node as a wallet and there is nothing to be worried about but you should take the same precautions as If you was using any other wallet and no , you don't earn anything by running a full node , you are simply helping the network and making it more secure.

They are free to claim whatever they want but as long as the project stays closed source , Its not suggested to download anything. I also think that hosting their files in Mega and using outdated data from CoinMarketCap to list the supported coins is very unprofessional.

It works fine but If you are planning to trade old coins such as LTC , DASH or others then using Poloniex would do the job. If Liqui.io gained users It's only because that they added new coins that no else did and they don't require any KYC verifications such as ICONOMI and In a couple of days ChronoBank too.

It's possible to see the current progress at Beta.bitcointalk.org but It seems like there are some issues today as reported here . Alternatively , you could take a look at The official website or the GitHub Repo but the pictures are outdated as we switched to a black theme and It's going to change overtime until we get the final release.

If the transaction involve BTCitcoin then you could use an escrow from the list where everyone have green trust and you are wrong, It's probably not as easy as PayPal to chargeback but It's definitely possible to do so. Neteller allow multiple payment methods to fund your account , If someone add funds using a credit card then charging back from the credit card is something easy to do so you should ask for the source of the money.

It has nothing to do with the wallet Itself as far as I know because all wallets calculate the fees the same way and those are network fees and unlike Multibit HD , BTC.com takes no fees for themselves and I have never experienced any slowness on confirmation times.

I cannot think of any other forum that is better then this one , what makes this one special is that It got created by Satoshi himself since a few years now and since then and the community supporting it and not to mention that the forum don't contain anything paid unlike the other forums where you need to upgrade etc... signature campaigns are not made by the forum administration but by individuals or companies and while advertising , they target the high traffic that this forum has and others don't.

TumbleBit could be a great add to bitcoin but I have my doubts about actually getting this implemented. but I wonder what would It take for the core developers to agree adding this and when and mostly what's the governments standpoint will be in that case , the more developed bitcoin gets , the more the banking system and governments gets angry and that's not really in our favor.

That's why projects based on P2P protocols are something usually hard to kill . I guess the time has finally come where China no longer control the most of the bitcoin supply , potentials investors could feel more secure now while investing and knowing that the price cannot be manipulated that easy.

A good wallet should give control over the private keys , as long as It does that then the other security measures should be taken by you such as not downloading anything you find on the internet , mostly cracked applications or anything you don't know the source of.
I will go and suggest using Electrum as a desktop wallet , It's open source and the development is very active , It works on multiple OS and should work for ever as long as there are servers running. If people ever stop running electrum servers which is unlikely , you could make your own and connect your client to it.