 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
Is there a blockchain explorer for Neocoin
|
|
|
|
|
I have been mining there all day with coins building up. No matter what I do it refuses to send a payout to my wallet. I sent an email to support with no response. I am getting a little worried. It is probably time to switch pools. Anyone else having similar issues?
|
|
|
|
|
Something seems wrong looking at block payouts I was getting nothing on 9 out of 32 solved blocks and couldnt see back since only last 50 displayed. Username Formularon some specific blocks 46,898; 46,900; 46,924; 46,934; 46936; 46954; 46961
|
|
|
|
It's real hard to resist mining DGC with this profitability level so I quit mining BTC/LTC for a while and tried again DGC. Yes, I know, I'm stupid... Same dissapointing results as before: net income is FAR, FAR AWAY from what has to be. I'm in BigVern pool and is giving me 0.16 DGC/block (0.16 DGC every 3 or 4 minutes) with my 5 MH/seg miner when it should be giving me 1 DGC or more per block (more than 20 coins per hour). A f*cking joke.  Has anyone come up with a reasonable explanation why DGC and WDC pay so far below expected levels? |
|
|
|
I hate to sound stupid but did something happen, fork maybe? Pool http://digitalcoin.scryptmining.com/ went from steady block every 1-2mins to average 6 mins per block over an hour. Seems to be approaching statistical improbability. Roughly 17% of network hash with 20sec blocks means approx 30 blocks per hour. So at 10 blocks in an hour that is really low. Additionally I am sure the 20 sec block rate is being way over driven based on high hash and difficulty not yet adjusting. Also starting to see orphans as well. Mathematically this seems really odd to me |
|
|
|
|
Interesting regardless of voltage or engine setting. I find that 805 is optimal memclock for my Sapphire 7950. If I take memclock down to 400 my watts increase by 40w which is roughly 10w per card.
|
|
|
|
|
Using all the pools listed I am getting over a 50% reject rate on all 3 of my rigs. Any ideas or is this expected on such a short block time coin?
|
|
|
|
So, candelone answered and agreed that he want to buy my 390 LKYs. I proposed him to send in packs to my btce account and as soon as i see incoming transaction i'll send equivalent portion of LKYs. He said that he won't send first and that i must use escrow, because i'm jr and he thinks that there is 2/3 are scammers. I understand this position so I entered all data in escrow and asked him to confirm that he want to buy asked quantity for proposed LTC's - and.. he disappeared. I waited 40 minutes before writing this.
So, decide for yourself to do business with him or not to do..
Now i have 0:22 at clocks and want some sleep so can't wait his messages any more.
Good luck to all.
Same situation here set up a 1.5k LKC escrow trade for 16LTC. He originally wanted me to send LKC first, when I asked for escrow he agreed but is now offline and has not completed the escrow transactions. It has been early an hour on my end. |
|
|
|
|
How long after 5 before you can post? I have over 1 day logged in plus 5 posts and still no access. Just want to post sale request.
|
|
|
|
|
Gox now LR. Why the sudden interest by authorities?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I am a little pissed I was roughly 15% of the pool hash so I lost out on roughly 500 Nibbles.
|
|
|
|
|
Word of caution I mined for about 8 hours, I discovered 2 blocks, one of which has been confirmed so obviously I should have some payout by now. Nothing, not a single Nibble has been credited to my account. It could be a glitch but please exercise caution.
|
|
|
|
|
I purchased 2 identical sapphire 7950 cards from Newegg, the 4L version. I am able to run litecoin on one at 670 k/hash at 1125/1825 when I set the other card at identical value it gets 550 k/hash. I am very confused because they should be much closer. At stock clock/memory 925/1250 both run around 500 k/hash, so with the full range of OC I get 170 k/hash one one (awesome) and 50 k/hash on the other (sucks ballz). I know it could just be luck of the draw and to be honest I run the bad one at 860/1080 900vdc so it makes 500 k/hash on about 145watts which is great from an efficiency standpoint. I did notice one thing that was unusual, the "bad" card has 1.25vdc stock and the good one is 1.168vdc. Whenever I overreach with OC these are what values the cards default back to. So while they are identical, they have different stock voltages and hash very differently.
Anyone able to shed light on this? Should I RMA the bad card, I could make the argument with Newegg that if I order 2 identical cards they should be identical in their stock voltages, etc. I dont have an issue with the card and will keep it in an efficient rig if this is just luck of the draw so to speak.
|
|
|
|
|
