I don't believe this haha, also take a look at those names and too far by craig on satoshi. Craig is not Japanese but satoshi nakamoto is a true japanese.  This is just a total hoax. Craig wants attention only because he knows he can caught attention if he will do it.

Wright is not Satoshi. It's becoming clear that he scammed the Australian tax office with a fraudulent R&D expenditure claim to gain tax credits, in a scam involving bitcoin mining claims.

Here is some other evidence debunking Wright, from what I recall about Satoshi:

1. Satoshi's posting and email patterns show he slept from Midnight-6 AM eastern standard time (USA). Not that he had to be in that time zone, but that's when he apparently slept. Very odd for an Australian on the opposite side of the world.

2. Satoshi valued anonymity VERY highly and was disciplined about it. This Wright guy teased Wired and gave them enough "evidence" to cause this story. That is TOTALLY out of character from what we know of Satoshi.

3. Wright has a flamboyant writing style with lots of "mouthing off". To the extent I've seen Satoshi's writings, he doesn't "mouth off", was concise and to-the-point in his writing and kept logic and reason ahead of emotion, unlike Wright.

4. Likewise, Wright's writing samples include many typos - clearly unlike Satoshi who was pretty impeccable about what he wrote.

You forgot the bit about how he clutched his silver metal encased USB the last few years of his life and now his brother has the key to 400M if he was one of the co-authors of the paper.

haha

It appears DK's talent in computers was mostly in the area of HDD fragmentation analysis and how hard it really is to 'erase' anything digitally.

What did Norton Erase used to do, like write 00000 over and over on a file thousands of times to make sure it couldn't be read again.

Nothing in DK's career or limited academic 'career' if his academics can even be called a 'career' show any connection to encryption and other ideas expressed in the original white paper.

DK didn't write it, the fake Satoshi aka Craig Wright didn't write it, neither had even one paper out on encryption and high level math theory.

DK analyzed HDD to try to put back together smashed drives and Wright was nothing but a guy installing canned network software that was good at updating patches.

There's nothing 'interesting' about either DK or CW as to their life.

Neither came up with anything original in their life.

Neither started a major company.

Neither authored a paper or a book worth reading.

The only interesting thing is how gullible the media is to believe Wright could have been Satoshi.

HAHA

Please send information pertaining to David Kleiman's participation in the development of Bitcoin

What if they were planning it for several years?

Louis Kleiman · Boss at SELF EMPLOYED PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER

Please send information pertaining to David Kleiman's participation in the development of Bitcoin

Like · Reply · 2 · Feb 12, 2014 12:24pm

Louis Kleiman ·

Please send information pertaining to David Kleiman's participation in the development of Bitcoin

Because LTC pools also have days with as low as 50-70% LTC profitability. You don't ever get straight 100.00000000%, ever. There's always some bad or good luck.

Most single-coin pools simply don't show such stats. But some of them do. Just an example from straight BTC pool stats: https://www.btcguild.com/index.php?page=pplns - at the very bottom of the page they show their results over several time spans which are (at the moment when I write this):


This shows that 75% day is perfectly normal even for a large pool which has 10-15% of total network hashrate.

In the long term mining straight LTC will give 98-99% LTC profitability (it won't be 100% because of orphans, etc). There will be days with 70% and days with 130%, but in the long term it will be just slightly below 100%, like 98-99%.

When you're mining at CleverMining, part of your hashrate goes to mining LTC and part of your hashrate goes to mining other coins (because not always there are other coins more profitable than LTC). That LTC part will generate ~98% in the long term just as if you were mining on a straight LTC pool. That other-coins part will generate >98% in the long term. The combined and final result is our 106% LTC profitability over the last 30 days compared to ~98% which you can expect at a straight LTC pool, so it's 8% better. And this is your reason to stay at CleverMining.

It is linked from mtgox.com

It's under Press releases and announcements:
2014-04-24(002): 破産手続開始決定書 / Bankruptcy proceedings written decision

Why not?? they knew what was going in gox because one of there accounts was there.
if you give me money that i know would get lost i keep it and say oops i lost it.

I am really looking for someone to help me make claim against the bank in poland,
but we need to get togather. I did not get reply from st4nl3y,
lets get our money somehow