So you have already broken multiple number of proper direction.I think you have already loses a big percentage of getting the chances of having apology from other DT members IMO.
I'll merit your thread (in words) since there's something to adsorb through your information, not for me, for other users. But, I'm suggesting to everyone that not to sacrifice your personality at a mirage. Need proof? This DT is well demonstrating the truth what I said earlier. Stop giving false hope to abusers. Those who buy/sell accounts in this forum are never ever going to get their negative trust into neutral trust. These things allow scammers to come into the forum in the reputation of a trusted person thus making their scam almost 99% effective. Similarly escrow scammers also unpardonable. I am not like the liberals of this forum who end up turning negative trust to neutral trust even when the person is confirmed to have bought accounts in the past and then started acting nice and cozy for 1month.  This is the mind of "some" DTs... If you'll be tagged by kind of DT, he'll never give you the apology. So, IF YOU ALSO WOULD BE DONE SOMETHING SHITTY (Like me) AND YOU'RE TAGGED BY KIND OF DT MIND, DON'T ASSIGN YOUR SOUL AT SOMEONE BY ASKING APOLOGIES, since you never get it. Under that kind of situation, you've two options... Be silent and leave away as a PONZI or show DTs (Not all of them, over 85% of DTs are legit & handsome in behavior) their own nudity, infancy and human imperfection (Not personally, ideologically) and be a different type of contributor. |
|
|
|
Conclusion: Recently I have seen two cases one is about "Ransom offer" and another one is "Account buy". In both of the case their negative feedback increased due to making false argumentative thread. Maybe some abuser can think that I am taking the the side of DT members but its really important for users to get apology by abiding proper steps to remove negative feedbacks from their account IMO. As long as you've mentioned my thread "Ransom offer", I think I also have some comment here. (Perhaps, I'll get another red trust after telling this) I don't need to change anything, I don't want to correct any one, but, through the "ransom offer" incident, I captured two DTs not deserve to work as DTs. I'll disclose information to the forum community when I'm free. Every dark cloud has a silver lining!! ! |
|
|
|
Am I just lucky or was it because I'm more careful when picking airdrops? Many are complaining about airdrops been shitcoins or worthless but my own story is plain different,even when I blindly joined airdrop in 2018 im still able to make few good money out of airdrops
1)i make 100$ plus from MTC airdrop, I was given 400tokens and I sold on bitcnia, MTC coin is a Korean project and I was shocked how it manages to keep price at 0.30plus even in bear market
2)another one is originalmy ,a Brazil based project and I did make 70$ worth of tokens and I'm able to sell off too
3)was Apollo currency airdrop, I earned 23,000 pieces and able to sell at 0.0023 which was 53$
And many more, I don't know why people are complaining about airdrops, they arent that bad as stated
Did you just sent the addresses or referred new participants as well for these airdrops? |
|
|
|
You are nothing but a speck of dust in a desert. Your existence in this forum does not change anything. You are nobody to say where I will comment and where I will not. Be a contributory member in the forum instead of being a Reputation whore and maybe one day you will also realize what is wrong and what is right.
I got nothing from your statement. I already and clearly know that "Who Am I?". I know I'm a dust, you don't need to mention it again. ---------- You proved it by yourself something I said earlier.... The truth is you're a kind of empty man in ideas. You followed the whole thread, but, your lack of creative mind found no weapon to use against me. So, you used the common statement of any weak & empty man "Go away if you can't stay".... As a man with lack of creative ideas, you used your ONLY weapon against me after my above reply message  . Yes, you served me another red trust. Thanks for it. |
|
|
|
@niotib
The amount of time you are giving at your already failed attempt to clear your reputation would have been more fruitful if you did some introspection about your own actions and how much it affects others. You could have talked to actmyname and then settled on something that would not require you to open a thread about it and then the spend sleepless nights checking the thread for every new reply. As other users are saying, and also due to the behavior of himself, actmyname is a tough DT at his decisions. I don't want to bargain anything from anyone.... Sir, remove my red trust sir... Please sir...  THAT'S NOT MY WAY... But hey, if you have that much common sense you would not be blabbering away incoherent posts here but move on in life and from this forum. In fact you could have used all this energy in creating your new forum about bitcoin where no "humor" is allowed and only serious "ontopic" posts are made with account sales and scammer being rampant. Nice place to live for scum like you, Thule and the other midgets.
This is a discussion forum, As the OP, I just asked a question. Except asking the question, I didn't try to do anything. some users answered, some users took actions and some of them did the both. I'm still discussing the subject matter because this is a discussion forum. I agree, some discussion points and messages may be irrelevant to the original post. But, that's how a forum discussion is going on... if somebody is thinking that forum discussion means to writing something at a thread for achieving the weekly post count target of the signature campaign, he's not a forum user, just promoter...... enough, I think you've an idea that how does a forum discussion is going on.... if my wastage isn't a problem for me, you've nothing to tell further more. Clear?  ----------- At the whole thread, I don't have insulted anyone personally. But, I also have to be very little bit acute at this message because you've used a set of discourteous words such as "scum", "Thule", "midget"... The truth is you're a kind of empty man in ideas. You followed the whole thread, but, your lack of creative mind found no weapon to use against me. So, you used the common statement of any weak & empty man "Go away if you can't stay".... |
|
|
|
1) Humor is subjective.
2) The value of merit is subjective.
3) Correlation is not causation, especially if the correlation has no substance.
4) The "Nobody else" argument is a twist of argumentum ad populum
1) Humor is subjective 2) The value of merit is subjective Ok, I'll explain....And, I'm taking due to the real world situation... 1) Humor is subjective. Of course I agree with you at this point. Not only the humor but also any human feeling/sense is subjective. I'll ask you one question, but, I don't want your answer because, most definitely, I know, you aren't writng the honest answer here. Did you laugh out loud at Lauda's comment? And I ask the same question form ALL OF YOU who're reading this reply message... Did you laugh out loud at Lauda's comment?actmyname, the whole forum is in your side, everybody hate me at the current situation.... So, ALL OF YOU, stop HATING at me for 10 seconds.....Right... knock to your conscience and listen to the answer.... Did you laugh out loud at Lauda's comment?1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 Ok, time's up, hate me up again........ At a certain situation what? 100 people smile, but, one person laugh loud, doesn't it hint that one person is somebody special in something? I believe bones261 is a healthy minded person, so, in the nude fact, by meriting an off sensitive message, bones261 expected to demonstrate his appreciation to Lauda due to the action he took against me. 2) The value of merit is subjective Yes, the value of merit is subjective but the right usage of the term "subjective" decides by the place and the situation you use it. This is a forum about cryptocurrencies, not about humor... (or at least this isn't the "off topic" forum). I don't think the forum administration is offering you merits for spending at humor. But, as long as "The value of merit is subjective" and you've rights to spend merits at any post you wish, you can spend merits at humor too, but, forthwith, you're reducing your merits' value by yourself because bitcointalk.org isn't a humor forum. |
|
|
|
Yes, humorous content deserves merit. For example, the movie "Airplane" is a silly farce; however it is one of the highest rated movies on Rotten Tomatoes. I give merit for a whole bunch of different reasons. You can check my recent merit history to see who else I merit. Apparently, theymos thinks I am doing an adequate job as a merit source since he is upped my monthly source merit twice since he granted it to me. Also, if I were in some sort of clandestine arrangement with Lauda, to give her merit, I'm doing a really bad job, since I'm only giving her a very small portion of all the merits that I give out.
Well, I'll show you the real reason behind your merit... If I wasn't there and Lauda wasn't there, are you still giving that merit to Lauda? (If what you're saying) the answer is NO (Ask from your conscience). The point is... If you aren't Lauda himself nor his conferrer, you wanted to demonstrate your appreciation to Lauda due to the action he took against me (The red trust). That's why you merited him. Anyway, there's another orientation as well to discuss this situation. Read this message again... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5135678.msg50762770#msg50762770 You see, I've pointed out there that, no healthy minded person wants to offer a merit at kind of hilarious and no sense reply And, you're saying in this message... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5135678.msg50768089#msg50768089I gave Lauda a merit because it made me laugh out loud when I read the trust comment that she gave you Nobody has yet merited Lauda, or at least mentioned here (until this reply message is published) they were made laugh out loud by Lauda's comment. Honestly, I just got little smile at his comment. Means, it has happened something special for you... |
|
|
|
I gave Lauda a merit because it made me laugh out loud when I read the trust comment that she gave you. That is a lot of cats to demand as "ransom." It appears that your attempt to get your red trust by offering to pay a ransom had the exact opposite effect. I was going to leave you alone, however I think I am now going to join this red paint party.
Sorry for my misunderstanding  . I was thinking that merit system have created for rewarding users who're sharing valuable contents with the community. It seems I'm wrong... merit system is possible to use for rewarding jokers as well. Is it the thing you're going to prove me after publishing 4946 posts herein this forum?Finally, worm welcomes to the red paint party and thanks for the red trust  |
|
|
|
It is not CNN, but CCN... You should also read article and try to figure out what this is really about.
My mistake, thanks for correcting. Articles with that kind of information aren't worth to read. Waste of time, you know why  |
|
|
|
Satoshi Nakamato just gave an interview and it's really interesting trust me .
He claims that he received a letter how getting he identity out would affect his personal trail and therefore he cannot just tell everyone who Satoshi is.
So, let's hijack the CNN reporter who interviewed satoshi. Unless, if this article was prepared upon a information source what? provided to CNN by somebody anonymous who're introduced himself as satoshi, I also can impersonate as satoshi. |
|
|
|
Stop whining.
Whining, Whining,  FOR WHAT? As long as I don't have any necessary at bargain anything from any one, how did you count it as a "Whining"?. YOU'RE TOTALLY MISUNDERSTOOD, not my problem. |
|
|
|
So, you don't consider childish behaviour to be a negative trait? I guess not, since you're exhibiting it yourself. Agree, I don't consider it since no value has been associated with a kind of empty consideration. But, somebody (not you) above proved me that childish behavior is a negative trait. Look at my trust page, you'll see it by yourself. |
|
|
|
I've left you the answer in your trust page.
Your answer make no sense. It clearly demonstrate the vision of DTs how? you don't have given any direct reason for your negative trust except the hilarious joke. It's no wonder why Bitcoiners are cheated by the scammers. Confuse? Ok, I'll explain... You're a guy or girl with, Name: Lauda Posts: 24686 Activity: 2198 Merit: 1882 Position: Legendary Date Registered: April 17, 2013, 09:08:39 PM Trust: 291: -0 / +30Numbers are correct and noble, but, your behavior is childish. Read comments behind other red trusts given by actmyname, shasan, DireWolfM14 and Foxpup... and learn something about logical expression mode (I'm not insulting you). Anyway, you've received a merit too for your reply by "bones261". In most causes, "he/she" may be yourself (another account) or your conferrer. Unless, no healthy minded person wants to offer a merit at kind of hilarious and no sense reply. At this point you're abusing the merit system too. At the comment, you're suggesting me that " stay silent"... For your good sins, I don't count it as a threat. |
|
|
|
You can create multiple posts on a single row and that is policy violation you should know it. You can provide as many information as you want on the same post if no one posted after you and also you can edit your post to provide more information. Thanks for the information. This is something I hadn't known before. |
|
|
|
Go to the top of the thread.. read the thread.... I'm just asked a question... have I noted anywhere that I need to remove my negative trust? It's implied. How much is the ransom for removing a red trust and to whom I should pay? If you're trying to say that this is without intent then that's fine. But it also means that I can't take anything you say seriously. If that is the case, then correspondence will subsequently cease.
It's OK, I got your answer. That means, you don't have an answer. Stop double-posting. Why are you always yelling as "stop double-posting"? I'm answering where I need to answer. It's a right I've. If my action will be a problem for the forum script, it would be blocked me. Mention your boundaries, you're only a DT, not a ruler. |
|
|
|
P.S: I expect a reply for this?
Lol. And I got your PM: After reading what you just wrote, the only question I have is what are you expecting me to respond to? I don't even understand what you're trying to say in that post. I don't know what my trust score has to do with anything, don't know what whales have to do with anything--I can't comprehend what you were trying to get across in that post. If anyone else can decipher your private code, I would be happy to give you some sort of answer. It's OK, I got your answer. That means, you don't have an answer. |
|
|
|
You're the person who red trusted me for the first time. I didn't care it too much till now. But, I've a big shame about my self now. That's because, My account was red trusted by such a babyish DT user. As long as that's the only thing you can do After I answer your questions, you resort to ad-hominem snarky remarks. Why even bother? Is this your answer to the cognitive dissonance? As long as Satoshi Nakamoto only knows who he is, how do I know? It's like you're suggesting me to "go to the moon and bring a piece of rock". That's the point. I don't want a ransom. I don't want any payment.
Don't double-post. "you resort to ad-hominem snarky remarks. Why even bother? Is this your answer to the cognitive dissonance?" - Don't think too much along the word "Babyish". That's the point. I don't want a ransom. I don't want any payment. Who tried to give you a ransom? Go to the top of the thread.. read the thread.... I'm just asked a question... have I noted anywhere that I need to remove my negative trust? Reactions of DTs were very awesome I got another two quick red trusts... But, these kind of poor reactions silently demonstrate the IQ level of DTs. Thomas, this is up to you. |
|
|
|
Here are my demands: Give me an exclusive interview with the real Satoshi Nakamoto, Craig Wright. Create a principled paper on why Bitcoin: Satoshi's Vision (the true Bitcoin!) should switch to 2GB blocks despite not needing a tenth of the maximum size. Access satoshi's bitcoin addresses and send 1 million bitcoins to the 1BitcoinEater address.
That should handle it. You're the person who red trusted me for the first time. I didn't care it too much till now. But, I've a big shame about my self now. That's because, My account was red trusted by such a babyish DT user. ----------- As long as Satoshi Nakamoto only knows who he is, how do I know? It's like you're suggesting me to "go to the moon and bring a piece of rock". |
|
|
|
I've had members PM me in the past asking this same question, and I would bet anything that it's a genuine one. They probably come from countries/cultures where bribing officials and various government workers like cops is a daily thing. It might even work with certain members here, and you just never know.
I would have tagged OP as well had I seen the thread, which I didn't. That's a silly idea anyway, OP. A scammer could do a lot of things with your account that you'd never be able to control, and it would only encourage someone to shitpost as much as they could for a campaign like Yobit, assuming that one was still running. It would be basically the same as an account sale, and those are frowned upon here.
Well answer for my question now... Your know bitcointalk.org forum allows users to sell their accounts. At the moment your trust score is 168: -0 / +20 which means, anybody who knows bitcointalk.org trust system believes you at a deal. Consider this situation...A user with highest rank and trust score sells his account to the scammer for a big price. Do I need to explain the result? And, Most definitely (Due to the behavior of Bitcoin world) scammers are already doing this kind of activities herein the forum. They may be legendary users, Hero users... Perhaps, DTs... DTs may be getting an innocent fun by negative trusting anchovies. Unfortunately, they always fail at whales. P.S: I expect a reply for this? |
|
|
|
Where is this user attempting to buy positive feedback? Unless you mean their attempt to pay for the removal of a negative.
A little mistake, post edited. I wanted to mean payment for removing negative trust. Also gave trust accordingly. How many times, have you negative trusted users with wrong understands? Shame on you man...  See your trust page there is no mistake, so no shame: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1042063You have to be shamed for 2 reasons: 1. You wanted to lend your account. 2. You wanted to give payment for removing feedback. You are older than me so you should know very well how trust works? I didn't try to make a "payment" for removing red trust. I mentioned a "ransom". As English writing person, I guess, you know the difference of both words. You told that I'm elder than you. Yes my kid, For easy understand, think on this way... Somebody hacks your computer and tell you that "give me $100 to recover files". Is it a payment or ransom? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
