Probably not, but at one point (over a year ago) I did clone the project, added checkpoints, and added network hashrate calcs to it. It worked, but not being a programmer by trade, I was a little leery to advertise it. It still exists, but I have been using the stock source up until now.

My guess would be that if you created a BTB address with Cryptsy BEFORE the fork, then any BTB you mined and sent to your Cryptsy address will be fine. If you made the address AFTER the fork, then your BTB may be lost. You would need to ask the guys at Cryptsy, because once the transactions leaves my wallet, there is not much I can do.

Do I have that about right Mullick? Not even sure there is anything you guys can do.

Give it another try on btg.pnwminer.com kilo17. SHould be working ok now. I think

Thanks for the info on Mintsy and keep us posted. I have a some miners who would like to do some Crypsty deposits once you get back on the original chain.

Hi kilo17,

   What screen is giving you the token expired message? I can potentially extend the token expiration time to make it easier to do what you need to do.

Hi All, I think I am running the oldest BTB pool at this point btb.pnwminer.com and I have been using the explorer at http://btb.cryptocoinexplorer.com/ for a long time. It looks like the fork took place right around the 18th of January.

Mullick, Is that went Minsty went live? I am just wondering if it accidentally forked when the beta site starting mining. Pure speculation, of course. I have no idea what coins it mines.

And we are finding blocks on the other chain. My pool alone has found 832 blocks in the past 4 weeks and that only accounts for about 20% of the total found blocks in the same time period. So there are a lot of people mining the pools on this chain.

It also appears from other posts in this thread, that others are using the http://btb.cryptocoinexplorer.com chain. It is mentioned multiple times in just the last few posts.

This issue has now been resolved. Thanks all!

BitJohn is quite correct. This is a Nibble chain issue of getting onto the correct chain. Cryptsy is doing a good job of expanding their infrastructure and have moved past their earlier growing pains.

Nibble is a very small volume coin and while it does have some good spikes, I can understand not putting a lot of effort into it.

That being said, BitJohn, I noticed that Mullick has altexplorer.info running on the correct chain with 13 connections. http://altexplorer.info/chains/NBL/block_crawler.php

If he can get it connected there, why not on Cryptsy also? He could actually use his own site (I know, it is still experimental ) as a connect client and sync your wallet to it, with no issues.

So it has now been over a month and no movement on this. And now Spots2 is having issue also and been offline since the 20th. I can provide help. I am fairly certain I can do it in a matter of minutes. Do you need a copy of the blockchain? More seed IP addresses? What needs to happen to get this fixed?

Or even just getting some help from additional people to keep the coins up to date?

Hi BitJohn,

     I was just wondering if there had been any movement on this. I noticed you guys added an icon to wallets that have issues and that is good, but we still need to wallet fixed. If you need it I can send you a copy of the .dat files to replace what you have downloaded. And I know where the explorer is if you need that.

Let me if I can help move this along at all, since the wallet has been offline for a month now and the ticket has been untouched for 24 days.

Oh and if you are going to just stop supporting the coin, just say so, so I can stop wasting my and your time.

Thanks,
CaptainAK

PM'ed you.

Who else has put in a ticket at Cryptsy in the past few weeks only to have the ticket ignored after the initial contact?

I noticed a wallet down Aug 23 and decided to let them have a day or two to sort it out. Nothing happened, so on Aug 30 I put in a ticket.

Immediate response was:


OK... so these 2 problems are not connected, but I will give them a chance to fix it. After all, the wallet I was asking about is fairly low volume, but I have quite a few coins in their wallet and having access to them would be nice.

Yeah.... no go on getting fixed.

So I replied to the ticket and Mullick picked it up. Excellent! No really. He knows his stuff and I know he can fix it.

It has now been sitting at "Being Processed" for "13 days 23 hrs" with no progress, I have replied to ticket every couple of days, but no answer. I have PM'ed Mullick, no answer.

Did I somehow upset someone by asking if a wallet can be fixed? Or is this just normal Standard Operating Procedure? Or did I slip through the cracks?

Anyone have similar experiences?

So since the blockchain is now at 137722, is has forked? A little earlier than the Sept 20 timeline? If it has I need to fix my pool.

Does anyone have a link to the source for the new wallet? I see the binaries, but I need source to build a new client for my pool.

I did close down, but reopened about 2 months back with upgraded servers, stratum, and pool software. I posted notices in several locations, but the mods are cutting down on what is allowed to be posts and since my posts were "Hey!  btg.pnwminer.com is back up again!", they were all deleted.

Anyway, enjoy the Furies I broke down and bought a Zeus Miner Thunder X6 (the 18-20 MH/s one) last week and it is running like a champ! But I do agree with everyone else... it sounds like a jet engine going off. I need to take a vid of it and post it.

I do not think coinchoose is actually a very good place to go for profitability anymore. I just had quick look at things and the top 7 items on the main page (I did not bother to look farther) are all wildly incorrect and have been for at least a few weeks now.

If all of the first 7 items are wrong, what are the chances that the rest are right?

I am not sure I would call them dead Both are being actively mined on my pools.

Thanks LukeMarshall. Good to be back.