Exchanges use tickers.
They use both the name of the coin and the ticker. So please enlighten me, which exchange uses "Bitcoin, BSV" to label their BSV trading pairs? ‘The name of the coin and the name of the ticker’ any exchange can up and call Bitcoin SV just ‘Bitcoin’ change the ticker to BTC. You realize these are social definitions given by humans. That’s like arguing you’re a ‘Nutildah’ and I’m a ’sirspalshalot’ rather then saying we are ‘human beings’ on the basis that Bitcointalk says so.
|
|
|
The forks Care to explain how this makes sense in the current universe in which both you and I reside? Your diagram proposes there are two universes, one in which BTC is BTC and one which BTC is BSV. I am supposing you live in the second universe (where nobody else lives). Bonus question: what exchanges list BSV as "Bitcoin" and not "Bitcoin SV"? Its clear we live in a different dimension. You stuck in third. _unwriter recently had the appropriate tweet, plain and simple https://twitter.com/_unwriter/status/1142780461690839040 , but far to advanced for you. BTC (Segwit) has defrauded consumers in leading them to believe that they have bitcoin. https://craigwright.net/blog/law-regulation/monetary-law-and-blockchains/Bitcoin is allowed to evolve. It doesn't need Craig's permission to do so. Everyone in the world except for a tiny subset of rich deluded freaks knows that bitcoin = BTC. I've said it before and I'll say it again: things will end badly for everyone heavily invested in BSV. Don't know when, but I do know how. You forgot to answer my question. Which exchanges list BSV as "Bitcoin" and not BSV? If BSV is bitcoin, why wouldn't they do this?
|
|
|
Just read the exchange name... Float SV is a great exchange, they delisted BTC and have no deposit and withdrawal fees. A great app too. You butthurt tuttbutt?
|
|
|
Yep, go to a fancy restaurant and end up with take-out, sounds like a metaphor for Bitcoin clones and faketoshi himself. Seriously, what was the plan with that, eat chargrilled octopus on a park bench? Too may people want to kill Craig because he has the power to completely flush the BTC market with those 1.1 million btc. Craig is a threat to this whole forum, and his threat continues to grow. Your action to defame Craig shows nothing more than your fear, which you cannot seem to ignore.
|
|
|
The argument was ‘according to court documents Craig committed fraud’ as was the title of the article. Now show me in these documents where he was convicted of committing fraud. Edit: Theymos wanting to destroy satoshis Bitcoin has everything to do with this topic because he is literally scared of what Craig Wright will do with those Bitcoins. This is a full on socialist dictatorship. Do you agree Satoshis Bitcoins should be destroyed? Do you believe the man who created Bitcoin should loose all his Bitcoins to someone who has no relevance other than censorship to this space? Looks like Greg Maxwell has nothing better to do then to continue to abuse his superior powers to bend the trust system on this forum.
|
|
|
Snapshots from 2014 and 2015 about a 2008 blogpost. This does not hold up, this is nothing. All your arguments about your pesant mate claiming Craig is a fraud prior to the Florida courts... also nothing. How do you explain Craig having (as proven in court) 56 million dollars worth of btc in 2013? Btw why does socialist dictator theymos (who’s got some power on this forum) now want to take away satoshis bitcoin? Red flag for the core boys.
|
|
|
All of those who were tricked by Ayre and CSW shenanigans should sell while they can.
The court in the Kleiman v. Wright case about to prove he is Satoshi "To lose he has to be Satoshi". Anyway this is the BSV Blockchain thread with large blocks, cheap transactions, growing number of apps, phenomenal tech.... There are plenty of threads about the Wright sideshow. Large blocks are real, BitCoin can scale, welcome to reality. Empty blocks, pump and dump, false claims... He can't prove any transfer of Bitcoins prior to 2013, can't name any trustee for the "blind trust" but "To lose he has to be Satoshi". You're a funny guy. Code is not law, when will you idiots understand?
|
|
|
Apparently?! That’s the problem, and I quoted this article last night, you are trusting a writer who is not a lawyer and situated in a country where he is making less than 10$ a day. These ‘journalists’ are paid to dictate the news, not report the news. They have no standard as to what the facts are but are rather paid by a higher source to relay on the standard. Why would some journalist in India be able to conclude that Craig Wright is a fraud prior to an American court of law? You cite these sources and take them at face value. Didn’t Iowa state University teach you this? Look at the beginning of your thread, you don’t understand hearsay evidence. You’ve taken a photo from 2015 from a blogpost that was created in 2008 and have taken it at face value. You literally don’t strike me as a stupid guy, but with all the misinformation on the internet (especially regarding Craig Wright) its insanely easy to side with the majority. The majority isn’t necessarily right mate, just remember what brought you boys to this space in the first place. You’re selling yourself out interpreting journalism as factual evidence. Edit: let’s take a deeper look into the author of this article: here’s his LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/priyeshu/Here’s his reference: Abhinav worked as a street food vendor aggregator at Streetingo and was responsible for getting vendors onboard our street food aggregating platform. He is a hard working fellow and needs to be given directions and goal for a task,rest assured he puts in his best.
He was a goddamn food vendor coordinator in 2017, he’s not a lawyer, he’s a goddamn peasant, and you’re stupid enough to site him. ‘Apparently’ my ass
|
|
|
No, but Craig has Submitted under oath the first 70 btc mined transactions. here’s the chance for all you Twitter law graduates to take him down for fraud.
|
|
|
The misinterpretation here blows my mind. This is Craig making a joke. I watched this live and people in the audience were LITERALLY laughing. This is complete fake news, watch the whole clip if you don’t believe me. This was blatant sarcasm. Don’t delete my post from this thread, I am making a legitimate claim that people should be aware of.
|
|
|
WARNING: I had 7 posts deleted from a nutildahs BSV Scam accusation thread. Read and interpret that thread with caution. These people will do anything to protect their BTC investment. Most of which don’t even care for BTC directly, but rather their ‘crypto’ of choice which piggybacks off the success of BTC in its trade pairing.
|
|
|
Bullshit
Dude.. I am ready to bet 1 BTC that after 1 month BSV will be under $150. Do you have balls to accept my bet ? I don’t believe 1 month is necessary enough time, a 5x increase deserves a long correction. That’s an honest bet though. I’ll give you balls for that. So you accept my bet. Great. Are you ready to use escrow for our deal? I do NOT accept your bet. I thought I was clear before. You tried to convince people that BSV will increase X5 very soon. Now it is $191 (Yesterday it was $210) I offered you a bet that after a month it will be under $150. But you refused to accept it.THIS IS A FINAL CONFIRMATION THAT YOU ARE A PAID SHILL AND A BEGGAR WHO IS TALKING BULLSHIT FOR A COUPLE OF DOLLARS PER MONTH. Based on the grounds I did not accept your bet you’ve concluded I make 2$ a month. I guess there’s no in between.
So I fail to see how Bitcoin SV itself is a scam
You fail at a lot of things. Livecoin eh?
|
|
|
Bitcoin scales, since it's inception.
BTC isn't, since it's 2017 hard fork.
K. That's great and all. What does any of that have to do with Craig Wright being a demonstrable fraud? That's what this thread is about, not the merits of different block sizes. Perhaps you should change the name of the thread because with a stable protocol, no one has power, Craig Wright says it best unfortunately for you. So I fail to see how Bitcoin SV itself is a scam when Craig Wright has the same equal access of control as you do. Here at 40:15 he says it best https://youtu.be/26LDWnM7qe4
|
|
|
Bullshit
Dude.. I am ready to bet 1 BTC that after 1 month BSV will be under $150. Do you have balls to accept my bet ? I don’t believe 1 month is necessary enough time, a 5x increase deserves a long correction. That’s an honest bet though. I’ll give you balls for that. So you accept my bet. Great. Are you ready to use escrow for our deal? I do NOT accept your bet. I thought I was clear before.
|
|
|
Bullshit
Dude.. I am ready to bet 1 BTC that after 1 month BSV will be under $150. Do you have balls to accept my bet ? I don’t believe 1 month is necessary enough time, a 5x increase deserves a long correction. That’s an honest bet though. I’ll give you balls for that.
|
|
|
Why on Earth do you think Gavin Anderson, the person Satoshi passed the project on to would not understand this? Call us all ignorant and in bad faith as you are clearly god.
Here were Gavin Andresen's last words on the issue (he's since distanced himself from it entirely), from his blog: I think there are two possibilities.
Either he was Satoshi, but really wants the world to think he isn’t, so he created an impossible-to-untangle web of truths, half-truths and lies. And ruined his reputation in the process.
If he was Satoshi, we should respect his wish to remain anonymous, and ignore him.
(except he's clearly trying his hardest to convince people he is Satoshi, so this possibility is out)The other possibility is he is a master scammer/fraudster who managed to trick some pretty smart people over a period of several years.
In which case everybody except the victims of his fraud and law enforcement working on behalf of those victims should ignore him.
So, either he was or he wasn’t. In either case, we should ignore him. I regret ever getting involved in the “who was Satoshi” game, and am going to spend my time on more fun and productive pursuits. This whole forum is ran by backwards broke ex scammers who are slowly watching their BTC fortune die.
You should probably go hang out in the Bitcoin SV forum then. Didn't you announce your departure like 3 pages ago? Adios muchacho. I’m going to continue arguing here. Going against your advice has paid off. It’s been over a year since BTC highs and there is no scaling solution that works yet. You can cheer for 20K BTC and people will need to wait days for overpriced transactions they are better off making with banks. BSV is ready to scale, the superstore Wal-Mart has been built in the middle of the dessert and we welcome anyone. You guys call Craig and Calvin scammers yet they’ve invested 300 million into mining equipment. They are paying just about anyone to build applications on BSV. They haven’t asked for money, they are giving away money and are paying people to develop on the BSV blockchain. They are trying to stay within the legal framework. These guys are taking risks and they have balls. They don’t care about you trolls. They have money and they can bring you down. What does BTC have? They have blockstream. A company that wants you to put YOUR Bitcoin on THEIR lightning network. This network still isn’t ready. This is a clear divide between capitalism (BSV) and socialism (BTC). I fight for capitalism. Anyone can compete in BSV, this is what Bitcoin is, not some second layer third party. I’ll argue this everyday if I have to. https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/05/30/1859754/0/en/Squire-Agrees-to-Purchase-Companies-With-Cloud-Computing-Assets-Totaling-2-985-Petahash-to-Become-One-of-the-World-s-Largest-Public-Crypto-Mining-Companies.html
|
|
|
|