|
|
sirsplashalot
|
|
June 15, 2019, 01:07:53 PM |
|
No, but Craig has Submitted under oath the first 70 btc mined transactions. here’s the chance for all you Twitter law graduates to take him down for fraud.
|
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
Cryptotourist
|
|
June 15, 2019, 01:24:09 PM |
|
No, but Craig has Submitted under oath the first 70 btc mined transactions. here’s the chance for all you Twitter law graduates to take him down for fraud.
What does "under oath" actually mean for a con man of Craig's caliber? Pfff, lollipop? Don't worry, he'll fuck himself sooner or later. # Thanks dude, but I got them all in my inbox (& email) already.
|
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass ... and I'm all out of bubblegum.
|
|
|
nutildah (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 8384
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
June 15, 2019, 01:43:15 PM Last edit: June 15, 2019, 02:20:52 PM by nutildah |
|
|
|
|
|
sirsplashalot
|
|
June 15, 2019, 02:25:55 PM Last edit: June 15, 2019, 02:50:04 PM by sirsplashalot |
|
Apparently?! That’s the problem, and I quoted this article last night, you are trusting a writer who is not a lawyer and situated in a country where he is making less than 10$ a day. These ‘journalists’ are paid to dictate the news, not report the news. They have no standard as to what the facts are but are rather paid by a higher source to relay on the standard. Why would some journalist in India be able to conclude that Craig Wright is a fraud prior to an American court of law? You cite these sources and take them at face value. Didn’t Iowa state University teach you this? Look at the beginning of your thread, you don’t understand hearsay evidence. You’ve taken a photo from 2015 from a blogpost that was created in 2008 and have taken it at face value. You literally don’t strike me as a stupid guy, but with all the misinformation on the internet (especially regarding Craig Wright) its insanely easy to side with the majority. The majority isn’t necessarily right mate, just remember what brought you boys to this space in the first place. You’re selling yourself out interpreting journalism as factual evidence. Edit: let’s take a deeper look into the author of this article: here’s his LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/priyeshu/Here’s his reference: Abhinav worked as a street food vendor aggregator at Streetingo and was responsible for getting vendors onboard our street food aggregating platform. He is a hard working fellow and needs to be given directions and goal for a task,rest assured he puts in his best.
He was a goddamn food vendor coordinator in 2017, he’s not a lawyer, he’s a goddamn peasant, and you’re stupid enough to site him. ‘Apparently’ my ass
|
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
|
June 15, 2019, 04:37:27 PM |
|
Apparently?! That’s the problem, and I quoted this article last night, you are trusting a writer who is not a lawyer and situated in a country where he is making less than 10$ a day. These ‘journalists’ are paid to dictate the news, not report the news. They have no standard as to what the facts are but are rather paid by a higher source to relay on the standard. Why would some journalist in India be able to conclude that Craig Wright is a fraud prior to an American court of law? You cite these sources and take them at face value. Didn’t Iowa state University teach you this? Look at the beginning of your thread, you don’t understand hearsay evidence. You’ve taken a photo from 2015 from a blogpost that was created in 2008 and have taken it at face value. You literally don’t strike me as a stupid guy, but with all the misinformation on the internet (especially regarding Craig Wright) its insanely easy to side with the majority. The majority isn’t necessarily right mate, just remember what brought you boys to this space in the first place. You’re selling yourself out interpreting journalism as factual evidence. *cough *cough *cough https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/bdxkii/the_fraud_continues_craig_wright_just_purposely/https://fr.scribd.com/document/406503654/Fake-email-from-Dave-to-Uyen
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
|
June 15, 2019, 04:47:12 PM |
|
F*CKING HUGE !! https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1139915209739579392CSW is in DEEP DEEP shit, the house of cards is gonna blow hard. Brace for impact, I'm gonna LMAO to read BSV shills reactions: "BSV is not about CSW" bla bla bla. The same shills who were writing that CSW is Satoshi therefore BSV is Bitcoin bla bla bla.
|
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
June 15, 2019, 06:36:41 PM |
|
Apparently?! That’s the problem, and I quoted this article last night, you are trusting a writer who is not a lawyer and situated in a country where he is making less than 10$ a day. These ‘journalists’ are paid to dictate the news, not report the news. They have no standard as to what the facts are but are rather paid by a higher source to relay on the standard. Why would some journalist in India be able to conclude that Craig Wright is a fraud prior to an American court of law? You cite these sources and take them at face value. Didn’t Iowa state University teach you this? Look at the beginning of your thread, you don’t understand hearsay evidence. You’ve taken a photo from 2015 from a blogpost that was created in 2008 and have taken it at face value. You literally don’t strike me as a stupid guy, but with all the misinformation on the internet (especially regarding Craig Wright) its insanely easy to side with the majority. The majority isn’t necessarily right mate, just remember what brought you boys to this space in the first place. You’re selling yourself out interpreting journalism as factual evidence. Edit: let’s take a deeper look into the author of this article: here’s his LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/priyeshu/Here’s his reference: Abhinav worked as a street food vendor aggregator at Streetingo and was responsible for getting vendors onboard our street food aggregating platform. He is a hard working fellow and needs to be given directions and goal for a task,rest assured he puts in his best.
He was a goddamn food vendor coordinator in 2017, he’s not a lawyer, he’s a goddamn peasant, and you’re stupid enough to site him. ‘Apparently’ my ass https://www.linkedin.com/in/priyeshu/ (with apologies for the skewed formatting) ... Experience Personal Projects Developer Company NamePersonal Projects Dates EmployedNov 2018 – Present Employment Duration8 mos LocationGlobal Ola (ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd) Full Stack Engineer Company NameOla (ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd) Dates EmployedJul 2017 – Nov 2018 Employment Duration1 yr 5 mos LocationBangalore I worked here in Demand Shaping team and we provide platforms to other teams to roll out offers and all communications.
Infosys Software Intern Company NameInfosys Dates EmployedJan 2017 – Jun 2017 Employment Duration6 mos LocationMysuru Area, India I did my final semester internship at Infosys and was given generic training in Python & Oracle, followed by specialization training using MVC in .NET , C#. I thoroughly enjoyed by training here. Later my group built a project using our acquired skills which scored very well and was deployment-ready.
Streetingo Co-Founder Company NameStreetingo Dates EmployedMay 2016 – Aug 2016 Employment Duration4 mos LocationAsaf Ali Road, New Delhi I co-founded Streetingo, an Android based street food aggregation with my friend Vasu Jain. We tried to make street food more accessible by aggregating and publishing information about 200+ street food vendors across Delhi. The app was downloaded by 800+ people and later discontinued becau... See more
IIIT Delhi Summer Intern Company NameIIIT Delhi Dates EmployedJun 2015 – Jul 2015 Employment Duration2 mos LocationNew Delhi Area, India Interned under Dr. P. Biyani under a segment of ongoing research project - TrafficKarma. There I worked with Django, BeautifulSoup and ElasticSearch. I also worked with team to improvise existing algorithms.
Peerfly Publisher Company NamePeerfly Dates EmployedNov 2009 – Jul 2014 Employment Duration4 yrs 9 mos LocationNew Delhi Area, India Media Buying specialist. Working on CPA model for about four years. Work includes scaling of campaigns in insurance, health, loans and education niche by primarily harnessing paid search, media buying & content marketing.
Show fewer experiences Education Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology Degree NameBachelor’s DegreeField Of StudyComputer ScienceGrade7.7 Dates attended or expected graduation2013 – 2017
Activities and Societies: I actively participate on Codechef & Qualified for ACM ICPC regionals 2015 and serve as Editor of University Magazine ( The Observer) Silver Line Prestige School Silver Line Prestige School Dates attended or expected graduation1998 – 2013
Activities and Societies: Debates & Quizzing Reads to me like Josh earns more than $10/hr. I'm guessing about $11.37/hr.
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 5318
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
June 16, 2019, 12:38:02 AM |
|
No, but Craig has Submitted under oath the first 70 btc mined transactions. here’s the chance for all you Twitter law graduates to take him down for fraud.
Craig Wright, who claims he is Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, was dealt a blow by a Florida court yesterday after they granted a motion to compel him to prove his bitcoin holdings by Monday. He has also been summoned to the federal court by the end of the month, where he will need to speak under oath.
The motion is part of a lawsuit filed against Wright by the estate of Dave Kleiman, a deceased entrepreneur, over claims Wright misappropriated billions of dollars of bitcoin (1.1 million BTC) through a complicated multi-year partnership with Kleiman earlier this decade.
To assess the claim, the Courts requested last month that Wright, an Australian computer scientist, produce records of his private bitcoin addresses as of December 2013.
The new motion to compel means that if Wright fails to comply now, he will be held in contempt of court, which could be a criminal act and punishable by a fine or jail time. It also means the Court has dismissed Wright's explanation that he cannot obtain the bitcoin address information because it is controlled by a blind trust. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/craig-wright-case-sees-motion-164133657.html
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3850
Merit: 10847
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
June 16, 2019, 04:57:45 AM |
|
Whoaza!!! Seems that the luck of that scamster, Craig Wright, is running low or out, perhaps, and if he shows up in court, as ordered, he may well NOT be able to leave, so he might not show up in court on 6/28 and thereby become a fugitive of the law, like McAfee - but even McAfee has more credibility than the CSW sack of shit liar. On the other hand, will we be so lucky as to NOT have to hear new phoney baloney from this fraudster while he is locked up, in the event that locking up occurs. His other lawsuits might dry up too, if we were so lucky to be relieved of his ongoing misrepresentations and distractions.
|
1) Self-Custody is a right. There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted." 2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized. 3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
|
|
|
nutildah (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 8384
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
June 16, 2019, 05:10:25 AM |
|
On the other hand, will we be so lucky as to NOT have to hear new phoney baloney from this fraudster while he is locked up, in the event that locking up occurs. His other lawsuits might dry up too, if we were so lucky to be relieved of his ongoing misrepresentations and distractions.
We can only hope... I don't see him coming out of this saving face. Look at the beginning of your thread, you don’t understand hearsay evidence. You’ve taken a photo from 2015 from a blogpost that was created in 2008 and have taken it at face value.
I thought I would address this as well. Not only did Wright admit that he changed the blog entry, I've tracked down both archived versions of the entry for your comparison: Original, snapshot taken June 2, 2014: https://web.archive.org/web/20140602022658/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com.au/2008_08_24_archive.htmlEdited, snapshot taken May 25, 2015: https://web.archive.org/web/20150525013625/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/2008_08_24_archive.htmlYou can see in the 5th blog post down (the one in question) he clearly added the sentence "I have a cryptocurrency paper out soon." somewhere between June 2014 and May 2015.
|
|
|
|
Baofeng
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1675
|
|
June 16, 2019, 05:11:17 AM Last edit: June 16, 2019, 06:25:52 AM by Baofeng |
|
"Apparently", here is the full and official context of the script, so no need to cite or attack the author or any other crypto related websites that reports it. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.24.0.pdf
|
RAZED | │ | ███████▄▄▄████▄▄▄▄ ████▄███████████████▄ ██▄██████▀▀████▀▀█████▄ ░▄███████████▄█▌████████▄ ▄█████████▄████▌█████████▄ ██████████▀███████▄███████▄ ██████████████▐█▄█▀████████ ▀████████████▌▐█▀██████████ ░▀███████████▌▀████████████ ██▀███████▄▄▄█████▄▄██████ █████████████████████████ █████▀█████████████████▀ ███████████████████████ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ▄███████████████████▄ ▄█████████████████████▄ ▄███████████████████████▄ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ▀███████████████████████▀ ▀█████████████████████▀ ▀███████████████████▀ ▀███████████████▀ ███████████████████ | RAZED ORIGINALS SLOTS & LIVE CASINO SPORTSBOOK | | | NO KYC | | │ | RAZE THE LIMITS ►PLAY NOW |
|
|
|
TheHas
|
|
June 16, 2019, 05:29:29 AM |
|
Why the hell are exchanges still listing Bitcoin SV.
Like, your reputation is somewhat attached to the projects you list, and you want to attach yourself to someone whose nickname is literally 'Faketoshi?'.
Seriously, this guy is the opposite of what crypto is about. Crypto is bigger than a single person, it is about decentralisation, and this guy keeps trying to make it about him so he can claim credit for Bitcoin and make cash off it. Glad he is being exposed for what he is.
|
|
|
|
RivAngE
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 169
What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger
|
|
June 16, 2019, 07:22:43 AM |
|
That was an interesting read! Thanks for putting everything together! I was sure he was a conman because he had not provided any cryptographic proof for his claim and because he is acting in such a childish way; I wouldn't be surprised if even his degree is forked.* Seems like there are many more juicy details though! It's good that we have a single thread to pinpoint people to when we need to explain them the situation. *PS: lol my guess was close enough after all! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Steven_WrightWright claimed to have a PhD in computer science from Charles Sturt University on his LinkedIn profile as of 2015; but the university told Forbes that it only awarded him two master's degrees and not a doctorate.
|
|
|
|
sirsplashalot
|
|
June 17, 2019, 02:45:17 AM |
|
Snapshots from 2014 and 2015 about a 2008 blogpost. This does not hold up, this is nothing. All your arguments about your pesant mate claiming Craig is a fraud prior to the Florida courts... also nothing. How do you explain Craig having (as proven in court) 56 million dollars worth of btc in 2013? Btw why does socialist dictator theymos (who’s got some power on this forum) now want to take away satoshis bitcoin? Red flag for the core boys.
|
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
nutildah (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3122
Merit: 8384
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
June 17, 2019, 03:12:54 AM |
|
Snapshots from 2014 and 2015 about a 2008 blogpost. This does not hold up, this is nothing. It proves Craig edited a blog entry previous to the release of the Bitcoin white paper to make it appear he had written it. This is you upon seeing evidence that Craig is a fraud: All your arguments about your pesant mate claiming Craig is a fraud prior to the Florida courts... also nothing.
So you're just going to steamroll over the other sources I listed that all imply the exact same thing in order to continue being racist. Gotcha. How do you explain Craig having (as proven in court) 56 million dollars worth of btc in 2013?
It wasn't "proven in court." It was a statement he made in a lawsuit he filed, which was subsequently dismissed. Thanks for reminding me about something, though. During this time, Craig went through a lot of trouble to forge Kleiman's signature and backdate documents to make it look like they had entered contractual agreements (that never existed): Btw why does socialist dictator theymos (who’s got some power on this forum) now want to take away satoshis bitcoin?
Red flag for the core boys.
This is off-topic nonsense. Stop changing the subject, or better yet stop commenting if it upsets you so much.
|
|
|
|
sirsplashalot
|
|
June 17, 2019, 11:13:06 AM Last edit: June 17, 2019, 11:43:06 AM by sirsplashalot |
|
The argument was ‘according to court documents Craig committed fraud’ as was the title of the article. Now show me in these documents where he was convicted of committing fraud. Edit: Theymos wanting to destroy satoshis Bitcoin has everything to do with this topic because he is literally scared of what Craig Wright will do with those Bitcoins. This is a full on socialist dictatorship. Do you agree Satoshis Bitcoins should be destroyed? Do you believe the man who created Bitcoin should loose all his Bitcoins to someone who has no relevance other than censorship to this space? Looks like Greg Maxwell has nothing better to do then to continue to abuse his superior powers to bend the trust system on this forum.
|
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
TheBeardedBaby
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2240
Merit: 3150
₿uy / $ell ..oeleo ;(
|
|
June 17, 2019, 11:45:07 AM |
|
The argument was ‘according to court documents Craig committed fraud’ as was the title of the article. Now show me in these documents where he was convicted of committing fraud. Edit: Theymos wanting to destroy satoshis Bitcoin has everything to do with this topic because he is literally scared of what Craig Wright will do with those Bitcoins. This is a full on socialist dictatorship. Do you agree Satoshis Bitcoins should be destroyed? Do you believe the man who created Bitcoin should loose all his Bitcoins to someone who has no relevance other than censorship to this space? Looks like Greg Maxwell has nothing better to do then to continue to abuse his superior powers to bend the trust system on this forum. The community wanted a simple proof to the Craig's claims that he is Satoshi? Why he didn't provide any? It's so simple and easy.. and then attempts to copyright Bitcoins' Whitepaper, without any proof again.. I can just go and copyright the Christmas just because I say I'm Santa. I can prove it by providing a picture of me in a Santa's clothes.
|
|
|
|
|