 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Dear Diary, Today, the thing is broken. I don't know if SwC Poker is up or down, or how often it goes up or down, because SwC Poker does not report out on their outages. Bored while you wait? Check out this new status page for swcpoker, managed by me: https://swcpoker.infoSuck me off.
|
|
|
|
Sorry about all of the spam from myz and kook everyone, the rest of us aren't this addled. To address your point myz, the reason I didn't post the raw data is because there's a 64k character limit on this forum, though I will post some of it now because you apparently think its necessary. Hand #7846975: No Limit Holdem - 0.05/0.10
2016-02-15 01:23:50
Table 'Sorrel' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: SlowGrowth (21.19)
Seat 2: kook (135.92)
Seat 3: IanBarns1188 (27.90)
Seat 4: exanano (10)
Seat 5: RUchamp (88.61)
IanBarns1188: posts the small blind 6274204
exanano: posts the big blind 6274176
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [4c Qd]
RUchamp raises to 0.35
SlowGrowth folds
kook folds
IanBarns1188 folds
exanano calls 0.35
*** FLOP *** [9h Ks As]
exanano checks
RUchamp bets 0.74
exanano calls 0.74
*** TURN *** [9h Ks As] [7c]
exanano bets 1.06
RUchamp calls 1.06
*** RIVER *** [9h Ks As 7c] [3h]
exanano bets 2.10
RUchamp calls 2.10
RUchamp wins pot (8.29)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: SlowGrowth (21.19)
Seat 2: kook (135.92)
Seat 4: exanano (5.75) -4.25
Seat 5: RUchamp (92.65) +4.04
Rake 0.21
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]
Hand #7853031: No Limit Holdem - 0.05/0.10
2016-02-15 05:44:31
Table 'Sorrel' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 2: kook (59.71)
Seat 3: IanBarns1188 (42.89)
Seat 6: RUchamp (44.75)
IanBarns1188: posts the small blind 6274204
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6274176
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [5c Ac]
kook raises to 0.35
IanBarns1188 folds
RUchamp calls 0.35
*** FLOP *** [Ts Tc Jh]
RUchamp checks
kook bets 0.69
RUchamp calls 0.69
*** TURN *** [Ts Tc Jh] [3h]
RUchamp checks
kook checks
*** RIVER *** [Ts Tc Jh 3h] [6c]
RUchamp bets 2.03
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (2.03)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (58.67) -1.04
Seat 6: RUchamp (45.74) +0.99
Rake 0.05
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]
Hand #7928466: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-18 05:43:13
Table 'Humongous 3' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (40.28)
Seat 3: TheWho_ (58.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (16.32)
Seat 5: ZhonRobear (85.14)
Seat 6: Mamma (252.89)
ZhonRobear: posts the small blind 6270828
Mamma: posts the big blind 6270800
BrokeNeck folds
TheWho_ raises to 0.60
RUchamp calls 0.60
ZhonRobear folds
Mamma folds
*** FLOP *** [5h 8s 7h]
TheWho_ checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [5h 8s 7h] [Ts]
TheWho_ bets 0.80
RUchamp calls 0.80
*** RIVER *** [5h 8s 7h Ts] [7c]
TheWho_ bets 2.26
RUchamp calls 2.26
RUchamp wins pot (7.24)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (40.28)
Seat 3: TheWho_ (54.44) -3.66
Seat 4: RUchamp (19.90) +3.58
Seat 5: ZhonRobear (85.04) -0.10
Rake 0.18
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]
Hand #7984503: No Limit Holdem - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-20 11:13:49
Table 'Garlic' Seat 9 is the button
Seat 2: kook (33.05)
Seat 3: laobeh (21.41)
Seat 4: Krixe (7.10)
Seat 5: RUchamp (87)
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.70)
Seat 9: ronco (50.14)
kook: posts the small blind 6273836
laobeh: posts the big blind 6273808
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [9d 2d]
Krixe calls 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.90
Orcfi folds
ronco folds
kook calls 0.90
laobeh folds
Krixe folds
*** FLOP *** [As 6c 7d]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 1.95
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.95)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (32.15) -0.90
Seat 4: Krixe (6.90) -0.20
Seat 5: RUchamp (88.05) +1.05
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.70)
Seat 9: ronco (50.14)
Rake 0.05
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]
Hand #7984703: No Limit Holdem - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-20 11:34:57
Table 'Garlic' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 2: kook (22.07)
Seat 4: Krixe (4.51)
Seat 5: RUchamp (92.07)
Seat 6: Ruckuss (22.31)
Seat 8: Orcfi (20)
Seat 9: ronco (55.90)
Ruckuss: posts the small blind 6273836
Orcfi: posts the big blind 6273808
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to kook: [3d 7h]
ronco raises to 1.10
kook folds
Krixe calls 1.10
RUchamp calls 1.10
Ruckuss folds
Orcfi folds
*** FLOP *** [9c 6c Ts]
ronco bets 3.51
Krixe folds
RUchamp raises to 7.02
ronco calls 7.02
*** TURN *** [9c 6c Ts] [Ah]
ronco checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [9c 6c Ts Ah] [7s]
ronco checks
RUchamp bets 8.55
ronco folds
RUchamp wins pot (17.11)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: kook (22.07)
Seat 4: Krixe (3.41) -1.10
Seat 5: RUchamp (101.06) +8.99
Seat 8: Orcfi (19.80) -0.20
Seat 9: ronco (47.78) -8.12
Rake 0.43
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]
Hand #8023857: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-02-22 01:59:31
Table 'Humongous' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: donkyalater (12)
Seat 2: Jdot (41.23)
Seat 4: ribeye (43.93)
Seat 5: kook (50.07)
Seat 6: RUchamp (87.81)
kook: posts the small blind 6339236
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6339208
Dealt to kook: [Qs As Ah Qd Kd]
donkyalater folds
Jdot calls 0.20
ribeye raises to 0.90
kook calls 0.90
RUchamp calls 0.90
Jdot calls 0.90
*** FLOP *** [2h 5c 2c]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 2.80
Jdot folds
ribeye calls 2.80
kook calls 2.80
*** TURN *** [2h 5c 2c] [9s]
kook checks
RUchamp checks
ribeye checks
*** RIVER *** [2h 5c 2c 9s] [3d]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 5.85
ribeye folds
kook calls 5.85
RUchamp wins pot (22.23)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: donkyalater (12)
Seat 4: ribeye (40.23) -3.70
Seat 5: kook (40.52) -9.55
Seat 6: RUchamp (100.49) +12.68
Rake 0.57
[MISSING CHIPS: .9]
Hand #8120812: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.25/0.50
2016-02-26 03:24:12
Table 'Wail' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: FishLivin (30.67)
Seat 2: w22 (134.41)
Seat 3: Grundle (56.56)
Seat 4: RUchamp (55.41)
Seat 6: btcpokerfund (14.87)
FishLivin: posts the small blind 6339508
w22: posts the big blind 6339480
Grundle calls 0.50
RUchamp calls 0.50
btcpokerfund calls 0.50
FishLivin calls 0.50
w22 bets 1.50
Grundle calls 1.50
RUchamp calls 1.50
btcpokerfund raises to 8
FishLivin folds
w22 calls 8
Grundle folds
RUchamp calls 8
*** FLOP *** [7s Td Qs]
w22 checks
RUchamp bets 23.89
btcpokerfund calls 6.87, and is all in
w22 calls 23.89
*** TURN *** [7s Td Qs] [Ah]
w22 bets 77.65
RUchamp calls 23.52, and is all in
*** RIVER *** [7s Td Qs Ah] [Jc]
RUchamp wins side pot 1 (80.70)
btcpokerfund wins pot (43.99)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: FishLivin (30.17) -0.50
Seat 2: w22 (79) -55.41
Seat 4: RUchamp (80.70) +25.29
Seat 6: btcpokerfund (43.99) +29.12
Rake 1.50
[MISSING CHIPS: .75]
Hand #8302658: Pot Limit Big O - 0.05/0.10
2016-03-04 05:33:30
Table 'Wide Gauge 1' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: Thrudaroof (10)
Seat 3: hardtime (7)
Seat 4: Goatlumps (9.25)
Seat 5: RUchamp (36.07)
Seat 6: kook (175.34)
kook: posts the small blind 6273348
Thrudaroof: posts the big blind 6273320
Dealt to kook: [Ts Kd 4c 7d Jc]
hardtime folds
Goatlumps calls 0.10
RUchamp raises to 0.45
kook calls 0.45
Thrudaroof folds
Goatlumps calls 0.45
*** FLOP *** [3c 9h 8h]
kook checks
Goatlumps checks
RUchamp bets 1.32
kook calls 1.32
Goatlumps folds
*** TURN *** [3c 9h 8h] [8c]
kook checks
RUchamp bets 3.90
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (3.90)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 3: hardtime (7)
Seat 4: Goatlumps (8.80) -0.45
Seat 5: RUchamp (38.20) +2.13
Seat 6: kook (173.57) -1.77
Rake 0.09
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]
Hand #8425322: Pot Limit Courchevel - 0.10/0.20
2016-03-09 03:48:03
Table 'Finger' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 2: newmoney (6)
Seat 4: DrowRanger (38.15)
Seat 5: RUchamp (191.44)
Seat 6: Mamma (20.72)
Mamma: posts the small blind 6274356
newmoney: posts the big blind 6274328
*** 1ST FLOP CARD *** [9d]
DrowRanger folds
RUchamp raises to 0.70
Mamma calls 0.70
newmoney folds
*** FLOP *** [9d Jd Td]
Mamma checks
RUchamp bets 1.56
Mamma folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.37)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 4: DrowRanger (38.15)
Seat 5: RUchamp (192.11) +0.67
Seat 6: Mamma (20.02) -0.70
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .2]
Hand #8591854: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.10/0.20
2016-03-16 05:15:31
Table 'Gangster' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (20)
Seat 2: PaperTrails (24.50)
Seat 3: kook (52.04)
Seat 4: RUchamp (14.40)
Seat 5: Lethal (46.30)
Seat 6: BonxBonxBonx (14.21)
BonxBonxBonx: posts the small blind 6274404
BrokeNeck: posts the big blind 6274376
Dealt to kook: [4c 6h Jh 2d 3d]
PaperTrails folds
kook calls 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.90
Lethal calls 0.90
BonxBonxBonx folds
BrokeNeck calls 0.90
kook calls 0.90
*** FLOP *** [Qh 8d 2s]
BrokeNeck checks
kook checks
RUchamp checks
Lethal checks
*** TURN *** [Qh 8d 2s] [4h]
BrokeNeck checks
kook checks
RUchamp checks
Lethal checks
*** RIVER *** [Qh 8d 2s 4h] [5c]
BrokeNeck checks
kook bets 0.20
RUchamp raises to 0.70
Lethal folds
BrokeNeck folds
kook calls 0.70
kook wins (2.44) from pot
RUchamp wins (2.44) from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (19.10) -0.90
Seat 2: PaperTrails (24.50)
Seat 3: kook (52.88) +0.84
Seat 4: RUchamp (15.24) +0.84
Seat 5: Lethal (45.40) -0.90
Rake 0.12
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]
Hand #8685846: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.02/0.04
2016-03-20 07:11:19
Table 'Rude Boy 1' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 3: BirthdaySuit (6.33)
Seat 4: Bethany (8.99)
Seat 5: RUchamp (10.93)
Seat 6: Gilthunder (5.72)
Gilthunder: posts the small blind 6274316
BirthdaySuit: posts the big blind 6274288
Bethany checks
RUchamp raises to 0.18
Gilthunder folds
BirthdaySuit folds
Bethany calls 0.18
*** FLOP *** [7d 5h 5d]
Bethany checks
RUchamp bets 0.28
Bethany folds
RUchamp wins pot (0.36)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 4: Bethany (8.81) -0.18
Seat 5: RUchamp (11.11) +0.18
[MISSING CHIPS: .06]
Hand #8788726: Pot Limit Omaha Hi-Lo 5 Card - 0.50/1
2016-03-24 21:29:58
Table 'Zoot' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: dontgetomaha (90.14)
Seat 2: knapp (90.84)
Seat 3: grimswootn (104.37)
Seat 4: RUchamp (136.23)
Seat 5: D1R1 (47.50)
Seat 6: BertBert (107.19)
grimswootn: posts the small blind 10860908
RUchamp: posts the big blind 10860880
D1R1 calls 1
BertBert calls 1
dontgetomaha folds
knapp folds
grimswootn folds
RUchamp checks
*** FLOP *** [3c Kh 5h]
RUchamp bets 3.42
D1R1 folds
BertBert calls 3.42
*** TURN *** [3c Kh 5h] [7h]
RUchamp bets 7.28
BertBert folds
RUchamp wins pot (9.11)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: dontgetomaha (90.14)
Seat 2: knapp (90.84)
Seat 3: grimswootn (103.87) -0.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (140.92) +4.69
Seat 6: BertBert (102.77) -4.42
Rake 0.23
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]
Hand #8914755: Pot Limit Omaha - 0.50/1
2016-03-30 11:44:46
Table 'Beige 1' Seat 8 is the button
Seat 4: hardtime (236.85)
Seat 6: RUchamp (129.91)
Seat 8: Kuschelbaer (100)
hardtime: posts the small blind 10862452
RUchamp: posts the big blind 10862424
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Kuschelbaer raises to 3
hardtime folds
RUchamp raises to 9.50
Kuschelbaer calls 9.50
*** FLOP *** [9h 3d Qd]
RUchamp bets 19.02
Kuschelbaer folds
RUchamp wins pot (18.53)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 6: RUchamp (138.94) +9.03
Seat 8: Kuschelbaer (90.50) -9.50
Rake 0.47
[MISSING CHIPS: .5]
Hand #8912200: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-03-30 07:33:43
Table 'Giant' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: Gusset (156.43)
Seat 3: Jdot (19)
Seat 4: RUchamp (100)
Seat 5: Mamma (419.22)
Seat 6: recursion (306.37)
recursion: posts the small blind 10862452
Gusset: posts the big blind 10862424
Jdot raises to 3.50
RUchamp calls 3.50
Mamma calls 3.50
recursion folds
Gusset calls 3.50
*** FLOP *** [4d 6c Js]
Gusset checks
Jdot checks
RUchamp bets 10.92
Mamma folds
Gusset calls 10.92
Jdot folds
*** TURN *** [4d 6c Js] [4h]
Gusset checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [4d 6c Js 4h] [2d]
Gusset checks
RUchamp bets 27.96
Gusset folds
RUchamp wins pot (34.95)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: Gusset (142.01) -14.42
Seat 3: Jdot (15.50) -3.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (120.53) +20.53
Seat 5: Mamma (415.72) -3.50
Rake 0.89
[MISSING CHIPS .5]
Hand #8931192: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-03-31 06:56:45
Table 'Giant 2' Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: BertBert (238.80)
Seat 2: sooperdooper (30)
Seat 4: RUchamp (509.44)
Seat 5: BrokeNeck (606.40)
Seat 6: donk4u2 (142.06)
donk4u2: posts the small blind 10862452
BertBert: posts the big blind 10862424
sooperdooper calls 1
RUchamp raises to 4.50
BrokeNeck folds
donk4u2 calls 4.50
BertBert calls 4.50
sooperdooper calls 4.50
*** FLOP *** [9c 5s Qd]
donk4u2 checks
BertBert checks
sooperdooper checks
RUchamp bets 17.55
donk4u2 folds
BertBert calls 17.55
sooperdooper folds
*** TURN *** [9c 5s Qd] [2s]
BertBert checks
RUchamp checks
*** RIVER *** [9c 5s Qd 2s] [Td]
BertBert checks
RUchamp checks
RUchamp wins pot (47.39)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BertBert (216.75) -22.05
Seat 4: RUchamp (534.78) +25.34
Seat 5: BrokeNeck (606.40)
Seat 6: donk4u2 (137.56) -4.50
Rake 1.21
[MISSING CHIPS: 4.5]
Hand #8955577: Pot Limit Big O - 2/4
2016-04-01 20:29:50
Table 'Colossal' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (423.84)
Seat 2: michaelproia (692.25)
Seat 3: BertBert (417.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (392)
Seat 5: AMphnx (1,021.61)
Seat 6: Gusset (360.44)
AMphnx: posts the small blind 10796188
Gusset: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck folds
michaelproia raises to 14
BertBert folds
RUchamp calls 14
AMphnx folds
Gusset calls 14
*** FLOP *** [Jc 2c 7h]
Gusset checks
michaelproia checks
RUchamp bets 34.32
Gusset calls 34.32
michaelproia folds
*** TURN *** [Jc 2c 7h] [6s]
Gusset checks
RUchamp bets 109.83
Gusset folds
RUchamp wins pot (96.18)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BrokeNeck (423.84)
Seat 3: BertBert (417.10)
Seat 4: RUchamp (439.86) +47.86
Seat 5: AMphnx (1,019.61) -2
Seat 6: Gusset (312.12) -48.32
Rake 2.46
[MISSING CHIPS: 14]
Hand #8951904: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:05:15
Table 'Giant' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,533.65)
Seat 3: veganhippie (100)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (984.57)
RUchamp: posts the small blind 10796188
veganhippie: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck raises to 3.50
RUchamp raises to 11.50
veganhippie folds
BrokeNeck calls 11.50
*** FLOP *** [Tc 5d Jd]
RUchamp bets 18.72
BrokeNeck calls 18.72
*** TURN *** [Tc 5d Jd] [9s]
RUchamp bets 43.50
BrokeNeck calls 43.50
*** RIVER *** [Tc 5d Jd 9s] [9d]
RUchamp bets 115.55
BrokeNeck calls 115.55
RUchamp wins pot (375.54)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,719.92) +186.27
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (795.30) -189.27
Rake 3
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]
Hand #8951914: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:08:55
Table 'Giant' Seat 1 is the button
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,732.81)
Seat 4: tmoney82 (484.65)
Seat 5: veganhippie (100)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (803.85)
tmoney82: posts the small blind 10796188
veganhippie: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck raises to 3.50
RUchamp raises to 12
tmoney82 calls 12
veganhippie folds
BrokeNeck calls 12
*** FLOP *** [Qs 7s 7c]
tmoney82 checks
BrokeNeck checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [Qs 7s 7c] [Td]
tmoney82 bets 36.08
BrokeNeck folds
RUchamp calls 36.08
*** RIVER *** [Qs 7s 7c Td] [5d]
tmoney82 checks
RUchamp bets 85.15
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (94.74)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: RUchamp (1,779.47) +46.66
Seat 4: tmoney82 (436.57) -48.08
Seat 5: veganhippie (99) -1
Rake 2.42
[MISSING CHIPS 12]
Hand #8952242: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 15:37:05
Table 'Giant' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 2: tmoney82 (309.44)
Seat 3: BrokeNeck (1,069.45)
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,705.78)
Seat 5: doesdo (93.50)
Seat 6: Marauders80 (96)
doesdo: posts the small blind 10796188
Marauders80: posts the big blind 10796160
tmoney82 calls 1
BrokeNeck raises to 4.50
RUchamp calls 4.50
doesdo folds
Marauders80 folds
tmoney82 calls 4.50
*** FLOP *** [Ts Qd Qs]
tmoney82 checks
BrokeNeck checks
RUchamp bets 13.65
tmoney82 folds
BrokeNeck folds
RUchamp wins pot (13.65)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 2: tmoney82 (304.94) -4.50
Seat 3: BrokeNeck (1,064.95) -4.50
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,714.93) +9.15
Seat 5: doesdo (93) -0.50
Rake 0.35
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]
Hand #8952589: Pot Limit Big O - 0.50/1
2016-04-01 16:14:08
Table 'Giant' Seat 3 is the button
Seat 1: BingoBob (300.39)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (239.89)
Seat 3: GottaGig (59.87)
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,382.19)
Seat 5: doesdo (195.50)
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (1,265.54)
RUchamp: posts the small blind 10796188
doesdo: posts the big blind 10796160
BrokeNeck folds
BingoBob folds
tmoney82 calls 1
GottaGig calls 1
RUchamp raises to 5
doesdo folds
tmoney82 calls 5
GottaGig calls 5
*** FLOP *** [2s 4c 4d]
RUchamp bets 12.48
tmoney82 calls 12.48
GottaGig folds
*** TURN *** [2s 4c 4d] [Kc]
RUchamp checks
tmoney82 checks
*** RIVER *** [2s 4c 4d Kc] [4s]
RUchamp bets 19.48
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (38.97)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: BingoBob (300.39)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (222.41) -17.48
Seat 3: GottaGig (54.87) -5
Seat 4: RUchamp (1,403.68) +21.49
Seat 6: BrokeNeck (1,265.54)
Rake 0.99
[MISSING CHIPS: 1]
Hand #9209897: Pot Limit Big O - 0.05/0.10
2016-04-15 01:06:53
Table 'Wide Gauge' Seat 4 is the button
Seat 1: kook (20.95)
Seat 4: RUchamp (24.65)
Seat 5: shipitdoit (93.91)
Seat 6: inv1nc1ble (57.44)
shipitdoit: posts the small blind 6273572
inv1nc1ble: posts the big blind 6273544
Dealt to kook: [2c Tc 9h 7s 5s]
kook calls 0.10
RUchamp raises to 0.45
shipitdoit folds
inv1nc1ble calls 0.45
kook calls 0.45
*** FLOP *** [Kc 9s Qh]
inv1nc1ble checks
kook checks
RUchamp bets 1.05
inv1nc1ble folds
kook folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.32)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: kook (20.50) -0.45
Seat 4: RUchamp (25.52) +0.87
Seat 6: inv1nc1ble (56.99) -0.45
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .05]
Hand #9305616: Pot Limit Big O - 0.10/0.20
2016-04-19 23:54:24
Table 'Humongous' Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: Jdot (69.48)
Seat 3: portice (59.25)
Seat 4: RUchamp (17.99)
Seat 5: BoutCoin (6.67)
Seat 6: Kingjack0726 (5.20)
Jdot: posts the small blind 6274676
portice: posts the big blind 6274648
RUchamp raises to 0.70
BoutCoin folds
Kingjack0726 folds
Jdot folds
portice calls 0.70
*** FLOP *** [9c 2h 8s]
portice checks
RUchamp checks
*** TURN *** [9c 2h 8s] [Tc]
portice checks
RUchamp bets 1.37
portice folds
RUchamp wins pot (1.37)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 3: portice (58.55) -0.70
Seat 4: RUchamp (18.66) +0.67
Seat 5: BoutCoin (6.67)
Seat 6: Kingjack0726 (5.20)
Rake 0.03
[MISSING CHIPS: .1]
Hand #9342221: Pot Limit Big O - 0.25/0.50
2016-04-21 21:53:31
Table 'Heavy Duty' Seat 2 is the button
Seat 1: kook (24)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (54.69)
Seat 4: sikatorr (78.33)
Seat 5: RUchamp (48)
Seat 6: SchillPuppet (141.69)
sikatorr: posts the small blind 6273372
RUchamp: posts the big blind 6273344
Dealt to kook: [Jd 9h 2d Qs Ks]
SchillPuppet folds
kook folds
tmoney82 raises to 1.75
sikatorr folds
RUchamp calls 1.75
*** FLOP *** [7h Qc 6h]
RUchamp checks
tmoney82 checks
*** TURN *** [7h Qc 6h] [7s]
RUchamp bets 2.92
tmoney82 folds
RUchamp wins pot (3.42)
*** SUMMARY ***
Seat 1: kook (24)
Seat 2: tmoney82 (52.94) -1.75
Seat 5: RUchamp (49.67) +1.67
Seat 6: SchillPuppet (141.69)
Rake 0.08
[MISSING CHIPS: .25]
Hey RUchamp, let me ask you something. Do you understand the difference between arbitrary plaintext and functional source code? |
|
|
|
I will answer all your points:
1. Regardless of their intent, money was misappropriated. Scamming without intent is a real thing! Support has STILL not officially notified any of their players that they had a bug in their software for 2.5 years.
2. They give away very little money in freerolls. The largest krillroll now rewards players who have 2500+ krill. What about the players who have earned upward of 300,000 krill? Where is their reward?
3. The logic of grinding freerolls in an insolvent room is to get as much as we can back from what they stole.
4. You are now saying that it's not worth our time to grind freerolls that only pay 1 chip over 3 places, but just two questions ago you asserted that "they give away so much money in freerolls." Do you have memory problems?
5. Our accusations have evidence. We've been reviewing hand histories together day and night for a couple weeks in discord chat. RUchamp has commissioned a script from a third party that can review a user's hand history to see exactly how much SWC misappropriated.
1. You are wrong 2. You are wrong about this too 3. You are wrong about this one 4. What? Are you even saying anything here? Are you on your meds today? 5. Yes, the absolutely do. However you are an amateur at what you do, therefore your understanding of the issue is not sufficient. I'm sure if RUchamp's "commissioned" (LMFAO) script is useful, SwC will acknowledge and use it. However you are so brutally incompetent that you can't understand that your motive has shifted to something malicious and unhelpful. You can continue on your path while the supporters of the site continue to be patient and understanding. Just stop, kook. You've threatened to kill everyone here at least once. Do you want me to post it all here? It's an ugly look into infrequent moments at SwC but I'm very, very tempted right now. It might just render you unreliable  I'm not wrong about any of my points. If you post screenshots of me, i'll be forced to post screenshots of tournament director and player liaison glitch attacking his players repeatedly based on things such as their race and religion every time he lost a hand or had his lies challenged in the trollbox. Who has more to lose? You're clearly desperate, and you know that when SWC is finally gone, you'll have no trollbox in which to live out your meaningless days. Time to get real friends, buddy! SWC is going away. You are wrong about literally all of them. With your reply you have proven my last one. You are not here to help, neither SwC nor any prospective or current players. You are here to be noticed and you want money. Kook, do NOT even come close to pushing me. I will end this thread faster than you can ask for my address and threaten to kill my mother repeatedly for hours at a time. Reputation matters. SwC seems to be working on theirs. What are you doing with yours, today? SWC is so concerned about their reputation that they asked several players who knew about the bug to not tell anyone for months! They are a dishonest company. I am here to help expose the truth about this horrible company that stole from its players and then concealed it to keep their exit scam faucet running just a bit longer. Join discord chat and ask some of the players who actually paid rake for the last 2.5 years, unlike yourself, if I've been at all helpful to them. If I started dropping names of all the oo oo bigshot players who are on my side, you'd realize that this is not just a crazy kook rant. I represent the majority. If anyone's here just to seek attention and be noticed, it's you. You have nothing to gain as you're not a real player. What you have to lose, though, is your precious trollbox in which you spend your days, running amok and abusing people for your own entertainment. Whose fault is that? It is not a dishonest company, it's just not the most efficient nor well-backed. It's still a fucking rockstar compared to the other btc sites which have been compromised by a number of interests other than BTC and anonymity. I agree with you that it's kind of hilarious how ambiguously defined this issue is, but I absolutely deny your understanding of the issue because you are simply not technically literate. RUchamp is even worse. You are showing zero restraint in making claims of a "scam" where MOST of the time, you as a player would never hear about this kind of issue. That doesn't make it right for SwC to drag ass in understanding and therefore announcing it, but you are simply misrepresenting the efforts of the site and its staff. It IS a crazy kook rant, you just think because you stopped pursuing people and trying to dox them, that you have some sort of mature perspective. If it's a shitload of money, it will be a problem and nothing you say along these lines will change what needs to be done: pay back or take a large reputation hit. I remind you that you have ventured into the realm of the hypothetical, kind of like you did when you spent months, years having incredible meltdowns at complete false alarms. I have all the attention I need, because I deserve it. I actually am furious with you as a person, because I hoped you would make it out of your struggles. I abuse people like you because you need a daddy, you need someone to remind you how life works. Be patient. You are a terrible person and unlike most users, would deserve to be stolen from if that turned out to be the case. With that said, I don't think that's what is happening here and I don't think you have any intention on helping the issue. You just want to see blood, for something you're still not sure is true. I would deserve to be stolen from? We're done here, Myz. You know you've hit the target when someone disregards the substance of your message, and replies to the open-ended comment at the end. Yes, kook, unlike all other users of the site, you would deserve it because genuinely and persistently threatening to kill people hundreds of times has its consequences. I didn't ignore substance. There simply was none. You're just a shill who doesn't even play cash games. As I stated above, you have nothing to gain by them paying, and everything to lose by them shutting their doors. Your life is that trollbox. Let justice be done, may the heavens fall. The thing about truth is that it doesn't depend on your acceptance of it to be true. What is self-evident eventually exposes itself as reality. The truth is SWC did misappropriate funds and then go through great lengths to conceal it from its player base. This won't be the first bitcoin scam to go under. ...are we done here? Let justice be done. That is the correct answer. I'm glad I still have a knack for getting in touch with your emotional weaknesses. If SwC misappropriated funds and it is not resolved, you know I am all over it. Unlike you, I have worked and managed projects before and understand the moving parts involved in addressing a customer issue. What was your last job other than getting banned from multiple poker sites? |
|
|
|
I will answer all your points:
1. Regardless of their intent, money was misappropriated. Scamming without intent is a real thing! Support has STILL not officially notified any of their players that they had a bug in their software for 2.5 years.
2. They give away very little money in freerolls. The largest krillroll now rewards players who have 2500+ krill. What about the players who have earned upward of 300,000 krill? Where is their reward?
3. The logic of grinding freerolls in an insolvent room is to get as much as we can back from what they stole.
4. You are now saying that it's not worth our time to grind freerolls that only pay 1 chip over 3 places, but just two questions ago you asserted that "they give away so much money in freerolls." Do you have memory problems?
5. Our accusations have evidence. We've been reviewing hand histories together day and night for a couple weeks in discord chat. RUchamp has commissioned a script from a third party that can review a user's hand history to see exactly how much SWC misappropriated.
1. You are wrong 2. You are wrong about this too 3. You are wrong about this one 4. What? Are you even saying anything here? Are you on your meds today? 5. Yes, the absolutely do. However you are an amateur at what you do, therefore your understanding of the issue is not sufficient. I'm sure if RUchamp's "commissioned" (LMFAO) script is useful, SwC will acknowledge and use it. However you are so brutally incompetent that you can't understand that your motive has shifted to something malicious and unhelpful. You can continue on your path while the supporters of the site continue to be patient and understanding. Just stop, kook. You've threatened to kill everyone here at least once. Do you want me to post it all here? It's an ugly look into infrequent moments at SwC but I'm very, very tempted right now. It might just render you unreliable I'm not wrong about any of my points. If you post screenshots of me, i'll be forced to post screenshots of tournament director and player liaison glitch attacking his players repeatedly based on things such as their race and religion every time he lost a hand or had his lies challenged in the trollbox. Who has more to lose? You're clearly desperate, and you know that when SWC is finally gone, you'll have no trollbox in which to live out your meaningless days. Time to get real friends, buddy! SWC is going away. You are wrong about literally all of them. With your reply you have proven my last one. You are not here to help, neither SwC nor any prospective or current players. You are here to be noticed and you want money. Kook, do NOT even come close to pushing me. I will end this thread faster than you can ask for my address and threaten to kill my mother repeatedly for hours at a time. Reputation matters. SwC seems to be working on theirs. What are you doing with yours, today? SWC is so concerned about their reputation that they asked several players who knew about the bug to not tell anyone for months! They are a dishonest company. I am here to help expose the truth about this horrible company that stole from its players and then concealed it to keep their exit scam faucet running just a bit longer. Join discord chat and ask some of the players who actually paid rake for the last 2.5 years, unlike yourself, if I've been at all helpful to them. If I started dropping names of all the oo oo bigshot players who are on my side, you'd realize that this is not just a crazy kook rant. I represent the majority. If anyone's here just to seek attention and be noticed, it's you. You have nothing to gain as you're not a real player. What you have to lose, though, is your precious trollbox in which you spend your days, running amok and abusing people for your own entertainment. Whose fault is that? It is not a dishonest company, it's just not the most efficient nor well-backed. It's still a fucking rockstar compared to the other btc sites which have been compromised by a number of interests other than BTC and anonymity. I agree with you that it's kind of hilarious how ambiguously defined this issue is, but I absolutely deny your understanding of the issue because you are simply not technically literate. RUchamp is even worse. You are showing zero restraint in making claims of a "scam" where MOST of the time, you as a player would never hear about this kind of issue. That doesn't make it right for SwC to drag ass in understanding and therefore announcing it, but you are simply misrepresenting the efforts of the site and its staff. It IS a crazy kook rant, you just think because you stopped pursuing people and trying to dox them, that you have some sort of mature perspective. If it's a shitload of money, it will be a problem and nothing you say along these lines will change what needs to be done: pay back or take a large reputation hit. I remind you that you have ventured into the realm of the hypothetical, kind of like you did when you spent months, years having incredible meltdowns at complete false alarms. I have all the attention I need, because I deserve it. I actually am furious with you as a person, because I hoped you would make it out of your struggles. I abuse people like you because you need a daddy, you need someone to remind you how life works. Be patient. You are a terrible person and unlike most users, would deserve to be stolen from if that turned out to be the case. With that said, I don't think that's what is happening here and I don't think you have any intention on helping the issue. You just want to see blood, for something you're still not sure is true. I would deserve to be stolen from? We're done here, Myz. You know you've hit the target when someone disregards the substance of your message, and replies to the open-ended comment at the end. Yes, kook, unlike all other users of the site, you would deserve it because genuinely and persistently threatening to kill people hundreds of times has its consequences. |
|
|
|
I will answer all your points:
1. Regardless of their intent, money was misappropriated. Scamming without intent is a real thing! Support has STILL not officially notified any of their players that they had a bug in their software for 2.5 years.
2. They give away very little money in freerolls. The largest krillroll now rewards players who have 2500+ krill. What about the players who have earned upward of 300,000 krill? Where is their reward?
3. The logic of grinding freerolls in an insolvent room is to get as much as we can back from what they stole.
4. You are now saying that it's not worth our time to grind freerolls that only pay 1 chip over 3 places, but just two questions ago you asserted that "they give away so much money in freerolls." Do you have memory problems?
5. Our accusations have evidence. We've been reviewing hand histories together day and night for a couple weeks in discord chat. RUchamp has commissioned a script from a third party that can review a user's hand history to see exactly how much SWC misappropriated.
1. You are wrong 2. You are wrong about this too 3. You are wrong about this one 4. What? Are you even saying anything here? Are you on your meds today? 5. Yes, the absolutely do. However you are an amateur at what you do, therefore your understanding of the issue is not sufficient. I'm sure if RUchamp's "commissioned" (LMFAO) script is useful, SwC will acknowledge and use it. However you are so brutally incompetent that you can't understand that your motive has shifted to something malicious and unhelpful. You can continue on your path while the supporters of the site continue to be patient and understanding. Just stop, kook. You've threatened to kill everyone here at least once. Do you want me to post it all here? It's an ugly look into infrequent moments at SwC but I'm very, very tempted right now. It might just render you unreliable I'm not wrong about any of my points. If you post screenshots of me, i'll be forced to post screenshots of tournament director and player liaison glitch attacking his players repeatedly based on things such as their race and religion every time he lost a hand or had his lies challenged in the trollbox. Who has more to lose? You're clearly desperate, and you know that when SWC is finally gone, you'll have no trollbox in which to live out your meaningless days. Time to get real friends, buddy! SWC is going away. You are wrong about literally all of them. With your reply you have proven my last one. You are not here to help, neither SwC nor any prospective or current players. You are here to be noticed and you want money. Kook, do NOT even come close to pushing me. I will end this thread faster than you can ask for my address and threaten to kill my mother repeatedly for hours at a time. Reputation matters. SwC seems to be working on theirs. What are you doing with yours, today? SWC is so concerned about their reputation that they asked several players who knew about the bug to not tell anyone for months! They are a dishonest company. I am here to help expose the truth about this horrible company that stole from its players and then concealed it to keep their exit scam faucet running just a bit longer. Join discord chat and ask some of the players who actually paid rake for the last 2.5 years, unlike yourself, if I've been at all helpful to them. If I started dropping names of all the oo oo bigshot players who are on my side, you'd realize that this is not just a crazy kook rant. I represent the majority. If anyone's here just to seek attention and be noticed, it's you. You have nothing to gain as you're not a real player. What you have to lose, though, is your precious trollbox in which you spend your days, running amok and abusing people for your own entertainment. Whose fault is that? It is not a dishonest company, it's just not the most efficient nor well-backed. It's still a fucking rockstar compared to the other btc sites which have been compromised by a number of interests other than BTC and anonymity. I agree with you that it's kind of hilarious how ambiguously defined this issue is, but I absolutely deny your understanding of the issue because you are simply not technically literate. RUchamp is even worse. You are showing zero restraint in making claims of a "scam" where MOST of the time, you as a player would never hear about this kind of issue. That doesn't make it right for SwC to drag ass in understanding and therefore announcing it, but you are simply misrepresenting the efforts of the site and its staff. It IS a crazy kook rant, you just think because you stopped pursuing people and trying to dox them, that you have some sort of mature perspective. If it's a shitload of money, it will be a problem and nothing you say along these lines will change what needs to be done: pay back or take a large reputation hit. I remind you that you have ventured into the realm of the hypothetical, kind of like you did when you spent months, years having incredible meltdowns at complete false alarms. I have all the attention I need, because I deserve it. I actually am furious with you as a person, because I hoped you would make it out of your struggles. I abuse people like you because you need a daddy, you need someone to remind you how life works. Be patient. You are a terrible person and unlike most users, would deserve to be stolen from if that turned out to be the case. With that said, I don't think that's what is happening here and I don't think you have any intention on helping the issue. You just want to see blood that's not your own for once. |
|
|
|
I will answer all your points:
1. Regardless of their intent, money was misappropriated. Scamming without intent is a real thing! Support has STILL not officially notified any of their players that they had a bug in their software for 2.5 years.
2. They give away very little money in freerolls. The largest krillroll now rewards players who have 2500+ krill. What about the players who have earned upward of 300,000 krill? Where is their reward?
3. The logic of grinding freerolls in an insolvent room is to get as much as we can back from what they stole.
4. You are now saying that it's not worth our time to grind freerolls that only pay 1 chip over 3 places, but just two questions ago you asserted that "they give away so much money in freerolls." Do you have memory problems?
5. Our accusations have evidence. We've been reviewing hand histories together day and night for a couple weeks in discord chat. RUchamp has commissioned a script from a third party that can review a user's hand history to see exactly how much SWC misappropriated.
1. You are wrong 2. You are wrong about this too 3. You are wrong about this one 4. What? Are you even saying anything here? Are you on your meds today? 5. Yes, the absolutely do. However you are an amateur at what you do, therefore your understanding of the issue is not sufficient. I'm sure if RUchamp's "commissioned" (LMFAO) script is useful, SwC will acknowledge and use it. However you are so brutally incompetent that you can't understand that your motive has shifted to something malicious and unhelpful. You can continue on your path while the supporters of the site continue to be patient and understanding. Just stop, kook. You've threatened to kill everyone here at least once. Do you want me to post it all here? It's an ugly look into infrequent moments at SwC but I'm very, very tempted right now. It might just render you unreliable I'm not wrong about any of my points. If you post screenshots of me, i'll be forced to post screenshots of tournament director and player liaison glitch attacking his players repeatedly based on things such as their race and religion every time he lost a hand or had his lies challenged in the trollbox. Who has more to lose? You're clearly desperate, and you know that when SWC is finally gone, you'll have no trollbox in which to live out your meaningless days. Time to get real friends, buddy! SWC is going away. You are wrong about literally all of them. With your reply you have proven my last one. You are not here to help, neither SwC nor any prospective or current players. You are here to be noticed and you want money. Kook, do NOT even come close to pushing me. I will end this thread faster than you can ask for my address and threaten to kill my mother repeatedly for hours at a time. Reputation matters. SwC seems to be working on theirs. What are you doing with yours, today? |
|
|
|
I will answer all your points:
1. Regardless of their intent, money was misappropriated. Scamming without intent is a real thing! Support has STILL not officially notified any of their players that they had a bug in their software for 2.5 years.
2. They give away very little money in freerolls. The largest krillroll now rewards players who have 2500+ krill. What about the players who have earned upward of 300,000 krill? Where is their reward?
3. The logic of grinding freerolls in an insolvent room is to get as much as we can back from what they stole.
4. You are now saying that it's not worth our time to grind freerolls that only pay 1 chip over 3 places, but just two questions ago you asserted that "they give away so much money in freerolls." Do you have memory problems?
5. Our accusations have evidence. We've been reviewing hand histories together day and night for a couple weeks in discord chat. RUchamp has commissioned a script from a third party that can review a user's hand history to see exactly how much SWC misappropriated.
1. You are probably wrong 2. You are wrong 3. You are wrong about this one too 4. What? Are you even saying anything here? Are you on your meds today? Didn't we already chat about the dangers? 5. Yes, they absolutely do. However you are an amateur at what you do, therefore your understanding of the issue is not sufficient. I'm sure if RUchamp's "commissioned" (LMFAO) script is useful, SwC will acknowledge and use it. However you, kook, are so brutally incompetent and you can't understand that your motive has shifted to something malicious and unhelpful. It's just like the good old days where you would consistently accuse the site of things that were absolutely baseless and often involve very very violent implications by you. You can continue on your path while the supporters of the site continue to be patient and understanding. Regardless, we are all smart enough to understand SwC's announcement that they will be announcing the findings as soon as possible. If there is a scam involved, it will come out. Just stop, kook. You've threatened to kill everyone here at least once. Do you want me to post it all here? It's an ugly look into infrequent moments at SwC but I'm very, very tempted right now. It might just render you unreliable |
|
|
|
RUchamp, who used to degen at midstakes Big O and Pineapple while harassing people when he was losing, now he grinds freerolls for a living on a « criminal » room who gives away free money… RUchamp, who posts about how insolvent is swcpoker but expects to win free money from an insolvent room by registering a freeroll no later than today… (see below)  I am just astonished by the dishonesty of certain posters in this thread. I cannot believe my eyes of what I read. So yes, there are some technical disfunctions at swcpoker and people are right to complain about it. But you have to admit that we are very lucky to play on a room who provides a ridiculy low rake, a huge amount of poker variants, and daily freerolls to attract newcomers. Let this small team work properly, thanks. See? This man knows how shit works. You degens think you're professionals for paying someone $5 to write a script, but really you're just bullying a team of people who run the coolest, least invasive, most user-tolerant btc poker site and ran into an issue with addressing a bug correctly. Based on the posts I've seen, it seems people are looking for blood because bitcoin is over $4000 and they regret not managing their BR. This is a glimmer of hope for them. If there is a persistent bug, I would imagine you probably have money coming, or you don't because you weren't affected! Get the fuck over it and wait for the announcements. Many poker sites would just nope the fuck out and you'd see your money in like 365 days, or you would never hear about it at all! SwC does not have issues with being dishonest with players, they clearly have some minor issues to address with software and I look forward to what their big-picture solution will be - given it's not all cosmetic. Yes, I understand it is concerning especially to people who haven't been around for a while, but jesus christ learn to recognize the difference between the poker sites you play on. Stop treating it like McDonalds vs BK, it's more like McDonalds vs that Jewish deli on the corner with a huge line, no bathrooms, but the best food on the planet. Support what you believe in. If you don't believe in it, leave the site. As for people like kook and ruchamp, they quit the site every few months and go on these rants in chat that are extremely aggressive nonsense. They are meaningless people all around, but they do pay rake and have reason to be concerned. I cannot stress enough that I am the kind of person that would be all over this shit. Some of you know me well. However it's pretty clear it will be taken care of in any way possible, and I do not want to see the site get a bad rep because of a few players, specifically the ones in this thread, who have a long history of trying to smear shit all over the site on total false alarms or non-issues, constantly get banned and come back apologizing, and are living proof that the site is trustworthy. They are also living proof that antidepressants are dangerous and unreliable. So... I do not support silencing opinions and complaints, but all this high-and-mighty "we are users and we have grievances" BS is just a group of a few degens who need money. NONE of them have jobs nor qualifications to understand what it means to manage and audit software. As someone who actually likes to help the communities he is a part of, I would like to thank SwC for coming back and acknowledging that there may be an issue and giving some general idea of how frequent and situational it may be. The timing is kind of shitty, but I can understand why there's caution in prematurely confirming a problem that seems to be pretty slippery and infrequent. I look forward to hearing what happens with this issue however I encourage any onlookers to practice due diligence, research the usernames making these aggressive claims, and see what you find. |
|
|
|
|
I too can vouch that I've been crushing all these fools on every 2 & 3 chip tourneys on the regular. Doesn't matter if BTC is $4000, 2 chip tourneys on swc are like Christmas without all the spiritual implications. Also I heard Hillary's emails play there. Good night.
I love you.
|
|
|
|
|
Please excuse Mr Cuzamano. He is an alcoholic and often gambles all his money on a single table. He thinks Newtown didn't happen and can't stop talking about it in chat.
Also you are wrong. I am not nobody. I am OG. Reread my message and try to properly respond to it without gargling mt dew sailor jerry. Technical issues suck. Be fucking patient. You grew up in a pseudo capitalist society for way too long hillbilly
|
|
|
|
|
I was editing my post. Sorry. You should check it out. It may trigger you even more than the first read
"Assiusplay, I have a teaching degree in secondary math" - Do you look back on saying this to a man named assiusplay and feel validated? Lol. Anyway, do you think that's relevant in addressing the financial implications of this issue and making payouts in a fair, exhaustive way? To me it sounds like the issue was addressed privately in past, and they made adjustments based on the idea of it being a one-off or recently emerging issue. It makes sense to be concerned that it may have gone on for longer. I am interested in the subject. I just don't like smearing shit everywhere for a site that doesn't have the corporate backing that the heavily censored, monetized with interests other than poker, and bureaucratized ones do.
"It's not okay for us to be cheated by a software bug"
I challenge you to live in a world where you imagine everything you say to be written on your tombstone. Youll find a huge jump in quality and maturity of your opinions.
In other news:
You're not on a high horse, you're riding a giraffe marlais. Get off of the giraffe.
|
|
|
|
Cool so it sounds like based on the announcement, they're gathering info on the issue and trying to reach the most effective solution. What makes you think there is wrongdoing involved in fixing the issue. Do you know how a company works? Have you ever managed a system? Be glad it sounds like they plan on launching a strong effort to locate the most high impact instances of the issue and be glad it seems repayment is part of that plan. I know dumb americunts get used to companies shitting out money indiscriminately based on possible technical errors, but don't forget these are very important to finances of a company in a space dealing with a highly volatile currency. It's industry standard to use great caution in confirming problems prematurely, especially when they are not frequent. If you think BTC price doesn't play a part in the timeline of addressing this issue, you are an idiot and should do some research on risk management before you move your money somewhere. Anyway, it sounds like the plan is to make sure players are compensated right away for Bitcoin Cash, which can be calculated very easily and paid out using a rudimentary and secure system. There are no ambiguities and it's great that they're doing it. That can be done with a clear timeline and should be a priority as a gesture of good will while research continues. I am glad there isn't some sort of wacky attempt at explaining the issue before they can fully understand it. Make your own judgements on whether or not the site is trustworthy. It's not your normal poker site and they are swinging for the fences with the variety of games they offer. It's also not the same kind of highly censored site (which goes against the idea of BTC) relying on advertisement money to pay for expensive systems. Understand what kind of community you are supporting and your expectations, as well as criticisms, will evolve accordingly. Marlais, this is why women shouldn't be in tech. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0h2FyvQ4T0Q |
|
|
|
Has anyone here received any form of higher education? That has to be the cringiest thing I've ever read, marlais ^ Just read it yourself. Think about some of your points. You walk back on your more inflammatory statements multiple times, and somehow you come to conclusion that site is not safe to keep funds on, without even a hint of technical evidence to back it up. I've never had a problem with my funds being lost on this site, and I trust that any actual issue of scale will come to surface on its own. Sigh I literally cant. I'm so anxious and threatened right now. Anyway I came here to say all this bullshit is just the result of people thinking they might have money floating around out there when BTC is at an all time high. I don't actually know what is going on, but as a player I'm willing to reject any form of compensation the site tries to provide me. Sorry the peasants feel the need to wield their pitchforks until BTC drops again, but I'm happy to run a car right through it    I've been perfectly happy with the level of rake, even if miscalculated once in a while. Nobody here has yet to talk numbers, provide any analysis; it's just a few cunty long time players of the site trying to find something to do other than drink Smirnoff through a straw. Shut the fuck up |
|
|
|
I have looked into the issue myself and have found absolutely no wrongdoing, though I've found the administration to be veering from the normal protocols in a concerning fashion. This is simply not a crime.
This is not to say that other poker sites will not face disciplinary action under the same exact circumstances. With that said, I guarantee there is no bias nor special treatment going on here. This has nothing to do with SwC being a favorite site for many of the investigators involved. I were to speculate on the scale of the activity, which I don't like to, I would argue that I have given out enough chips to enough degens to entirely neutralise the problem. rate me/ BTC/ 
|
|
|
|
|
