Well, I have to say that in general my experience with the site has been satisfactory. I requested a withdrawal, it took about 20 minutes to process, and I've already received it. I've been lucky, I've withdrawn my profits and I've still left money to keep betting.



As for areas for improvement, I would suggest that the casino fix the image issue once and for all, because as you can see in this email, the image does not appear either. I receive emails from several other casinos and this does not happen. This industry is very competitive and small details like this can make a difference.

I should also mention that when I made a deposit, I did not receive an email about it. I think this should be automated and an email should be sent every time you make a deposit, just like when you make a withdrawal.

I believe that paying attention to details like these and making improvements can be beneficial when it comes to attracting more customers.

I saw the CEO of Coinbase being interviewed about this yesterday, and as you say, it's good publicity. He said that the good thing about having bitcoins on Coinbase is that if you lose your keys, you can recover them, as in this case. If you lose your seeds, you can't. He ended by saying that he is in favour of self-custody, but that for many people it makes sense to store their bitcoins on sites like Coinbase.

I know he's not very popular around here, but I don't think what he says is unreasonable. For high net worth individuals, keeping bitcoins on Coinbase (or having bitcoin spot ETFs or bitcoin treasury companies) can be a complement to self-custodying bitcoin, in order to diversify risk.

I agree. It's true that bitcoin was not created with the idea that governments and large companies would hoard it. But given how things have turned out, I think it's a positive development. It hasn't been banned, favourable regulations are being implemented, and the entry of these major players is putting upward pressure on prices. I don't see it as such a negative thing.

It's good if you already own some bitcoin. If you don't have a single satoshi and are just getting interested in the subject now, 5% may seem like a small amount, but I believe that the real scarcity will be seen in two or three cycles, which means you still have time to buy relatively cheaply if you start now. By 2036, the block reward will fall below one bitcoin. At that point, I believe bitcoin will be widely perceived as extremely scarce.

That statement is misleading, and what you are saying about it is false. It's misleading because it doesn't take into account the money you have to put in from your own pocket to win the jackpot. And what you say is false because the statement refers to a series, not an individual event. If you play a series of 1,000 spins, you have a much better chance than if you play a single spin.


He confuses the probability of a single spin with the fact that when you play slots, you don't play just one spin, so you have to take the series into account.

In addition, El Salvador is buying 1 bitcoin per day, which amounts to 365 per year. That's nothing. It would take 500 years to catch up with the US at this rate. If it could increase its acquisition through mining operations, it would be something else, but if the US starts buying in earnest, no one will be able to catch up.


Not from victims, from criminals. A criminal may have robbed a bank, stolen jewellery, or trafficked drugs and converted the money obtained into Bitcoin. Those seized Bitcoins are the ones held by the USA.

Exactly. I don't know what people are thinking when they take such a small sample and start drawing conclusions. Another thing is that it is normal for Bitcoin's volatility to decrease, as it has been doing as the price and market cap rise. Today it is less volatile than in 2010. But I think it will be many years before the volatility in large samples even resembles that of the Nasdaq.

No, I wouldn't do it because I've been financially stable for a long time and I don't aspire to have billions either. So risking my life at 1/7 odds for the chance to win millions or even billions isn't worth it to me. I understand that someone in a more extreme situation might consider it, though.

The thing is, the OP is mixing two things here. I don't know if it's deliberate or what, but what he's saying is incorrect.


A roulette wheel does not need more odds because even AI cannot predict the results, so the analogy does not apply here. ç


I think you're trying to deceive people. Just as users can use AI, so can casinos, and guess who has more money to pay for better AI? By calling yourself NewCryptocasinos, I think you're giving people false hope.

That's right. Even considering that in the future some altcoins will coexist with Bitcoin, it is becoming increasingly clear that they are rubbish in comparison. I remember when I registered on the forum, there was a lot of talk about the supposed flippening, which never happened, and thank goodness, because Ethereum is rubbish that only succeeds because it serves as the basis for a lot of other rubbish, as the OP says. Eth will surely survive and remain important for years to come, just like stablecoins, which have a use and are being promoted by the US government but are nothing more than digital fiat, and we already know that fiat is rubbish too.

I'm still accumulating sats and I don't care about all that rubbish.

I'm amazed at how people in this thread talk about gambling in general as a form of mental exercise without distinguishing between different types. If you play poker with knowledge or sports betting, but studying, and not just guessing, it's a form of mental exercise, but in other games it's not.


The disciplines I have mentioned are indeed a kind of mental exercise, as chess can be. And going for a walk or to the gym is not incompatible with being a successful sports bettor, just as it is for a great chess player. It is recommended and what they usually do. Mens sana in corpore sano.

I would say it is quite likely because beating the previous all-time high from this level is something Bitcoin can do in a couple of days without it being anything extraordinary. However, as the end of the month approaches and that does not happen, it becomes less likely. I feel the same way about the prediction for the rest of the year. I expect a big rise, but we have reached a point where almost three quarters of the year have passed and it has not happened.

There isn't. Bitcoin is fairer because it doesn't depend on a central body that cheats you by devaluing it. But it isn't egalitarian in the modern political sense. What is somewhat equal is the opportunity you have to buy it, but in your view that those who bought early had an advantage, you forget all those who could have bought and didn't, or bought and sold at a loss, or sold after making a 5x return.

The issue is much more complex than you make it out to be. If I were you, I would buy sats just in case, instead of preparing to complain about how unfair it is that Bitcoin is so expensive, because it is going to be much more expensive in the future.

It's lucky you withdrew in time. If you had tried to withdraw now, with the price much higher than last year, and found that the funds couldn't be moved from the site, it would have been a real pain. Did you withdraw that amount because you could see that things were going badly? The 30,000 sats are nothing if that's the price to pay to finally confirm that FBI has gone bust.

No es tanta sensación. Cuando un activo sube de precio y capitalización de mercado la volatilidad se amortigua. Hay debate sobre si hemos llegado a un ciclo donde se nota esa reducción de volatilidad. Por lo que pasa en los últimos meses parece que sí, pero no sabes si dentro de nada el precio se va a poner a subir como si no hubiera un mañana.

Yes, to begin with, the OP seems unaware that this is the general norm, not a hypothetical scenario. But I see the advantage of Bitcoin as being that it is very difficult to confiscate and easily transportable, meaning that at some point, the smartest countries will start to lower capital gains tax on the purchase and sale of Bitcoin, or even eliminate it altogether. In real estate, if your taxes go up and you want to leave the country, you will first have to sell your properties, which will have to be at a lower price if you are in a hurry and because the buyer will also be willing to pay less money due to the taxes. Even if you do not pay your taxes or have a problem, your property can easily be confiscated. You do not have that problem with bitcoin, which is why many crypto millionaires have moved to Dubai or similar jurisdictions where there is no capital gains tax. At some point, states will have to recognise this difference and lower capital gains tax rates on Bitcoin, even if they maintain or increase them on real estate and other assets.

Surely part of the rapid growth was previously hidden in people who bet underground and did not appear in the statistics, although I do not believe that most of the growth was due to this. As has been said, bans have been lifted, and this, combined with massive advertising and easy access via mobile phones, explains the rapid growth. I would bet that in countries where sports betting has been regulated for some time and gambling ads are banned or heavily restricted there has not been such rapid growth.

Although it is still early days, it would be a shame if Atlético Madrid did not put up a fight, because in the last 20 years the leagues have been shared between Real Madrid and Barcelona, with the exception of two that were won by Atlético Madrid. It seems that Atlético is the only team that can stand up to these two. If Atlético does not stand out this year, there will be someone else in third place who at some point may seem capable of challenging them, but it is normal for the league to be contested by the usual two teams.

El precio cayó tan poco que dudo que tenga nada que ver con lo que hizo la FED. Caer a 115 y al cabo de pocas horas ponerse en 118 entra dentro de la volatilidad normal del bitcoin. Nada extraordinario ni nada que podamos decir que está causado por la FED. Además, yo no se lo que esperan los que escriben esos artículos. Aquí lo importante va a ser el incremento de liquidez paulatino que va a haber en los próximos meses si las dos rebajas más que se esperan se cumplen.

The thing is, if a site organises these competitions, it's because it makes a profit, usually through commissions. No matter how much the OP tries to covertly convince us how cool they are, and I don't think his nickname is a coincidence, they are usually ruinous for the average trader. They are somewhat similar to wagering competitions in casinos. If the required trading level is close to your usual level, it makes sense to try, but putting a lot of effort into it means the odds are against you.