Good question!

It's not decided yet.

Financial situation changes fast.
We are about to start 2-3-5 restaurants soon anyway.

Hi!

We know about couple of big competitors and they are working with big networks like Applebees and so on.
They do not offer terminals to small business, they do not offer it for free. )))

Thank you!
Fixed.

Hello! Thank you for question!

There are at least two points:
a. Using cryptocurrency give a discount and money savings to customer.
b. If customer agree to get a discount then he will immediately and easy get his own Crypto wallet. All crypto <-> fiat conversions will be done automatically.

It is really interesting.
Could you give me please a couple of advice about your project?

Is there anybody there who want to discuss bounty role ?

It looks like if your ICO have huge bounty campaign then it could be threatened like a scam....?

Why?

Because real project do not need bounty.
Because real project do have enough attention.
Because real project do its best (I hope).


Once upon a time, a half year ago it was too required. No one knew what is ICO it is. Now all the experienced know about the ICOs.

The question is: do they need a horde of bounty instead of just clear and strait WP - Business program - SMTH else.

Another reason to not list soon after ICO.

Sad but true. ((

He-he. It's not real investors. They are someone who wants easy money just like ICO initiators. ))
But OK. They are new generation of investors. More risky but acting faster and easier and get income faster.
So what is the proportion between classic investors and new-generation? Is there real ones who ready to wait for real project grow?
Or there are just new investors who want to fund-and-exit ASAP...



That is exactly I'm talking about!
But it could not last forever I hope.


So the question is: what should do the project which is really going to do something real?  List coins? Do not list?

Yes sure, it allows to get profit back very fast but:
1. It's just a speculative profit and not the profit the company intended to (in case of real project, not fake).
2. This is too risky.
3. If company got enough funds to raise the project it needs no more investors. In case of good growing project investors who fund this project already are not interested in new participants because they do not want to split further profits with others.

Again: if company works good token price raise accordingly. If company did not work yet and just finished ICO no one knows real price so it's accidental at the beginning.

И надо отметить, что Россия по технологичности этих вещей (selfservice и подобное) выше чем Америка.
Просто позже начала, а в Америке до недавнего времени очень неохотно меняли старое, но работающее на новое.
Но сейчас картина сильно меняется и мы хотим быть в авангарде этого процесса.

Hello!

We know that a lot of tokens drop price when listed in exchanges just after ICO. I do not understand why companies list tokens immediately.

Suppose some company goes to ICO and DO NOT have plans to list the token at any exchange immediately after ICO.
What are conclusions from this?
1. The company have good project and really looks for investment to develop the project. It needs money to grow and make good business.
2. If cap have not been reached then Company could store tokens to sell later because it have good intentions (see p.1). Definitely some investors will want to buy after see the company is on good way.
3. The company goes to take all the money and disappear so it does not care about promises. But having this intention does not prevent company from making promises to list token.
3. What else?


Suppose some company goes to ICO and DO have plans to list the token at any exchange immediately after ICO.
What are conclusions from this?
1. The company have good intentions, but want to drop the price to buy its tokens back for much smaller amount? If it has money after ICO to grow the project then why it should go to exchange?
2. The company have good intentions, but want to raise price to sell some tokens for extra amount.
3. The company have bad  intentions, want to drop the price to buy its tokens back for much smaller amount, ideally buy all the tokens back and remain "clear" - no tokens, no liability - profit.
4. The company have good intentions but poor management? If company have good project isn't it better to start it and show some growth and list token later when it will have good support according to project results and not because of ICOs promises.
5. Something else?

What do you think?

Пиар - не пиар, а несколько десятков лишних заходов не помешают. ))

Процентов чего?

Actually very good idea!
It could be like CV for children which is started as child born.

Sure! Researches are very expensive, right!

One more:
Guys, "Panacea" is too promising word. Don't you think so?
It could turn off potential investors...

Thank you!
I guess it will be interesting! )))

It's definitely great project!
Blockchain itself is useless for it right?
You need just funds to continue your growth right?

Hi!
I'm the one of a team of this project.
You could contact me.
gmail com emityaev

...instead to get a job. Any kind of job.