Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
need ATH the end of this year when the beta platform will be on ligne and people test it but we need some marketing and new listening like binance to be sure that utk will be disponible for majority and have a good volume . Don't claim for Binance till 0,7 at least. At that point, Binance listing would multiply x3 to 2$ Dreams, dreams... :-)
|
|
|
THAT'S FALSE - Bitcoin has NOT been banned in Spain
The government has not banned bitcoin nor any other crypto. I'm from Spain.
|
|
|
Is this is the bottom-line guys? The current price of UTK for now is $.08 which is really a bargain for every one... UTRUST team seems so active but i'm just wondering for the opposite direction of the price.. Market is really dumping a lot of altcoins. Anyway $.08 is a still a good price for this token. All ICO/presale investors are still in profit. i am sure all ico and presale investors sold their utk when it was 1.2 dollars will not surprise if devs sold it to.They can not sell. The whole team and company tokens are locked for 5 years. So, please, get informed before suggesting that devs do not believe in the project. All their tokens are locked.
|
|
|
4 MONTHS OLD POST - stop taking this seriously, it's over, if it was even real.
|
|
|
As I said before, I am not worried. I've expressed my convincement on your (very) good job and the quality of the preoject. I'm in since july 2017, and I'll keep my tokens on my trezor for a long time.
BUT I must admit that I'm a bit dissapointed. Your job is excellent, but there's something wrong about the investor's perception of the project. Market is still bearing/accumulative, ok, but anyway the Iexec Project seems to ve extremely undervaluated caused by a "under-the-radar" situation.
With due respect, I really believe you guys should make a bigger effort in crypto-audience marketing, since in my honest opinion price should be much higher at this development stage. Having said that, I'm proud and happy to be here for almost a year, BUT please have in mind that you do have a product now, it is time to promotion, including crypto-audiences.
Investors need to see a return as well.
I didn't understand about your point of view if you are holding this token since ICO than what should make you disappointed but from my opinion overall progress of this project is still amazing if we compare with price than we are into very strong position and in future it will get succeed to get more value. I absolutely agree with you: this project is amazing, and the team is working hard and doing an excellent job. I'm not worried, as I said, I'm confident, just think a bigger effort in communication would change the "under the radar" current situation. As soon as this incredible project comes to people's attention, price will rise. That's what I meant.
|
|
|
As I said before, I am not worried. I've expressed my convincement on your (very) good job and the quality of the project. I'm in since july 2017, and I'll keep my tokens on my trezor for a long time.
BUT I must admit that I'm a bit dissapointed. Your job is excellent, but there's something wrong about the investor's perception of the project. Market is still bearing/accumulative, ok, but anyway the Iexec Project seems to be extremely undervaluated caused by a "under-the-radar" situation.
With due respect, I really believe you guys should make a bigger effort in crypto-audience marketing, since in my honest opinion price should be much higher at this development stage. Having said that, I'm proud and happy to be here for almost a year, BUT please have in mind that you do have a product now, it is time to promotion, including crypto-audiences.
Investors need to see a return as well.
|
|
|
Take a look on iEXEC RLC. Real company, real useful coin, great, GREAT team, lots of awards, partnerships with RSK + Ubisoft + INTEL announced this month, and Marketplace release on May the 29th.
This is a real and bright company, and still under the market radar. Take a look.
|
|
|
Take a look on iEXEC RLC. Real company, real useful coin, great, GREAT team, lots of awards, partnerships with RSK + Ubisoft + INTEL announced this month, and Marketplace release on May the 29th.
This is a real and bright company, and still under the market radar. Take a look.
|
|
|
What does this coin do? how and where can i buy this coin? i want to invest but i am new to crypto, is this the right coin for me ?
So you are new to crypto? Hmmm legendary, 864 posts... you serious?
|
|
|
Iexec RLC - - This month, they have announced partnerships with: UBISOFT + RSK + INTEL
- Before May the 29, they will announce another partnership with an important Cloud Company
- On May the 29th, they release V2
https://iex.ec/news_categories/partnerships/This is gonna be really huge.
|
|
|
Iexec RLC - - This month, they have announced partnerships with: UBISOFT + RSK + INTEL
- Before May the 29, they will announce another partnership with an important Cloud Company
- On May the 29th, they release V2
This is gonna be really huge.
|
|
|
Please can someone answer questions?
When the mainnet will be released, Do I need to swap my RLC? If I do not swap them, will they be burnt?
Anyone from the RLC Team could answer this question? First time I hear about this, but any information would be very welcome.
|
|
|
I didn't see anything to be worried about as iExec has no mention anywhere in that article which was referred at STK platforms vulnerabilities about Intel. They are working well and this kind of finding will be helpful for team iEXec RLC to look at there platform more carefully. RLC is most advance project among others trying to solve these issues.
Sure but I'd like an official statement about RLC team concerning this potential hack. All their software relies on SGX security, and the SpecterSGX attack make it useless. Looks to be a serious security breach for Intel SDK, and RLC if sticks to this would be another disaster for a good project.I am too waiting for the team for an official announcement if there is any impact due to this flaw. In the oficial Slack channel, they have said (I'll copy literally): " "All their software relies on SGX security" This is just wrong. Sgx is an extra security in addition to Poco. It gives a bonus but we never assumed it was absolutely secure. It's one of the technologies we study and evaluate weither or not to integrate as a part of the iExec platform. Workers without sgx are fines, and when other similar technologies become more widespread we might integrate them as well. "
|
|
|
Expected impact in the market?
|
|
|
|