|
1BW4pJJx49Aa91pJXNpemGMt1wGKy8TEmQ
Thanks alot. You're one in a billion. I'd actually say a billion.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh this thread is setting new lows to say the least.
What is tried to do with David is just cruel, like kicking someone lying on the ground.
Cruel. Do I get a "lulz" gais, afterall I said the funny word?
Even if you are paid for posting against Monero, Davids person has done exactly zero to you, not to mention your person.
How about keeping personal tragedies out from the shitposting parade.
I can guarantee you David would not in a million years do something like this to you, either.
|
|
|
|
|
This thread is so saturated with fail it's embarrasing. Nothing "major" has been "unveiled" whatsoever, has it?
Sure, the xmr crew is feisty but guess what, that's what happens when you bully the smart kid in school long enough, he will eventually take his backpack off and fucking knock you out with it.
Big lessons in life, it's a shitty thing people like othe and smooth needs to hand them out to you.
Again, what a fucking embarrasing joke for a thread. Make no mistake, those that matter will take note of what is going on here.
|
|
|
|
The dude's blaming the pool for the malware. It's not mining for the pool, most likely, it's mining to someone's address...
Someone finally gets it. Why would anyone imagine it's the pool's fault (without other supporting evidence at least)?
You're both playing dumb. Pools can easely detect and block addresses being mined by botnets. FYI, a huge botnet went live today, over 3MH/s, XMR distribution is no better than premined DASH... If you say so. Why, a guy like you posting cold hard facts with nothing else than that behemoth credibility to back it up, is commendable. Even your trading trust glimmers like gold. What a hero. |
|
|
|
hurr hurr durr
U mad bro? Because you sound mad |
|
|
|
|
I, too, want to mine the new algo aeon thanks
|
|
|
|
So, "fake" walls can become real walls if the strategy is formulated as: "I will buy it back if I get at least 10% cheaper, if not, it will be a permanent partial cash out of my long term position." This strategy gives you peace of mind when operating large fake walls. I wonder why I know it  Now would be a good time to start buying so eth traders take notice... In my opinion he is waiting to dump. Always good strategy with XMR. just ask him you goddamned muppet |
|
|
|
Interested in seeing where this coin goes.
Good luck, smooth.
I'm interested myself. Checking in - I'm super picky but smooth has a midas touch |
|
|
|
A domain worth big bucks would be http://mone.ro however some guy just want's to say "Salut!" to the world. Honestly none of these domains are worth big bucks because: 1. Monero itself is an early stage project that may or may not really go anywhere. 2. There are a countless variations, all of which are nearly perfect substitutes for the others, which means any one of them is worth next to nothing. Yea thats why these domains are selling for cheap now. If Monero goes somewhere, it surely will. You are the devs, trust yourself. These domains will be worth so much more. Only the speculators will buy these domains Hey fuck you for laying siege on cool monero domains and then trying to pat the devs on the back. What a goddamned hero. |
|
|
|
To save some time I'll quote this remark which expresses it more concisely....
When all else fails pull out the dead horse and hope that noone notices the stench, eh? |
|
|
|
Putting aside hashrate increases, is any work being done to reduce power usage / increase efficiency?
Hey good question, I think the code could be improved. |
|
|
|
Perhaps Monero was a pump & dump after all. The miners rigged the original vote about reasonable emission curve in their hopes of making money with optimized (non-deoptimized) mining software. It worked. The promise of finally having something fresh in the altcoin scene, with fair launch and compelling new tech was so good. I think the only people who have understandable grounds in opposing the emission cut are the only ones who benefit from the current situation - the privileged miners, ones who should not even exist, according to my understanding from the others who are deeply involved. If I have been wrong and such people do exist, their short-term interest is to have as high emission as possible (same as in April when they foiled the vote the last time). Long term (a few months probably), the coin is mortally wounded, but to them it does not matter. A common tactic in high-profile voting is to demonize the ones who lean on the opposite side. But that's what I am going to do anyway  If you reject the proposal of the emission cut, the hardest part for me is that I am not sure if you even have Monero's good in mind.Hey, how about we change this discussion to the Monero Forum! It is a better software than this!^^^This kind of stuff is why I don't join self-important harmless-at-best granfalloons like the BTC Foundation and your MEW. You knew the emission curve when you bought and it is not fair to change the rules in the middle of game. Since you are demonizing, I will up the ante and psychologize: Please take a vacation for the remainder of the low phase of your manic depressive cycle. And don't forget your crazy pills! Monero is only six months old and not even complete; it's far too early to panic because you're getting cold feet and going off the rails (again). The emission will not be changed merely to assuage your desire for a short-term pump attempt. You are hereby relieved of your duties as the CEO Of Monero until such time as you regain your composure and stop creating unhealthy controversial FUD about the settled issue of (main body, non-tailend) emission. If you want out, feel free to dump at a loss into my stronger hands.  Hey IB when you have the time throw me with a pm, I have happy happy material for ya. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
bullshit express is just irrelevant. Go steal some private keys about it.
|
|
|
|
Go away, pathetic attentionwhore troll. I'm not wasting a single more word on you.
well, look at that quality, I will make sure to search this matter and have you reported if I find anything about any malicious activity, like it is not enough to pump worthless alts and to make fake and delusional promises... Funny how there has been several of the happenings already and no exclamations about "delusions". From what I've read, people have been happy and thankful for the Supernode events. Listen buddy, I will only write this one post, but you are somehow sick. Stalking and hating systematically isn't normal procedure for people. You might not feel like it, but it would be most beneficiary for you to search for professional help. It might change things alot for you. A simple pill a day might be enough. Srsly. Now let Risto please do his thang and you can do yours. |
|
|
|
|
The only thing this sort of threads will result in, is a general distaste to even go to the one cryptocurrency nexus on the web - btct itself. I'm actually disgusted by the attempts at "proof" "presented" on Monero here.
I've many times said I'm disgusted but now I really know what that saying means.
Since noone else says it out straight, I'll do it - up yours, fudding, paid shills. For the forums and Monero, really - UP YOURS. Disgusting.
|
|
|
|
|
Please explain like I'm 5 - what happens if I give 1k XMR only because I want to invest in you as a person?
I certainly think many people find Risto Pietila as an establishment in himself here and believe in his undertakings, but do not hold advanced economic grasp on .....different offerings. That said it might be beneficial to explain it further.
Thanks.
edit* sorry I missed the first posts - i followed a clicky from a certain location directly to the options post. But please do elaborate if you still feel the need, I will read the OP.
|
|
|
|
I'm sure there will be pushback on these as there was to the others, but kudos to him and the Boolberry team for putting it out there for others to read, steal from, and criticize. (Disclaimer: I looked at an earlier draft of this one and provided some minor writing feedback. I'm not an author of it and am not part of the BBR team.)
Busy reading through it - he leads into it with a huge fallacy that is either incredibly naive or very disingenuous of him. When describing CryptoNight he states: "These constraints were supposed to protect hash from GPU and ASIC implementation" [sic]. Literally the first paragraph in the CryptoNote whitepaper that describes the PoW algorithm says: "Our primary goal is to close the gap between CPU (majority) and GPU/FPGA/ASIC (minority) miners. It is appropriate that some users can have a certain advantage over others, but their investments should grow at least linearly with the power. More generally, producing special-purpose devices has to be as less profitable as possible." Misrepresenting the facts of the matter in a whitepaper, purposely or not, is unconscionable. Unconscionable? The way you over react to anything negative (real or perceived) about your adopted cryptocurrency bemuses me. This was included in the original post: I even left the typos  Idiotic nitpicking. In addition, it's not fluffys job to correct such a gaping hole in the whitepaper integrity, not via google documents, nor via pm's. The guy who writes it has to be able to get the basics right all by himself. |
|
|
|
Guys! We've added cryptonote-based currency - Monero (XMR). It seems we are the first lottery who really did. Go to Fairproof.com and spend your Moneros. Well done. Small step for Monero huge step for FairProof  Such backwards logic. No offense. That said, it should be easy for other gambling and lottery sites to add monero. It's inevitable as it will not die like so many other coins with which those nice kind of sites do business, anyway |
|
|
|
|
It's called "grilling". And there are other ways you can help out, without involving that particular activity.
|
|
|
|
From what I've read, Zerocash will Only allow anonymous transactions, there will be no regular sending.
There is also trust involved in setting up Zerocash, you have to trust that the devs won't keep the key that will allow them to doublespend anytime they want, without anyone knowing.
Those two points make Zerocash a No-No for me. It makes no sense to use a coin that involves trust , that's why Satoshi made Bitcoin in the first place. Bitcoin may have it's 51% mining issue, but there are measures in place to stop such a threat if it happens, but Zerocash's trust issue is far scarier, the devs would be able to doublespend at any time whether they have 50% 1%, or 0% of hash power, and you will Never know that they have done so.
But Monero is not truly anonymous, merely pseudo-anonymous. Doesn't that bother you? How the fuck is this legendarys' posts in any way Monero speculation? And for what it's worth, he's clearly picking a fight. Another goddamn hero. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
