 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
Yes it seems to me that the problems have been fixed! 5% rejects is awesome, and once we have the EU and Asia servers it will get even better. Thank you so much Terk for this awesome pool. Now we just need the profitability to go up...
Anyways, Terk, I would suggest making an iPhone and Android app for this pool. That would be pretty cool.
Been working on one probably will have it finished and in the market tonight/tomorrow. For starters I added CleverMining but I Intend to add all the coin switching pools Hope you will enjoy it. Looking good, an idea include the btc/mhs/day. I'll look forward to installing it.... Pool wide? or uses? is that not the same ? when going pr mhs  and clever do provide the info |
|
|
|
Yes it seems to me that the problems have been fixed! 5% rejects is awesome, and once we have the EU and Asia servers it will get even better. Thank you so much Terk for this awesome pool. Now we just need the profitability to go up...
Anyways, Terk, I would suggest making an iPhone and Android app for this pool. That would be pretty cool.
Been working on one probably will have it finished and in the market tonight/tomorrow. For starters I added CleverMining but I Intend to add all the coin switching pools Hope you will enjoy it. Looking good, an idea include the btc/mhs/day. I'll look forward to installing it.... |
|
|
|
I believe thats been the issue the last few days. Payouts have been terrible. There was a bad fork with KittehCoin, and now Doge. I switched pools for now.
I agree payouts are horrible and Slooooooooowwwwww I stopped mining Middlecoin and *Surprise* still waiting for payout. Unless the Dev shows there was some sort of Bug issues this past week i won't be using MC ever again. Couldn't agree more. Everyone is telling me I am crazy, but its obvious there is some sort of issue. Just 5 days ago MC was working great, after those 5 days payouts slipped to 0.0048 per MH from 0.1140. Real question is where the hell is H2o? Switch to a diffrent pool... I'm on clevermining.com, admin is alive, and also on the bitcoin forum Nice payout, and great graph. |
|
|
|
Hi M4TTY, I don't know what version of cgminer your using ? I downloaded mine from the LTCrabbit website get started page. Your scrypt looks like something I would expect to use for a Linux system. I got my tweaking tips from the litecoin mining hardware comparison site https://litecoin.info/Mining_Hardware_ComparisonIf I even put in my scrypt --shaders2048 the miner starts then closes immediately, I am guessing this is because I running a windows os. Try installing 1 card at a time rebooting after each Try to keep it simple to start with then tweak from there on with 1 adjustment at a time so once its all working , if it then doesn't work you can remove your last tweak. What motherboard are you using ? Have you tried uninstalling each card in the device manager shutting down, removing plug from mains for a minute, then rebooting, if device manager finds the card then you can opt to update drivers ? I am sure there are many people on this forum who will be able to help you, I did a lot of reading the last 2 days over weekend and was almost pulling my hair out, whats left of it anyway, I am already going bald. All the best Axco Thanks for advice axco I will try doing a few of the things you mentioned, albeit I will struggle considering I'm not computer savvy, thanks for the reply bro. Best Matt Try a linux setup: https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=10253.0 it runs off a USB stick, so easy to test and revert back to os on hdd, I did try it some time ago, and have not looked back since. It's SMOS 1.3 but without the forced donation of 15 min/day´ |
|
|
|
I have been experimenting with clevermining last week but did not like the payouts, there were constant issues with the pool, very high reject rate and one day we got 85% of LTC profitability so i moved back to middlecoin which has always been good to me  If you read the CM forum, you will know that they did try Doge, and that was not the best way, profit is back, and everything is good now. |
|
|
|
guys,
I want to back at multipools, found 3 (middlecoin, hashcows, altcoinplex)
May you share please your experience with them to see which one is better.
Try pool.trademybit.com - hyperactive dev and lot of nice (but also bit confusing) stats and decent payout. I´ve got half of HR here and half there and profits seems to be equal - with bit difference on both sides. Avoid HashCows, because they are somehow broken with more than 30% less payout since christmass hack (IMHO they stealing from users to cover loses, but its pure speculation). I've experienced the same on hashcows. they actually had higher returns than middlecoin for me before the hack, not sure why they started messing with their algo it was fine. I'm on clevermining.com, with mc as fail-over, looks like clevermining is dooing a better job then MC, but most days the are about the same. just more and better stats at clevermining.com, than mc |
|
|
|
If you're asking why your last payout was 2 days ago, it's because you don't have enough payable balance for a daily payout, which is minimum 0.01 BTC. There is also a weekly payout for all balances above 0.001 and it runs on Sundays.
Noticed last sunday, that I got a 0.00x payout, but I was mining, there was no need for that payout, as it would be 0.01 later. Perhaps something you need to look into? (or?) |
|
|
|
@Terk, you have by far the best looking site out of all the auto-exchanging multipools out there, yet somehow these other pools are gaining hashrate far more rapidly than yours, which is unfortunate.
Now instead of it being the need to master some dark arts to get your hashrate up, I feel you should think about reconsidering your strategy and offer full transparency on the coins you're mining and the fees you're charging.
Your initial strategy of keeping things secret but still managing to keep miners based on the look and feel of your site clearly isn't working, people in the crypto community have been scammed in every corner they turn to and need full transparency and trust when it comes to where they point their precious miners, I feel you should respect that and if you want any chance of becoming the biggest multipool start rethinking your strategy.
Just my 2c, I hate seeing other new multipools overtake yours because I really love your site.
TL;DR change your strategy and become fully transparent otherwise all your hard work will be for nothing.
FWIW, just as an alternate opinion on this issue, I don't require any of this kind of transparency at all to point my hashes at clevermining. I also don't need a well-designed website. I have hashed at middlecoin and at wafflepool and their pedestrian websites don't put me off at all. I do not care what coin the pool is mining at any given time. I really only care about maximizing my profit and I don't need @Terk to tell me how he is doing that as long as he is actually doing it. I also don't care what his fees are. If his fees are literally 5 times higher than the fees at middlecoin or wafflepool, but I am still banking more coin to my wallet, then I am happy to pay those fees. In my reality, there is no such thing as "fair" fees. If @Terk figures out how to get me more coins for my hashrate than I can get elsewhere, then he can charge me whatever he wants to put more coins in my wallet than I can get elsewhere. The only transparency that I need is as follows: 1. The indisputable and irreversible BTC deposits into my wallet should match up with the claimed stats on the website 2. Nobody else who is mining at the pool should be reporting discrepancies in what they are actually being paidFor me, the reason that I am currently hashing at clevermining is that from the care of design of his website and from his responsiveness in this thread, I believe that @Terk is putting in a good-faith effort to create a more profitable pool and based on the quality of his work that I have seen so far, I think it is possible/probable that he may be better at it than others. But I will switch to another pool as soon as I don't believe that anymore. So far, for me the results are still inconclusive. On the plus side the reported history of profitability looks to me a bit better than middlecoin and a fair bit better than wafflepool, though I don't think there is enough history yet for that to be conclusive. My own experience is that my daily earnings at clevermining have been roughly on par with my daily earnings at middlecoin - within the statistical noise that mining is. But that is also not conclusive to me because I haven't mined long enough at either pool to get past the statistical noise. I'm not saying that you are not correct for yourself and others requiring the kind of transparency that you are asking for in order for clevermining to gain more hashers. You might be totally right about that. I'm just saying that that is not true for me. Given the ease of pointing one's miner at another pool at a moment's notice, I just utterly fail to see how @Terk could possibly be taking advantage or scamming anyone. As long as the payouts are hitting miner's wallets, I just don't see any space available for ripping anyone off. And obviously the moment the payouts are not happening, or are not competitive, it will be completely obvious to everyone and there will instantly be no more clevermining. At absolute BEST, @Terk might be able to walk away with one day's take before everyone left. My guess is not even that. And given what he has obviously invested in sweat so far, my judgement is that he has much more financial incentive to make the results as competitive as possible and pull in his percentage for the long haul. That's my 2c. You hit the nail.... |
|
|
|
Vardiff not online right now
Looking at the data on CleverMine and a stat page for middlecoin, then Clever is in front in btc/mh
hmmm currently clevermining states 0.01137, yesterday middlecoin did about 0.013... Last I looked mc was at 0.0109, but hard to compare as the page I uses, are calculated from last payout. |
|
|
|
So anyone ran a parallel side-by-side comparison between clevermining and middlecoin?
Also, has vardiff been re-enabled yet?
Vardiff not online right now Looking at the data on CleverMine and a stat page for middlecoin, then Clever is in front in btc/mh but in 2 hours, it might change... but so far, i'll stick with Clever... just hoping more will join. |
|
|
|
Middlecoin Monitor [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=428298.20] Celebrating 1000 Downloads !!!!!! Offering free address registrations for 15 people who want to use the app.Just reply on this thread with your address, quoting this message. PS: 1 address limit per bitcointalk id. Only for first 15 addresses. 16BaAmZM1vdNVqdpyG5RVxKAvGrCVaac1z |
|
|
|
|
Hi
What's going on with the btc/mh/day ? Why are we making so little ? are we mining to much doge ?
|
|
|
|
I tried again with increased intensity and the reject rate has jumped.
With my usual -I setting i get over 9% rejects. But this way i get over 1770 WU and higher hasrate.
With reduced intensity i get a little over 1400 WU and lower hashret but between 2% and 3% rejects.
Which is better ? The WUs are the actual work units, so the higher number - the better and rejects are considered, correct ?
Whats cards are you running ? couple of r9 290x on that one OMG, I can't get more them 1400-1450 WU on my 290x, do you mind sharing your config ? |
|
|
|
I tried again with increased intensity and the reject rate has jumped.
With my usual -I setting i get over 9% rejects. But this way i get over 1770 WU and higher hasrate.
With reduced intensity i get a little over 1400 WU and lower hashret but between 2% and 3% rejects.
Which is better ? The WUs are the actual work units, so the higher number - the better and rejects are considered, correct ?
Whats cards are you running ? |
|
|
|
Hi, compliments to the devs for the awesome pool, but i have a problem... im mining for like 5h but in the "Last Hour Hashrate" it say 0, i have more than 150 accepted shares and mining at about 44 mh/s
If you are up for 5 hours and running 44MH/s and only have 150 accepted, you have an issue on your end I would be. I have 1 card running at 277kh/s and for the past 1 hour it has 27 shares accepted. So your number seems crazy low to me. I would restart your rig just to be safe if oyu haven't yet. Link your address and I will look up and let you know if I can find anything to help Thank you, i will restart my rig btw what software are you using for mining(maybe is a software problem)? Thanks I'm using cgminer, kalroth edition (version 3.7.3) I thought version above 3.7.2 does not support scrypt mining. Kalroth edition, is a 3.7.2 but mod'ed. it's still scrypt :-) only with some fixes... |
|
|
|
Hi, compliments to the devs for the awesome pool, but i have a problem... im mining for like 5h but in the "Last Hour Hashrate" it say 0, i have more than 150 accepted shares and mining at about 44 mh/s
If you are up for 5 hours and running 44MH/s and only have 150 accepted, you have an issue on your end I would be. I have 1 card running at 277kh/s and for the past 1 hour it has 27 shares accepted. So your number seems crazy low to me. I would restart your rig just to be safe if oyu haven't yet. Link your address and I will look up and let you know if I can find anything to help Thank you, i will restart my rig btw what software are you using for mining(maybe is a software problem)? Thanks I'm using cgminer, kalroth edition (version 3.7.3) |
|
|
|
|
Hi
I'm getting a lot of these:
[15:45:50] CelverMine stale share detected, submitting as user requested
Are they counted, or do I have to see if I can reduce then ? and if I need to reduce then, are there any hints on how to reduce them ?
|
|
|
|
|
