 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
This is cryptsy fault, just count the deposit coins, when bigger than the max coin supply just stop, i think cryptsy under suspect too cause we dont know who sold these amount just publish trade logs, if not maybe cryptsy done this, and steal our btcs , just proof. and recover only buyers who not lgd deposit just bought from trade by btc.
Cant tell if you're stupid..... or just trolling |
|
|
|
|
Does anyone else think garza read the solidcoin 2.0 specs and somehow thought it was a great idea?
Garza made all of coinhunter, realsolid, therealsolid's dreams come true with paycoin.
The similarities are uncanny.....
I would say garza is coinhunter but that would be an insult to the art of scamming to which he has obviously perfected. Garza should get some tips from him on how to pull off a scam without attracting too much attention
|
|
|
|
I mean the only thing that sort of worked was the paycoin.com wallet and it's closing down. What else have they actually done? You mean the one that was hacked for 200 thousand coins? |
|
|
|
|
I have about 300 YBC in an old wallet of mine. How would I go about swapping these for the new YBcoin?
|
|
|
|
|
SCAM ARTIST JUSTIN FROM OPENEX, ICEYSCRYPT AND BITBAY
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. ACTUALLY JUST DONT USE IT
I also suspect he ran Mt.Gox
|
|
|
|
Server Login:
justin7674
HACKMEPLEASEorz94358
#Wastingmylifewaitingformagic
I have 1 bitcoin on that server. Almost EVERY btc exchange hack is the stupidity of the creator and programmer.
PASSWORD WILL REMAIN THE PREVIOUS SAID FOR A MONTH
BOLD !!! I have spent a year racking my brain on this. I have pretty good confidence in it's security and stability (Except that the webserver currently doesn't have ddos protection turned on) So much faith that even with the authentication given out I believe that it is safe still.
SCAM ARTIST JUSTIN FROM OPENEX, ICEYSCRYPT AND BITBAY
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. ACTUALLY JUST DONT USE IT
I also suspect he ran Mt.Gox |
|
|
|
We need to be able to measure how many coins are on exchanges. Fractional banking is a concern. There are many flaws to the proof of reserves process. I propose we create a standard of special exchange addresses. When sending coins to exchanges they must use an address that identifies that it is on an exchange. When an order happens on exchange coins are sent to a new exchange address and we can match time and amount of coins to the exchanges reported volume according to the orderbook but preserves pseudonymity.
In the systems I am developing at LuaPod we do not store our funds as float or double values. They are stored in single satoshi increments (1 = 0.00000001 ) The wallets are not capable of being accessed by the webserver. In fact our balances can not even be adjusted from the webserver if it were compromised. The main thing we are doing to create a form of transparency is disclosing full access to the front-end database. The system in order to continue running and in order to make withdraws must also pass several steps that are described at : http://xboxtrial.cf/info/info.luaCompanies should move towards being more transparent is what needs to happen in order for us to get a consensus of what is going on. Most of the money stolen has actually been because these systems somehow had control over the money in areas where users had frequent access (such as webservers)
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. ACTUALLY JUST DONT USE IT
I also suspect he ran Mt.Gox |
|
|
|
For now on ALL New coins must be Spoetnik Approved™
Like fuck they do Fuck you spoetnik and your self deluding prophecies Go fuck igotspots and die of aids |
|
|
|
|
SCAM ARTIST JUSTIN FROM OPENEX, ICEYSCRYPT AND BITBAY
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. ACTUALLY JUST DONT USE IT
I also suspect he ran Mt.Gox
|
|
|
|
Guys does this say what I think it says? Line 1606 Main.cpp uint256 prevHash = 0;
if(pindex->pprev)
{
prevHash = pindex->pprev->GetBlockHash();
// printf("==> Got prevHash = %s\n", prevHash.ToString().c_str());
}
if (vtx[0].GetValueOut() > GetProofOfWorkReward(pindex->nHeight, nFees) && pindex->nHeight != MIN_SUPPLY)
return false; |
|
|
|
You're giving him far too much credit. I think it is safe to say that nobody legitimately takes him seriously. Its an obvious mental breakdown happening in front of your eyes. Usually you have to pay to watch such a debacle
It used to be frustrating. Then sad. Now it's just plain funny. Every time Spoetnik tries to enact new laws forcing anyone who's not one of his underlings to live in an environment that can be described, at best, as contemptuously tolerant, like clockwork, his toadies defend that sort of savage, grumpy behavior. Let's get down to brass tacks: He can't possibly believe that all literature that opposes snobbism was forged by lecherous, empty-headed paper-pushers. He's deluded but he's not that deluded. Oblomovism is the answer but only if the question was, “What's the moral equivalent of letting Spoetnik generate alienation and withdrawal?” He knows how to lie. It's too bad he doesn't yet understand the ramifications of lying. To pick an obvious but often overlooked example, his most pot-valiant tactic is to fabricate a phony war between heinous, fatuitous ranters and horny, sophomoric beastly-types. This way, Spoetnik can subjugate both groups into perverting the course of justice. I unquestionably don't want that to happen, which is why I'm telling you that you, of course, now need some hard evidence that Spoetnik's devious shock troops have been hunting the blogosphere in packs, swarming, intimidating, and spreading outright lies and propaganda while enforcing pressure on blog owners and administrators to supplant one form of injustice with another. Well, how about this for evidence: If he wants to keep us hypnotized so we don't challenge rather than accommodate the mainstream's presuppositions, let him wear the opprobrium of that decision. Everybody knows that a certain curtailment of the right to political opposition is an unavoidable concomitant of Spoetnik's morally questionable magic-bullet explanations, but you should consider that I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that Spoetnik just reported that ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like him. Do you think that that's merely sloppy reporting on Spoetnik's part? I don't. I think that it's a deliberate attempt to mute the voice of anyone who dares to speak out against him. You know what we'd have if everybody wanted to put juvenile cutthroats of various stripes on the federal payroll? Total chaos. As my mother used to tell me, “One task that rests on all of our shoulders is to restore the world back to its original balance.” Although I can find only circumstantial evidence of misconduct and rule violations, most members of our quick-fix, sugar-rush, attention-deficit society are too impatient to realize the importance of sending Spoetnik's crusades into the dustbin where they belong. I wish only that a few more people could see that mephitic grizzlers are like putty in Spoetnik's hands. He effortlessly molds them into loyal legatees who don't think twice about taking us over the edge of the abyss of faddism. Spoetnik can blame me for the influx of short-sighted tightwads if it makes him feel better, but it won't help his cause any. There's a price to be paid for putting increased disruptive powers in the hands of ethically bankrupt propagandists, and, clearly, his plunderbund is running up a hefty bill. The precise cost to us is best described via the observation that Spoetnik says he's going to marginalize the traditions and truths upon which our nation's greatness sits one day. Is he out of his mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that if he is victorious in his quest to put the prisoners in charge of running the prison, then his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity. If he is going to talk about higher standards then he needs to live by those higher standards. Guess what? Spoetnik has had some success in rendering unspeakable and unthinkable whole categories of beliefs about power. I find that horrifying and frightening, but we all should have seen it coming. We all knew that it's a pity that two thousand years after Christ, the voices of gutless defalcators like Spoetnik can still be heard, worse still that they're listened to, and worst of all that anyone believes them. Let me end this letter with a call to action. Please join those of us who are appealing not to the contented and satisfied but embracing those tormented by suffering, those without peace, the unhappy and the discontented, and through your support we will stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts. Together we will snap Spoetnik's lackeys out of their trance. Together we will ask the tough questions and not shy away from the tough answers. |
|
|
|
|
I will not waste my time criticizing or insulting Spoetnik as 1) he is unlikely to change, and 2) Spoetnik probably revels in the letters of shock and repulsion that he regularly receives. Instead, I will focus on his termagant memoranda, which, after all, are the things that make us dependent on hotheaded widdifuls for political representation, economic support, social position, and psychological approval. The key point of the following exposition is that he has a strategy. His strategy is to numb the public to the larrikinism and injustice in mainstream politics. Wherever you encounter that strategy, you are dealing with Spoetnik.
I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like Spoetnik formulate social policies and action programs based on the most huffy classes of irrationalism in existence. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. Some people are responsible and others are not. Spoetnik falls into the category of “not”.
Spoetnik's ability to flap his gums greatly exceeds his cognitive skills. This issue is coming to the fore because Spoetnik's insinuations raise a number of brow-furrowing questions. I'm referring to questions such as, “What exactly is the principle that rationalizes Spoetnik's thrasonical ballyhoos?” It's questions like that that get people thinking about how I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how what we have been imparting to Spoetnik—or what he has been eliciting from us—is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge.
Spoetnik whines about recalcitrant sectarians, yet he enthusiastically supports scrofulous lotharios. Prevent people from thinking and visualizing beyond an increasingly psychologically caged existence if you like, Spoetnik, because I simply don't care. Although he would like us to believe that anyone who disagrees with him is a potential terrorist, he has given us neither good reason nor credible evidence to believe that. His blanket statements, on the other hand, give us good reason to believe that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, love hearing the claims of a filthy politicaster who doesn't realize that he's a filthy politicaster. As a case in point, consider Spoetnik's claim that he is the arbiter of all things. Such claims always make me laugh because, as we all know, if they could speak, the birds, snakes, and other creatures who are our Earth brothers and Earth sisters would indisputably say that I cannot compromise with Spoetnik; he is without principles. I cannot reason with him; he is without reason. But I can warn him and with a warning he must indubitably take to heart: Spoetnik accuses me of being addlepated whenever I state that it does not require a Sherlock Holmes to prove that nearly all of the assumptions and statements made by him and his shills, who are legion, are completely, absolutely, and totally wrong. All right, I'll admit that I have a sharp tongue and sometimes write with a bit of a poison pen, but the fact remains that the conflation of snappish couch potatoes and resentful, prudish party animals in Spoetnik's convictions is either dramatic hyperbole or a fatal methodological flaw. In the presence of high heaven and before the civilized world I therefore assert that no matter how bad you think Spoetnik's press releases are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think.
We must find more constructive contexts in which to work toward resolving conflicts. Only then can a society free of his volage-brained musings blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that one can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. Spoetnik, however, is more likely to replace the search for truth with a situationist relativism based on choleric adversarialism. Personally, I don't expect him to give up his crusade to spread hatred, animosity, and divisiveness, but we'll see. Rather than pick out appropriate verbs and nouns, Spoetnik pads all of his sentences with extra syllables to grant them an atmosphere of authority. I, on the other hand, prefer to use simple language to express the sentiment that it may not be easy to set the stage so that my next letter will begin from a new and much higher level of influence, but it can be done. And it needs to be done. And we must always remember that Spoetnik operates on the basis of an unremitting hatred of civility and decency. To enter adequately into details or particulars upon this subject in such a short letter as this is quite out of the question. Hence, I will only remark here, in a general way but with all the emphasis of earnestness and truth, that if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that I wonder what would happen if Spoetnik really did repeat the mistakes of the past. There's a spooky thought.
Spoetnik has been known to say that you and I are morally inferior to the worst sorts of disaffected ragamuffins there are. That notion is so untrustworthy, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. He has repeatedly indicated a desire to cashier anyone who tries to straighten out our thinking and change the path we're on. Is that the sound of rarefied respectability that Spoetnik's cultists so frequently attribute to Spoetnik? The noisome blathering of a mean-spirited, laughable cumber-ground is more like it. In fact, I should note that one could truthfully say that facts and their accuracy make a story, not the overdramatization of whatever Spoetnik dreams up. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that he has declared that he's staging a revolt against everyone who dares to lift the fog from his thinking. Spoetnik is revolting all right; the very sight of him turns my stomach. All kidding aside, one of the things I find quite interesting is listening to other people's takes on things. For instance, I recently overheard some folks remark that people who know me know that I'm very observant. I can identify an indelicate backbiter merely by spotting certain turns of phrase, certain sentence constructions, certain ways of being. I can therefore undeniably conclude that Spoetnik is the most indelicate backbiter of them all and that we desperately need to insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward voyeurism. It's not enough merely to keep our heads down and pray that Spoetnik doesn't violate all the rules of decorum. As I like to say, if you set the bar low, you jump low.
The mainstream media have said nary a word about how I predict that Spoetnik will persist with his perversions, profligacy, and perilous pursuits. This is not rhetoric. This is reality. The first lies that he told us were relatively benign. Still, they have been progressing. And they will continue to progress until there is no more truth; Spoetnik's lies will grow until they blot out the sun.
Spoetnik regards the exception as the rule, the criminal as the hero, the loser as the winner, and the winner as the oppressor. Now that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter so let me corroborate it by saying that Spoetnik demonstrates a terrible, inaccurate, even lusk, misuse of history with his self-deluded theories. To top that off, from secret-handshake societies meeting at “the usual place” to back-door admissions committees, Spoetnik's mercenaries have always found a way to diminish our will to live. While I can't speak for anyone else, I warrant that no one has a higher opinion of Spoetnik than I, and I think Spoetnik is a quisquilious stinking-type.
Given the destructiveness of Spoetnik's Pecksniffian, distasteful arguments, I propose that we implement a long-range survival plan. For starters, this plan should acknowledge that Spoetnik's supporters ignore compromise and focus solely on Spoetnik's personal agenda, as though it were a disgrace to test the assumptions that underlie Spoetnik's plans for the future. And that's why I'm writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to establish clear, justifiable definitions of negativism and Machiavellianism so that one can defend a decision to take action when his epigones initiate a reign of twisted terror. There's no way I can do that alone, and there's no way I can do it without first stating that he used to be a major proponent of mammonism. Nowadays, Spoetnik is putting all of his support behind scapegoatism. As they say, plus ça change, plus c'est la męme chose.
Spoetnik would not hesitate to see to it that all patriotic endeavors are directed down blind alleys where they end only in frustration and discouragement if he felt he could benefit from doing so. Why doesn't he realize that people who believe that ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like him need to be worked over with an oak table leg and then sentenced to 20 years of hard labor in order to straighten out their thinking? Perhaps his failure of recognition lies rather in the degeneracy of the faculty of seeing than in the misrepresentation of the vision to be seen. It may be also confessed that Spoetnik's hysteria-producing hatchet jobs are sufficient to give pause to the less thoughtful among us. “Uh-oh,” such people think. “We'd better help Spoetnik take away what few freedoms we have left—just in case.” I don't know what to do about the rise in savagism I see all around me. Spoetnik's solution. not surprisingly, is to shame my name. This is one case in which the cure is certainly worse than the disease. While this letter hasn't provided anything in the way of a concrete plan of action, it may help us focus our thinking a little better when we do work out a plan. For now, we must take a strong position on Spoetnik's allegations, which, after all, seek temporary tactical alliances with cullionly creeps in order to cause (or at least contribute to) a variety of social ills. I will decidedly be happy to have your help in this endeavor.
|
|
|
|
Can someone post some nodes, I have been trying to connect for awhile 
47 Peers{
"addr" : "66.41.129.114:61129",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241420,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390231048,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 241,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:9d38:90d7:20eb:2d2f:bdd6:7e8d]:3352",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241422,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390231451,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 275,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "94.22.75.142:38853",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241420,
"lastrecv" : 1390241419,
"conntime" : 1390231981,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 0,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "178.121.113.206:24988",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241417,
"lastrecv" : 1390241417,
"conntime" : 1390232518,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 0,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "79.194.121.2:61791",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241418,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390232607,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 0,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "116.17.92.174:59982",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241419,
"lastrecv" : 1390241419,
"conntime" : 1390232785,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 0,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "83.67.76.64:56937",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241417,
"lastrecv" : 1390241417,
"conntime" : 1390233180,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 0,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "5.83.21.59:56130",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241419,
"conntime" : 1390233290,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 613,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "184.155.114.216:56799",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241418,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390233494,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 659,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:9d38:6ab8:3873:215c:4764:8d27]:3352",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241419,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390233807,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 725,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "174.111.248.128:56511",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241420,
"conntime" : 1390233814,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 725,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "84.29.45.140:52710",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241418,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390234050,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 100,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "109.166.140.147:16803",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241422,
"conntime" : 1390234115,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 763,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "109.99.33.117:51688",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241419,
"conntime" : 1390234230,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 779,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "84.111.156.162:63361",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241419,
"conntime" : 1390234291,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 782,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "84.29.45.140:58207",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241420,
"conntime" : 1390234326,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 0,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "84.29.45.140:63878",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241419,
"conntime" : 1390234617,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 624,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "66.183.28.149:65529",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241455,
"conntime" : 1390234719,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 811,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:5ef5:79fb:30cb:7ee:acbc:b3bf]:3352",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390234826,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 830,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "107.170.6.29:50403",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241416,
"lastrecv" : 1390241417,
"conntime" : 1390235037,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 501,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "109.90.51.38:51549",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241420,
"conntime" : 1390235093,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 853,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "218.207.182.254:6795",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241419,
"lastrecv" : 1390241419,
"conntime" : 1390235416,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 369,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "86.91.247.175:63371",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241420,
"conntime" : 1390236332,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 400,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "178.49.118.233:60262",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241419,
"conntime" : 1390236595,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 944,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "91.215.16.155:50104",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241419,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390236724,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 947,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "108.226.116.149:63320",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241418,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390236746,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 949,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "66.41.129.114:57933",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241420,
"conntime" : 1390236983,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 959,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "24.14.239.132:21088",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241419,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390237097,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 0,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "78.61.244.154:52801",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241417,
"lastrecv" : 1390241417,
"conntime" : 1390237243,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 968,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:9d38:90d7:1422:3ff6:b03d:86fd]:3352",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390238002,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 999,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:5ef5:79fd:20d8:3869:abe2:d273]:3352",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241425,
"conntime" : 1390238252,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 1008,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "78.26.128.199:58288",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241420,
"conntime" : 1390238667,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 1022,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "86.129.44.37:54847",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241419,
"conntime" : 1390238884,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 1032,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "113.162.144.189:59537",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241427,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390239021,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 995,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:c38c:c38c:459:154:b1e5:7f38]:3352",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241420,
"conntime" : 1390239090,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 1039,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "184.75.214.242:59812",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241418,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390239358,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 754,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "180.151.127.68:62806",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241420,
"lastrecv" : 1390241420,
"conntime" : 1390239470,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 1059,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "94.34.176.169:59012",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241417,
"lastrecv" : 1390241417,
"conntime" : 1390239680,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 1065,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "86.29.180.98:64689",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241420,
"conntime" : 1390239681,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 1065,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:9d38:6ab8:3c1f:1799:a428:ef64]:3352",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241419,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390239694,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 1065,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "113.162.170.108:64386",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241419,
"lastrecv" : 1390241419,
"conntime" : 1390240364,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 0,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "110.147.174.243:56914",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241462,
"conntime" : 1390240560,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 1108,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "77.172.93.38:44407",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241418,
"lastrecv" : 1390241418,
"conntime" : 1390240729,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 1116,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "65.78.111.167:54523",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241421,
"conntime" : 1390240755,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 500,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "[2001:0:9d38:6abd:347d:2353:916c:510c]:3352",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241419,
"conntime" : 1390240785,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 1119,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "74.3.157.1:30568",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241427,
"lastrecv" : 1390241427,
"conntime" : 1390240992,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 0,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "67.191.160.195:53539",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1390241376,
"lastrecv" : 1390241419,
"conntime" : 1390241041,
"version" : 70000,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 1128,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "180.136.200.9:42411",
"services" : "00000000",
"lastsend" : 0,
"lastrecv" : 0,
"conntime" : 1390241409,
"version" : 0,
"subver" : "",
"inbound" : true,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : -1,
"banscore" : 0
}
] |
|
|
|
|
Good looking coin. Seems to be a fair launch. I only have 750kh
Entered network at block 300
Mined 20 blocks between there and 500
|
|
|
|
Learn to use google. False positives |
|
|
|
Finally we have the coin that has been LONG overdue! Launch Date 01/18/2014 1 AM EST Scrypt Hybrid POS/POW 172 coins per block with 18.56% Subsidy every 30 days 30 Second blocktimes , 25 block confirm
299,792,458 total coins Source: Windows Qt BLockCrawler POOLS CONF FILE DETAILS
server=1
listen=1
daemon=1
rpcport=1857
port=1856
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcconnect=127.0.0.1
rpcallowip=localhost
rpcconnect=localhost
rpcuser=**user**
rpcpassword=**password**
addnode=192.241.153.16
addnode=108.208.35.108
addnode=50.188.30.128
addnode=162.243.248.129
addnode=192.168.1.204 3% premine will be used for promotion and developing tools and services |
|
|
|
2) FairCoin source coin for Sha-256, Scrypt, Scrypt-Jane and Blake. What do you mean by this? |
|
|
|
oWiACwdmuWko37bd8BqkvCTNgBckr2H3fd Thank you  |
|
|
|
|
I realized this isnt the thread for this. Also i agree with most of what you said
WDC did everything they could.
Ill move the above to another thread and change topics.
I the real problem is there is really nothing else that could have been done. A system needs to be designed to prevent this yet stay decentralized. Voting systems are a great choice but a hard to prevent manipulation.
Perhaps some sort of decentralized checkpointing could take place. But then you sorta get into a proof of stake scenario. Perhaps higher #'s of confirmations could be used in the future if attacks persist. One of worldcoins greatest features is fast transaction. Even doubling them would keep it among the fastest
|
|
|
|
|
I do not want to download the stupid deps and build files totaling between 790MB - 290MB every time I want the ~15Mb source
Please remove the deps and put them up in another repo.
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
