Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
Could you throw off (or show with screenshots) the AM setting in such a bundle? PS I have long thought of such a bunch
|
|
|
This indicates that the download of the MSI file failed. Can you try the procedure one more time or download it from the web site if it still doesn't work? Direct link from the site - it's works
|
|
|
As for the inbound rules, I understand is good to have them to prevent the popups but there is no need to have them as "allow the connection" rules, because the monitoring connections are local we could have them as "block the connection" rules and the monitoring would still work correctly(as far as I have tested over the years) without allowing other LAN devices access to the mining software. The "Block all incoming connections, including those in the list of allowed apps" might seem enough for most use cases but I have mining computers that serve other content so I need access to some of their ports. Please consider adding an option so we can decide whether to create the rules as allow or block rules, thank you. With all due respect to Patrike, I ask you not to, AM is monitoring software. And building a firewall into it will simply be a big mistake, because there will be a huge number of problems with permissions and restrictions in the rules And what you ask for is done at the border router
|
|
|
If you are mining Grin, supported only in the very latest Bminer release, it uses some variation of Cuckoo Cycle that will require "cuckaroo29" as you point out. I suppose this will be yet another algorithm to add. To make it even more complex it looks like Grin supports GPU mining via CuckaRoo29, but also ASIC mining via CuckaToo31. Green will not support asik, and a fork is scheduled for a turn every 6 months. C29 ~ 5.5-6 gb Ram GPU C31 ~ 10.5-11 gb ram GPU C32, C33 and so on https://www.grin-forum.org/t/what-to-mine-choosing-between-cuckatoo31-and-cuckaroo29/1732
|
|
|
patrike
I stumbled upon a new universal block explorer, with a large amount of information collected by it, with API support coinexplorer.net It can be used as an alternative to cryptoid.info
|
|
|
I do see three different ways for this implementation: 1) Show the coins, even those not matching any Exchange Filter or Exchange Volume settings, but set the Revenue to zero 2) Show the coins, even those not matching any Exchange Filter or Exchange Volume settings, but set the Revenue to zero for the profit switcher and when mining, but show the reported Revenue (although it might be unrealistic) on the Coins tab and indicate it with a gray color 3) Simply hide the coins that doesn't match the Exchange Filter or Exchange Volume settings. It will not be visible on the Coins tab and not possible to select for a mining pool. Which one would be preferred? Highlight color (gray / red) but leaving prices
|
|
|
is there any way to limit or schedule bandwidth usage? AM is hitting about 1.5gb a day and it's killing my 50gb a month limit. You can change the number and increase the polling time of installations in the settings of each miner Example 1 asic with AM polling at 60 seconds = 12-14 mb/day
|
|
|
Maybe it should be possible to define something like this: - Additional power usage (W) on a global level, in addition to the individual miners. To be used to reduce the total profit on the dashboard - Additional power user per miner - configured per profit profile - Possible to override this per miner as well All this would be added on top of the power usage specified per algorithm.
Please let me know your view on this. I`m looking for a way to set FIXED expenses to run an ASIC. Just to give you an example. I current host my ASIC at a mine farm. I do not pay any particular expenses, but I pay a set FEE a month. It would be good to have an ability to set daily expenses or monthly without basing calculation on power consumption. I hope this helps to clarify the situation and is possible to setup in awesome.
|
|
|
patrike
Is it possible to specify a specific number per kW in a certain profile? those. not the price for 1 kW / hour, but the fixed price?
|
|
|
Awesome Miner version 6.0.2 ASIC mining - Update firmware feature for Antminers. The firmware will be uploaded and updated for all the selected Antminers. An excellent solution, especially when it can be done at once in the entire list. But is there any kind of fool protection? for verification of incorrect firmware for a specific model? --- bitma*n made the service "Bitmain Crypto" https://index.btc.com/defaulthttps://btc.com/api-doc
|
|
|
Are there only a few specific coins that are incorrect on Coincalculators? Any example? At first there was a MAZA coin and then BCHSV. There were a few more, but I don’t remember
|
|
|
SIA is very difficult to figure out balance for with the Block Explorers that has been available so far. Unless there is a block explorer that has an easy-to-use API where Awesome Miner can get the balance, it will not be supported. hyperspace is available only this page https://hyperstats.info/apiother forks do not have such services
|
|
|
patrikeAfter the SIA fork, three coins were added, the site has an API (including the API market place) I could not get the balance API https://siamining.com/chainsalgo blake2b
|
|
|
patrikeProblems continue in the network, and as a result, the reported profit is 750k $ / month!!!!! I suggest either to highlight this problematic coin in color, or to hide it on the “Coins” tab until you solve problems in the network. http://images2.imagebam.com/03/e2/bd/8095981002744754.PNG
|
|
|
Yes, this is what you need, thanks, now the balance has started to appear correctly There should probably be some kind of feature to detect unrealistic profit values - but this will have to be configurable in some way. it's like at the moment WTM vs CC: WTM = 27,298.01 mzc / day CC = 12,535.97 mzc / day is it the same as variant to paint in red or the name of the coins or all statistics on this coin, at that moment when there are problems in the network? http://images2.imagebam.com/5a/8b/33/eae497999825814.PNGso that the coin does not hang for days as the most profitable
|
|
|
|