I don't think that we have to justify why we are doing this. If you decide to keep your placed orders it's up to you. Nobody should point fingers based on our reasons.

Urmareste si threadu asta ca raspunde si aici: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=189582.msg2785584#msg2785584.

Presupun ca oricum nu prea are ce sa anunte.... Chipurile le va primi cand vor fi livrate cele din Lotul 2.... pana atunci din cate am inteles eu se lupta cu prototipul placii (firmware, schema etc): http://alphahpc.com/2013/07/08/
Testele de placa la K16 sunt si ele in curs. Acum se cauta piese pentru placi din cate vad eu pe threadul original K16....

Se pare ca BKK asteapta si el placile "Beta" revizuite pentru a rula testele finale dupa ce a modificat schema.

Salut,
Va felicit pentru initiativa! insa am o intrbare poate retorica... Nu sunt cam mari comisioanele voastre ?
In cazul asta nu ma atrage nimic sa folosesc serviciul asta ba chiar contrar, fata de alte case de schimb mai "cu vechime".

PS: nu vreau sa starnesc ceva, doar curios.
Bafta

BkkCoins, What are you using under linux to compile the source for the pic? And can you try to make the hex under win also to see if there are diff?
Just curious if there will be significant differences between.

Best regards

Enigma...
Please keep it real, My certification in EE and IT that i have can back up most of what i say.
If you can keep this discussion on topic it it will be beneficial for all of us. Just because you love yourself we do not need to know....

Anyway as BKK say-ed the board will have the clock "covered" and will be in the admissible range for EMI (in my opinion). And if indeed we will see that it does interfere with other equipments (ie not FCC compliant) one can always create a casing from aluminum with proper ventilation holes and just use GND on the Board and the case.
The case can also be very good in such a way that we can make the airflow go trough the fins of the radiator as we want and not let it take the easy way out.

For example take a ATX or mATX mainboard. It has multilayer circuit (not 2 layers), the oscilator is greater and there are more circuits than on the K16. The power feeded into the board is huge compared to K16. Not to mention the power filters and transformers.
So I assume that the circuit traces of the K16 are not enough to emit EM interference so that the values are greater than FCC aproves.
And let's keep in mind that those values are given at 1 meter from the device You will not sleep with the k16 boards.
In my opinion this is somewhat not important to discuss since there is more EMI using a cell phone. And if you decide to have a "farm" of k16 they will probably be placed in a location far or away from people (due tot the heat and also to prevent accidental intervention).

And anyway we are discussing about an experimental device. There are lots of things to improve and this is only one thing of them

There are no components on the board that their function will generate interference greater then the maximum admissible value of FCC.
This is just marketing IMHO.

Can this code be generated from a timeout read or based on the count of a x number of nonce....
 
Just a idea (don't throw any stones yet )

Da, corect, nu am BTC sau ฿.
Schimbul din Lei/Euro in ฿ este dificil de realizat si prefer sa platesc asa (conform cu paritate). Plus ca intervin si pierderi semnificative cand faci schimb (cel putin la noi).
Speram sa imi spuna t13hydra daca se poate rezolva si asa sau exclusiv numai prin ฿.

Salut,
Daca nu am BC si vreau sa fac o comanda cum se poate rezolva ?