Thank you, you are the only one that try to explain your point of view and ask serious question.
Thekool1s is a stupid guy. He posted a picture and I stopped reading from that point.
theultralite bla bla bla bla make your own forum...who forced him to read my message?

Probably most of you don't fully understand what I mean because a few months ago I was like you. I Never had thought that I could be involved in this thread.

I am a legendary member tagged from Lauda that never had any discussion, never sell or bought account, never scam people.

Now I feel disgusted, I feel the sensation of something deeply unfair. I feel I have no way to defend myself because the only things you can do is write to DT1 members.
So I thought about asking to every bounty manager to put ~Lauda. It could be an alternative way of defend against Lauda.

I did a lot of research and asked to a lot of user tagged by Lauda.

I hate scammers and users that have multi accounts too, but here we are beyond the limit: a member tagged because Lauda hates bitcoincash, another member tagged for the intention to do something and not for something really proven.

If tomorrow Lauda decides to tag someone because she doesn't like the nickname, you don't really have a procedure to recover your trust status because "trust is not moderated"

Remember that Lauda isn't Mother Teresa or a charity organization. She told that she spent a lot of her time doing this for free but if you think how is important reputation I see a conflic of interest (I see an avatar selling something).

I asked to a lot of moderators about some case and all of them told me that they didn't tagged those people but they aren't surprise that Lauda did.

I discovered that Lauda was removed from staff member because she did an extortion/blackmail  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1761133.20

Probably the exclusion from the staff member cause her to be angry with the entire world. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1761133.20

This is the post where she is red tagging anyone that supports Bitcoin Cash. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2420291.0

And this is the incredible thread. I can't believe:Lauda, Sold bitcointalk accounts, Giving neg for others for same reason. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410318.0

To be honest I think that 99% of people tagged by Lauda deserve that negative trust, the problem is if you are in that 1%.

I prefer an unpunished guilty rather than an innocent punishment and Lauda doesn't act in this direction.

My two cents.

Close the "invite & accounts" and do a KYC per person.
But please don't give punishment for the intention without any proof and pretend to be right.
The real world doesn't work in this way. Doinfg this you will obtain that people will creat a newbie account to do the deal.
The problem is the possibility to create infinite accounts per user...this is the only problem.
And Lauda is forcing people to create new account for everything...he put also a negative trust to someone who didn't think the same in a discussion.
He call idiots BCH users. He is not controlled by DT1. I am sure that they didn't consider any action against him.
So the only weapon is ~Lauda in the trust of every user of the forum.

Lauda is very smart because he didn't answer directly to the question.

You can buy and sell account

Lauda: You can also steal from others, but that doesn't make it right.

let's try in other way. (I don't mean "To be able to" with the "can" above)

Is totally legit to buy or sell an bitcointalk account? (non hacked, not stolen)
Yes or No? (there is only YES or NO).

How do you complete this sentence: Lauda is telling everyone that buying or selling bitcointalk accounts it perfectly and totaly rig...and within the forum rules.

How many are the DT1 members?

If the 51% of the forum users thought that you are wrong what is your advice? How can the majority remove you from your role. I don't think you are untochable, aren't you?
Let's create a democracy forum together!

No, look at this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2412617.0

He was a normal user.

he din't sell or buy any accounts! if He asked this does not mean that he bought something or sold it!

So your answer isn't right. To be a normal user is not enough.

I think we have a serious problem in the forum.
Lauda and other members put negative trust without any rules. They created their own rules.
Sometimes they punish the intention. They don't have to report any proof.
The reference is not a proof.
They decided to apply  their own rules but they don't understand that the problem is the possibility to create multiple accounts.
Why Lauda doesn't ask theymos to link the account to an Id card or to a cellular phone number?
Lauda giving the neg trust, force you to create a new account.
Why Lauda doesn't ask Theymos to lock the  "Invites & Accounts". (remember that buying accounts is legit)
It should be very happy but doing this he would not have his game anymore.

So I ask to all of you to do something against this problem.

I think that we can ask every day  in every thread for a bounty campaign to the bounty manager  to put ~Lauda in his default trust list ignoring Lauda trust.

Maybe we can create a Signature asking for ~Lauda in the default trust.

We could create every days tons of account (remember it's not against the rule) posting this message in every thread and reporting this problem to DT1 users.

We have to do something, they put red trust to legit users without any rules, without anybody that told them to do, they punish the intention, this is witch-hunt.

So the fact is:
There are no rules
You can buy and sell account
You can ask to everyone to ignore Lauda putting ~Lauda in the default trust list.

Remember that Lauda can't be judged by anyone and ignoring him is the only weapon we have.

I want to buy a knife! Do you think will I be accused of murder?

Your words have no logic without limiting the number of user per person.
And I want to tell you a thing: you can't because people can't create a lot of users!
Can you imagine a nation with tha possibility to have hundreds of different Id-card or Driving License?

I think we have a serious problem in the forum.
Lauda and other members put negative trust without any rules. They created their own rules.
Sometimes they punish the intention. They don't have to report any proof.
The reference is not a proof.
They decided to apply  their own rules but they don't understand that the problem is the possibility to create multiple accounts.
Why Lauda doesn't ask theymos to link the account to an Id card or to a cellular phone number?
Lauda giving the neg trust, force you to create a new account.
Why Lauda doesn't ask Theymos to lock the  "Invites & Accounts". (remember that buying accounts is legit)
It should be very happy but doing this he would not have his game anymore.

So I ask to all of you to do something against this problem.

I think that we can ask every day  in every thread for a bounty campaign to the bounty manager  to put ~Lauda in his default trust list ignoring Lauda trust.

Maybe we can create a Signature asking for ~Lauda in the default trust.

We could create every days tons of account (remember it's not against the rule) posting this message in every thread and reporting this problem to DT1 users.

We have to do something, they put red trust to legit users without any rules, without anybody that told them to do, they punish the intention, this is witch-hunt.

So the fact is:
There are no rules
You can buy and sell account
You can ask to everyone to ignore Lauda putting ~Lauda in the default trust list.

Remember that Lauda can't be judged by anyone and ignoring him is the only weapon we have.