Of course i don't sell coins I mining right  now. Even  ETH
But this doesnot mean mining is still profitable.
Some said they got $1 per GPU in a day. I 'd said it more close to $0.5
We can speculate  that rebond will  come one day. That's perfect.
But mining can't be the only work for leaving. Course you can't  now even sell  this coins for  electricity bills Or  pizza.
It's a hobby again. Or some kind of investment.
That's the point

yes i create it with hdd raw copy and it worked fine, i think  .but it wont boot up,i also tryed usb but it was the same problem.
and when i connect the ssd it boots up just fine with win 10.
but is it normal to see nothing on the other partition? the first you can see the config txt file

What I have done is to widen the time frame, this one is running at 14.16 hours and has not taken a loss since the 6th. I visually review them from time to time, looking to create a symmetrical sine wave with corresponding entry and exit points. I almost never run under 4 hours most ranging from 8-10 hours a month ago I had one running 52 hours. NBT is costing me to run, I currently have it at 36.85 hours. Some simply do not have enough undulation to get the job done and eat up exchange fees.


DASH is another one notorious for being a flat liner for mArgin maker. This is mine running at 14.02 hours for a couple of  months and is another excellent example of what I try to accomplish with setting statistics interval. Even still, in this market it only profits half the time.

@rothcom65 thanks for chiming in and your willingness to see both sides.

Speaking for myself here -- as someone who purchased the ultra license in LATE December, have only paper traded (as I felt the software still had some small issues to be worked out)... while I feel taken advantage of, I don't expect Margin to give us lifetime free access to the new model. That doesn't seem sustainable to me. However, I would have appreciated to see a little more effort in extending the free period, or at the very least allowing those who purchased within xx days prior to the rebranding announcement, the option to be refunded, especially if they have not used Leo to trade IRL.

I can see frustration on both sides. Lifetime means what it says. We can talk semantics all day and never get anywhere. I can also see that having a viable business means the software will continue. I also don’t like heated exchanges, where someone is called a troll for voicing their opinions, and where someone says the company is unethical. There has to be a willingness to talk things through and come to a reasonable compromise of sorts. With any software purchase, there is a company that wants to do what they love and make money to keep doing it, and a customer that wants use out of it. If those two things benefit each other, everyone is happy. When the equation becomes imbalanced, there is friction and one side has to make a change. Software doesn’t do what the customer expected, refund or change the software. Business has to decide what they can do. Business can’t stay afloat with current software licensing model to stay in business. Have to change or go under, not good for anyone.

Extremes:
1.   Business changes licensing model, leaving current customers in the dust.
2.   Business marks all current customers as lifetime paid and changes model for new customers.

My guess is that option 2 is what most customers would want, unless they have other reasons motivating them such as fear of the business going under and losing access to software they love. Number one was probably the best bet to keep the business afloat at the risk of alienating customers.

Seems a compromise was put forth in between the extremes by providing a free period and by reducing fees to try to create a win for all. Some like it, some do not for whatever reasons. The choices are to continue to try to reach a consensus, or a higher percentage of agreement, or just see what survives the fallout of the current offer.

1.   In an effort to offer other options for discussion, which may be impossible, it there a way to turn over the API portion of the code for community updates, or charge for API updates.
2.   Maybe you get a percentage of trades like an exchange. I’d give you .1% of all trades. I give Bittrex .25% on each.
3.   Another thought would be to continue to support API changes for free, and entice people away from the old software with great new features with Margin. This would only work if there was an agreement on what current feature sets or performance criteria for Leonardo it should end with. I know there are challenges with this as have been mentioned.

I think entertaining a frank discussion with customers, without everyone getting bent out of shape, is beneficial for everyone. It may not change the current offer, but it could change opinions to be a little more positive and receptive to changes that must happen for us to continue our relationship. I think everyone wants this to succeed or we wouldn't be here.

I am sorry, but if we didn't take this step then we would risk not being able to stay competitive. This was necessary to ensure that we could expand and do all the things we want to.

We think that the Starter plan which costs $180 a year is reasonable for small investors.

But of course, everyone will have to make up their own mind.

All the best,
Jonathan

Leonardo upsets me If there was a power outage, all orders should be monitored manually or Leonardo will sell them in negative :(sorry for bad English

Well, that is not really true. They're working on it constantly and we get new features and even new included exchange APIs every few weeks. Additional, they usually answer a mail sent to support@marginsoftware.de within hours..

So ... hey ... they had a _ton_ of new customers in the last months and have to cope even with that. But they're still really fast whenever a problem arises.

If you have still access to you email account you used back then when you registered your API keys, i think you could simply send them an email and i'm sure they will happily change your keys if you send them the new ones.

Greetings,

hacky

We agree. It is in on our todo list and would also love to see it

All the best,

  Rene

Hello

EVGA DG-86 will be a nice case
But 4x 1080 with only 1000W will not be enough
I got 3x 1080ti (with AIO in a bequiet case) which need about 800W
The case get very hot too. Add some extra fans on the case

I'll recommend you to include the amount of downtime for reasons such as electricity down, Internet loss, miners acting up leading to crashes. Many people who come all enthusiastic to get into mining forget to take this into account. I was one of them. Moreover, check for the stability of the miners that you're going to buy. I'll definitely say that the price is really good for the offer but do your research before buying them and ask if he can produce some invoice for the GPUs which will make your RMA process for any GPU a less hassle in the future.