|
10 million of my CENT arrived at Cryptsy after several hours.
|
|
|
|
It is not clear in the front page that UFC has been relaunched... also the pools are missing. Is http://ufccoin.com the pool? Also, when I issue "getwork" or "getblocktemplate" into the UFC console, the program crashes... Finally, when trying to solomine I get Error with server: {"result":null,"error":{"code":-7,"message":"Out of memory"},"id":"1"}
although I have over 2GB free... Finally, what is the port for the ufccoin.com pool? the "getting started" page is not helpful |
|
|
|
|
"blocks" : 280884,
"moneysupply" : 42891297001666.00000000,
Can someone confirm that this is the correct chain?
|
|
|
|
|
I downloaded the latest version and have currently downloaded 34K blocks. Will update here when syncing is completed.
|
|
|
|
|
What is the status of CENT deposit to Cryptsy? My wallet version is v0.10.0.0-beta, and the outputs range from date 13-12-27 to 14-01-14.
|
|
|
|
|
KED has a lower price than UFC... interesting...
(that reminds me, I need to redeem my KED soon)
|
|
|
|
Doog just said this in chat: 12:22:25 [removed] Doog, biggest.txt seems to be not updating?
12:22:28 [removed] generated Tue Jan 21 19:59:30 UTC 2014
12:22:43 (1) <dooglus> [removed] yeah, I stopped it - it takes far too long and makes the server lag to update it
12:22:55 (1) <dooglus> I should make it just do the easy ones - last hour, etc.
12:23:00 (1) <dooglus> it's the 'last 52 weeks' that kills it
|
|
|
|
My blockchain is stuck at block #257923. Debug.log is full of these:
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block d11d8ba7a831b5255255b026923133842dd64b30ae7d82970310f7385b949148
received block efe4d5e10cf7ca6cc2cf
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake eb1a72517503729351512204730094fab032b36c91ec3885509e900c92c2506f, hashProof=ee3c3e4949bfebf6583ca2b14509e4753d606d76d335d0d8039d507e20e4c860
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block efe4d5e10cf7ca6cc2cfd5b9a9976cc14db0bf58367fc6593c153988d78e1074
received block 80c7145295e0166b85f0
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake 8bcdfd49147e974cd960b106de16fb5b1ec12fbbb2b08ab171ed1e9357e5ed7b, hashProof=0274a4151226c91ee405b2a76e8177f56ef83b2d6de7100d055826563eb1e30d
received block d107f9194ff3f60cd59d
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=2a099458b259d6a1e173
received block 87dd8f6c7367ae995dc4
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=35b892650896c7face3c
|
|
|
|
I wish I had more 42s... only have 0.00000005 (incidentally my hashrate is 42 KH/s  ) |
|
|
|
|
In the end, I only managed to stake half of my 50-million outputs before the stake fix kicked in (and a majority of my money was in unstakable 170-million outputs). But that's okay - I still have several billion stored up.
|
|
|
|
On the new year's day I realised that most of my outputs are 170 million in size, meaning they won't be able to generate 10x stake...  Saddening... I thought I would be able to get 20 billion after Jan 8, now it seems I'll only be able to get 8 billion... |
|
|
|
|
You should move all the Quark algorithm coins to the Limited GPU list.
Also do you know about SIFcoin, ancestor of Quark?
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to amend the max amount that can be sent in one transaction to, say, 100 trillion?
|
|
|
|
|
If I have a 170-million coin output can I stake it? It will form 2 outputs of nearly 1 billion each, but is the resulting transaction legal?
Also, could we raise the coin limit to, say, 100 trillion coins?
|
|
|
|
You want to make this a success, you must tell all singapore people first, cannot just like that release on some random forum in the middle of nowhere, okay? And we all know that all the people mining will be our dear FT from America, not Singaporeans... You think our old cleaners construction workers and hard labourers can know about this coin? Please lah, think three times before announcing stuff like this And, isn't it ironic that a coin for "offset the unevenly" has quite a large premine?  Finally, your logo makes absolutely zero reference to Singapore... it's just three letters S G and C |
|
|
|
|
CPU only -> GPU does not have large advantage over CPU? Then Momentum PoW, Prime PoW are CPU-only, others are not
Also YaCoin's algo might be too hard for GPUs come the next N-factor increase
|
|
|
|
|
The CENT market will probably have prices in the thousands... what will be on it? ShitCoin?
|
|
|
|
I do not, on the other hand, have any connections or sway over exchanges to make them keep trading an unprofitable coin. That's not my job, and that's all I'm saying. The only thing I will not do for you is to advertise and promote a coin i know you shouldn't invest in. But i'm not going to stop you from doing so, and that is all.[/size]
The_Catman, in this topic we should have to discuss about how to make a coin better, more balanced and interesting for use in services. That's what I expect from the developer. I twice proposed to introduce a fee for transfer, which will be destroyed. This would reduce the number of coins gently, without shocks. This would balanced the coin a little. It is necessary for the salvation of the coin. I was very surprised that no one has commented on this and did not express their views. And the developer unfortunately as well. I support the idea of putting in fees and destroying those. say, put some % of the amount as fees about 1% or 0.1% would be nice i guess and would make sense..... maybe even 0.01% This steady deflation, though, would encourage people to hoard their coins... I suggest the following fee scheme: fee = max(1, 0.01*(total number of coin-years)) CENT
Like this, the fee is increased over the years, discouraging hoarding, since to move the coins around after a long period would incur huge fees... Any pitfalls with this strategy? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
