Bitcoin Forum
July 20, 2024, 10:31:01 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with the future in mind on: October 20, 2021, 08:31:08 AM
...
What Michi wrote:

Chinese mining powerhouses feel that mooncoin should reamin PoW... This isn't surprising at all. So what you're saying is since you and your friends have the advantage, it should remain biased to your advantage. Shocking. The purpose of Mooncoin is not to line the pockets of Chinese mining farms. Nor is Dogecoin. The world may change around you guys soon. I know you enjoy having crypto holders be dependent on your whims -- who in your position wouldn't? It won't last. PoW coins WILL become a pariah the world over. The future of currency is not giant Chinese warehouses filled with single purpose hardware doing useless calcs. And I'm not at all worried as to whether or not you agree on that. Time will take care of it.

This response really struck me because in some ways it is meant to shed light on the technology to come, with a number of implications that could profoundly change the entire crypto world. Which, in light of the energy and environmental implications as well, I can't help but agree with.

At the same time, the block of the mining farms in China and the almost total zeroing of the role of the Chinese in the hash power, the idea of the president of El Salvador to use the geothermal energy of a volcano, and last but not least Jack Dorsey that with Square intends to revolutionize the energy mining industry are equally valid visions in support of the PoW algorithm.

What do you think? Shall we open a debate here on this forum about the different algorithms and their implications?

Well, you say now that to keep Mooncoin PoW is a 'whim' (is it okay btw to use words like that, again and again trying to say something to make other people look bad, is it normal discussing?)
Okay, let's check out what is a definition of 'whim',
Whim definition is -' a capricious or eccentric and often sudden idea or turn of the mind.'
But Mooncoin is PoW since its beginning, since 2013. Rather turning it to PoS is turn of the mind and a whim itself.

Next, why nothing is being said about what is necessary to transform PoW into PoS. Because, even if someone can support the idea itself, the price of this action can be hidden behind the scene. A simple question how one is going to make it even in the theory, to describe it step by step? Do you mean to start a new blockchain and swap, with which ratio, with which staking rewards? How exchanges would react? Could there be potential issues during the process?

Again, you say like you know the future that PoS will live and PoW willl die.
Time will tell. No one knows the future. Is it wise to make it look like someone knows the future? Maybe laws in the future will just consider staking as a financial pyramid unlike PoW and that can lead to sanctions against PoS coins. Yes, crypto is basically government-resistant, but would all this mess help the project grow?

Mooncoin is PoW. Let's say you came to it to help it. But many its native features you don't agree with. But why just not create your own coin or join and help any PoS coin which better fits your view? Why change everything, the algo, the nature of coin, attack people who don't agree with all that mess and say that they are dictators with whims, not mature etc.

What you write makes a lot of sense about the need to keep the PoW algorithm.

What - not me, but Michi - says worries me from an energy and sustainability point of view, but as - I - wrote below it is also true that the mining industry is moving towards more environmentally sustainable solutions and reinforces the idea of the PoW algorithm for Bitcoin and a few other coins.

Thanks for your point of view Abiki, this is all very important for me to understand.
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with the future in mind on: October 19, 2021, 08:17:51 AM
There are not too many classic Proof of Work coins in the crypto world.
Mooncoin is one of them.
99 percent of coins are tokens and pos.

You're right about that. Not many coins are PoW nowadays. The market is full of shitcoins and tokens based on PoS. If this keeps up, the industry might become heavily-centralized. It goes against the principles of crypto/Blockchain tech. Consider how Bitcoin hasn't switched to a new consensus algorithm, despite many people criticizing its "high-energy" consumption. The energy "wasted" is being put to good use as it makes the network much more decentralized and censorship-resistant.  I'm glad Mooncoin is still a PoW coin, or it would've been a goner.  Hopefully, a country like El Salvador would open up to Mooncoin as PoW-based cryptocurrencies become extremely rare in the future.  Smiley

In the last poll proposed in one of Mooncoin Telegram channels (https://t.me/MoonCoinEco) about algo change preferences (PoW, PoS, Hybrid PoW/PoS) I voted for PoW.

While I generally agree with what Abiki and Heitor have written in this forum, I was puzzled by the direct response that Michi, the mooncoin lead dev and also a Doge core dev, gave to a Chinese investor who is insisting for Mooncoin to stay with PoW technology.

What Michi wrote:

Chinese mining powerhouses feel that mooncoin should reamin PoW... This isn't surprising at all. So what you're saying is since you and your friends have the advantage, it should remain biased to your advantage. Shocking. The purpose of Mooncoin is not to line the pockets of Chinese mining farms. Nor is Dogecoin. The world may change around you guys soon. I know you enjoy having crypto holders be dependent on your whims -- who in your position wouldn't? It won't last. PoW coins WILL become a pariah the world over. The future of currency is not giant Chinese warehouses filled with single purpose hardware doing useless calcs. And I'm not at all worried as to whether or not you agree on that. Time will take care of it.

This response really struck me because in some ways it is meant to shed light on the technology to come, with a number of implications that could profoundly change the entire crypto world. Which, in light of the energy and environmental implications as well, I can't help but agree with.

At the same time, the block of the mining farms in China and the almost total zeroing of the role of the Chinese in the hash power, the idea of the president of El Salvador to use the geothermal energy of a volcano, and last but not least Jack Dorsey that with Square intends to revolutionize the energy mining industry are equally valid visions in support of the PoW algorithm.

What do you think? Shall we open a debate here on this forum about the different algorithms and their implications?




3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Top 10 Cryptos Under 20 Cents on: September 28, 2021, 10:28:48 AM
The cryptocurrency market is diverse, and as a trader, you have to be strategic in diversifying your portfolio to minimize risks and reap better returns. Altcoins make an ideal way of diversifying your portfolio. Some of the altcoins suitable for diversifying portfolios are those that cost less because you can add many coins to your portfolio with just a small amount of funds. Below are the top 10 cryptos that cost less than 20 cents.

What should i choose? SHIB, BTT, VET, TRX, AMP, REV, ONE, ZIL, SAFEMOON, IOST....
 let's discusse

The following two old altcoins once were among the top ones and I think they will return being among the top again in a near future:

- Feathercoin (FTC): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178286.0

- Mooncoin (Moon): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351789
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Updated "What Feathercoin offers with links and explanation" on: August 24, 2021, 09:58:49 AM
Since NFTs are now in the latest omnifeather release (active on block 3,624,000 around the 12th of april), an update of the Feathercoin details has been published here https://forum.feathercoin.com/topic/9390/what-feathercoin-offers-with-links-and-explanations

See a recap here below:

Feathercoin Under the Hood (how it operates)

NeoScrypt Algorithm - This is the algorithm used in solving a block (aka mining) and is then instrumental in moving from one set of currency transactions in the block chain to the next. A white paper is available at http://phoenixcoin.org/archive/neoscrypt_v1.pdf - and the implementation is at https://github.com/ghostlander/NeoScrypt

Current Generation ASIC resistance - The NeoScrypt algorithm is designed to use enough resources, in this case memory, such that current ASICs cannot mine Feathercoin. ASICs are a dedicated circuit board to just mine coins. Creating a dedicated circuit board to mine feathercoin would take considerable investment. For a little more detail at http://forum.feathercoin.com/topic/2156/why-ftc-is-asic-resistent-for-beginners-requesting-feedback

Advanced Checkpointing - This is a method used to prevent network attacks on the currency. Details are provided at http://forum.feathercoin.com/topic/2709/advanced-checkpointing-released there is also more information in the feathercoin wallet guide https://wrapperband.github.io/FeathercoinWalletGuide/#advanced-checkpointing-acp

336,000,000 Total Coins
- Eventually there will be 336 million coins in circulation. This will be pretty close to done around the year 2121 (see schedule below)

1 minute target block time - This is the average amount of time it takes for a block to be mined and transactions to appear in your wallet. The software constantly adjusts the mining difficulty to keep this time consistent as mining intensity varies. Look here for a deeper explanation of block time https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@ghayas/what-does-block-time-mean-in-cryptocurrency

enhanced Hash Rate Compensation - This is a method of adjusting the difficulty of the calculation the miners must do to find a block. Difficulty is adjusted based on the speed the blocks are being found on the network and should increase as the hash power of the miners increases. eHRC uses the time it took the last 15, 120 and 480 blocks to be solved and calculates (re-targets) the difficulty after every block using that data. Difficulty in general is explained at https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Difficulty a full write up on the details of eHRC can be found in the feathercoin wallet guide at https://wrapperband.github.io/FeathercoinWalletGuide/#enhanced-hash-rate-compensation-ehrc

40 coins per block (currently) - Each feathercoin block that is mined pays the miner 40 feathercoins. Every 4 years the amount paid is cut in half. (see schedule below) details at http://forum.feathercoin.com/topic/6847/block-reward-adjustment

Block halving every 2,100,000 blocks - As more and more of the feathercoin currency gets in circulation the payout of the solving a block (ie mining) is decreased. 21 million blocks is a few days short of 4 years. The intent is that miners get paid for the work in both transaction fees and from the network putting currency in circulation. As time progresses and the distribution of the source currency dries up the transaction fees become the main source of income for miners. Details on the concept can be found here https://academy.binance.com/en/glossary/halving

OmniLayer functionality - OmniFeather has been released https://github.com/OmniLayer/omnicore/releases which adds OmniLayer functionality to the Feathercoin blockchain. This allows for the creation of additional assets on the Feathercoin blockchain other than the native feathercoin. Assets can be either managed or have a fixed supply, can be introduced via crowdsale and exchanged via a decentralised exchange built into the OmniFeather protocol.

Default Feathercoin network port is 9336 - The whole Feathecoin cryptocurrency network for sending coins around and exchanging blocks runs on this port. You can retrieve the peer to peer information on various sites like this one https://www.coinexchange.io/network/peers/FTC

Default RPC mining port is 9337 - This is the port that is used by mining software to communicate via Remote procedure call (rpc) to a server when doing mining. Checkout the solo mining thread for an example of its use http://forum.feathercoin.com/topic/9058/guide-solo-mining-for-feathercoin-and-neoscrypt


What features are available


Comments - Comments can be added to transactions. The technical details for reading them are available here http://forum.feathercoin.com/topic/8640/faq-how-to-read-comments-from-the-feathercoin-blockchain further information about comments can be found here in the feathercoin wallet guide https://wrapperband.github.io/FeathercoinWalletGuide/#comments-in-the-feathercoin-blockchain

Coin control - The coin control feature allows you to control how you spend the coins in your wallet when sending a transaction. You can choose what addresses will be the ones sending the coins and which of the coins you have received will be used. The wallet interface details for this can be found here https://wrapperband.github.io/FeathercoinWalletGuide/#options-menu---wallet-tab

Setting up a wallet

download the software - To use feathercoin you just need software to handle receiving coins to a generated address (created by the wallet) . The same software allows you then send the coins to another address. Links are on the main page of the site at https://www.feathercoin.com/ or from github at https://github.com/FeatherCoin/Feathercoin/releases/
Setting up a server to do e-commerce and feathercoin block chain actions

Feathercoin rest API
- the feathercoin.com site has rest APIs available for full documentation see https://www.feathercoin.com/feathercoin-api/

Payment Gateway Software from gourl.io - Their site has a number of live samples and code examples on how to do commerce with their payment gateway software. Many currencies including feathercoin are supported. They have code in php and .net available (they even have a nuget package). Their site is at https://gourl.io/ and a 3rd party forum discussing them can be found at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1043437.0

Implementing your own - If you are going to start from scratch the best place to get example code for technical reference is from the feathercoin wallet software. The code is in C++ https://github.com/FeatherCoin/Feathercoin . You can ask for further assistance in the technical development forum area https://forum.feathercoin.com/category/71/technical-development

OmniFeather


What is the Omni Layer - The Omni Layer is a communications protocol that uses the Feathercoin block chain to enable Smart Properties (tokens) and a Decentralized Exchange. A common analogy that is used to describe the relation of the Omni Layer to Feathercoin is that of HTTP to TCP/IP: HTTP, like the Omni Layer, is the application layer to the more fundamental transport and internet layer of TCP/IP, like Feathercoin.

What is OmniFeather - OmniFeather is a fast, portable Omni Layer implementation that is based off the Feathercoin codebase. This implementation requires no external dependencies extraneous to Feathercoin, and is native to the Feathercoin network just like other Feathercoin nodes. It currently supports a wallet mode and is seamlessly available on three platforms: Windows, Linux and MacOS. Omni Layer extensions are exposed via the JSON-RPC interface. Development has been consolidated on the OmniFeather product, and it is the reference client for the Omni Layer.

Compatibility with Feathercoin - OmniFeather is based on Feathercoin 0.18.4 and can be used as replacement for Feathercoin. Switching between Omni Core and Feathercoin may be supported. However, it is not advised to upgrade or downgrade to versions other than Feathercoin 0.18.4. When switching to OmniFeather , it may be necessary to reprocess Omni Layer transactions.

NFTs in OmniFeather - NFTs are non-fungible tokens. They act as a non-duplicable digital certificate of ownership for any assigned digital asset. Once the code is written, it is then minted, or permanently published, into a token on a blockchain. Once the NFT is purchased, the owner has the digital rights to resell, distribute or license the digital asset as they please. see https://digiday.com/media/wtf-is-an-nft/ for more info

NFT - Availability - Non-Fungible Tokens are not active on mainnet until block 3,624,000, this is roughly four weeks ahead of launch and should be sometime around 12 April. This feature is already live on testnet and can be tested there in preparation for mainnet launch.

Omnifeather on github - The project is located at https://github.com/OmniLayer/omnifeather

Download the software - The releases are available for download at https://github.com/OmniLayer/omnifeather/releases


Additional Resources


OmniFeather Support - If you have any questions or problems with OmniFeather please raise a GitHub issue, send an email or post questions on Telegram linked below.

GitHub - https://github.com/FeatherCoin/Feathercoin/issuesTelegram - https://t.me/FeathercoinOfficialEmail - admin@feathercoin.com

Telegram - https://t.me/FeathercoinOfficial in recent years the telegram group chat has been the go to place to talk to others active in the feathercoin community.

Discord - https://discord.com/channels/375269855160565762/382242792518451201

Reddit - https://www.reddit.com/r/FeatherCOin/ A subreddit to talk about everything Feathercoin related

Twitter - https://twitter.com/Feathercoin

Bitcointalk.org’s thread on feathercoin - This is a 3rd party site dedicated to crypto currency. this is the feathercoin thread in their forums https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178286.0

Block Explorer: - https://fsight.chain.tips/

API - https://www.feathercoin.com/feathercoin-api/

Mining Statistics - https://www.feathercoin.com/netstats/

Mining Calculator (CoinWarz) - https://www.coinwarz.com/calculators/feathercoin-mining-calculator

Newsletter Archive -https://www.feathercoin.com/category/newsletter/

FAQ - http://forum.feathercoin.com/topic/8523/faq-new-forum-member-most-asked-questions-try-here-first
Feathercoin wallet guide - https://wrapperband.github.io/FeathercoinWalletGuide


Halving Schedule


Halving Date - Block Count - Coins Mined - New Block Payout

2017-07-10 - 1793040 - 168000000 - 40

2021-11-03 - 3893040 - 252000000 - 20

2026-02-27 - 5993040 - 294000000 - 10

2030-06-24 - 8093040 - 315000000 - 5

2034-10-18 - 10193040 - 325500000 - 2.5

2039-02-12 - 12293040 - 330750016 - 1.25

2043-06-08 - 14393040 - 333375008 - 0.625

2047-10-02 - 16493040 - 334687520 - 0.3125

2052-01-27 - 18593040 - 335343776 - 0.15625

2056-05-22 - 20693040 - 335671904 - 0.078125

2060-09-16 - 22793040 - 335835968 - 0.0390625

2065-01-10 - 24893040 - 335917984 - 0.01953125

2069-05-07 - 26993040 - 335959008 - 0.009765625

2073-08-31 - 29093040 - 335979520 - 0.004882813

2077-12-25 - 31193040 - 335989760 - 0.002441406

2082-04-21 - 33293040 - 335994880 - 0.001220703

2086-08-15 - 35393040 - 335997440 - 0.0006103516

2090-12-10 - 37493040 - 335998720 - 0.0003051758

2095-04-05 - 39593040 - 335999360 - 0.0001525879

Halving dates are a best guess and will need to be recalculated from time to time as the block times vary slightly. They are targeted at 1 minute per block but the average tends to run a few seconds more over time. It is possible for this to go lower than 1 minute as well as chance plays a factor.

These dates were calculate on feb 9th 2021 using 64.9 seconds per block which was a the block time average from that date back to the previous halving date. Ideally you would just look at block counts. the July 2017 block was 1793040 and every 2100000 after that it will be cut in half.


Legacy features


These are only available in Feathercoin-qt version 0.9.6.2.

Paper Wallet - A paper wallet is a document that contains copies of the public and private keys that make up a wallet. Often it will have QR codes, so that you can quickly scan them and add the keys into a software wallet to make a transaction. The feathercoin wallet provides an interface for you to get hold of the necessary keys to create one details are here https://wrapperband.github.io/FeathercoinWalletGuide/#paper-wallet-menu as well as here http://forum.feathercoin.com/topic/8650/faq-how-can-i-generate-a-feathercoin-paper-wallet-online an online tool for creating the actual paper wallet can be found here https://walletgenerator.net/?currency=Feathercoin

Stealth Addresses - Stealth Addresses are used to keep wallet to wallet transfers hidden from others despite being in a publicly available block chain. Details are available here http://forum.feathercoin.com/topic/8609/faq-feathercoin-wallet-advanced-feature-stealth-addresses the feature can be found here in the feathercoin wallet guide https://wrapperband.github.io/FeathercoinWalletGuide/#stealth-addresses

Multi Signature Address - A multi-sig address is a special kind of public key address. it has more than one private key. This means that you can create an address which no individual person can spend money from, but which instead requires every signer to agree before a payment can be made. details on using it can be found here http://forum.feathercoin.com/topic/7870/guide-how-to-use-feathercoins-multi-signature-address-page the feature can be found here in the feathercoin wallet guide https://wrapperband.github.io/FeathercoinWalletGuide/#multisig-button

FTC is one of the oldest POW coins with a bright future, a concentrate of technology with a tremendous growth potential.

Thanks to the development team and to all investors and supporters for developing this fantastic project.

FTC is going to Mars  Cool
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with the future in mind on: August 09, 2021, 04:29:03 PM
Vassilis, a dev who unexpectedly received 62B in 2018 said that he was in full control of private keys of address, which was his personal address for donations, other investors never had control on his address or on him
(unlike what some people were actively saying in Telegram during years).
He said that shortly after receiving coins in 2018 he reported unjust enrichment to Greek and European authorities.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5236362.msg56686081#msg56686081
Vassilis always was saying that though coins were sent to his address for donations, he considered them as seized property not belonging to him, and only asked for legal documents to proceed. If he would consider these coins as personal funds, what would prevent him from selling at least part of them when the price was 50 times higher, in 2018?
He never touched even one coin.

However, POLITICALLY the truth is not wanted, politically it is more interesting to keep saying that Vassilis 'unethically acquired these coins and wants to own them at expense of community'.

You decide whether you like to be cheated and passively serve interests of people who care only about personal ambitions and never care about the truth or about the project, or you finally will start to defend your interests and your investments.

I also believe that the previous developer, Vassilis, was the victim of an attack aimed at discrediting the whole project and he found himself in the middle of a tornado.

I remember that at that time I became interested in the Mooncoin project and during the Christmas period there was the famous 62B transfer to our developer's personal account... coincidentally that move was the beginning of the decline of the Mooncoin project. So definitely a deliberate move with a clear intent.

But as you correctly pointed out, Vassilis has never moved a single coin and is awaiting an official ruling from a court of law. So I think that those who claim that Vassilis is a crook are exploiting the issue for their own ends.

6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with the future in mind on: August 02, 2021, 08:24:45 AM
Today, on July, 31 we are glad to announce
Mooncoin Fellowship (Foundation), brotherhood of Mooncoin investors.
Any investor with any amount of mooncoins can be part of our Fellowship.

We all are interested in a well balanced model of our coin. To balance interests well, devs cannot be part of Mooncoin Fellowship of investors.

Hi Heitor,
many thanks for all your efforts.

I think that Mooncoin Fellowship is a great idea.

My wish would be for a place where, democratically and transparently, we can vote and decide what direction to take the project and where to address our funds for future development.

I am proud to be joining the Mooncoin Fellowship, brotherhood of Mooncoin investors.


7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with the future in mind on: March 18, 2021, 09:54:12 AM
It is clear that the Mooncoin community needs to rebuild trust so that we can move forward together and advance our project.

I have been talking to several senior members of the Mooncoin community in a private Telegram channel which I set up and invited them to.  This small group includes a couple of long-term investors in Mooncoin and three of the principal developers for the Mooncoin Core wallet.

We have all signed onto the following Mooncoin Statement of Guiding Principles and we offer this to the rest of the Mooncoin community in the hopes of getting broad support.  Please see the link at the bottom of this post to add your name to the list of people who have signed this and who agree on this path forward for the Mooncoin project.

Link to read this as a Google Doc

Mooncoin Statement of Guiding Principles

This is a statement on the future of our decentralized cryptocurrency among those who care the most about it.  These are all beliefs and principles that we share and have widespread agreement among our community.  We have listed what needs to be done in a specific order, except as otherwise noted.  Once there is broad support and consensus on these principles, then we will decide as a community how to move forward with addressing them.

We, the undersigned, agree the following:

Building Trust & Governance
(These items are the foundation of our project and its community.)

1. A cease fire on individual accusations and attacks based on what happened in the past; people must stop making public accusations and testimonials of their lack of trust in others. We must assume positive intent among the individuals who are coming together to move the project forward.  This is a new start.  The past is the past and we are doomed to repeat it unless we learn from it.  Moving forward we will insist that all members of the community act ethically and responsibly towards positive outcomes, otherwise they forfeit their participation in our community.

2. While we hold to our philosophy of a decentralized project, we will create innovative methods to allow our community to have a voice in the future of the project and its development, and we will seek partnerships with like-minded organizations. We will find new ways to represent the constituencies of our community and ensure their voices are heard.

Sanctity of Official Resources
(These items should be roughly done in the order specified.)

3. It is critical that the Mooncoin community have a single official Wallet and all other github repositories are deleted to maintain consistency and provide confidence to potential users of the cryptocurrency. All other wallets should be archived or deleted.

4. Additional technical and protocol work needs to be done to the current wallet & blockchain to limit risk of chain attacks and other vulnerabilities.

5. The Mooncoin community should also have a single official Website. Again this is to maintain consistency and provide confidence to users.  All other websites should be archived or redirected to the main website. It is fine for there to be multiple ancillary websites such as for mining pools, explorers, etc, but the main project information should be on one official website that is the source of truth for all.

6. A new development fund consisting of a major cryptocurrency (such as BTC) should be set up to collect donations on behalf of the community for the initial purpose of being listed in an exchange. 

7. Any coins that were acquired unethically should be destroyed (burned), and that should be determined by blockchain consensus, representing the entire community.

8. Any Folgory promotion should cease immediately and users told to withdraw their coins. Then Mooncoin should ask to be delisted from Folgory.  Folgory has been proven to be an unethical exchange and we do not support Mooncoin being used by unethical exchanges.

Rebuilding the Community
(These items can be done in parallel once everything above has been accomplished.)

9. Inquiries for listing on additional exchanges should be a priority with a listing on an audited US exchange being a top priority.

10. People should be encouraged to run the current Mooncoin Core wallet on their machines at all times and to open port 44664 on their router to assist the network by running full nodes.

11. An official or semi-official mining pool should be set up and detailed instructions given to the community on how to mine with ASICs, to build the network-wide hash rate.


Signed by:

James L. Burk, Vice President, The Moon Society - 3/11/2021

George E. Pidiktakis, Mooncoin Investor - 3/12/2021

Michelle Sakayama "michi", Mooncoin Core Developer and Engineer - 3/12/2021

Andrea G. Scarpa "agswinner", Mooncoin Investor - 3/15/2021

Mark Barry, Mooncoin Core Developer - 3/17/2021

Phillip Stanton "mebagger", Mooncoin Core Developer - 3/17/2021


Add your signature by filling out this Google Form.



Good morning everybody. Thanks James for your efforts. I have just signed the Mooncoin Statement of Guiding Principles. We all hope in a better future. Best wishes. Luigi aka actarus
8  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with the future in mind on: March 04, 2021, 01:12:06 PM
 
Quote
Hi Greek Bro, I think it's really good if they return the coins to the community. The danger in this situation is if the altilly team is dishonest to the point of returning the "Moons without an owner" to Mark and friends, and as we all know the great dream of the life of Mark and associates: owning the 62B of Moon that were usurped from cryptsy , Mark once asked me if it would be a good initiative if the 62B were split between Mooncoiners, instead of being locked in with AGS who are waiting for legal responses to burn. I didn't continue the conversation, when the 62B was stolen I didn't even know what cryptocurrency was, so following a simple logic, I never had or will be entitled to 1 unit of the controversial 62B.

Heitor,
Can you prove it?
9  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with the future in mind on: March 02, 2021, 01:53:46 PM
Once we have refunded those who can provide deposit confirmation emails (which are your receipt of deposit), we will
explore more options provided there are still funds in the moon wallet. Once all approved refunds have been dispersed
we will send what is left to the team.

Charles,

Altilly.com

Is perhaps Altilly.com stating that an email is a more valuable traceability system than the blockchain itself?

the refund procedure must satisfy the rightful owners directly as much as possible. Any transfer of the remaining coins to a dev team account is illegal and takes the form of 62b stolen coins.  That would be a situation I would call cryptsy number 2.


I couldn't have come up with a better definition....
10  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with the future in mind on: March 02, 2021, 08:53:06 AM
Once we have refunded those who can provide deposit confirmation emails (which are your receipt of deposit), we will
explore more options provided there are still funds in the moon wallet. Once all approved refunds have been dispersed
we will send what is left to the team.

Charles,

Altilly.com

Is perhaps Altilly.com stating that an email is a more valuable traceability system than the blockchain itself?
11  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Feathercoin [FTC] on: November 17, 2020, 09:39:54 AM
Feathercoin is updated to the latest version of Bitcoin.
It means that it has exactly the same core features as Bitcoin + several differentiators such as ASIC resistant algorithm, protection againts 51%, ...
The new exchange has been enabled to offer alternatives to people interested on buying or trading Feathercoin. It is somehow better to organize it when it is quiet rather than all the attention is their.

Overtime the original developer and founder Bushstar has made amazing work. In addition to recently join the Bitcoin core developer team, he is still active today on Feathercoin and working on the following subject:
- Regular alignment of Feathercoin Core with Bitcoin core. Current version is 0.18.1
- As part of the OMNI foundation, Peter is currently adapting the OMNI layer to run it over feathercoin in order to get faster network and higher capacity. Thanks to Feathercoin 1 minute block time.
If you look at the Hashrate, you can see that Feathercoin for more than 2 years as a hashrate average of 6 Ghz. This power is equivalent to 6,000 high-end GPU. In other words it means that Feathercoin is currently mined by a big actor. We don't exactly who is behind but we know that something big is happening.

We truly believe that the volumes on Feathercoin will reach new highs in the future and we definitely need new Exchange to offer new investor a chance to buy and sell Feathercoin.

OmniFeather now available. This adds OmniLayer to Feathercoin, the first non-Bitcoin blockchain to add it.
https://twitter.com/Feathercoin/status/1326882351796813824

This is great news!




12  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with the future in mind on: August 14, 2020, 10:04:44 AM
Good morning. The hosting fee (for the next year) about Mooncoin Explorer (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/moon/#) has been paid by  one of the most known Moon's supporters : Agswinner. I want to say a big thank you about it !

Thanks to Agswinner and the old supporters of this historic coin!
13  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with the future in mind on: April 26, 2020, 12:52:47 PM
Hi all Moon Bros, i make one extratab in my website for shared information about Mooncoin Web Wallet, the page is:

http://mooncoin.vip/mobile-wallet/

and i make a monetized tweet for shared the new tab in my website

https://twitter.com/HeitorMooncoin/status/1254113452253118466

Well done bro 👍🏻
14  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with the future in mind on: April 04, 2020, 05:07:56 PM
Good afternoon. Altilly has opened the deposits and withdrawals for Mooncoin. It's a positive news.

Good news! Thanks 😊
15  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with the future in mind on: March 30, 2020, 06:09:15 AM
it’s a bad time for the whole world but I foresee many big changes and many opportunities, I always remain convinced that MOON will have a lot to say.

Hello everyone!

Hope this new thread can bring fresh air and good fortune to Mooncoin 🌙 and all mooncoiners.

Take care!

🖖🏻
16  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 built in 2013 with future in mind on: March 29, 2020, 05:20:26 PM
I was thinking about some accusations, that there were 'individual instructions' and not the consensus thing. Anyway, when a dev codes a wallet, he does it whether after his own decision, whether after receiving instructions from other members. Instructions can be public, made by different community members via posting at forum, or instructions can be sent via PM, by a member who is a 'bridge' between the community and a dev.  However, if the community agrees with something, asks for it, waits for it, if it is evident for everyone that something is good for the entire community, is it correct to say about 'individual instructions', even if finally these instructions were sent to a dev in a PM by one person who connected a dev and the community?
Another accusation was that things should not be voted at forum, but should be presented to miners via miners or users activated fork. Maybe it works for big coins like DOGE, LTC or BTC. But if there are about 50-80 nodes like in Mooncoin network and we understand that miners mine a coin mostly to sell it at exchanges and are not very well informed about a situation with Mooncoin, and one user can run easily 10 nodes, can we say that miners or users activated fork means community consensus and fair voting exactly in this case?
It worked in this way: community members were asked via posts in the thread and via PM about their decision and a dev was informed, or a dev asked other members by himself, via posting or via PM, some devs communicated also at Discord and got instructions from Discord community members. If even minority of members don't agree with something, for me it is always a sign that something is wrong. However, if I remember correct, until the last events, the only disagreement in the community about what to implement was about Mooncoin logo.

Accusations? Again? From the Mooncoin Core Team? They should stop making accusations and focus only on development instead, if that's really what they want, or definitely leave, as you already proposed to them...
17  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 mandatory update to 0.18.1 on: March 06, 2020, 04:46:05 PM
Ok, I will prove that I am not a boss and that I am not personally interested.
My suggestion to the community:
to invite an independent dev, not ChekaZ , not MooncoinCore devs.
This dev had to be experienced, responsible, trusted, and with respect to decentralisation,
with respect to Mooncoin history and looking into the future,
and not affiliated with current devs, and not affiliated with agswinner and me.

He will start his own Bitcointalk ANN thread, Telegram channel and will unite the community.
I will not participate in important questions when I see that Mooncoin development is in trusted hands, and Mooncoin will remain decentralised with volunteers.
There will be another Bitcointalk ANN thread, and I will be just a topic starter of inactive thread obviously.

Of course, I am still responsible, if coins of normal members were locked by mistake in 0.18, but it had to be proved with research. No one, except Michi, reported it before, or show me a post. After the research and comments from ChekaZ we will know the truth.

A Big Thank You MF for your transparency and your help so far! This is a very precious suggestion!

Edit: I will expect the same suggestion from Mark Barry and Mooncoire Core Team!

Thank you? Seriously? Thank you for what?

You are thanking the person that is responsible for the blocking of 1,500 transactions but doesn't know who's coins are blocked. None knows how many coins are blocked nor how many wallets are blocked,  

It took a senior developer to find out that her coins were blocked.

Do YOU know if YOUR coins are blocked?

You talk of transparency. How transparent is Mooncoin Foundation?

You then edit to say you expect the same from our team.  It was OUR team that found out that coins other than the 62+12 were blocked. Is your type of transparency one that keeps these things hidden?

We found that out because WE were looking into how both wallets could be combined. Through all this crap WE are still working on a suitable solution.

And WE ARE TRANSPARENT.

A few small talk from now on, only serious proposals for a future development of Mooncoin.

I ask you again. Do you and your team accept MF's proposal to give up, reset everything and start over with an independent third party or not? It is a simple answer, YES or NO. Proposals will follow.

18  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 mandatory update to 0.18.1 on: March 06, 2020, 01:40:13 PM
Ok, I will prove that I am not a boss and that I am not personally interested.
My suggestion to the community:
to invite an independent dev, not ChekaZ , not MooncoinCore devs.
This dev had to be experienced, responsible, trusted, and with respect to decentralisation,
with respect to Mooncoin history and looking into the future,
and not affiliated with current devs, and not affiliated with agswinner and me.

He will start his own Bitcointalk ANN thread, Telegram channel and will unite the community.
I will not participate in important questions when I see that Mooncoin development is in trusted hands, and Mooncoin will remain decentralised with volunteers.
There will be another Bitcointalk ANN thread, and I will be just a topic starter of inactive thread obviously.

Of course, I am still responsible, if coins of normal members were locked by mistake in 0.18, but it had to be proved with research. No one, except Michi, reported it before, or show me a post. After the research and comments from ChekaZ we will know the truth.

A Big Thank You MF for your transparency and your help so far! This is a very precious suggestion!

Edit: I will expect the same suggestion from Mark Barry and Mooncoire Core Team!

Thank you? Seriously? Thank you for what?

You are thanking the person that is responsible for the blocking of 1,500 transactions but doesn't know who's coins are blocked. None knows how many coins are blocked nor how many wallets are blocked, 

It took a senior developer to find out that her coins were blocked.

Do YOU know if YOUR coins are blocked?

You talk of transparency. How transparent is Mooncoin Foundation?

You then edit to say you expect the same from our team.  It was OUR team that found out that coins other than the 62+12 were blocked. Is your type of transparency one that keeps these things hidden?

We found that out because WE were looking into how both wallets could be combined. Through all this crap WE are still working on a suitable solution.

And WE ARE TRANSPARENT.

I AM VERY SERIOUS AND I DON’T TRUST YOU!

SO, IF YOU ARE A FAIR PERSON WITHOUT ANY HIDDEN INTEREST, PUT IT DOWN AND FOLLOW THE SAME SUGGESTION MF GAVE, OTHERWISE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A LIAR!
19  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 mandatory update to 0.18.1 on: March 06, 2020, 12:07:16 PM
Ok, I will prove that I am not a boss and that I am not personally interested.
My suggestion to the community:
to invite an independent dev, not ChekaZ , not MooncoinCore devs.
This dev had to be experienced, responsible, trusted, and with respect to decentralisation,
with respect to Mooncoin history and looking into the future,
and not affiliated with current devs, and not affiliated with agswinner and me.

He will start his own Bitcointalk ANN thread, Telegram channel and will unite the community.
I will not participate in important questions when I see that Mooncoin development is in trusted hands, and Mooncoin will remain decentralised with volunteers.
There will be another Bitcointalk ANN thread, and I will be just a topic starter of inactive thread obviously.

Of course, I am still responsible, if coins of normal members were locked by mistake in 0.18, but it had to be proved with research. No one, except Michi, reported it before, or show me a post. After the research and comments from ChekaZ we will know the truth.

A Big Thank You MF for your transparency and your help so far! This is a very precious suggestion!

Edit: I will expect the same suggestion from Mark Barry and Mooncoire Core Team!
20  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 mandatory update to 0.18.1 on: March 06, 2020, 10:27:21 AM
It certainly cannot be said that the Mooncoin project is a dead project, on the contrary! Alive and kicking! 6 pages of bitcoin talk forum in 2 days! Wow

Now a tech question by a non-tech person.

Michi wrote this: "Is there a reason why on Feb. 7, in a commit for the 0.18 build, changes are made to 0.18 (before its release) to block *my personal wallet* along with the 62 billion mooncoin?"

Please, can someone explain the difference between 'ADDRESS' and 'WALLET' and 'TRANSACTION'. My logic is confused.

Thanks

Pages: [1] 2 3 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!