We remember that in 2014 Mooncoin was completely abandoned by devs, investors saved the project, and by the end of 2017, before any team came,
decentralized Mooncoin was in top 100 at Coinmarketcap.
Forbes wrote about Mooncoin together with Dogecoin in 2017:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2017/07/10/cryptos-in-wonderland-12-of-the-weirdest-wackiest-coins

Since 2018 we see no real progress, new devs request 1 or 2 percent of total supply for their work, complain about lack of funding, lack of support, permanently accuse and attack us.

It is necessary to stop politics and centralizing Mooncoin for personal ambitions, including self promoting.
We need to reestablish positive, non toxic spirit and care about decentralization.
Decentralized only Mooncoin has real value.
We can see that interests of devs and investors often contradict.
Investors are interested in bright future of project and of their investments.
Investors are interested in secure and also fast progress.
Time collects all risks, it is more and more difficult to compete with top coins.
The game must be fair and rules must be the same for everyone: mine or buy mooncoins, benefit from investment profit. Not at expense of investors.
 
We all understand that since 2018, if our initiatives (for example, with 0.18 wallet, engineered by well known and trusted Bitcoin dev Peter Bushnell) wouldn't be blocked, we could reach great progress. There is not too much coding needed for progress, it is work of several days, but since 2018 there is stagnation. If several people can block any progress, how we learn from these years, that is definitely against idea of decentralization and against interests of all investors.

Hello everyone, as a big Moon investor I support this “Mooncoin Fellowship” model!
As always I will support any good initiative in the name of decentralization and innovation. 

DECLARATION
of Mooncoin Fellowship (Mooncoin Foundation),
brotherhood of Mooncoin investors


DECENTRALIZATION
1. Mooncoin is a decentralized coin, with its own blockchain.
By definition, *decentralized* means *with no center*, it is inappropriate if some people (no matter how you call them: 'group', 'team', 'board', 'devs') decide things and impose them to the decentralized project.
Self promoting, also positioning of someone as "official", any governance, burecraucy, limitations, attacks against the truth, rewriting Mooncoin history, attacks against historical resources are unacceptable.
That all is not only unethical, contradicts with the project nature, but also causes big damage to the project with its main value originated from no-center model (Mooncoin is decentralized crypto, with Bitcoin-like classic model).
Decentralized only Mooncoin has real value.
Mooncoin Fellowship aims to defend decentralized nature of Mooncoin project and interests of Mooncoin investors.

HONESTY AND ETHICS
2. Decentralized crypto with preconfigured, set in stone rules doesn't depend on trust. However, it is necessary to have friendly and collaborative, non toxic, not low-minded spirit in the community. Honesty and ethics are very important, and not less important is understanding of what is ethical and what is not.
The past of project, its true history matter. Bright future of the project cannot be built upon fake info, incorrect understanding and wrong ideas.
It is unethical that people who call themselves "official", made a chain split in 2020 and then a 51÷ attack to make their 0.17 version the main one, and falsely accused others of chain split, also in 2021 request that investors must pay to them percent of total Mooncoin supply for any further progress. If some people call themselves "official" to try to receive unclaimed, not belonging to them coins from defuncted exchanges, it is also unethical and unacceptable.

TRUE PROGRESS
3. All teams and devs, including those one who call themselves "official" - who are not capable to keep Mooncoin in top 100 at Coinmarketcap, where Mooncoin was before those teams came, or at least let it stay in top 500, must stop causing damage and leave.
False promises, inadequate delays (year and more) in solving important issues and delays in fixing of urgent security flaws (how it happened in 2019-2020) are not tolerable any longer.
"The dog in the manger" model when some people cause stagnation, block and falsely discredit good initiatives of others at expense of entire project is inadequate model of development.

FREEDOM AND PRIVACY
4. Crypto world is for freedom. It defends privacy of people and of their funds. Attacks against privacy of Mooncoin investors and supporters are not acceptable.
Privacy guarantees real decentralization, no politics, no bosses, no arrogance, no company-like model, no personal career ambitions at expense of investors and future of project, and no imposed decisions, originated from non private CEO-like center, falsely recognized as "official" one. No one is "official" in a decentralized project, there is no center. People are free to join the project, to support it in accordance with its decentralized nature, without any "governance".
Mooncoin should never be transformed into Orwell's 1984 with a single source of "the truth", and not be transformed into Orwell's Animal Farm, where "some animals are more equal".

RESOURCES AND PARTICIPATION
5. Mooncoin.com website, launched by Mooncoin investors in 2015, is the primary website of Mooncoin Fellowship. Bitcointalk ANN thread is the primary forum.
It is recommended to verify all information which you receive from Telegram channels, there were numerous requests from people, telling that there was unconfirmed or fake info.
Mooncoin is decentralized and all normal resources, not violating ethics and principles of decentralization are welcome.
Any Mooncoin investor with any amount of coins can be part of Mooncoin Fellowship. To balance interests of investors and devs, devs cannot be part of the brotherhood of investors.

There is no difference in interests of old or new, big or small investors like you say. The interest is one and healthy: profit from investments, and it is true for 99 percent of investors here. The problem occurs if someone tries to benefit at expense of investors, the project stagnates as a result.
If you change nothing in the current situation, and just will follow wrong ideas, imposed as a result of politics, that 'old bagholders are evil', like you say, there will be again and again stagnation for years.
If something sounds mad for you, please try to think it over and understand other people before just attacking them.

Vassilis, a dev who unexpectedly received 62B in 2018 said that he was in full control of private keys of address, which was his personal address for donations, other investors never had control on his address or on him
(unlike what some people were actively saying in Telegram during years).
He said that shortly after receiving coins in 2018 he reported unjust enrichment to Greek and European authorities.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5236362.msg56686081#msg56686081
Vassilis always was saying that though coins were sent to his address for donations, he considered them as seized property not belonging to him, and only asked for legal documents to proceed. If he would consider these coins as personal funds, what would prevent him from selling at least part of them when the price was 50 times higher, in 2018?
He never touched even one coin.

However, POLITICALLY the truth is not wanted, politically it is more interesting to keep saying that Vassilis 'unethically acquired these coins and wants to own them at expense of community'.

You decide whether you like to be cheated and passively serve interests of people who care only about personal ambitions and never care about the truth or about the project, or you finally will start to defend your interests and your investments.