Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
The prise rockets abnormal highs last days. But it's good because a lot of newspapers started write about bitcoin. Every day more and more people are getting familiar with it.
Doesn't that risk a bubble as more hype goes into it?
|
|
|
There are some more or less fundamental flaws with today's implementation of bitcoin. If they will not be corrected as time goes, then I would expect to see an alternative picking up the pace, leaving bitcoin behind. On the other hand, if they will be corrected, then there is no upper limit. Currently bitcoin is superior to its competitors, so it definitely has potential, but its deflationary aspects make it difficult for it to be considered a currency rather than a stock. It will not reach this price as a stock, only as a currency.
Couldn't it be used as a stock once the price becomes more stable?
|
|
|
would the two transactions via bluetooth need to then hook up to the net in order to update? The blockchain wouldn't know the transaction occurred otherwise
Yes, miners need the transaction so it can be included to blockchain So if the transaction occurred via bluetooth, the person receiving them couldn't respend until they went back online?
|
|
|
*sniff* Now i feel so bad to keep me from selling shares because of pictures of immersion cooling and strange interviews... on top i kept shares from someone because i told him the news are good...
If you stayed in only because of this week dividends, then you made a mistake, sure. Also is immersion cooling actually in use yet? I thought it was more of a proof of concept so far. The next gen has yet to be deployed, and immersion cooling could become very interesting in the long run (older gens can run for longer, larger amounts of chips can be deployed). Are they the only company doing next gen that's visibly doing so?
|
|
|
Do venture capitalists ask for insurance? for the amount of money we are giving them, we would get more than 5% ownership if we were venture capitalists. We'd also get a bigger chunk of the profits. You don't get the potential growth without taking on the risk yourself.
what potential growth? Even their own optimistic estimates put this at 6% APR with 50 new listings a year. The investors here are taking ALL the risk and getting very little in return. You want a guaranteed return on your investment, go buy 0.2% treasuries or something "safe". For the level of risk with this venture, we should be getting a bigger cut for us effectively loaning them our money. Look at the other securities with similar risk profiles. The APR is 30% or more. I mean, 2 of their competitors closed within the last 2 months, and both competitors were considerably larger, had significantly more users/listings, had better service, had better interfaces/platforms, and they STILL closed. What does HL bring to the market? "We're not closed... yet" In every single way, they offer an inferior service to those that have shut down. On the subject of risk and some sort of mitigation for that risk, look at XBOND, they are paying 17% and have considerably less risk than this security. Go play at the kids table if you can't handle it. Adults do the math, and when it doesn't add up, they ask questions. I know you're new here, so I'll let that one slide, but you should really be asking questions, not jumping on those that do. Wow, thanks for proving to everyone you have no clue about investing. 6% APR is the dividends...which few if any startups ever pay. You think the early investors demanded google to start paying dividends or rightly re-investing profits into the business. The investor's return comes in the form of CAPITAL GAINS. You are looking for a bond not a stock/fund. You'll let that one slide? OH THANK YOU HAVE MERCY. You have allowed me to exist.
|
|
|
To make this even half way worthwhile for investors, you need to back up this security with some sort of insurance to mitigate the high risk. Typical return in this area is well over 30% APR for something with a similar risk profile.
So, if you are giving 6%, you need to come up with a way to lower that risk.
Since when do securities offer insurance? Investing is a risk, if you don't want to take on the risk fine but its kinda funny that you require a safety net. Do venture capitalists ask for insurance? Did people investing in google when it came out demand insurance? You want a guaranteed return on your investment, go buy 0.2% treasuries or something "safe". You don't get the potential growth without taking on the risk yourself. Go play at the kids table if you can't handle it.
|
|
|
would the two transactions via bluetooth need to then hook up to the net in order to update? The blockchain wouldn't know the transaction occurred otherwise
|
|
|
Is the bottom above the last high (260ish)?
|
|
|
What are the requirements?
5 posts i think
|
|
|
Can't you deposit EU to bitstamp or btc-e?
|
|
|
This one's simple. You create the online dice betting site in the us, then you go to jail.
Looks like I will be moving to the Netherlands now... Or at least I wish I could... Some exchange in the Netherlands just got closed and everything seized.. Damn. Is there any country where it is legal? Bitcoins are legal everywhere. It's how certain countries consider a bitcoin exchange as a money services business (or their country's equivalent) and whether or not you have the licenses to be an MSB or not that's the issue I think.
|
|
|
Love everybodies take on this!! Of course its all speculation no matter what you think, so no need to flame each other. I do think it will hit 1000.00 easy under a year from now, I also beleive there will be another selloff that will cause a huge drop again like after the 242.00 in April or whenever that was. We need transactions to happen not the Chinese hoarding them like pokemon cards! This huge buy up by them is fueling the raise in price obviously but when that hype is done and all those coins are dormant in a bitcoin wallet it doesnt help in my opinion. If they arent being spent it defeats the damn purpose of them, I kind of hate how people are using it as a stock investment. Not saying its wrong but in the long run its not a good thing when we want BTC to be a fully functioning payment and not a stock. When large amounts are held by any person or entity thats when the bullcrap happens.....example - what if Bill Gates bought up every available BTC tomorrow then put them in a wallet and tossed it in the ocean?? I know the results could be a million different scenarios but most of the possible outcomes arent too awesome, unless you think the remaining coins would be worth a million a piece which is not realistic. Just my opinion, I dont know for sure, none of us do or wed all be loaded right now. Cheers guys!
I'm guessing it depends if there's not a big trigger to cause people to sell (ie a big fish selling a lot, a major site shutting down etc). People will take profits from gains but if no big pressure people won't panic.
|
|
|
|