The user wasn't forcing Mitchell to do anything. I don't see them talking about Mitchell. I think they just meant anyone in general. Whether someone wants to give info on Lauda is their business. Although I don't understand the point of doxing because it should be illegal here.
OK, where do I start? I've shipped stuff to Lauda in the past, I got stuff from Lauda. Both times, the shipping was handled with Mitchell acting as halt in between. From what I've gathered in chats/talks with Lauda, aswell as generally, that's the common way when dealing with them. Anyone who would have shipped to Lauda would only be abled to provide Mitchells address as a result. And the only person to provide the acutal dox is, correct, Mitchell. But that's not the point I'm trying to make. |
|
|
|
Oh, I see.  Well, I suppose as long as people get the jist of the ad, it may not seem as urgent to fix.  I'm sure a moderator will still review this. |
|
|
|
im totally disagree to DT member. they can easily give negative trust even if the reason is personal and not scam or illegal accuse. i hope that admin will change the rule about trust feedback. maybe it is to have a reference proof before the trust feedback occur..
Half of the time, there is reference. Yeah. For the ones with no reference or proper reference, something should be done. |
|
|
|
If you have the DOX of Lauda please PM me.
Mitchell, DONT! If you shipped to Lauda please PM me the address shipped to.
That's most probably Mitchell, in 99.99% of the cases. Leave them out of this, they've got nothing to do with the conflict between you and Lauda. I will verify with public sources and publish her DOX.
My guess is, you won't.
You also kinda destroyed all your credibility in this thread with that post up there. Trying to dox lauda seems like a desperate last swing to me. The user wasn't forcing Mitchell to do anything. I don't see them talking about Mitchell. I think they just meant anyone in general. Whether someone wants to give info on Lauda is their business. Although I don't understand the point of doxing because it should be illegal here. |
|
|
|
So I helped my wife go vegan just a couple of days ago, and she loves the lifestyle. Cows are considered sacred in India, and being with a beef eater was emotionally difficult for me to do. So, I just introduced her to cheaper meat substitutes that taste exactly like the real deal. I love saving little critters' lives just because I know they have eyes, noses, mouths, brains, and families just like you and I.  She ended up looking up tons of recipes online and there was this one recipe for a veggie burger made of shredded broccoli, onion, carrot, garlic, and cauliflower with curry powder and seasoning salt for taste. It's combined into a bowl with a small amount of flour then lightly pan fried. It's usually topped with mustard, ketchup, and a pickle on top. She ate half the burger and it's just sitting there. I can't.  Do I blame it on our dog? |
|
|
|
|
You can't really "fight" spam. You can monitor it or reduce it but you can't exactly eliminate it completely.
|
|
|
|
Explain LOL
You're a proven Escrow Scammer that Vod outted a long time ago.
PROVEN...
How is that NOT relevant to you calling anyone a scammer?
Just answer the question,
Have you ever been caught decieving anyone in escrow?
If the answer is not no, then you have no credibility in calling anyone out.
~BCX~
Before I say anything, I would first like to say that it'd be best to tone your retaliating responses down a little. By that, I mean please stop using offensive words\acronyms like LOL, indicating you're laughing in his face which is considered disrespectful. Or saying things like "outted" and "scammer". It's just rude. If you wanna be respected, you need to give it. As for your commentary when putting aside the obvious rude behavior, I have to agree. Quickseller's creditability is temporarily unavailable. Not to defend him or anything, but sometimes actions and behaviors can become misunderstood or completely executed poorly. Lauda is definitely an abusive character who usually contradicts themself and always seems to kiss up to people higher than them. Hearing that information from someone who isn't in any better shape just won't help the case though. I suggest making a second account at this point and just putting everything behind you. No rule book saying you can't start off fresh. That's what I did, and now I have a hero account with neutral trust for trading and whatnot. |
|
|
|
I got negative feedback from a user who refused escrow and a random user I never saw. There should be a way to apply to get feedback removed
Hi there! Just so you know, there is indeed a way to get feedback removed, just as you had requested! http://archive.is/mohqY |
|
|
|
If you don't like Lauda, I suggest putting her on ignore like I did. The moderators kind of have their own personal clique here, so.
Don't fight it. Just ignore it. It's not that big of a deal. On my other hero account, I also have her ignored so just block her on any secondaries you have, and block others you have issues with. No need to make a public thread. Thank you.
Oh jeez, why throw out a common sense solution on this forum  ~BCX~ Another reason why people should just take my highly recommend and reasonable offer.... The moderators keep refusing to take me up on it because they just want to keep their abusive or aggitating behavior noticed like this guy right here Please consider my offer. Please. 100% free. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1550911.0 |
|
|
|
There is a way. It's called messaging a moderator and pleading your case.
He can't. Trust feedbacks are not moderated that is why most people do as what they will with it. If you appeal their response will be of that it is their own trust feedbacks and opinion and you can't change it because that is how their mind works. Wrong. I have proof that the admin changes ratings. Do you want me to show you the web capture? Please go ahead and show the proof, from my understanding, they will not change ratings, they would just delete it Oh yeah, you're right. I apologize. I worded myself incorrectly. By change, I meant make it neutral or lower in that sense. I apologize. http://archive.is/mohqYBut still, I was on the right path. What I meant was to inform people that the moderators can do something about a rating if you just plead your case like this person did. Indicating that ratings are indeed monitored. |
|
|
|
|
If you don't like Lauda, I suggest putting her on ignore like I did. The moderators kind of have their own personal clique here, so.
Don't fight it. Just ignore it. It's not that big of a deal. On my other hero account, I also have her ignored so just block her on any secondaries you have, and block others you have issues with. No need to make a public thread. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
To be honest, I would just ignore it. If you don't give someone any attention, they eventually go away. Believe it or not, posts like this psychologically encourage said behavior. If you really have a problem, don't make a thread. Report it to a moderator.
I totally agree with you sir. Just don't pay attention to those nonsense post and they would go away if someone pays attention. We can't stop those nonsense topic since people have different thoughts either nonsense to other people or not. That's why I tried to offer getting the ignore feature enhanced, but nobody is taking my highly recommend and reasonable offer. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1550911.0 |
|
|
|
|
Well I mean, I guess you could message him....
I guess..?
|
|
|
|
|
To be honest, I would just ignore it. If you don't give someone any attention, they eventually go away. Believe it or not, posts like this psychologically encourage said behavior. If you really have a problem, don't make a thread. Report it to a moderator.
|
|
|
|
There is a way. It's called messaging a moderator and pleading your case.
He can't. Trust feedbacks are not moderated that is why most people do as what they will with it. If you appeal their response will be of that it is their own trust feedbacks and opinion and you can't change it because that is how their mind works. Wrong. I have proof that the admin changes ratings. Do you want me to show you the web capture? |
|
|
|
|
Since I have a lot of extra free time now, I genuinely don't mind working on the coding for the ignore feature. I made a proposal several months ago that the ignore feature needs to be set up in a way where I cannot see a person I have blocked posting in my threads or in anyone else's. Not only that, I don't take too well to the fact that when a person you have ignored makes a thread topic, their post is highlighted in gray which makes it stand out.
The ignore feature is what it should be. An ignore feature. If I still have to acknowledge your existence, I consider the ignore feature to not be very effective. That's just me. I don't want any trouble is all. Again, this offer is free. I love volunteer work.
|
|
|
|
|
There is a way. It's called messaging a moderator and pleading your case.
|
|
|
|
|
Let me first start off my commentary by apologizing on behalf of any frustrations you have here. Second, please understand that moderators only have a select amount of time to do what they need to do here. There is also only a few amount of moderators. Please be patient with your situations, provide any kind of proof for said infractions and issues and a moderator will hopefully handle your case accordingly. Good luck to you.
|
|
|
|
|
Depends. Different moderators would kindly respond differently to different situations regarding a ban. Any actual evidence you have on you to make your story plausible will be urged.
Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
But you're trying to make it seem as if gambling in itself is an issue. If you wanna gamble here and there, it's fine. It's like drinking once in a while when you're with friends at a night party, or playing a video game with your dad on Father's day. You just gotta remember Kenny Roger's song. Once in a while is cool, but to the people who literally dedicate every waking moment of their lives to drinking, smoking, drugs, video games, sex and gambling...
That's a different story. I think what you're trying to say is "Quit addiction".
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
