Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no

[TheGr33k]

Explain LOL

You're a proven Escrow Scammer that Vod outted a long time ago.

PROVEN...

How is that NOT relevant to you calling anyone a scammer?

Just answer the question,

Have you ever been caught decieving anyone in escrow?

If the answer is not no, then you have no credibility in calling anyone out.


~BCX~

Before I say anything,  I would first like to say that it'd be best to tone your retaliating responses down a little.  By that,  I mean please stop using offensive words\acronyms like LOL,  indicating you're laughing in his face which is considered disrespectful.  Or saying things like "outted" and "scammer". It's just rude. If you wanna be respected,  you need to give it.


As for your commentary when putting aside the obvious rude behavior,  I have to agree. Quickseller's creditability is temporarily unavailable. Not to defend him or anything, but sometimes actions and behaviors can become misunderstood or completely executed poorly. Lauda is definitely an abusive character who usually contradicts themself and always seems to kiss up to people higher than them. Hearing that information from someone who isn't in any better shape just won't help the case though.  I suggest making a second account at this point and just putting everything behind you.  No rule book saying you can't start off fresh.  That's what I did,  and now I have a hero account with neutral trust for trading and whatnot. 

[1714751068]

1714751068

[1714751068]

1714751068

[1714751068]

1714751068

[1714751068]

1714751068

[1714751068]

1714751068

[1714751068]

1714751068

[CanaryInTheMine]

Maybe Quickseller can go ahead and lock this thread, at least temporarily, while these guys cool off and discuss privately.

I think pretty much everyone involved is aware of that right now.

I am not sure what you are trying to say. I am not the OP, I am not defcon23, and I am not anyone that has vouched for defcon23 in this thread. Sounds like you are trying to distract from the issue that you tried to extort someone out of property worth ~$250

For those that do not know the OP gorgon666, defcon23 and Quickseller are one in the same.

Lauda has been a proactive staff member here doing his best to keep this place in order.

Quickseller is a confirmed and caught in the act escrow scammer.


Who you going to believe.


~BCX~

Defcon and QS are not the same.

[Quickseller]

Added: How come when I click on the bottom two quotes I never made they go nowhere but the top one goes to an actual quote I made?

hint: You a noob at posting fake quotes, you're better at Escrow Scamming

The quotes are not fake, they are from Personal Messages that you sent me.

[BitcoinEXpress]

Before I say anything,  I would first like to say that it'd be best to tone your retaliating responses down a little.  By that,  I mean please stop using offensive words\acronyms like LOL,  indicating you're laughing in his face which is considered disrespectful.  Or saying things like "outted" and "scammer". It's just rude. If you wanna be respected,  you need to give it.


As for your commentary when putting aside the obvious rude behavior,  I have to agree. Quickseller's creditability is temporarily unavailable. Not to defend him or anything, but sometimes actions and behaviors can become misunderstood or completely executed poorly. Lauda is definitely an abusive character who usually contradicts themself and always seems to kiss up to people higher than them. Hearing that information from someone who isn't in any better shape just won't help the case though.  I suggest making a second account at this point and just putting everything behind you.  No rule book saying you can't start off fresh.  That's what I did,  and now I have a hero account with neutral trust for trading and whatnot.  

@TheGr33k

While I certainly do have an appreciation for your rational demeanor, it isn't my nature to show a proven scammers any respect at all.

Quickseller ripped off Bitcoin newbies that didn't know any better.

Whether Lauda is abusive or not, I have no idea or really care as I am on a mission.

Lauda is a productive staff member.

and Yes QuickSeller/Defcon23/gorgon666/Panthers52/Jhanzo/Bipolarbob/PistolPete/Grumpster AND MANY OTHERS ARE ALL THE SAME PERSON


~BCX~

[gorgon666]

If you have the DOX of Lauda please PM me. If you shipped to Lauda please PM me the address shipped to.

I will verify with public sources and publish her DOX.

[Lutpin]

If you have the DOX of Lauda please PM me.

Mitchell, DONT!

If you shipped to Lauda please PM me the address shipped to.

That's most probably Mitchell, in 99.99% of the cases.
Leave them out of this, they've got nothing to do with the conflict between you and Lauda.

I will verify with public sources and publish her DOX.

My guess is, you won't.


You also kinda destroyed all your credibility in this thread with that post up there.
Trying to dox lauda seems like a desperate last swing to me.

[TheGr33k]

If you have the DOX of Lauda please PM me.

Mitchell, DONT!

If you shipped to Lauda please PM me the address shipped to.

That's most probably Mitchell, in 99.99% of the cases.
Leave them out of this, they've got nothing to do with the conflict between you and Lauda.

I will verify with public sources and publish her DOX.

My guess is, you won't.


You also kinda destroyed all your credibility in this thread with that post up there.
Trying to dox lauda seems like a desperate last swing to me.

The user wasn't forcing Mitchell to do anything.  I don't see them talking about Mitchell.  I think they just meant anyone in general. Whether someone wants to give info on Lauda is their business. Although I don't understand the point of doxing because it should be illegal here. 

[Lutpin]

The user wasn't forcing Mitchell to do anything.  I don't see them talking about Mitchell.  I think they just meant anyone in general. Whether someone wants to give info on Lauda is their business. Although I don't understand the point of doxing because it should be illegal here.  

OK, where do I start?
I've shipped stuff to Lauda in the past, I got stuff from Lauda.
Both times, the shipping was handled with Mitchell acting as halt in between.
From what I've gathered in chats/talks with Lauda, aswell as generally, that's the common way when dealing with them.
Anyone who would have shipped to Lauda would only be abled to provide Mitchells address as a result.
And the only person to provide the acutal dox is, correct, Mitchell.

[gorgon666]

If you have the DOX of Lauda please PM me.

Mitchell, DONT!

If you shipped to Lauda please PM me the address shipped to.

That's most probably Mitchell, in 99.99% of the cases.
Leave them out of this, they've got nothing to do with the conflict between you and Lauda.

I will verify with public sources and publish her DOX.

My guess is, you won't.


You also kinda destroyed all your credibility in this thread with that post up there.
Trying to dox lauda seems like a desperate last swing to me.

11 or more shipped to Lauda. The thread uncovered Lauda wanting free things and threatening when he does not get free things. In my country this is not legal.

Lauda is becoming more dangerous all the time.  Lauda should not be a moderator, and Lauda should not be deemed green.

I was understanding that you did not wish to discuss Lauda. What happened?

I told you I didn't want to comment on the matter between you and Lauda. Please don't pull me into the middle of fights where I have no stake in whatsoever, I'm already having my fair share of them as it is.
My concern was simply about where this discussion should take place, not how and what's being discussed.

[Lutpin]

I was understanding that you did not wish to discuss Lauda. What happened?

I didn't want to comment on, nor take sides in the conflict between Lauda and Defcon.
As this has clearly shifted to something else now, I don't see the need for me not to comment on it, if I feel like doing so.
I'm happy to comment on Lauda (as I did in this thread earlier aswell), it was the situation I was trying to stay out.

Summa cume Lauda (sic) I vote remain - no Bitexit for Lauda

s/o for wordplays and brexit jokes. Thumbs up!

[Jet Cash]

Summa cume Lauda (sic) 

I vote remain - no Bitexit for Lauda

[TheGr33k]

The user wasn't forcing Mitchell to do anything.  I don't see them talking about Mitchell.  I think they just meant anyone in general. Whether someone wants to give info on Lauda is their business. Although I don't understand the point of doxing because it should be illegal here.  

OK, where do I start?
I've shipped stuff to Lauda in the past, I got stuff from Lauda.
Both times, the shipping was handled with Mitchell acting as halt in between.
From what I've gathered in chats/talks with Lauda, aswell as generally, that's the common way when dealing with them.
Anyone who would have shipped to Lauda would only be abled to provide Mitchells address as a result.
And the only person to provide the acutal dox is, correct, Mitchell.

But that's not the point I'm trying to make. 

[Zepher]

Summa cume Lauda (sic) 

I vote remain - no Bitexit for Lauda

Dammit that made me spill my coffee
Well played good sir.

[Lauda]

If you shipped to Lauda please PM me the address shipped to.

That won't work.

Defcon and QS are not the same.

Correct.

Trying to dox lauda seems like a desperate last swing to me.

They're just flogging a dead horse. I wonder what they think would happen if they had my DOX and posted it.

Summa cume Lauda (sic)  

I vote remain - no Bitexit for Lauda

Well played sir.  
Timeline of events (summary):

• 02/07/2016 – I offered defcon23 a genesis trade-in or $25 for #1 Brass (which is what the coin was worth at the time, as the other #1 coins have sold for a maximum of $25). He declined my offer.
• 09/07/2016 – Genesis Auction starts.
• 12/07/2016 – Mutual negative ratings were left (I left the first rating). Later this day, the auction had finished[1].
• 15/07/2016 – We have come to an agreement that  works for each other. We have made peace and have resumed normal communications.

       
[1] - I'm actually the person who won the auction as the current winner was bidding for me.
In anyone has questions they can ask us both directly. As far as we are concerned this case is solved.                                

[defcon23]

If you shipped to Lauda please PM me the address shipped to.

That won't work.

Defcon and QS are not the same.

Correct.

Trying to dox lauda seems like a desperate last swing to me.

They're just flogging a dead horse. I wonder what they think would happen if they had my DOX and posted it.

Summa cume Lauda (sic)  

I vote remain - no Bitexit for Lauda

Well played sir.  
Timeline of events (summary):

• 02/07/2016 – I offered defcon23 a genesis trade-in or $25 for #1 Brass (which is what the coin was worth at the time, as the other #1 coins have sold for a maximum of $25). He declined my offer.
• 09/07/2016 – Genesis Auction starts.
• 12/07/2016 – Mutual negative ratings were left (I left the first rating). Later this day, the auction had finished[1].
• 15/07/2016 – We have come to an agreement that  works for each other. We have made peace and have resumed normal communications.

       
[1] - I'm actually the person who won the auction as the current winner was bidding for me.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

i confirm: this is absolutely exact .  

defcon23

[CanaryInTheMine]

I'm glad you made peace! Carry on

[defcon23]

the resolution that i  came to was to each remove our negative trust ratings, and to replace them with positive trust that was from an actual deal. ..

I think that Lauda was trying to extort me, that i think the price of the coin was at least .25 when lauda offered $25 for it, and i don't think that Lauda was joking when he was threatening to leave me negative trust if i did not sell him the coin


now apparently he try to push me to a ban in making removing many of my posts wich lutpin report with no valid reasons to moderators


i report as he can many of my posts ....  at least 4 since today



i have screenshots of all of those posts ...  there's no reson the were be deleted ... that's not some old bumps , and nothing offensive inside , or what...

i think i need to talk to Theymos.

[Lutpin]

I've reported 6k posts so far, some are yours, others are not.
None of the reports I made could have been handled by Lauda, as it's not their section to moderate and you're not a newbie.

[Lauda]

I'm glad you made peace! Carry on

It was good while it lasted?

now apparently he try to push me to a ban in making removing many of my posts wich lutpin report with no valid reasons to moderators

No, I can't delete the posts that were deleted and no I have not requested a ban for you as there is no reason to do such.  The people who are able to remove your posts are:

+ grue + admins.

i report as he can many of my posts ....  at least 4 since today

I have nothing to do with either reporting nor the moderation of your posts. Even if I could, I would most likely leave them to someone else considering the situation that we were in.

[defcon23]

I've reported 6k posts so far, some are yours, others are not.
None of the reports I made could have been handled by Lauda, as it's not their section to moderate and you're not a newbie.

i know you do that for Lauda ,  the goal is only to having me banned ... that's the goal .. the sad part it's it's just cause i have reported Lauda extortion ( try )