 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
So, I decided to take a look at Ubiatar’s Telegram chat after I read that a user was chatting with their CEO, Francesco Raco, and he told him that now the bounty hunters’ request aren’t 12k, now they have increased to 20k!! A quick recap: - Before the bounty hunters are 12k - Now they are 20k - In the Telegram chat there are less than 13k subscribers - In the old bounty spreadsheet there were less than 2k people. So it’s easy to see that Ubiatar and their CEO are lying to everybody, probably they think to be very smart and have a very low consideration of other people’s intelligence… After I took a look at their Telegram subscribers I found this:         Those of course are just a part of the screenshots, there literally are hundreds or even thousands of deleted accounts and other accounts with Southeast Asia names without profile picture. So what does it mean? It means that all those accounts are fake and have been bought in packages just to increase the number of the subscribers in the chat, so they are trying to show a lot of people interested in their project when clearly many of them are fake. This project just gets worse day by day, SCAMMERS!! |
|
|
|
So, I decided to take a look at Ubiatar’s Telegram chat after I read that a user was chatting with their CEO, Francesco Raco, and he told him that now the bounty hunters’ request aren’t 12k, now they have increased to 20k!! A quick recap: - Before the bounty hunters are 12k - Now they are 20k - In the Telegram chat there are less than 13k subscribers - In the old bounty spreadsheet there were less than 2k people. So it’s easy to see that Ubiatar and their CEO are lying to everybody, probably they think to be very smart and have a very low consideration of other people’s intelligence… After I took a look at their Telegram subscribers I found this: Those of course are just a part of the screenshots, there literally are hundreds or even thousands of deleted accounts and other accounts with Southeast Asia names without profile picture. So what does it mean? It means that all those accounts are fake and have been bought in packages just to increase the number of the subscribers in the chat, so they are trying to show a lot of people interested in their project when clearly many of them are fake. This project just gets worse day by day, SCAMMERS!! |
|
|
|
So, I decided to take a look at Ubiatar’s Telegram chat after I read that a user was chatting with their CEO, Francesco Raco, and he told him that now the bounty hunters’ request aren’t 12k, now they have increased to 20k!! A quick recap: - Before the bounty hunters are 12k - Now they are 20k - In the Telegram chat there are less than 13k subscribers - In the old bounty spreadsheet there were less than 2k people. So it’s easy to see that Ubiatar and their CEO are lying to everybody, probably they think to be very smart and have a very low consideration of other people’s intelligence… After I took a look at their Telegram subscribers I found this: Those of course are just a part of the screenshots, there literally are hundreds or even thousands of deleted accounts and other accounts with Southeast Asia names without profile picture. So what does it mean? It means that all those accounts are fake and have been bought in packages just to increase the number of the subscribers in the chat, so they are trying to show a lot of people interested in their project when clearly many of them are fake. This project just gets worse day by day, SCAMMERS!! |
|
|
|
The team apparently does not know what to do and is wasting time. Participants become more aggressive and lose credibility in the project. Is their goal from the very beginning was fraud?
This project is already dead. Take a look in their Telegram chat, they have 13k subscribers and nobody writes or asks anything, nobody cares anymore about this shit, the only messages come from the bots, and the chat keeps losing subscribers day after day. They're dead guys, I don't know if this is they're strategy to run away with the money or what else, because it's the first time that I see a team that deliberately kills its own project, they're doing it on purpose, they can't be this stupid otherwise. |
|
|
|
I think we don't have hope here like there is just few people that wanted to have transparency with the ubiatar team. And some seems don't bother about this, guys we've got scammed and they should be hearing our voices. So speak out so the team will take an action and won't belittle us.
Do you wanna speak out? Then leave 1 star here, at their rating, so maybe they wake up when they have the shittiest ranking of the whole store: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ubiatarplay |
|
|
|
I installed the new UbiatarPlay app and logged in with the old credentials. There are only 23 users: it is not a little bit right now?
Actually I don't understand why you are surprised. Before the ICO the Ubiatar team was nice, kind, helpful etc etc, after they got the money they completely changed their attitude, not answering to all the inquiries (or giving useless answers), banning people from Telegram without any reason, lying about the bounties (12k people? For THIS project? Who do they think they are, Satoshi?), not giving a single info regarding the exchange and especially they keep considering people like shit, they are extremely arrogant. This project is already dead, nobody would ever trust this people. 2 dollars per coin? Yeah, Zimbabwe dollars... I'm too lazy to look for the answer by tracking down the entire pages, especially since I didn't know when did the issue started to rised so I can't skim through to the exact date, so can you please help me explaining the reason why they reduce their rate on the first place? I mean, was it because they allocate for future bounty? They didn't reach the hardcap? Or . . . . ? The issue started weeks ago when people started to receive some Ubiatar tokens in their wallet, and those tokens weren't for the airdrop, they were for the bounties. The problem is that everybody received exactly the 5% of the reward. The FIVE%. There are people who did the signature bounty for 3 months and got like 50, 80 or 100 tokens when with the simple airdrop they gave away 130 tokens per user. So 3 months of signature to get 100-200 dollars when they promised thousands. Also, the old spreadsheet is still online but they say that the bounty manager has made a lot of mistakes (nobody knows what mistakes btw) so they are fixing the spreadsheets, but they won't make them public because, they say, there are privacy laws that forbid to show these spreadsheets with the ETH address. So, again, nobody has a clue of what they are doing. They are dealing with the people by email, not in public, in this way, again, nobody knows what's going to happen or how many tokens they are going to distribute. This is the first time ever that I read the spreadsheets can't be public because the privacy laws don't allow to share the public address of the ETH wallets. So then, why is it called "public address"?  Oh, last thing, they say they have something like 12.000 people who took part to the bounty program, I checked the spreadsheets, the real number it's not even 2.000... So they just keep lying and considering people like idiots. That's an interesting story, but have they even explained why the bounty reduced? I mean, does the other 95% is allocated for that 130 token airdrop? Future bounty? Future marketing? Etc? Absolutely not. We only know that they were supposed to give away 1 mln UAC token (total value $2mln) but they didn't. After the complaining they pretty much said it's bounty manager's fault and they are fixing things. That's all. They never explained why the bounty has been reduced, they never explained what was that 5% people got since they keep saying that "bounty distribution is going on" and when you ask more info by email, as they tell you to do because they clearly have something to hide if they don't want to make things public, you get answers such as "we are evaluating everybody's position" and updates like this one: We inform you that we are still working at the bounty program campaigns and we are about half of the work done. When the verifications are over we will update you, as soon as we can and with specific information about it.The 130 UAC were for an airdrop, that has nothing to do with the bounty, those are two separate things. And I don't think there will be any future bounty, this one was supposed to last 6 weeks and then became 12. And regarding the marketing, if they want to do some marketing for sure they shouldn't do it using bounty hunters' rewards, don't you think? |
|
|
|
I installed the new UbiatarPlay app and logged in with the old credentials. There are only 23 users: it is not a little bit right now?
Actually I don't understand why you are surprised. Before the ICO the Ubiatar team was nice, kind, helpful etc etc, after they got the money they completely changed their attitude, not answering to all the inquiries (or giving useless answers), banning people from Telegram without any reason, lying about the bounties (12k people? For THIS project? Who do they think they are, Satoshi?), not giving a single info regarding the exchange and especially they keep considering people like shit, they are extremely arrogant. This project is already dead, nobody would ever trust this people. 2 dollars per coin? Yeah, Zimbabwe dollars... I'm too lazy to look for the answer by tracking down the entire pages, especially since I didn't know when did the issue started to rised so I can't skim through to the exact date, so can you please help me explaining the reason why they reduce their rate on the first place? I mean, was it because they allocate for future bounty? They didn't reach the hardcap? Or . . . . ? The issue started weeks ago when people started to receive some Ubiatar tokens in their wallet, and those tokens weren't for the airdrop, they were for the bounties. The problem is that everybody received exactly the 5% of the reward. The FIVE%. There are people who did the signature bounty for 3 months and got like 50, 80 or 100 tokens when with the simple airdrop they gave away 130 tokens per user. So 3 months of signature to get 100-200 dollars when they promised thousands. Also, the old spreadsheet is still online but they say that the bounty manager has made a lot of mistakes (nobody knows what mistakes btw) so they are fixing the spreadsheets, but they won't make them public because, they say, there are privacy laws that forbid to show these spreadsheets with the ETH address. So, again, nobody has a clue of what they are doing. They are dealing with the people by email, not in public, in this way, again, nobody knows what's going to happen or how many tokens they are going to distribute. This is the first time ever that I read the spreadsheets can't be public because the privacy laws don't allow to share the public address of the ETH wallets. So then, why is it called "public address"? Oh, last thing, they say they have something like 12.000 people who took part to the bounty program, I checked the spreadsheets, the real number it's not even 2.000... So they just keep lying and considering people like idiots. |
|
|
|
I installed the new UbiatarPlay app and logged in with the old credentials. There are only 23 users: it is not a little bit right now?
Actually I don't understand why you are surprised. Before the ICO the Ubiatar team was nice, kind, helpful etc etc, after they got the money they completely changed their attitude, not answering to all the inquiries (or giving useless answers), banning people from Telegram without any reason, lying about the bounties (12k people? For THIS project? Who do they think they are, Satoshi?), not giving a single info regarding the exchange and especially they keep considering people like shit, they are extremely arrogant. This project is already dead, nobody would ever trust this people. 2 dollars per coin? Yeah, Zimbabwe dollars... |
|
|
|
The new app is in fact Ubiatarplay where you have the possibility to set up your fee per hour in case you want to offer unicast
it comes also with the wallet in order to pay and receive payment
Nobody cares about their app if they don't pay the bounties as they promised! On the Android store the rating of this app is going down day after day, they are ruining themselves with their poor management choices. |
|
|
|
Following the numerous requests sent to the email: bounty@ubiatarplay.io, we would like to point out that users who worked for the UbiatarPlay bounty program are almost 12,000. Our team is checking the work done one by one and only at the end of this procedure we can proceed with the total payment of the amount due. Thank you UbiatarPlay Sa So you are saying you have received almost 12,000 email?! Please, do you really think we're this stupid? Without the Telegram bounty these are the numbers of the other campaigns: - Translation: 75 users (accepted: 12) - Signature: 265 users (accepted: 185) - Blog and articles: 564 users (accepted: 180) - Facebook: 632 users (accepted: 588) - Twitter: 421 users (accepted: 376) Total: 1957 users (accepted: 1341)I highly doubt that all the people who took part in the Telegram campaign have sent an email, they will get 1-2 tokens maximum... |
|
|
|
it seems like there is a problem in this project seeing the response all seems to be disappointed with this project, what is going on in this project, if it is a big problem hopefully soon resolved.
In short, they changing the rules of the initial payment plan where they now only pay 5% from what they should. Many would think this is unprofessional, and many felt cheated. Unprofessional? Let's call things with their proper name, SCAM! If they refuse to pay what they have promised it's a SCAM, there are no other options. People took part to this bounty because the reward was good, if you promise 100 and then you pay 5, 20 or 50, it's a SCAM, nothing more, nothing less. I really hope for them they know what they are doing otherwise they better prepare for the incoming shitstorm on their project! |
|
|
|
The bounty program was played according to some choices of the bounty manager not shared with Ubiatarplay Sa. Explain better, what are these choices? What exactly did he do wrong? A spreadsheet has been issued without the permission of Ubiatarplay with incorrect, unverifiable and disproportionate data. Actually to all of us the spreadsheets look quite good, with a correct ratio work done / reward, and all the final calculations reach the full amount of tokens so again, explain what's wrong and how it's possible that the data are unverifiable when everything is written in the bounty thread, week by week. We are trying to solve problems on a case-by-case basis. Why don't you want to solve this in a public way? Why keep separate every inquiry and problem of the bounty hunters? Why don't you want to solve this in a public and transparent way? All work will be paid. Can you confirm that you are going to distribute the full amount of UAC you previously promised, so 1.000.000 tokens? |
|
|
|
|
Are you guys in the Telegram chat? They keep hiding themselves behind the "mistakes" of the old bounty manager (of course they don't say exactly what these mistakes are) and, this is ridiculous, they say they can't publish the new spreadsheets due to "privacy reasons". A guy asked what these reasons are and they answered again "for privacy reasons we can not publish data", so they really are like bots!
And this is maybe the funniest part, that guy then asked how it's possible that they have to keep safe those personal info if there was NO KYC process, so they have no info at all of the bounty hunters, and than replied the CEO, with these words, this is his very answer:
thanks for the advice but you have no responsibility in our company.
the chat is made to talk about the project and the ubiatarplay initiatives.
we are handling the emails concerning the bounty disputes.
with a large community this is normal.
now I beg you to be patient and you will also be given an answer.
do not continue to be insistent.
thank you
So again, they don't answer and they imply that if you keep asking you're gonna be banned. Disgusting behavior, these people are very shady!
|
|
|
|
Wait, is not better to wait until Monday ?
We want answers now, not on Monday. What's the problem to simply explain what's going on?! And why hiding the new spreadsheets? There is no transparency at all from the Ubiatar team, these people are shady! |
|
|
|
New bounty means another bounty pool right? I just hope that the urrent bounty pool now will not be reduced like what other bounty does. They are only good at the beginning but then changes everything after ico.
They wrote "We will reduce the bounty for any campaign and we will run a new campaign after the ICO end" so it doesn't really leave too much space to interpretation, they wanna run a new bounty but they are not willing to spend other money, so they reduce the reward of the bounty hunters. Someone wrote an article about scam bounties, and Ubiatar is in the list (twice), it's not a great publicity for the project at this point, they've been too greedy. |
|
|
|
A bounty campaign just like other campaigns will sure need to have certain regulations or rule before starting the campaign they surely have the rights to change the amount needed for their payments because the value of Cryptocurrency is not stable and it will sure base on the exchange ICO was base in, For some valid reason bounty hunters will need to manage their time if they are joining a campaign and certain ICO will need to raise their funds by starting a Crowd sale well if the management can not handle the expenses needed because it will sure need billions of funds to start your own coin, I had some experience once, That an ICO couldn't reach its hard cap and in the end had to stop the ICO and then returned the investment they accumulated from investors I really think they are quite honest with their apology because for almost 12 weeks or less we didn't get the payment we deserve and just had to accept the fact that this is a reality for certain bounty hunters their are certain risk involve and you are accepting this by joining a campaign.
Here we are talking about ICOs that actually made it and reach their caps, not ICOs that failed, that's a completely different situation, perfectly understandable. And I'm sorry but I don't get the point "because the value of Cryptocurrency is not stable", they pay you anyway with their tokens, they don't have to buy the tokens, they make them. Maybe am I missing something? |
|
|
|
For me, it is their right to do so. Whenever we join a bounty campaign we are bound with the rules in it. Sounds like bounty hunters have to do a better job at vetting their ICO choices. So for you people it's ok to say that a bounty campaign will run for 4 weeks and you'll be paid 100 tokens (just as example), then before it finishes they tell you they're gonna extend it for other 6-8 weeks without any extra reward and if you change the signature you'll be disqualified and then, few days before they give you the reward they tell you they decided to give 50% of what they had previously promised? So you worked the triple of the time for half of the reward? Wow, probably you people work for the glory, not for the money, I really admire you and I really hope you can buy a lot of food with that glory!  I think we should try to see this from a different point of view: do they actually decide these kind of stuff at the end of the bounty (make it longer, reduce the rewards etc) or maybe, I say maybe eh, they decide all this before the bounty begins, they write their "we can do whatever we want" clause and here we go! They cheat a lot of people make them believe there is a short and/or rich campaign so they have a lot of people joining them and then they change everything, and the poor idiots can't do a shit. Am I really the only one who thinks this? |
|
|
|
I have just found this article on Steemit and I completely agree with the author: https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@criptomoneta/the-world-of-bounty-scam-qurrex-tokenpay-and-moreLately the bounty managers and the devs have been doing everything they want thanks to clauses such as "We reserve the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these terms and conditions at any time without prior notice and you accept and agree to the changes" and the only people who lose money and waste time of course are only the bounty hunters. Do you agree with the article? Are bounty managers and devs taking too much advantages of their position? Do you think it's correct they have such a big power in order to exploit the bounty hunters? |
|
|
|
|
