 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
|
|
I am unable to connect to Sparkpool. Is the stratum correctly specified for that pool?
Please add GPU temp limit control into the miner as well.
|
|
|
|
|
For the next release, would like to see the following
1) GPU temp, fan % display
2) Temp limit setting
3) List of algo supported in .doc format
4) Ethash support for Navi. I am adverse to using Claymore or Phoenix miner.
5) GPU watchdog
|
|
|
|
Is this Windows 10? Because the 0.9.4 code changes increased the memory demand a bit ... could be that this causes the problem :/
yes, it is windows 10,thank you for your answer.best regards from serbia.any way good work,keep it that way
Please tell me how to solve this problem. I have a 6xvega 64 8GB. OpenCL init failure: invalid kernel name.  I have the same problem. The miner says OpenCL init failure: invalid kernel name..... ? How do you fix this. I don't have this issue running other miners with this rig. *** Fixed with Adrenalin Driver 19.12.2 **** |
|
|
|
I'm on Windows 10. What AMD driver are you all using to get TR to work on ETH Hash? I've tried several different versions, including the 2020 drivers and the miner reports a dead GPU within minutes. This is using their guide on my mix of Vega 56's and 64's.
I am using Adrenalin driver 19.4.2 with no problems |
|
|
|
|
Where's the developer? This miner still doesn't have cuckaroom29 support. Coronavirus got to them?
|
|
|
|
|
Here's the hashrate for my AMD rig
Algo : RandomX
Avg hashrate : 11kh/s
Miner: XMRig 5.01
CPU: Ryzen 9 3900x @ 3.8GHz
Memory : 2x 16GB GSkill 3600MHz 18-22-22-42
System power draw : 200W
Threads used : 24
|
|
|
|
Right now my i7 3930k making 300h/s on cryptonightR and it values as 0.10$ for a day consuming 130w .
if im not wrong it will pay me about 0.25$ with randomx.im sure it will pay this for 2-3 days then after it will be again like 0.10$.All people waiting something huge but results becomes same at the end of the road.cryptonight always paid for cpu very little.so dont be sooo exited.
It's not that cryptonight paid so little for CPU. It's a fact that there are many more CPUs active at the moment rather than GPUs. So, there will be a lot more CPUs mining RandomX algorithm for Monero thus reducing profits drastically. If it's profitable for people, they are going to mine and they will activate each and every bit of CPU power they have which is really good for decentralization but not for incentives. This is what I have been saying all along. If you think you will profit from investing in 4-5 or even 10 Ryzen 3900x systems in preparation for the XMR RandomX fork, you will be sorely disappointed. Please learn from both the Loki and ArQMA networks....there are a lot of CPU hashpower out there. Your multiple 3900X systems isn't going to make you any profit worth investing on. You have been warned.. |
|
|
|
hes not wrong, only reason im mining eth dual with ckb is to heat my garage
What’s in your garage that you need heated? |
|
|
|
Any RandomX adding news ?
Its a CPU algo.. Yeah, at this point we're not planning on investing time and effort into RandomX. The current GPU implementation for AMD GCN can be improved, but it's too far from being profitable vs CPUs anyway. @kerney666 I think what the people are asking for is that whether you can do RandomX optimisations for Ryzen as you did for the GPU algos on CGN. They are not necessarily asking for RandomX optimisations on CGN. Is what I’m saying making any sense? |
|
|
|
Well Loki cant show anything. XMR alone will bring 100x times USD value in daily rewards. Loki and Wownero together are traded about 2k usd daily. Thats ridic low. There will probably be a lot of coins following monero, probably more than ever before. So the market will be so much bigger for bad actors to dilute. Still could go either way.... PS: Epic Cash based on Randomx shows 1.3-1.4usd per day for 3900x. Dont know if it's accurate though as havent had time to try. Meiby someone could test just for lulz  There is already a single Loki miner contributing a whopping 17MH to the Loki network!! That hashrate is equivalent to 11K Ryzen 3900X units and that is only from a single miner. Once XMR forks, where do you think he will be diverting his hashrate to. And how many more of these giants lurking around waiting for the xmr fork. So, I'd say good luck trying to make a good profit from CPU mining. |
|
|
|
The issue here is the amount of hardware that needs to be bought for a CPU algo. For a GPU algo, all you need to increase hashrates is to buy the GPU and riser card. Now, you will have to get the whole shebang (PSU, memory, MB etc.) How will this be ever profitable? Will there ever be a riser card/board equivalent for CPUs?
That's all part of the cost per hash. It's no different than an algo with a lower hashrate requiring more CPU (or GPU) power to produce the same hash. What matters is how much the hash is worth. Yes Intel has Xeon Phi compute addin boards with up to 72 cores with 4:1 hyperthreading for 288 threads. The're compute beasts but very expensive and not suitable for mining due to the low mem/thread ratio. It maxes out at 384 GB which is similar to the cache/thread ratio of most desktop CPUs. If Loki network hashrate is any indication, it's not going to be profitable for RandomX |
|
|
|
My Sapphire Radeon VII refused to post 2 months ago. Could not get another GPU for replacement. Used my store credit for a Ryzen 3900x and X570 MB instead.  |
|
|
|
Makes no sense to me why anyone should be excited about coins moving to RandomX. The cost per added hashrate for RandomX is so much higher than that for a GPU mineable coin and if you think the network hashrate of a RandomX coin will be low, think again. Just take a look at the Loki network hashrate as an example of what's in store for all CPU mineable coins. It's 71 MH vs 11KH from a single Ryzen 3900X!! How many Ryzen 3900X do you need to make enough coins to ROI?
not sure what your issue is here, yeah the ryzen is a beast at random x , but its a beast at every other cpu algo out there anyways. its 12 cores on a consumer chip basically we have never seen this type of power for non server builds. i mean its expected it would destroy every cpu tuned algo out there, which random x is and it does, you can buy a ryzen 3600 for 229 and get 6k on randomx , not sure what the issue is The issue here is the amount of hardware that needs to be bought for a CPU algo. For a GPU algo, all you need to increase hashrates is to buy the GPU and riser card. Now, you will have to get the whole shebang (PSU, memory, MB etc.) How will this be ever profitable? Will there ever be a riser card/board equivalent for CPUs? |
|
|
|
|
Makes no sense to me why anyone should be excited about coins moving to RandomX. The cost per added hashrate for RandomX is so much higher than that for a GPU mineable coin and if you think the network hashrate of a RandomX coin will be low, think again. Just take a look at the Loki network hashrate as an example of what's in store for all CPU mineable coins. It's 71 MH vs 11KH from a single Ryzen 3900X!! How many Ryzen 3900X do you need to make enough coins to ROI?
|
|
|
|
Team Red Miner v0.5.7 releasedhttps://github.com/todxx/teamredminer/releasesChanges in v0.5.7 - Added CN conceal algo for Conceal (CCX).
- Added cuckarood29 algo for grin.
This release brings a couple new algos: CN conceal and cuckarood29! CN conceal is a bit picky about memory timings, so please checkout the CN_MAX_YOU_VEGA.txt doc before switching your rigs to it. I am unable to run cn_conceal algo. The miner always fail GPU initialization beyond the first GPU. How to fix this? |
|
|
|
(12) GTX 1070 Hybrids getting 60g/s (4.8-5each) @ 1150 watts total. No cards over 40 degrees celcius.
Afterburner OC settings...
-Power: 70%
-Core: +100
-Memory: +300
(Micron memory, Windows 10 (stripped), 120gb virtual memory, Cuda 10.0, Nvidia drivers 411.31)
...I am absolutely speechless right now and want to thank the team for Gminer. My Bminer nightmares are over! Thanks again.
Are you reporting on the wall wattage or what is reported by the miner? A 12 GTX 1070 at 70% PW settings should be using close to 1300-1400W at the wall. |
|
|
|
.....
What’s special about the P5 state ? Also are all your Vega56 flashed to 64?
I found that by limiting the Vegas to only use the P5 state I could use a lower voltage without crashing. My Vega 56's are all flashed with a Vega 64 BIOS. You are absolutely right. It works. Thanks for the tip. Did you also flash non reference Vega56(Hynix) to 64? Can this be done? |
|
|
|
Hello everyone, I have 6 vega64 (Samsung memory) rig windows10 18.5.1drive, core 1408/900mv, mem 1100/900mv, when I use the 0.5.2 version to mine XMR, each card can reach 2.4Kh, the wall power consumption of the whole machine is 1800 watts. Except for the power consumption of the motherboard of 200 watts, the average power consumption of a vega64 reaches 267w. Is this power consumption normal?
Is there a way to reduce the power consumption of vega to less than 185w, even if it is a little less than 2.4kh?
That power use is very high. Undervolt. Power table mod. All the usualy things people do. Read a bit more of the thread and you will get plenty of ideas I do some undervolt and ppt moding . set cclock to 1100/860mv mclock 1100/860mv , I got the 1450w power consumption at wall and 11.7Kh mining cnR running trm 0.5.2 with cn_config 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] Mining cnr with 6 GPU workers [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 0 (06:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 63C Fan 49.00% (2408 RPM) Core 1062 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 1 (19:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 63C Fan 49.00% (2446 RPM) Core 1058 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 2 (13:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 51C Fan 58.00% (2874 RPM) Core 1055 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 3 (16:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 63C Fan 52.00% (2575 RPM) Core 1053 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 4 (03:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 62C Fan 56.00% (2788 RPM) Core 1069 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 5 (09:00.0) 64 CUs Temp 62C Fan 53.00% (2599 RPM) Core 1040 MHz Mem 1100 MHz, VDDC 862.0 mV [2019-06-30 17:39:10] [2019-06-30 17:39:10] Current CN configs: [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 0 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 1 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 2 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 3 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 4 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 5 15*14:AAA [2019-06-30 17:39:10] [2019-06-30 17:39:10] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:16:53 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 0 [63C, fan 49%] cnr: 1.951kh/s, avg 1.951kh/s, pool 2.388kh/s a:24 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 1 [63C, fan 49%] cnr: 1.949kh/s, avg 1.950kh/s, pool 1.393kh/s a:14 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 2 [51C, fan 58%] cnr: 1.937kh/s, avg 1.945kh/s, pool 2.290kh/s a:23 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 3 [63C, fan 52%] cnr: 1.939kh/s, avg 1.942kh/s, pool 1.892kh/s a:19 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 4 [62C, fan 56%] cnr: 1.957kh/s, avg 1.962kh/s, pool 2.191kh/s a:22 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] GPU 5 [62C, fan 53%] cnr: 1.928kh/s, avg 1.927kh/s, pool 2.388kh/s a:24 r:0 hw:0 [2019-06-30 17:39:10] Total cnr: 11.66kh/s, avg 11.68kh/s, pool 12.54kh/s a:126 r:0 hw:0 I modified the PPT with the registry. GPU_P0=852;800 GPU_P1=991;810 GPU_P2=1084;820 GPU_P3=1138;830 GPU_P4=1150;840 GPU_P5=1202;850 GPU_P6=1212;850 GPU_P7=1100;860 Mem_P0=167;800 Mem_P1=500;800 Mem_P2=800;810 Mem_P3=1100;860 Fan_Min=1588 Fan_Max=4900 Fan_Target=63 Fan_Acoustic=2400 Power_Temp=75 Power_Target=0 The above parameters I have been through a number of tests, found a relatively stable data, if the voltage is set below 860mv, some cards will randomly appear crash How can I further optimize and reduce the power consumption to 1200w? Your driver seems dated. Have you tried using the latest 19.xx drivers? |
|
|
|
Hello, I would like to know if anyone can help me. I have a problem with the autotune Quick and Full option in TRM. I use three Vegas 56 but when the tunning starts, only two are making all the process at the same time, the third one is working at half the hash rate of the other two. For example, if two of them are being tested at 1900 hs, the third one is hashing at 1300 at it stays there. I have replaced risers, PSU cables also reinstalled drivers, and always one of them is slower.
I am using an EVGA G3 1000 and I have checked the wall consumption with a wattmeter which is 500w.
Thanks in advance.
Mariano.
What happens if you don’t run tuning and set all you GPUs to following config 16+14:AAA. Is the 3rd card still hashing with 1 thread? That’s basically what is happening when the card hashes at just 1300 |
|
|
|
|
