You have zero technical details in your whitepaper and no developers in your team, yet you are already having a presale. Your "whitepaper" is just a bunch of history & marketing. Also you apparently don't understand the difference between ICO & IEO:

To me it looks like, you thought you can easily grab some cash without actually understanding blockchains etc. You probably thought you can hire some devs afterwards who'll create your whole ecosystem.

I'd gladly ready any technical information on your product, but I doubt you can provide them.

I see this year as a big opportunity for crypto. What we want and need is a steady and slow growth (stable value), instead of the big volatility we saw (especially) in the last few months in 2017. If cryptos have a stable value, more and more people and businesses might invest in.

By cows and angry farmers? I guess I'll go check SAM cube 1 out.

It's not my intention to insult someone, but those translations are awful. Bribed tried to translate 1:1 and hardly changed any structure in the sentences or adjust the meaning of some words. The result is an inaccurate and bumpy thread, which is - without consulting the english ANN - not really understandable.

Are the SAM cubes somehow protected against demolition or theft?

There are actually several approaches, I suppose the most promising ones are error-correcting code or lattice based code. An error-correcting code would additionally need to transmit it's "key", which can't be encrypted by it's own encryption, leaving attack possibilities open. There are already different (already aged) concepts of currencies with lattice based code, but I'm not sure, if it's possible to implement those with a soft fork.


https://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.4740.pdf "Quantum Money from Hidden Subspaces" is a wonderful example of a quantumproof concept

17RTTUAiiPqUTKtEggJPec8RxLMi2n9EZ9
There you go. Bitcointalk Forum Donation Address.

Should also be over 100k.

I won't judge Giracoin as I have no knowledge regarding that coin, but I want to point out, that it's really easy - not to say to easy - to get a SRO certificate in switzerland. The abbreviation SRO stands for Self Regulation Organisation, which is in fact nothing else than a legal alternative to FINMA regulation (official authority). To get the certificate you simply need to hand in some personal information and have more or less clean accounting.

The thing about Ponzi is, they usually keep running for a long time, why it shouldn't be possible to run Ponzi in switzerland is unclear for me.

SAM Unit 1 would generate you 50*4k/2=100'000USD per Year. If you really mine 19 bitcoin per year you would better keep them yourself and sell them. It always seems fishy to me, selling something under the value it had, if you keep it for yourself 

If only two merged and wanted to create a monopoly, others would also merge and create an oligopoly, in which we would most likely see Bertrand competition. Those two players would undercut eachother resulting in the exact opposite of what you described. The price would drop until one player left the competition resulting in a monopoly. Then the remaining firm would raise the price until the profit was high enough for another firm to enter this market. Because those firms most likely don't trust eachother, they won't merge together.

I doubt that any developer takes this serious. If you really had like 250M+ $ I'm pretty sure you would be able to find qualified developers everywhere. I don't understand what the purpose of your thread is, because every serious dev will ask about payment before starting to work and as I doubt your capital, there's no point.

Why would you need an offshore company to share profit, sounds a bit shady  

1. Select country of your desire.
2. Open a company and a bank account (no problem if everything is legal and you provide valid documents)
3. Enjoy your own Offshore Company.

If there are some illegal or barely legal aspects and you wouldn't want to provide them with your documents, it becomes a bit more complicated. But I surely won't advise you, how to do it, as long you can't explain why it needs to be an offshore company  

It's that same pattern all over again:
People cry/fight for less control but want the government to still protect them from their own greed/stupidity. Reminds me of that Family Guy Episode, where they wanted an uncontrolled city, just to reimplement taxes and the government, I'll post the Episode as soon as i found it.

Bitlicense is also a wonderful example, there are like 5 licenced companies within 4+ years 

I think instead of regulations, there should be more audits (maybe paid or whatever) and reviews in order to verify legit projects (kind of swarm intelligence).