 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
Just wanted a third red party member in a row. We need 1 more to play cards  I was expecting something witty about communism there. |
|
|
|
and he's back again... ghibly stop being a hypocrite by coming back. you said you were done with this so stop coming back with your nonsense. You obviously are making this a personal vendetta against the dev. stick with your black coin you seem to love so much and leave standard coin be.
Why do people trade on here anyway? Don't they know there's things like Cryptsy which are automated, fast, and risk-free? |
|
|
|
If people starts to break GPUs often due to mining, manufacturers will start to refuse product replacing, citing overclocking; honestly, i can't blame them, shall they go for this choice.
I don't overclock my GPUs, and I run them at the intended clock speed and limit the temperature to well under the rated maximum. If the manufacturer is going to refuse replacements, then the graphics card has to have some kind of log of how fast it's been run, otherwise what's to stop miners just saying they played games on it without overclocking it? Anyway most Radeon R9 290 cards overclock automatically if they're under max temperature and/or the manufacturer of the card has already overclocked the GPU faster than AMD intended. Scrypt multipools only mine scrypt coins, they cannot switch from scrypt to scrypt-n. At least for now.
Cool. I am a windows user too, and if you accept my suggestion, you should learn cgminer/sgminer/bfgminer commands, you can do amazing things with it. Things you can't do with guiminer.
Guiminer uses cgminer, it's just a front end. I will give an ASIC a shot I think, as with current coin prices, I'm breaking even with electricity costs. It sounds safer than stealing the electricity! I take it all ASICS will run with cgminer? |
|
|
|
It's a matter of choice.
GPUs won't last more than 2 years mining, beacuse you'll fry them. Best to do is mine 6-12 months and resell them.
ASICs are more efficient in terms of power draw, so you get your ROI sooner, that's all.
Yes, scrypt ASICs won't mine scrypt variants for now (E.G. Vertcoin).
Scrypt multipools are fine with ASICs.
AFAIK GUIminer won't work.
I'm not so sure about the 2 years. If they're gonna break, it'll probably be in the 1 year warranty period, and don't a lot of them have a 3 year manufacturer warranty too? The only one I broke was only 2 months, and that got excessive dust on the little capacitors and they exploded. I think that was bad design anyway because later ones had much bigger capacitors there. Yes the power cost is ridiculous with GPUs, that's the reason I'm thinking of ASICs. If I use a scrypt multipool with an ASIC, what happens when the pool switches to a coin it can't do? I like GUIminer-scrypt, as it just works. Tried cgminer and it was a horrid interface and I could never get it to do more than one GPU at a time. I'm a Windows user only, I don't like text mode stuff. |
|
|
|
|
"ghibly79
Re: [ANN][STD] StandardCoin - BUILT-IN EXCHANGE - Permanently Rising Rate
This user is currently ignored."
Yet still replies! What an idiot!
|
|
|
|
I knew you were not actually ignoring me ahah xD
Yes I'm ignoring you, I clicked ignore. The forum isn't perfect, so I do still get an email when you post, but I see "ignored". I only chose to reply to you because I spotted you childishly gave me a negative. My tag to the dev was legit and I explained myself ad nauseam and not going into it again. You may of course disagree but you cannot leave a negative to me cause you disagree (you yourself said this wold be wrong  coherency). It's not my opinion, it is a FACT that you left a trust negative on the dev incorrectly. Trust is for TRADES ONLY. You are not trading with the dev, you are making assumptions. You are free to ignore me and my warnings though.
Why didn't you just post one warning then? Why have you posted now about 50 times to this thread? Why didn't you just make your opinion on the coin known and leave it at that for everyone to decide? You have taken it upon yourself to attack the dev and reduce the value of his coin. If I was the dev I seriously would have taken you to court by now for libellous damages. You are a lowlife who should have his account removed from this forum immediately. You are free to abuse the system yourself and take my negative too ofc. I'll handle people who "retaliate" fine and dandy, as you can see.
How stupid can you get?!? YOU abused the system. YOU left a negative on the dev which was NOT for a trade. I can't care less for your feedbacks, it won't even show beside for you and for anyone who have you under his trust tree (try creating a new account and see for yourself).
Yes we all know the trust system on here is a badly designed piece of crap. But everyone can read all the feedbacks everyone has given you, even if it doesn't change the number properly. If I were a new person deciding whether to trade with you or not, I'd read all your feedbacks, see a pile of red, and steer well clear. Unfortunately no trustworthy member here is going to leave a negative to me cause they understood I am right.
Maybe you didn't get how the system works.
The system doesn't work. It's an "it's who you know" shambles, similar to masons. [clicks ignore again] So don't waste your time replying, because it won't be read. |
|
|
|
ghibly is now leaving negatives on us aswell as the original poster. ghibly, you've been reported to the moderator. Now grow up or go spam another forum.
Legit, since you are leaving fake feedbacks to me to begin with. Already stated I will do that. Report all you want, trust system is not moderated (otherwise you'd have been banned by now). YOU started it by leaving a fake feedback on the dev. Unless you bought coins from him and never received them (which has not happened in a single case), then you had no right to do that. Everyone who has left you a negative is because of that. YOU are the one that abused the system, and you can't handle it when people retaliate. Now as I said, stop throwing your toys out of the pram and get a life. Remove your fake negative from the dev, and we will all remove ours from you. There are more of us with more feedbacks to leave, so all you're doing is ruining your own reputation. |
|
|
|
|
ghibly is now leaving negatives on us aswell as the original poster. ghibly, you've been reported to the moderator. Now grow up or go spam another forum.
|
|
|
|
Any news on the STD multipool?
I'm already warming up my gridseeds.
Do you know of any ASICS that do better than a Radeon R9 290 at scrypt? I just bought 2 of these. The problem is that those do only vanilla scrypt, not scrypt-n or scrypt-jane. Oh, and there's the knc titan incoming I'm not sure if I should go for ASICs. I've always used graphics cards, because they are always graphics cards - i.e. at end of mining life, they can be sold to play games on. Out of date ASICs are worthless. What is this scrypt-n & scrypt-jane? Does that mean I can't mine certain coins? I currently use multipool, I don't really want to stick to one coin. Also will GUIMiner (Windows 7/8) run ASICs? |
|
|
|
Any news on the STD multipool?
I'm already warming up my gridseeds.
Still working hard on it Any other plans to make a good supportive community? Also why arent there more investors? I can't tell you why there are no more investors. Maybe people can't understand the system yet. I think I didn't make my words clear since English is not my native language, it would be great if someone can help me rewrite the documents and make a white paper. But honestly, I don't think many bitcoin users can understand the bitcoin the protocol clearly. They just use it because it works. There are about 200 altcoins and not enough investors to go round. Only the strong coins will survive, unfortunately there are new ones every minute! |
|
|
|
Cannot believe this conversation is still ongoing. Dev you should a made a moderated thread this is absolutely ridiculous. Guys remember this always, winning on the internet is like winning the special Olympics, even if you win you're still retarded. Let...it...rest...
I don't think a moderated thread is fair for everyone. Just ignore the kids that can't learn to do math and everything is fine like I did with ghibly. There is an ignore button under the username, just press it. I ignored ghibly after I told him to learn math and he gave me a negative review for that. I know exactly how the system work, I know it's good. And soon, people will realize it. They just need time. There is no rush at this point. A single negative feedback from a kid can't do any harm to the system. Someone needs to give ghibly some negative trust, since he ABUSED the feedback system by pretending he'd traded with you when he hadn't (which amounts to FRAUD), but the feedback system on this site is crap so hardly anybody gets a vote. He needs his childish ego deflated. Imagine if a newspaper printed an outright lie? They'd be in serious trouble. |
|
|
|
Cannot believe this conversation is still ongoing. Dev you should a made a moderated thread this is absolutely ridiculous. Guys remember this always, winning on the internet is like winning the special Olympics, even if you win you're still retarded. Let...it...rest...
Agreed. I don't know what ghibly's saying as he's blocked, but I can see a lot of messages marked as blocked. He's not STILL going on is he? I was in danger of falling asleep at my desk reading his inane drivel. |
|
|
|
Any news on the STD multipool?
I'm already warming up my gridseeds.
Do you know of any ASICS that do better than a Radeon R9 290 at scrypt? |
|
|
|
It is not difficult. Just click on the word "trust" below username TheRealStandard.
On this trust page scroll down, enter the risked amount of BTC, enter your comment and click submit.
That is all.
Which has bugger all effect unless you are a chosen one. |
|
|
|
So short summary of your not so short answer, you are using words that clearly describe your worries and not facts.
"He is not, If he does, he will be, there won't be" - So you are just guessing what he will or will not do.
You completely ignore the fact that it does not share any features of a ponzi scheme (or you don't understand it) but you defend that by saying "he tries to mud things a bit". Sure man.
Anyway, I am done with discussing this with you. If DEV flees I will hold you personally responsible for it.
+1 |
|
|
|
Is anyone investing in standard coin now a days?
I think everyone was chased off at this point. It's too bad. Now this is weird, I though it was me who can't understand the system and the only one "crying" there, ranting and whatnot, while everybody else can see the light and the legitness of this coin. Weird weird werd! I'm so totally surprised. lol, exactly as I predicted few pages back. ghibly gives this guy negative trust for no reason at all, DEV has big red warning sings under his name, newcomers that come to the thread see that DEV has negative trust, they don't check details to see it is only because of one person. Then few days later ghibly comes back here to say he was right all the time because everyone stopped investing in the coin! Yes, I am totally surprised also ghibly! Man, you must be so much fun at parties and have so many friends. But to give you a serious answer Ghibly, read on. Italian is your native language, but your english is quite good so i am assuming you are an educated person that has a good job. So let's have a serious discussion instead of trolling. You are blaming DEV of running Ponzi scheme, right? Now let us look at the definition of Ponzi scheme. A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation where the operator, an individual or organization, pays returns to its investors from new capital paid to the operators by new investors, rather than from profit earned by the operator. Operators of Ponzi schemes usually entice new investors by offering higher returns than other investments in the form of short-term returns that are either abnormally high or unusually consistent. The perpetuation of the high returns requires an ever-increasing flow of money from new investors to sustain the schemeDEV is not paying us from capital gained by new investors and DEV is also not the only place where we can get trade STD as on Bittrex I can trade my coins for BTC. DEV did not promise any short-term returns, in fact on his homepage he is talking about years before we have profit STD also doesn't need an ever-increasing flow of money from new investors to sustain the scheme. First round 16 BTC was invested, second round it could be that only 8 BTC is invested and third round only 4 BTC. And most importantly, DEV could have just collected IPO money and ran away, he didnt and paid us the STD coins. So DEV and STD do not comply to any of the main features that a Ponzi scheme has. Also atm your negative trust is not hurting the DEV, in fact one could think you are DEVs sockpuppet as you are now helping the DEV to dissappear with all the BTC. As he is tagged as scammer already he has nothing to lose. So just be reasonable here, give this guy a chance and if he makes one mistake then leave a negative trust. thanks! So right! But let me add another point: You didn't only accuse the dev of running a Ponzi scheme, you also disturb the development of this coin and harm the investors. There's no evidence of a fraudulent system so far. Destroying the coin by negative postings and abusing the feedback system is fraudulent. You're not meant to give negative feedback unless you have TRADED with the other person and LOST COINS. What we need is an admin to delete all of ghibly's posts. |
|
|
|
It is not difficult. Just click on the word "trust" below username TheRealStandard. On this trust page scroll down, enter the risked amount of BTC, enter your comment and click submit. That is all. Not possible unless you have trust yourself. Which is why ghibly has the only vote. What a screwed up system. |
|
|
|
Best we can do is move and stop talking about that idiot. Lets start promoting this coin!
DEV, let me know what I can do to help you!
+1 |
|
|
|
Why isnt anyone trading?
Probably because there's like 200 coins to choose from, it's ridiculous. Also why no news from dev and whats up with his negative ratings?
Because a moron called ghibly keeps making up libellous stories about him. |
|
|
|
I will fell bad if more people burn into a scam, on the other hand, so it's staying Unless the lie is removed. Let's just stop, I read your concerns but I'm not convinced, pointless to go on. If I was the dev I would seriously take you to court for libel. You are a despicable excuse for a human being. In the interests of reducing this flame war to nothing, I am placing you on ignore. If we all do the same ghibly will get bored and go do something less damaging. If the dev is reading, take him to court. |
|
|
|
|
