 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »
|
|
Updated hardware wallets data on the website, comparing now 55 different Hardware Wallets.
- Added new OneKey Pro
- Added new OneKey Classic 1S
- Discontinued OneKey Classic
- Discontinued OneKey Mini
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the feedback. I couldn't reproduce it, but probably the amount of data in the table is starting to be huge, mainly on the hardware wallets screen. I am planning to implement any kind of pagination, so the website can support more items. Did you make any other changes to the tables [specifically hardware and software tables]? For some reason, it keeps lagging when I try to scroll down from the very top section in Google Chrome [I couldn't replicate it in Tor, Firefox, and Microsoft Edge browsers].
|
|
|
|
Updated all the Portal Hardware Wallet specs on the website. - 135 x 65 x 5 mm, 30g - OLED Screen / 0.91" / 126 x 64 px - Mainnet, Testnet, Signet and Regtest support - Firmware upgraded through NFC - Open source: https://github.com/TwentyTwoHW/portal-hardware- Alphanumeric PIN entered via mobile app - 12/24 words support - Taproot addresses support - Miniscript and mutisig support and more. |
|
|
|
I added Portal hardware wallet to the website. Still waiting for a response from the TwentyTwo team, to complete the missing data. I love the idea of a NFC wallet with screen without any kind of batteries.
I don't like the shape. I would prefer something more similar to a credit card shape.
I already contacted them on Twitter, so I can add their wallet ASAP.
|
|
|
|
I love the idea of a NFC wallet with screen without any kind of batteries. I don't like the shape. I would prefer something more similar to a credit card shape. I already contacted them on Twitter, so I can add their wallet ASAP. @maxirosson what do you think about newly announced open source hardware wallet called Portal, made by TwentyTwo? This looks like interesting new concept of device that works without cables or batteries, and it is connected with smartphone via NFC connection. One thing I noticed on their video is small screen that probably can't show complete bitcoin address at once. Portal is currently being offered as pre-sale for €89 and delivery should be expected in Q3 of this year, unless something unexpected happens. Good thing about it is that everything is released as open source even hardware schematics: https://github.com/TwentyTwoHW/portal-hardware  https://twenty-two.xyz/ |
|
|
|
Just noticed one of the hardware wallets that only supported their utility token on its launch, is now supporting Bitcoin [and a few others] as well: KleverSafeThanks. Added to the backlog |
|
|
|
|
Some news about the website in the last weeks:
- Now you can see the latest version and release date of each hardware wallet firmware.
- Added Frostnap hardware wallet
- New features added:
- Support to view receive address as QR
- Support to view receive address as Text
- Support to export receive addresses to SDcard
- Support to verify receive address from QR
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the idea. Could you give me more info so I can analyze it? Those websites you mention, for example. I am trying to focus on self-custody, so I want to be sure those additions are a good idea or not.
This would be more like a way to spend Bitcoin on websites and services where Bitcoin is not accepted directly. For example of gift cards there are websites like thebitcoincompany.com, bitrefill.com and maybe few others, that can be used to purchase this cards without kyc. As for debit cards there are both kyc and no-kyc, virtual and physical, some of them are issues by centralized exchanges or other by companies. Few examples I found in bitcointalk forum: 1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5208530.02. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5473572.0Ok. Sounds interesting but I would prefer to keep my focus on products related to self custody. |
|
|
|
I get a bit confused in terms of making comparisons - especially if one wallet type is not next to the one that I am trying to compare, or having to scroll across several pages horizontally to be able to see the comparisons in which I am interested.
Sure, I see the ability to filter various categories, but could there be a way to either select favorites (and then compare favorites) or maybe just a click box in the right upper corner to compare specific ones that are clicked (or the box could allow for the placement of a number value such as 1, 2, 3 and then the wallets would be sorted in accordance with the number that the user types in the box.. all the 1s would go next to each other, all the 2s next to each other, but after the 1s, and the ones without numerical assignment in their box would come last)..
Maybe being able to compare up to 10 or more at a time.. or if they are put in the order that the user-chooses, then maybe all of them can be compared and prioritized by the user.. and then that would end up allowing an ability for the user to order the wallets in a personalized way..- to customize which ones are next to each other if scrolling through the comparisons?
Hi. Thanks for the feedback. On the filters section you have the ability to filter by wallet name so that you can pick your favorites. Maybe you can explain a little bit better how I would achieve such a result to compare 5-10 wallets side by side and in one glance rather than typing in and presumptively looking at one named wallet at a time. Let's say for example, I wanted to compare: 1) Jade, 2) Coldcard Mk4, 3) Bitbox02 (BTC ONLY), 4) Keystone 3 Pro, 5) Passport Batch 2, 6) Trezor Model T, 7) SafePal S1 Pro  SafePal S1 Pro 9) KeepKey and 10) CoolWalletPro. Then how would I accomplish such side-by-side comparison of those specific 10 HWs? What I am suggesting is to put some kind of a check box or even a number ranking so that I can rank them myself and be able to see the ones that I choose side by side. Do you see what I mean? Is such a thing already possible? If not, can you see how it would be user-friendly to be able to achieve a customized selection of side-by-side comparisons? You can see the step-by-step in this video I posted on Twitter https://twitter.com/thebitcoinhole/status/1732846389367906370Basically, you need to go to Filters -> Basic Information -> Name and then pick all the wallets you want to compare. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the suggestion. I added it. Hi. Thanks for the feedback. On the filters section you have the ability to filter by wallet name so that you can pick your favorites.
I think you should add Seedkeeper by Satochip as one of the Seed Backup solutions. This is not made from metal, but it is waterproof and it's better than paper in my opinion. https://satochip.io/product/seedkeeper/Thanks for the idea. Could you give me more info so I can analyze it? Those websites you mention, for example. I am trying to focus on self-custody, so I want to be sure those additions are a good idea or not. Can I pitch you another idea?
I know you are doing a great job on your website with hardware wallets, software wallets, seed backups, btc nodes and books,
but how about adding comparison for Debit Card and Gift Cards that support Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies?
There is only one or two websites doing that, mostly with outdated data and I am not impressed with them.
|
|
|
|
I get a bit confused in terms of making comparisons - especially if one wallet type is not next to the one that I am trying to compare, or having to scroll across several pages horizontally to be able to see the comparisons in which I am interested.
Sure, I see the ability to filter various categories, but could there be a way to either select favorites (and then compare favorites) or maybe just a click box in the right upper corner to compare specific ones that are clicked (or the box could allow for the placement of a number value such as 1, 2, 3 and then the wallets would be sorted in accordance with the number that the user types in the box.. all the 1s would go next to each other, all the 2s next to each other, but after the 1s, and the ones without numerical assignment in their box would come last)..
Maybe being able to compare up to 10 or more at a time.. or if they are put in the order that the user-chooses, then maybe all of them can be compared and prioritized by the user.. and then that would end up allowing an ability for the user to order the wallets in a personalized way..- to customize which ones are next to each other if scrolling through the comparisons?
Hi. Thanks for the feedback. On the filters section you have the ability to filter by wallet name so that you can pick your favorites. |
|
|
|
|
Added 3 new features to the Hardware Wallets comparison:
- Fee Control
- Replace-by-fee (RBF)
- Child-pays-for-parent (CPFP)
|
|
|
|
|
- Added Ellipal Titan 2.0. The previous Titan wallet is now discountinued.
- Added new Tangem Ring
- SecuX Shield Bio is in stock, not in pre-order.
- Satochip integration on Sparrow
|
|
|
|
According to the list there is a Bitcoin-only firmware for the new Keystone 3 (Pro). According to https://keyst.one/firmware this is not true: Keystone 3 Pro doesn’t support BTC-Only firmware. We will develop a new BTC-Only product to provide a more dedicated BTC wallet solution You are right. Fixed. Thanks for reporting that. |
|
|
|
I still see $80 price in their page Are we using the same source/shop or perhaps talking about different ones? Is this the one you are using https://btc-hardware-solutions.square.site/product/orange_pill_kit/6?cs=true&cst=custom ? It does say $80 to $98 but that's before you make any of the required selections. Select between the non-assembled and assembled unit in the first drop-down menu and the price goes up to $93. It's $88 if you select the grey device as I said previously. So, you have to ignore the initial price range you see once the page loads because no unit is selected at the time, which also doesn't make sense. Yes, using the same website. If you select "Do not add QR cards", no microsd and no usb cable, the price is 80. |
|
|
|
Perhaps you can edit the price for the Seedsigner on https://thebitcoinhole.com/. You still have it set at $80. If assembled, the Seedsigner now costs $88 in silver and $93 in all other colors. If you ship it as a kit, it costs $93 regardless of the color. It doesn't make sense to me that the assembled silver Seedsigner model is cheaper than the one you have to assemble yourself.  But it is what it is. If you add all the accessories to it (USB cable, MicroSD card, and QR code pack), the price goes up to $98. I still see $80 price in their page |
|
|
|
|
