Bitcoin Forum
July 27, 2024, 03:50:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 »
1  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Bitcoin_BOy$ farming accounts with bots - now used to shill ICO scams on: February 16, 2024, 04:35:23 PM
Either way, those from Lauda are not going to get removed!
Lol, nope.  Not unless by some miracle Lauda returns to the forum and decides to start removing old negative feedbacks (which I guess would be two miracles).

a) I have created the accounts to sell them later (which there is no rule that prevent it AFAIK at that moment).
Yeah, that just earned you another negative, bud.  Congratulations for calling attention to your bad behavior, and it was not acceptable in 2017 to farm accounts in order to sell them; I'm surprised I didn't tag you then.
I don't really care, maybe you should give the forum moderators a negative trust because V2 (Epochtalk) was never released and it is more relevent to the forum than spamming.

Epochtalk costed maybe nowdays value more than $200M, the last update to it on github was 3 years ago.

Well played forum protectors.

This is a scam accusations board, not really a spam board..
2  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Bitcoin_BOy$ farming accounts with bots - now used to shill ICO scams on: February 14, 2024, 02:43:01 PM
I don't know how you can know if I cheated a giveaway... Did they get paid anything?? The were just spamming.. which is not like cheating a giveaway.
I mean, it's pretty easy to spot. Are you trying to say you never participated in the ▓ ★☆★777Coin★☆★ ▓ ★Full Range of Games★ ▓ ★Provably Fair★ ▓ ★Free mBTC!★ ▓ giveaway which was in games and rounds using the alt account farm?

I have participated and got paid on this account, I made legit posts.
The farmed accounts posted there, but they were never paid.

That's what I am trying to say.
3  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Bitcoin_BOy$ farming accounts with bots - now used to shill ICO scams on: February 11, 2024, 03:45:04 AM
1.
  a) I have created the accounts to sell them later (which there is no rule that prevent it AFAIK at that moment).
  b) The accounts were posting without any constantly into a campaign thread, that was very active and people mostly will ignore them (Yes it might be spamming).
  c) I did not get any money from the campaign that was used in the signature.
The fact is the accounts were created by you to cheat on some giveaways as evidenced by the post history, the idea to sell them off came in later, yes or no?

Quote
2. As I have stated the accounts were like bots, I don't even get time to check them, so I was not aware of their hack.
In the earlier days of the account farm, you posted through them, right?

Quote
There is no proof that I had control on them and I used them in ICO scams.
But you admitted that you created the accounts and farmed them by spamming.

Quote
Let's say the accounts which I said I run using bots were spamming, why don't they just get banned, And this account too, Story done.
They can get banned if you continue spamming. Perhaps no one reported the spamming back in the day.

Quote
Giving an end to this story, a negative feedback means I am a thief, that's what exactly it means on this forum, and I am not.
When you cheat on a giveaway using multiple accounts, does that make you any different from a person who can not be trusted?


I don't know how you can know if I cheated a giveaway... Did they get paid anything?? The were just spamming.. which is not like cheating a giveaway.
4  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Bitcoin_BOy$ farming accounts with bots - now used to shill ICO scams on: February 10, 2024, 06:01:02 AM
<...>
1. Can you tell us a valid reason as to why you were farming accounts (farming accounts is associated with bounty and signature campaign abuse, account sales, paid bumping service0
2. When you realized your accounts got hacked, why didn't you bother recovering them?
Naturally, anybody would be pained if their account got stolen and attempt to recover it.

1.
  a) I have created the accounts to sell them later (which there is no rule that prevent it AFAIK at that moment).
  b) The accounts were posting without any constantly into a campaign thread, that was very active and people mostly will ignore them (Yes it might be spamming).
  c) I did not get any money from the campaign that was used in the signature.
2. As I have stated the accounts were like bots, I don't even get time to check them, so I was not aware of their hack.

There is no proof that I had control on them and I used them in ICO scams.
Let's say the accounts which I said I run using bots were spamming, why don't they just get banned, And this account too, Story done.
Giving an end to this story, a negative feedback means I am a thief, that's what exactly it means on this forum, and I am not.

Shouldn't the negative feedback be neutralized in this context?



I am a programmer and Yes I have farmed the accounts, they were running on a server.
~
Hence I would like to request the removal of the negative feedback.

That's the exact reason why you got tagged, so why do you think anything will change?
Hacked or not hacked after that you have created an alt farm and you were running them at least once.

Moreover how do we would even know it's you and not somebody who has got access or bought this account and its trying to get rid of the red tags?
Either way, those from Lauda are not going to get removed!
They were not used to collect money from any giveaway, the giveaway signature was there, I was only getting money from my personal account Bitcoin_Boy$ from giveaways, nothing prevent anyone to use it even if they don't sponsor the giveaway.

There is no proof to you guys that I have used these accounts in a SPAM nor there is a proof that I didn't, So shouldn't the feedback be neutral at least?

I don't care about that Lauda thing he is shady as f. check (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5098579.0) for more context

5  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Bitcoin_BOy$ farming accounts with bots - now used to shill ICO scams on: February 09, 2024, 10:44:56 AM
I haven't been much on this forum since I was given a negative trust, it destroyed my carier on it,
I have been working with few companies that trusted me and they suddenly cancelled their partnership with me.

For example I was running the Waves campaign and they have deposited more than $200k worth of funds into my bitcoin address 16pe2twTgrjKC8mioPjX3f2UbCMGvWbVz4, Which I managed in a good way.

I am a programmer and Yes I have farmed the accounts, they were running on a server.
I have almost never put attention on them until this thread came up.

As you all guys know this forum was once hacked, and I can see on Google One that my account are part of a data breach on 2017

https://imgur.com/a/p9TUZkD

Hence I would like to request the removal of the negative feedback.
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: AMD Radeon 550 Sapphire Pulse on: May 08, 2021, 08:27:41 AM
Did you change GPU Workload from Graphics to Compute mode in 'Radeon Software - Settings - Graphics - Advanced' ?

Yes I did, By the way, I have a slow computer specs can that affect ?
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / AMD Radeon 550 Sapphire Pulse on: May 07, 2021, 07:47:39 PM
Hello guys,
I am stuck using "AMD Radeon 550 Sapphire Pulse" getting low hashrate.
Can anyone help ?



8  Bitcoin / Hardware / Bitcoin mining hardware on: April 28, 2021, 03:25:50 PM
Hello guys, what are the top bitcoin mining hardware out there ?
9  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Transaction Confirmations & Accelerator | How it works ? on: June 02, 2020, 12:40:05 AM
Transaction confirmations depends on the bitcoin network, on peak time transactions are proceed slowly and the fees to get higher.

- So how does a transaction get confirmed ?
- What about transaction accelerators how they work ? is it possible to make a transaction accelerator that work only for my transactions ?
10  Economy / Services / Re: [OPEN SLOTS] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | Sr Member+ | Up to 0.0375 BTC/w on: May 24, 2020, 03:42:33 PM
Username: Bitcoin_BOy$
Post Count: 915
BTC Address (must be SegWit): 33asqJxTYWGaZTY5wbr3M4xJtyQ3neDa8
11  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bot to automatically check signatures. on: November 19, 2019, 11:25:27 PM
Ho, your project is very interesting too !

If I understand correctly you have abandoned it ?

I thought precisely as a next project, to develop an extension ( Or a website ), which would manage very easily signing campaigns.

Would you mind if I developed a similar idea ?
I have not abandoned the project, but the waves campaign stopped at a given time, they were paying me a very high salary.

I would suggest to you, to make a campaign manager, it's hard to find campaigns who going to trust you, but you can at least develop the system,
bot to count posts and filter the bad ones, create an admin dashboard with good statistics and overview of all posts, and duties,
and let the campaign manager use it to make his job easier. So, in that case, you can ask for pay to develop for the new features + maintenance.

12  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bot to automatically check signatures. on: November 19, 2019, 09:47:38 PM
I have already worked on the same idea back in 2015, Built it with PHP:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=934229.msg10253433#msg10253433

It was worth it, I was considering to make it available for everyone for generous donations, but forum members warned that I should not expect donations  Grin .
Finally, I decided to make it paid service, I was on behalf waves platform campaign bot, I managed to relay the bot with my personal address https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/16pe2twTgrjKC8mioPjX3f2UbCMGvWbVz4,
so every week I receive bitcoins on my address the bot automatically distribute payments for signature campaign members.

I'm not sure if the idea is still applicable since theymos has set a limit for 1 second for requests.
Anyway, thank you for sharing your hard work.
13  Other / New forum software / Re: 59 packages used in Epochtalk, why ? on: April 15, 2019, 11:55:15 PM
Thank you everyone, for your replies.

@mprep well you've given a nice debate here, you almost changed how I see things here  Grin.
Let's we all agree with the idea of a new software, back to the date of epoch talk building NodeJS wasn't highly recommanded, contradictory to the situation today,
in the view of Security and speed, it's highly rates those days, + Javascript is the programming language of the future web.

The purpose of this thread is to find a solution for our new forum software,
make a reasonable decision about what to do now:

Simple of questions:

Shall we continue with Epochtalk ? If No keep in mind that hundreds of thousands already spend.
Is there any urgent design upgrade or feature missing for current version ? (Maybe at the time we're waiting for the new software there's some urgent upgrades..)


Everyone kindly participate with questions and answers.
14  Other / New forum software / 59 packages used in Epochtalk, why ? on: January 24, 2019, 01:33:02 AM
Hello everyone,
Epochtalk has been in development status for many years (Millions of dollars has been sent to developers).

Rather than talking about why it's late or when it will come, I would ask why is 59 packages really needed ?
maintenance of such project would be a hell for developers and this means developers will be rent forever to keep the new forum working.

Almost every user in this forum like the classic design, they need new features. don't say that PHP is too old to run a forum, Facebook is built on top of PHP
fast and has billions of users.

development of such project using PHP wouldn't cost you a 15 000 dollars at max, and it will be super fast and secure, same for python.

So today, I will ask theymos to have the epochtalk project paused and not cancelled.
Focus on security update for the current forum, add new features.

go and search 3 expert PHP developers & 2 frontend developers for a 3k per month each for and that's a real solution.
15  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Types of charts & order book on: October 28, 2018, 07:43:24 PM
That was helpful, Those red & green bars fill the order book table based on what ? the last red one fill about 90% of the order book.
16  Economy / Trading Discussion / Types of charts & order book on: October 28, 2018, 10:24:16 AM
Hello everyone, I want to know the types of charts used in exchange and how they're calculated.



This order book has red lines and green lines how is that calculated ?
17  Other / New forum software / Re: What is the current status of epochtalk ? on: February 09, 2018, 06:04:50 AM
No clarifications where really those millions of dollars of bitcoin went to? Someone is now multi-millionaire  Roll Eyes.

It wasn't millions of dollars when it was spent...
Okay, does this give a valid reason for the developer to fail building a forum even after many years ?
being a developer, maybe you can understand that 4 years of continues development is a lot for just a forum ?
18  Other / New forum software / What is the current status of epochtalk ? on: February 09, 2018, 04:30:10 AM
Hello everyone, its been years the new forum software project funded and we can see just some crappy scripts that one single developer can do.

here's the repository of the project: https://github.com/epochtalk/epochtalk
Millions went to this project, while there is no product. just github files keep getting updated from day to day to kill time.
I think the person who announced (everyone know him) this project is the one who is being working on this project,
expecting that its an open source others developers may help him.

No clarifications where really those millions of dollars of bitcoin went to? Someone is now multi-millionaire  Roll Eyes.
19  Economy / Scam Accusations / Lauda & Gunbot Advertising a scam Exchange on: December 23, 2017, 02:29:17 PM
Hello Everyone,

Beware of Lauda this individual is collecting money for any reason.
The tool that he's advertising: Gunbot is trading on Poloniex which he sent a negative trust himself.

Proof:

Lauda Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101872
 


[GUNBOT] Automatic Poloniex Profit Generator : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1715214.0

Poloniex scam accusations:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2047172.20
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1909615.0

And many unresolved issues.

busoni Profile ( only one who has the authority to list coins for Poloniex):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=139578



Gunbot should at least delete Poloniex, or they're recommending a scam for their customers.
Lauda is responsibility because he's advertising Gunbot while he knows that Poloniex is a scam.


Disclaimer: I don't have any relations with Poloniex nor I ever used their website
20  Other / Beginners & Help / Can I Discuss about Bitcoin Cash in Bitcoin Discussion ? on: December 20, 2017, 01:13:46 AM
Hello Everyone,
I wonder if I can talk about bitcoin cash in bitcointalk.org bitcoin section or in altcoins section ?
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!