 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
|
Our lord and savior Yeezus, of course. The whole trademark thing was just for publicity.
|
|
|
|
Can bitcoin technology be used to end election fraud globally?
No, absolutely not. In any form of voting, and individual cannot have ANY means of proving which way they voted. Why? Because allowing voters to prove how they voted opens the market to vote-selling. Voting must be done in such a way that: I, as an individual, cannot prove to any other party how I voted. It doesn't matter if the system is pseudo-anonymous like Bitcoin -- I can still show someone my private keys / sign a message / whatever. There is also no way, mathematically, to 1) verify that each individual is authorized to vote and votes only once, while 2) not allowing that individual to prove which way they voted. You need to trust a third party for that. |
|
|
|
Just wait the 1 million usd forum software it will be finished soon. I'm pretty sure the avatar feature will be included.
"soon" TM |
|
|
|
RMT is defined as "earn ISK in-game, then get something out-of-game for that (excluding more game time)". You can buy PLEX -> sell for ISK, that's fine. But not the other way around. I don't know if you heard about the "Unholy Rage" operation. Basically CCP decided it's time to kill RMT, jumped around and banned thousands of accounts, and set up many automated systems to detect and ban RMT. Essentially, if you trade something with someone you're not connected with (ie haven't talked to / are not in the same corp / haven't talked in local), you're going to get flagged. This is the dev blog about it.The war against the RMT element continues. We strive towards driving their operating costs to unsustainable levels. Our objective is to get rid of them, plain and simple. This is a deeper explanation into why RMT is a bad idea. There's also the whole legal "if you let people earn real money in-game, you're a money transfer business, enjoy your AML." Entropia Universe had to jump through massive hoops for that, and I think they eventually discontinued it. |
|
|
|
Nothing is illegal in the EVE universe BTW.
Except bug exploitation and RMT. bitterisk wants to start RMT, and the ISK transactions will be reversed in a few months time (as always happens when an RMT gets discovered). |
|
|
|
The extra 0.18x went to a change address. Your client created a new address for this change, and it's held there. It's still in your wallet, just under a new address. Your client will handle this transparently, don't worry too much about it. |
|
|
|
Yes, that does help. Thank you. But doesn't it go against what was said in this thread? The link brings us to a member of the Cointerra team who is stating that he basically had everything to do with making the ASIC card. Where would he do this? Like Deafboy said, these companies design the chips, while Global Foundries, etc physically produce the chips. Why do they still go to companies like Open-Silicon for ASIC design and development (well, I'm not sure if they do but I know Butterfly Labs does)?
Open-Silicon provides manufacturing operations management. You give them designs and a sum of money, and they deal with individual factories, production lines, etc. Global Foundries (a fabricator, also something to do with "tape out")
Tape-out is where you make the final set of modifications to a design. Basically the step right before the physical manufacturing. Read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tape-out |
|
|
|
When I insert both, Xserver (donno what is this) wouldnt start, xinit/xstart wouldn't work,
What do you mean by "wouldn't start"? What's the error message? Other info: my psu is 750w bronze
That won't handle both cards at full load, this review says 365W per card... My mobo is F2A88X-D3H, it has 2 pciex16 (one x16 one x8)
The slots are railed together, meaning that when you plug something into the x8 slot, the x16 slot gets throttled down to x8. Your problem might have something to do with that (the cards don't like x8?). Also, do you have the cards bridged together or no? |
|
|
|
This most likely happened because the miner did not receive any transactions between the last block and this one: block 290330 is timestamped 06:29:04, while the block in question is timestamped 06:30:18. Someone got very lucky. |
|
|
|
Any one can guess, how long it can wait for confirm?
0 fee is generally a bad idea. You can calculate your transaction's priority with: priority = sum(input_value_in_base_units * input_age)/size_in_bytes So we have: (160000000*281 + 50000000*390 + 150000000*375 + 150000000*141) /669
= 212,047,832 57,600,000 is the cutoff, so you're quite a bit above that ("high priority"). However, 0 fee transactions always take significantly longer to be included in a block. To answer your question: a couple hours would be a good bet. |
|
|
|
|
I hope you realize this is a comedy sketch. It's not meant to be serious.
|
|
|
|
You can't honestly expect Wikipedia to put a BTC donation address on the bottom of every page. Even this forum doesn't do that. Instead, this forum has a "DONATE" button in the top menu -- similar to how Wikipedia has a "Donate to Wikipedia" link on the left navigation pane. I'd be happy with a Bitcoin address on that donation landing page. |
|
|
|
2FA would be great. GAuth is stupid easy to implement, or you could go the hosted route if you like having someone to blame. Then again, avatars have been broken forever, so I don't think implementing new features is too high on the priority list right now. |
|
|
|
Surely the people running this forum had his IP address and traced it through and found it was running through proxies
Theymos and others have stated that Satoshi always used TOR. |
|
|
|
I think if people really would want to know who he is, someone would already hack his accounts and trace his ip or something.
Nothing to find there, theymos and others have mentioned he always used TOR. Bitcoin is a decentralized network, not sure if it was planned but not knowing Satoshi at this point is a good thing. It forces developers to work together without a king to issue decrees.
Precisely. Just like the software is decentralized, the human management behind the software is also decentralized. |
|
|
|
Btc@100$
1$ = 1M satoshi
Btc@1000$
1$ = 100K satoshi
Btc@10,000$
1$= 10K satoshi
Btc@100,000$
1$= 1K satoshi
That just sounds like we're talking about Zimbabwe dollars... |
|
|
|
pub 1024D/5EC948A1 2008-10-30 Fingerprint=DE4E FCA3 E1AB 9E41 CE96 CECB 18C0 9E86 5EC9 48A1 uid Satoshi Nakamoto < satoshin@gmx.com> sig sig 61B3DB0C 1995-09-16 __________ __________ Dade Murphy (Crash Override) < zerocool@dev.null> sig sig 5C5BF7A4 2001-03-23 __________ __________ John Titor sig sig3 5EC948A1 2008-10-30 __________ __________ [selfsig] sig sig E2513C30 2009-01-03 __________ __________ Bitcoin Jesus sig sig C40AC6B9 2009-01-03 __________ __________ Dustin D. Trammell < dtrammell@dustintrammell.com> sig sig 9F8F1989 2009-04-01 __________ __________ [] sig sig 04143362 2011-11-01 __________ __________ lzsaver < lzsaver@gmail.com> sig sig DAB591E7 2013-03-27 __________ __________ theymos <theymos+pgp@mm.st> sig sig 7480B161 2013-04-01 __________ __________ Dorian S Nakamoto < mtn_sssh@hotmail.com> <------- WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?sig sig F2E50027 2013-04-19 __________ __________ Antony Bailey < support@antonybailey.net> sig sig 2346C9A6 2013-05-10 __________ __________ Wladimir J. van der Laan < laanwj@gmail.com> sig sig FFDB1CCC 2013-07-01 __________ __________ [] sig sig F91975FE 2013-09-20 __________ __________ Cubaguy < cubaguy@gmail.com> sig sig 7471C2D0 2013-09-21 __________ __________ Harald Schilly < harald.schilly@gmail.com> sig sig1 67E4FA04 2013-10-12 __________ __________ Peter Todd < pete@petertodd.org> sig sig 7B536415 2014-03-06 __________ __________ Satoshi Nakamoto (Resident of California) < satoshin@gmx.com> sig sig 415AF4A3 2014-03-07 __________ __________ William Casarin < bill@casarin.me> sub 2048g/D6AAA69F 2008-10-30 sig sbind 5EC948A1 2008-10-30 __________ __________ [] Anyone can create a key with any name and email address they wish. They can then sign any other key, with any date they choose, and upload it to a keyserv without the knowledge of the original keyholder. I can create a key right now for "Our Lord Yeezus" and sign Satoshi's key. |
|
|
|
|
