bwhahahahaha you can't be serious cause man, someone should tell this every MMORPG out there, esoecually games like Second life or EVE Online..

I don't presume Nefario gives a rats ass about his scammer tag, but you better believe he is done for life when it comes to doing business in the Bitcoin world because no one will ever trust this scum ever again.

Obviously. Hence why he received his scammer tag.

Oh and even if we cared what some gang of thugs thought about his company, I fail to see how his company could have possibly fit the definition of a securities trading market when there was no money ever involved in what this company did.

I mean unless bitcoins somehow recently became money legally speaking, I don't know what the fuck you are taking about.

I don't have a clue what you are talking about or why any of what you said matters.

He owned a company. He sold ownership to that company. He did stuff other owners didn't give permission to and he ended up unilaterally shutting down a good company screwing the other owners and the users' privacy in the process. What some gang of thugs thought about his company is completely irrelevant.

Nobody will die because there will be nothing but love.

Except, as it was organized, it wasn't his to close.

If he did the right thing he would have gone to jail and took responsibility for his actions that he alone was responsible for and whould have gotten his legal advance on his own dime before taking anyone's money.  

Yes, Rarity was clearly right.  It's somewhat inexplicable dank has escaped the scammer tag here.  According to reviewing what occurred, dank solicited Rarity to take part in this agreement.  He proposed it and Rarity agreed.  Why an individual should be allowed to go around proposing deals with people, asking them to swear to agree in writing, and then breaking the deal despite all this is bizarre.

dank's defense appears to be a Matthew Wright style of intentionally misreading the agreement in a manner no reasonable individual ever would.  That an individual asking for a well known tune, and providing sheet music to illustrate it further, was agreeing to receive a collection of random screeching sounds does not pass the smell test.  That any musician would think the song played was the one requested is also not believable.

In fact, dank admits to intentionally sabotaging the song here out of spite, which any musician knows would make it unrecognizable:


This is akin to a painter agreeing in writing to paint a house red, and instead painting a giant red penis on it out of spite and later claiming no breach of contract because the contract was not specific enough.  No reasonable person would side with the painter.

That the song was not actually the requested song is not a matter of subjectivity, I have fed it into the music identifying service "Shazam" and it has failed to identify it as the song in question. 

dank proposed an arrangement contingent on his delivery of song, he delivered a product he knew to be fraudulent and intentionally sabotaged in an attempt to pass it off as genuine to receive payment.  A scam attempt, clearly.  That he has not received the tag is baffling to me.  It is also baffling that he is allowed to derail this serious discussion with discussions of spiritual healing and drugs while the wronged party is apparently being mocked by individuals such as Psy for some reason.

The first is size itself. Without the guarantee that one’s personal assets are off limits in a lawsuit, one must take more risk in buying stock in a corporation. Imagine if potential stockholders knew that their personal assets might be at risk in a case like the BP oil spill. Some number of shareholders would decide against taking that risk, or at least limit it by acquiring less stock.

Rarity, that is my version of Mary Had a Little Lamb, just for you.  Perhaps if you didn't spam my threads with the same questions, I would have turned the distortion down and tuned my guitar before recording.