A person can still achieve success even without any investment and only relying on the salary he receives every month. That can happen if the salary at his workplace is quite large and he is good enough at managing his finances. But without having an investment, it might be quite difficult for him to maintain that wealth. Especially in a time where inflation continues to occur and the value of paper money continues to decline every year.
Broadly speaking, a person can achieve wealth without investment, but that wealth will not last long.
Wealth is the product of investment when talking about wealth it has a lot to do with having a residual income that is having an income flow without actively participating, considering the high rate of inflation from time to time even a person with a monthly salary we get use to the amount being paid over time, honestly this shouldn't be a debate because there can never be wealth without an investment, certain person can be considered to be rich rather than saying that they are wealthy and this can be achieved through investment. You could be wealthy person if you have no money but it will be time consuming because one have to start his own business if he want to be rich and wealthy person of the society. People are doing investments and they are already wealthy people and there are also many people who have start up and they will take many years to be successful person. Being rich is not easy because you have to be disciplined person but that is not easy because you have to learn from rich people who became rich without Investment. Firstly you have to learn skills and it will take 5 years and after you will be successful person of society.Very less people are rich without Investment in anything because you have to invest time to learn skills. People get the money before investing before investing, then you have to print your own UAG tone machine in a business or work or whatever it is, afterwards just investing to maintain your wealth and strengthen your wealth so that reaching income that is more than generally, investment is made when you have money. Then the calculation must be clear, when you invest $ 1k will be different from people who invest $ 100k, capital gains will be different, but there are indeed ways, like you do the discipline with discipline in asset classes that can rise every certain period from time to time, but it will still be different if the nominal is not large for the tube. |
|
|
|
We know that some people can't help themselves in panic and have the intention to sell their losses. The best way for me to relieve stress during market crashes like now is to; - Stopping all price update notifications
Are there any other ways you can suggest? You have arguments in your words, but not every person can never control himself in time. Usually those of us who are Bitcoin Holder, it is most important to control ourselves to deal with bad contacts. Because the person who loses control will suffer losses and plans to sell Bitcoin to the loss. However, the suggestions you have given I do not think everyone will be effective as you say that you have to get out of online. Even different ads should be avoided. These things seem crazy to me. Because Bitcoin's situation is the most important of all time updates. There's no one method that works for everyone, as it varies based on a person's perspective, determination, and character. Similarly, learning methods won't necessarily work well for them without the right approach. Likewise, everyone has their own way of coping. While this is a temporary strategy, especially during a market crash, where you're still within your holding period, it's certainly a wise choice to hold your Bitcoin this way when you have no other options. It's better to go fishing or hang out with your family, rather than constantly monitoring the market or engaging in online discussions about the same topic. |
|
|
|
Betul mas itu proyek yang saya maksud, meskipun proyek ini dibacking oleh perusahaan teranama seperti a16z setidaknya kita harus tetap waspada dengan kemungkinan-kemungkinan negatif yang akan terjadi.
Jangankan hanya sebagai backers, perusahaannya langsung sebagai inventor atau pembuatnya pun kita harus tetap waspada. Ingat orb milik Worldcoin (WLD) yang sudah dibatalkan di Indonesia? ternyata negara-negara lain sebelumnya juga sudah membatalkan orb tersebut karena alasan keamanan. Beberapa negara yang membatalkan orb adalah: | ╔ | ══════════ | ╦ | ══════════ | ╦ | ══════════ | ╦ | ══════════ | ╦ | ══════════ | ╗ | | ║ | 1. Spanyol | ║ | 2. Portugal | ║ | 3. Hongkong | ║ | 4. Jerman | ║ | 5. Brazil | ║ | | ╚ | ══════════ | ╩ | ══════════ | ╩ | ══════════ | ╩ | ══════════ | ╩ | ══════════ | ╝ |
| ╔ | ══════════ | ╦ | ══════════ | ╦ | ══════════ | ╦ | ══════════ | ╦ | ══════════ | ╗ | | ║ | 6. Kolombia | ║ | 7. India | ║ | 8. Korea Selatan | ║ | 9. Prancis | ║ | 10. Inggris | ║ | | ╚ | ══════════ | ╩ | ══════════ | ╩ | ══════════ | ╩ | ══════════ | ╩ | ══════════ | ╝ |
pakai table generator dari SignaTools  . Tentu saja saya tidak akan melarang member jika ingin ikut airdrop ini, bisa saja apa yang saya takutkan itu hanya imajinasi negatif saya, pada akhirnya yang elig justru dapat jutaan rupiah, nanti saya yang disalahin. Yang penting bagi yang mau ikut, pastikan saja identitasnya tidak sampai dikirmkan ke perusahaan, jika nanti perusahaan meminta KYC sedangkan suara kita sudah ada di aplikasi tersebut, lengkap sudah mulai dari suara, wajah, nama, ktp, alamat dan sebagainya kita tukar dengan uang.
Jadi, hati-hati saja yang mau ikut airdrop, ini bukan larangan, cuma mengingatkan saja. DYOR/DWYOR
Semua itu pilihan om, logikanya, mereka membuat program seperti itu tujuannya pasti ingin mendapatkan banyak resource dari suara-suara manusia yang bisa dipakai untuk membangun big data. Yah, setiap program ada negatif & positifnya, mau uang tapi data kita diambil, tapi kalau data tidak diambil tidak dapat uang, semuanya berpulang ke kebijaksanaan masing-masing. Airdrop dalam jenis seperti ini memang sangat rentan, melihat bagaimana WLD mengumpulkan data retina orang-orang, kemudian yang baru-baru ini suara sebagai salah satau bentuk aktiovitas yang haru di lakukan untuk mendapatkan airdrop tentunya sangat berisiko di masa depan dengan teknologi yang lebih tinggi jika di satukan dengan AI. Saya belum mencoba untuk observasi mengenai airdrop ini, mungkin perlu observasi dan apakah kita bisa menggunakan suara yang aneh yang bisa digunakan, karena suara bisa di ubah-ubah atau meniru gaya suara lain, tidak seperti retina, sidik jari. table yang menarik  |
|
|
|
~snip~
The worst thing that can happen to an inexperienced gambler is when he or she thinks that they can beat the house or that they can win a heavy amount from the house when the house didn't allow it. Winning is by luck and who ever don't know that yet is being deceived by something that they might regret about later on. One don't need to have illusion in gambling except they want to lose everything they have. It's better to have self control and know the truth about gambling.
I think that is actually true. If someone just wins on the first time, they will probably think that they are somehow a genius or something like that. They will continue to pour money into it, and end up losing it all. It is a slippery slope. A tiny initial win can make them lose it all. Yes, someone who has just experienced a win at a casino will be much more easily tempted to increase their bets, because they start to think optimistically about achieving the big win they envision—it's a common occurrence. However, what's truly strange is that many people who have gambling experience refuse to learn and remain trapped in this mindset for years, ultimately leaving only a lingering addiction that leads them to poverty. |
|
|
|
|
Ini cukup menarik, saya pikir perubahan pada pasar mulai terasa dan melihat banyak institusi mulai menyicil ETH untuk memenuhi kantongnya, itu adalh pergeseran atau bisa di katakan rotasi liquiditas, baik dari ETF maupun ritel mulai beralih dari fokusnya.
Namun di sisi lain juga ada beberrrapa orang yang memprediksi kemungkinan Altseason tidak terjadi pada tahun ini melainkan tahun depan, telatnya bulan maret sebagai altseason, mereka menyuguhkan data dengan membandingkan BTCD msim sebelumnya dengan pola struktur pasar yang mungkin akan terjadi sama persis.
Namun tidak ada salahnya jika mulai meyicil beberapa altcoin hari ini, di tambah lagi posisi pasar sedang koreksi dalam, ini sebuah kesempatan yang datang menghampiri kembali ke kita dimana sebelumnya masih ada beberapa orang yang tidak mendapatkan keuntungan.
|
|
|
|
Kalau tradingnya di Future ya memang sulit mas karena disana setiap trader tidak hanya harus mampu membuat Teknikal analisis, tetapi juga harus punya kemampuan dalam menentukan arah pergerakan koin yang kita beli, selain itu modal yang sedikit lebih besar juga bisa menjadi dukungan demi bisa membuat tingkat laverage yang tidak terlalu banyak agar tingkat likuidasi bisa sedikit menjauh. Tetapi semua itu juga tidak menjamin setiap trader bisa untung karena seperti yang saya katakan tadi dimana setiap trader harus mampu membaca arah pergerakan koin yang dia beli agar tidak salah dalam menentukan posisinya pada saat ingin trading, sehingga dalam hal seperti ini mas seharusnya memilih opsi trading yang lebih cocok dengan waktu dan modal yang mas punya agar tingkat kesulitan yang harus mas tanggung tidak begitu banyak.
Maka dari itulah saya mengatakan bahwa setiap aktivitas trading memiliki resiko besar untuk di jalani, apabila seseorang tidak siap menghadapi resiko yang akan terjadi. Konsepnya tidak ada seorangpun yang mampu menjamin keuntungan setiap saat di trading terutama jika bicara tentang perdagangan future sehingga yang diperlukan bagaimana seseorang bisa menjaga peluang untuk bertahan. Jika seseorang memahami dampak resiko mungkin akan sedikit lebih mudah menangani perdagangan sehingga pada saat seseorang mengalami kerugian tidak mempengaruhi secara psikologis. Yang paling penting jangan serakah dan jangan mengejar keuntungan besar di trading karena kebanyakan orang tidak mampu menjaga kedisiplinan sehingga akan mempengaruhi pola trading yang mereka jalani. Jika dianggap penting untuk di pelajari maka pelajarilah sehingga pada saat berhadapan dengan trading kita memiliki opsi dan seseorang bisa lebih santai dengan kondisi yang terjadi. Disanalah pentingnya setelah melakukan analisia pada pergerakan harga untuk memasang TP agar tidak serakah dan memasang SL untuk mengurangi kerugian, kebanyakn trader tidak memperdulikan hal itu pada perdagangan mereka yang berakibat pada pasar yang berbalik arah dalam waktu sekejap, padahal sebelumnya sudah mendapatkan keuntungan sesuai target yang di di perhitungkan sebelumnya, atau mereka yang tidak memasang SL yang terus menggenggam kerugiannya hingga pada akhirnya kerugian mereka terus bertambah dan harga posisi mereka tidak mendaptakan posisi keuntungan dan melah mendapatkan kerugian secara terus menerus. Strategi itu harus benar-benar solid agar tidak berlebihan dalam berekspektasi pada pergerakan harga pasar yang memiliki fluktuasi tiggi, |
|
|
|
1. They don't have a maximum supply, so the potential for inflation is much higher than the potential for price increases.
2. The game's payout isn't as good as it sounds; some players are fed up with the mechanics.
3. I remember having to buy Axies before starting the game.
4. Axie's decline was too steep; their ATH was $165, and today it's only $2.39.
Pretty much agreed with the first point, it's the reason why I wouldn't touch this project with my money despite playing their games back in the days. The uncapped supply where the gamers are farmers that willing to pull off all nighters to make profit as much as they can. Doesn't seem like a sustaining economy if you ask me. The new investors just become exit liquidity. Isn't that just like a Ponzi scheme? New investors will always be the ones who suffer losses, instead of seeking profits by exploiting their own friends? This is very difficult to achieve due to several issues with the Axie Infinity project. 1. They don't have a maximum supply, so the potential for inflation is much higher than the potential for price increases. 2. The game's payout isn't as good as it sounds; some players are fed up with the mechanics. 3. I remember having to buy Axies before starting the game. 4. Axie's decline was too steep; their ATH was $165, and today it's only $2.39. And the narrative surrounding the game project has really declined. Today's investment isn't focused on games that are just a waste of time and result in losses, especially with holding their tokens. If they don't offer substantial rewards and engaging gameplay mechanics that make the game enjoyable, there won't be a massive following. Their user base has also steadily declined over time, and you have to remember that games are short-lived on the Web 3. Especially if the developer doesn't create a competitive game system and guarantees good returns, users will reconsider and try other, more profitable games.  There's no growth, and the data looks flat.I am holding some in loss. Do you suggest me to book losses ? If it were up to me, dude, you should forget what you believe in. With all the new, potential crypto projects coming out in this industry, it's impossible that you don't see anything with more potential than AXS. Let me just ask you this, do you research the top altcoins or meme coins these days? Honestly, the time of AXIE's popularity is over, so it's going to be hard for it to get its shine back, just to tell you frankly. Now, if you still really believe in it, you should just think about it and accept the fact that the capital you'll use for it will be a loss. He should have opened his eyes and seen that there are many more potential projects. But I advise him not to force him. From what I've said, he should have understood that this kind of game is no longer worth investing in. Any altcoin with an overly hyped narrative in the past will be discarded, because it's not based on value but on community discussion hype. |
|
|
|
? We can't know, Or the halving year, last time in 2020 it was up on august, but in 2024, it was down. So as you can see this chart is risky, dangerous, and could make you lose money and you should be careful with what you are doing about this.
It’s averaged, could be bearish or bullish but it’s mostly bearish same for September.. Could be different this time anyways but here’s my take.. Normally the 116.5~116.8 was suppose to be our bottom for last week but after it broke it, it means there was no buying force at that moment so it headed straight for the demand zone which was at 110.7 ~113.7k.. now it pumped a little but anything that takes us below 115k again could takes us just down again to the DZ and maybe even more for September if the pressure force it downward below 110k then we could be talking about 106~99k(maybe more can’t say) for September ..So, we could just maintain the current DZ / pump to new ATHs or we could get more dips for more buys, doesn’t matter anyways just more time to stack up more cheap sats , I could be wrong though (DYOR:)). What happened in the past and today is different in recognizing a bullish market. Graphically, each year is also different, but we will see a similar pattern because it can come sooner or later. Support has been broken, and we are seeing how strong support is today at the $109-$112 price level because this is also forming a barrier. If it moves sideways close to this number, it is likely to become the next strong support as well. However, it is also very uncertain at times. The bearish trend in the near term is still visible. We need fresh sentiment to see significant price developments, with demand influenced by better news as a bullish catalyst and/or prices breaking out of the near-term bearish trend. Some people should add to their positions, as I also believe that the current decline won't last long. If there are those who haven't bought yet, it's best to try at this price, because if they wait for the price to drop below $100k, I think they'll face difficulties and their wait will be in vain. |
|
|
|
This is very difficult to achieve due to several issues with the Axie Infinity project. 1. They don't have a maximum supply, so the potential for inflation is much higher than the potential for price increases. 2. The game's payout isn't as good as it sounds; some players are fed up with the mechanics. 3. I remember having to buy Axies before starting the game. 4. Axie's decline was too steep; their ATH was $165, and today it's only $2.39. And the narrative surrounding the game project has really declined. Today's investment isn't focused on games that are just a waste of time and result in losses, especially with holding their tokens. If they don't offer substantial rewards and engaging gameplay mechanics that make the game enjoyable, there won't be a massive following. Their user base has also steadily declined over time, and you have to remember that games are short-lived on the Web 3. Especially if the developer doesn't create a competitive game system and guarantees good returns, users will reconsider and try other, more profitable games. There's no growth, and the data looks flat.I am holding some in loss. Do you suggest me to book losses ? If I so you will certainly choose to throw it away, unless you are still actively playing there, maybe because you like to play or whatever it is, but if you believe that xie will rise it is very difficult to think, the game industry on the web3 is not as good as the web2, especially with a stuck project. See first how the team, whether they are still doing development or not, pay attention to everything in your reference, if it makes you sure to keep it holding it. |
|
|
|
There will be some project sometime in the future where it is going to be just a project decentralizing AI power one day, but that's just not the one we are dealing with at the moment and it will be some other time. Which is why it's going to be something that doesn't exist today. If that happens, and there is a brand new huge one eventually, then it will be great for the long term.
However, what we have right now is not that great because the ones that already exist do not have that power or fame or attention. For this to work, something has to do a lot better before we can actually get a good result, and right now we do not have that kind of power on anything at the moment to get that type of attention or result at all.
AI also requires data centers for its research and must be constantly updated. It requires a lot of power to operate. Without power to manage it, AI will not function. On the other hand, AI also needs to provide benefits to its contributors, just as Bitcoin fairly rewards miners. If such principles can be implemented for the successful development of decentralized AI, then we can safely say it is possible. Definitely! If AI doesn’t reward contributors then it people might actually lost interest, the recent one i’m aware of is DecentralGPT which rewarded its contributors with its token $DGC which got listed on Bitget. Also, i’m sure these AI projects would have made necessary requirements to function well but the issue which i think might arise is how well the ‘decentralization’ is accepted by people. The big question is, how many users will this AI have, and how much income will contributors receive in return? Of course, it must be calculated to be profitable in order to maintain decentralization, because the cost of power requires a considerable amount of expenditure, although it depends on how much power they consume. What if there are few users? And I noticed that their tokens also amount to 1T with a very low value, which is enough to make many people skeptical. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin dropped to $110K today, after a temporary reversal following Jerome Powell speech last week. This drop was the lowest since Bitcoin hit a new all time high of $124K, but many remain optimistic that Bitcoin will reach $130K in August.
With less than 5 days left until September and it looks like the bitcoin correction is not over yet, I would be surprised if anyone still believes bitcoin will hit $130k this August. I see that we may be in a bearish situation in the short term, and reaching $130k by the end of August seems very difficult, but I have hope for a bullish trend even though I am bearish in my thinking. If the Fed officially cuts interest rates in the future, the market will automatically recover, and it's very realistic that Bitcoin will reach $130K. Meanwhile, I think this decline is also a good opportunity to increase the portfolio size.
If the Fed decides to cut interest rates next September, bitcoin and the entire market will definitely recover and even grow. But whether that growth will last or end as quickly as it has over the past two days remains to be seen. Bitcoin will rally if the Fed cuts interest rates but if whales suddenly dump a large amount of Bitcoin or there is geopolitical instability, that rally won't last. There are many factors that affect bitcoin, not just the Fed's interest rates. In his previous statement, Powell remained uncertain in his remarks and suggested that interest rate cuts are merely a probability that must be considered, indicating an uncertain decision for September. This suggests that sentiment will first decline before experiencing an uptick, and we may test support below $110k. I simply want to highlight that this trend will persist if Bitcoin can remain above $105k. |
|
|
|
There will be some project sometime in the future where it is going to be just a project decentralizing AI power one day, but that's just not the one we are dealing with at the moment and it will be some other time. Which is why it's going to be something that doesn't exist today. If that happens, and there is a brand new huge one eventually, then it will be great for the long term.
However, what we have right now is not that great because the ones that already exist do not have that power or fame or attention. For this to work, something has to do a lot better before we can actually get a good result, and right now we do not have that kind of power on anything at the moment to get that type of attention or result at all.
AI also requires data centers for its research and must be constantly updated. It requires a lot of power to operate. Without power to manage it, AI will not function. On the other hand, AI also needs to provide benefits to its contributors, just as Bitcoin fairly rewards miners. If such principles can be implemented for the successful development of decentralized AI, then we can safely say it is possible. |
|
|
|
This is very difficult to achieve due to several issues with the Axie Infinity project. 1. They don't have a maximum supply, so the potential for inflation is much higher than the potential for price increases. 2. The game's payout isn't as good as it sounds; some players are fed up with the mechanics. 3. I remember having to buy Axies before starting the game. 4. Axie's decline was too steep; their ATH was $165, and today it's only $2.39. And the narrative surrounding the game project has really declined. Today's investment isn't focused on games that are just a waste of time and result in losses, especially with holding their tokens. If they don't offer substantial rewards and engaging gameplay mechanics that make the game enjoyable, there won't be a massive following. Their user base has also steadily declined over time, and you have to remember that games are short-lived on the Web 3. Especially if the developer doesn't create a competitive game system and guarantees good returns, users will reconsider and try other, more profitable games. There's no growth, and the data looks flat. |
|
|
|
|
Forum Username; khiholangkang
Merit in 120 days; 17
Bitcoin Segwit Address: bc1q2ntgunrm33yhfx4ymalqnqeftt5m6c56hn5zef
|
|
|
|
A raked hand is one hand played at a cash table.
Many industry leading websites have the similar feature/promotions where you have to complete some missions (play x amount of hands, get x pair, etc.) in order to unlock some reward. Usually these rewards are close to nothing (few cents). @TonPoker can you post your detailed rake structure here across all formats? It would be helpful if you can post all leader boards + cashback rearwards also, I just want to check if if is possible to beat the rake in your platform. That would be quite helpful in identifying opportunities, as gamblers also need to consider the other side, whether it's worth it or not. At least we know how to manage it. If they are consistent posting give aways and other updates there's good chance that their brand grows. For now they need to explore lots of ways to gather more exposure so that TON Poker will be known by lots of players not only in Bitcointalk but also even on X and other social media platforms.
In a competitive settings, brands explores available means of surving and growing, you know, with what we have seen so far, theres competition here and TON Poker should strategically adopt some means that can get the attention of players here in this community, do you know why the really need to get more smart in this forum, this forum is housing different gambling brands, so they must think of something very different from other poker stuff, although your advise is very good because I believe in versatility because it also helps in achieving aim as quick as possible. Speaking of exploration within a competitive landscape, and we've also seen that poker has become quite a hot topic in forums over the past few months, marketing management must have a strategy that can truly attract gamblers in this community, especially in this community. Interest in poker is slowly starting to increase in the forums, and they need to capitalize on that existing market. Increasing exposure isn't just limited to the forums; I'm pretty sure they're doing it outside of them as well. But the question is, what marketing will attract poker players to want to play at our home? That question underscores the need for marketers. In my opinion, they need to create championship events on the forums, or perhaps even create a poker league. |
|
|
|
You are the one who introduced the DCA method, so you should know the risk as well. Also, if you are going to give him a loan so he can use it in the DCA method, isn’t it better if you just use it yourself? And you just said he is having some good turn up, then why would your friend still ask for a loan? If he really is and still asks, it means he is getting greedy or he is letting his emotions control him. Maybe that’s a sign you shouldn’t give a loan.
Investing requires having money that's secure and not intended for long-term use. If you don't have that, it's better not to invest. Especially since they aren't a hedge fund or VC with experience in managing investment funds. They simply listened to what the OP said and were tempted by the profit. It's best not to lend money to someone who doesn't understand investing, or who only knows the profit without understanding the risk. DCA also has risks, as the market will always fluctuate. On the other hand, there must be a set amount of money allocated for a specific period of time. How would they get that if they were just borrowing? Logically, it's better to use it for themselves. The OP wanted to motivate them, but they were attacked by the question. Instead, they could provide profits and repay their debts with those profits. It's better not to lend at all. |
|
|
|
|
SunfireCasino username: khiholangkang
Merits earned in the last 120 days: 17
|
|
|
|
|
Gambling for me is merely an alternative way to seek enjoyment in this world. Of course, as people grow older, they prioritize other aspects of life over gambling, whether it be family, career, or other activities.
However, one common trait shared by responsible gamblers is that they limit the time they spend on gambling, making it one part of their life but not the priority in living it.
When I watch and play soccer as a hobby, I naturally set aside time each month for gambling in a few sessions spread out over the week.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
