 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
|
Hi,
I'm looking for someone with good experience with building and optimizing algorithms in sgminer.
Right now I have a working implementation, but the speed is much to be desired. Even though another implementation on, lets say a cpuminer, does way better.
Price for your service can be negotiated, please DM me for more info.
(To the mods: If this is in the wrong subforum, let me know)
|
|
|
|
|
Remove the ANN from this topic as it gives the false impression that you are part of the Garlicoin team
Not cool
|
|
|
|
Many people from the subreddit are following [Reddit post] where it was suggested to create accounts and report/flood this post here. Perhaps they don't know that reports here aren't the same as in Reddit.
Such comments as the one bellow make me laugh.
Back at it again with the FUD, no one even remotely suggested to "flood" the topic what the fuck are you on. I hope the mods ban your sorry ass lol |
|
|
|
The mass production of L1 being canceled doesn't mean that the chip wassn't developed.
Bruh you think they just canceled it because they didn't feel like it? No they canceled the product as it failed horribly .... Like I said you can't make a scrypt-n asic that is efficient, is fast and has a long lifespan. Honestly you should be happy if you can get even one of those attributes Once again I ask you to stay neutral as an OP, its not in your rights to just turn a coin announcement into a SCAM topic. (Do this in the RIGHT subforums!!) Especially when you only spread FUD based on either totally proven false information or information that has no proof attached with it at all. |
|
|
|
Stop posting the github url How fast is it??? How much MH/s does it ACTUALLY do on scrypt-n:2048??? So far there is NOONE posting here with proof of how fast the KnCMiner does scrypt-n other then some old advertisement before the product was even released!! After further investigation, Bitmain's the most reputable manufacturer, L1 miner seems to be capable of mining scrypt-n. Read below:
Our brand new, high-performance L1 will be hashing at 120MH/s with the market-best pricing of only $599.00 USD per unit with free shipping worldwide, hailing in at a market-topping rate $5/MH/s. This ensures our L1 will be absolute the best $/MH/s as well as power efficiency spec in the Scrypt mining market. What’s more, a dramatic discount will be given to bulk orders.
L1 will be produced with our state-of-art chip powered by the 28nm tech process. The efficiency is only 2.37J/MH at Core Voltage 0.81v on chip level. The Core Voltage and Hash Rate will be adjustable by software, over clocking and under clocking will be very easy to operate while miners trade-off the speed and efficiency. Moreover, the miner will be able to mine multifarious scrypt based altcoin, of which scrypt length can be 1024, 2048, 4096 (n = 10, 11 or 12).
IT LITTERALLY SAYS [Cancelled] IN THE TITLE LOL |
|
|
|
|
Can we just remove all the scam FUD from the OP while we're at it? It doesn't make any sense and they have been debunked
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry but the more comments I read from you the more I realize that it's a case of poor Due Diligence.
1). Your entire claim is based on one speculative Reddit post. If you read the comment section of that post, you would realize how wrong /u/kamencco (the OP) was (i.e. not fully understanding what scrypt-n is).
2). Taking a step back (assume GRLC isn't ASIC resistant). The coin started off as a meme coin. To most ppl (probably even the devs), scrypt-n is analogous to ASIC-resistant. It's highly defamatory to accuse the devs as scammers. They clearly didn't intend to use "ASIC resistance" as the platform to rip other redditors off. (Of course, there might be a rogue dev right now but I'm pretty sure you weren't specifically describing him).
It's fine to hate GRLC and give constructive criticisms about the coin. However, it's unfair to make sweeping accusations about the coin (i.e. calling it a scam). Also, note that GRLC is a month old meme coin. So please make balanced comparison with decade old currency disruptor like bitcoin.
Garlicoin was released and marketed as ASIC resistant with the devs either willfully lying or being ignorant. Either would be extremely irresponsible ans showcases their incompetence. "ASIC resistance" is still on the official website... Garlicoin is NOT ASIC resistant and the developers lied about this. Facts, not speculation. It's sad to be coming to this realization but the truth has to come out. Keep on saying that its not ASIC resistant does not suddenly make it "Facts". You cited zero sources other than that heavily debunked reddit post. If you hate GRLC, that's completely fine. Just don't influence other people with your unsupported belief by having that red, bolded warning sign on the first page and the [scam] title. KNC Titan, one of the biggest scrypt miners produced, supports scrypt-n up to n of 19. https://github.com/KnCMiner/knc-asic/blob/d83f1e67785eff0af00175d85564ace840c28186/knc-asic.h#L10Garlicoin I'd scrypt-n. What else do you need to know? Thanks for once again posting the very same github code The hashrate of these things is not amazing and neither is their power draw. On top of that you keep ignoring that these devices are quite rare, are not being sold anymore and are dying really fast (making it a horrible investment no one wants to but anyhow) How can I report you to the bitcointalk staff, this is a joke. You have no idea what you're talking about |
|
|
|
OP why did you remove my pool from the list just because i gave you some heat?
You're totally abusing your power
This is your pool garlicpool.org ? You can just promote it in simple post here or in pools themes. I think that is only one friendly pool with normal statistic and dashboard. It was in there but I gave the OP some Heat yesterday (check the previous) page and now he removed me Total OP abuse. I know there are other ways of letting people know but a topic manager shouldn't put his own opinion before having a neutral thread |
|
|
|
|
OP why did you remove my pool from the list just because i gave you some heat?
You're totally abusing your power
|
|
|
|
A single party holding a handful of miners could perform a 51% attack on Garlicoin. Its chain is worthless. The rarity of the miners is in fact making things worse. There is no market for such miners so there is no fair market for mining, as there is in bitcoin or litecoin for example.
How fast do you think those miners are exactly? Because I get the feeling that you think Scrypt-N asic miners easily beat 1000+ GPUs. (Which it doesn't)Please look into the bare hardware requirements of calculating 1 scryptn:10 hash, there is no way this can be done without also having a massive amount of silicon on board which will make it very failure prone and super expensive to produce. Why would someone buy a MASSIVE amount of scrypt-n ASIC miners (which again DO NOT exist in such quantities since not a lot were sold and most of them died already) which such a high failure rate Once again I'm more convinced you're just trying to spread FUD or are just thick. It's well known that none of the miners were ever released. (Guess why? Its incredibly hard to make them and the production costs are so high) You're even linking to web.archive.org because the original live source doesn't show the miner anymore wtf It's not inconceivable that there are a number of working ASICs out there. The devs themselves owning ASICs or being paid by ASIC owners would be pretty wild, though. In any event, I think the benefit of hard forking to change the algorithm and remove all doubts outweighs the hassle of hard forking.
Sounds like a movie plot, I'd say pitch it to Hollywood maybe you will make some money to buy the non-existing asics with. A hardfork will not do the coin well in an early stage and without any real proof (other then scam companies and dead chips) there is no reason to act to it. |
|
|
|
Very nice proof indeed. The KnCminer Titan has been a total failure, they are not being produced anymore and are dying by pieces. On top of that, they aren't even THAT fast doing ScryptN. Its nothing like Bitcoin had with the first ASICS and won't ever be due the need of a high memory (bandwidth) Look at ebay, all the listings (and they are pretty rare) almost all have one or more dead die on the cubes. On top of that, they usually have burned PCI power plugs because the hardware design was so bad it pulled too much power through the +12V connectors. |
|
|
|
Why is this suddenly called a scam? Facts: - There is no solid proof of an ASIC on the network and if this EVER happens a switch to scrypt:11 can be made later in the future - The airdrop is in progress literally right now are you blind there is a big thread on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/garlicoin/comments/7v3qr2/the_official_garlicoin_airdrop/- Scrypt:10 = 2048. Do the math: 2^(n+1) Also for those not up to date: - There is NOT going to be a hardfork and there is none planned in the near future |
|
|
|
|
BURST-XFDW-ESQ8-DB2B-FE3RH
cad33c001bceb22eabf1245ae591e5207601214c3caee3c8a2126634e138a90a
I've read you'd need to have 1 BURST in order to change the reward address... Could anyone be nice enough?
|
|
|
|
|
this site is scam! Stay away!
|
|
|
|
i am reading now on reddit 'smiba' and 'djdan' asking for loan on every site if not getting it they are writing bad reviews that is brilliant idea for getting money must admit  Yeah, not.. Link to post please? Oh this is my reddit http://www.reddit.com/user/smiba/Not asking for loan or whatever |
|
|
|
|
Don't you get it? Its not a ponzi scheme... Its a scam. They pay you the first time and the next time they screw you over.
their level system is just a way to make sure you'll be busy for a few days
|
|
|
|
|
Confirmed scam, sending fake emails to me and never paid me.
|
|
|
|
SCAM CONFIRMED - DO NOT USE!!! SCAM CONFIRMED - DO NOT USE!!!
|
|
|
|
|
