 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
when do you add Ubiq  since musicoin is added so fast i hope this one finaly get added too and i hate it to mine on a other site just for one coin My +1 post was deleted, but here's another vote for Ubiq. Ethash is the most profitable algorithm for me and Ubiq pops to the top of the most profitable coins from time to time. I'm not sure how hard it is to add another coin, but it would be most appreciated. Cryptonight and Equihash are the next most profitable, so all of the other coins on those algorithms would be my next vote: KRB, ZDASH, KMD, BIP, XDN, etc. Thanks for a great pool! Mining a coin when it pops to the top of whattomine isn't always your best option. Most people don't even look to see what the coin is actually paying, they just see what is on top and start mining it. Example: Ethereum(ETH) Ethash BT: 15.23s BR: 4.85 LB: 3,615,603 321,761,623M 21.12 Th/s 2.0% 0.2768 0.2823 0.04911001 (Poloniex) 3.0% $5,778,184,019 68,987.72 BTC 0.01359<---------------------------- currently paying0.01386 $17.90 $16.54 100% | 100% 100% | 100% Exp2 Expanse(EXP) Ethash BT: 1m 28s BR: 8.00 LB: 598,246 7,470,836M 84.90 Gh/s -7.6% 19.6141 18.1184 0.00070841 (Poloniex) -2.3% $6,363,175 167.96 BTC 0.01389<---------------------------- currently paying more0.01284 $16.57 $15.22 102% | 93% 89% | 91% Sorry the site fucks up the formatting, but as you can see ETH is on top, but EXP is actually paying more. It is also more profitable to be mining coins where the diff has dropped, instead of what is simply listed on top. It takes time to mine coins, so mining the top coin NOW might not be very profitable by the time you actually get the coins. Well, whether you want to use the auto switching pool or manually switch depending on your own criteria, we need the coin to be available on the pool to even have the option of mining that coin. BTW, whenever I refresh the site, the top revenue is always on top for me. Maybe there is some way to sort it. I agree with you, but I guess it is a matter of time and complexity. Ideally, we would mine whatever is at the lowest difficulty to get the most coins, then hold them until the exchange rate is favorable and exchange them then. I used to basically do that on another pool before. Every day or so, I would see what was best to mine, then hold it until there was enough to deal with the exchange and transfer fees. Then, put in a trailing stop, hoping to catch an upswing. It was nice to see how things worked, but it took a good bit of time to monitor, and really volatile coins (like ZCash) were all over the place. I don't have a huge farm or anything, so it really is a relatively small difference in the end. It is just easier to let MPH take care of it all, and then transfer to an offline wallet when I build up enough balance in my preferred coin. |
|
|
|
when do you add Ubiq since musicoin is added so fast i hope this one finaly get added too and i hate it to mine on a other site just for one coin My +1 post was deleted, but here's another vote for Ubiq. Ethash is the most profitable algorithm for me and Ubiq pops to the top of the most profitable coins from time to time. I'm not sure how hard it is to add another coin, but it would be most appreciated. Cryptonight and Equihash are the next most profitable, so all of the other coins on those algorithms would be my next vote: KRB, ZDASH, KMD, BIP, XDN, etc. Thanks for a great pool! Mining a coin when it pops to the top of whattomine isn't always your best option. Most people don't even look to see what the coin is actually paying, they just see what is on top and start mining it. Example: Ethereum(ETH) Ethash BT: 15.23s BR: 4.85 LB: 3,615,603 321,761,623M 21.12 Th/s 2.0% 0.2768 0.2823 0.04911001 (Poloniex) 3.0% $5,778,184,019 68,987.72 BTC 0.01359<---------------------------- currently paying0.01386 $17.90 $16.54 100% | 100% 100% | 100% Exp2 Expanse(EXP) Ethash BT: 1m 28s BR: 8.00 LB: 598,246 7,470,836M 84.90 Gh/s -7.6% 19.6141 18.1184 0.00070841 (Poloniex) -2.3% $6,363,175 167.96 BTC 0.01389<---------------------------- currently paying more0.01284 $16.57 $15.22 102% | 93% 89% | 91% Sorry the site fucks up the formatting, but as you can see ETH is on top, but EXP is actually paying more. It is also more profitable to be mining coins where the diff has dropped, instead of what is simply listed on top. It takes time to mine coins, so mining the top coin NOW might not be very profitable by the time you actually get the coins. Well, whether you want to use the auto switching pool or manually switch depending on your own criteria, we need the coin to be available on the pool to even have the option of mining that coin. |
|
|
|
when do you add Ubiq since musicoin is added so fast i hope this one finaly get added too and i hate it to mine on a other site just for one coin My +1 post was deleted, but here's another vote for Ubiq. Ethash is the most profitable algorithm for me and Ubiq pops to the top of the most profitable coins from time to time. I'm not sure how hard it is to add another coin, but it would be most appreciated. Cryptonight and Equihash are the next most profitable, so all of the other coins on those algorithms would be my next vote: KRB, ZDASH, KMD, BIP, XDN, etc. Thanks for a great pool! |
|
|
|
|
Is Musicoin Auto Exchange Stuck?
I mine ethash on 17020. On most coins, I see balances move through unconfirmed, then confirmed credited for auto exchange, then on exchange, and finally my chosen coin balance will increase.
Over the past 3 days or so, I see Musicoin showing up in my account and the balance says credited for auto exchange, but it never moves to the exchange. It has been a couple of days and there is a pretty decent balance in there, so I would think it should go to the exchange by now.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Hi -
Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I've looked everywhere and can't find it.
I've been mining ETH for the last couple of days and have been very happy with the service. Love the auto exchange feature. I just changed my config to point to the ethash switch pool (us-east.miningpoolhub.com:17020) and added SIA (using Claymore).
SIA is mining just fine and I can see the worker and hash rate on that page. ETH is connected to the pool, showing shares and hash rate in the miner. However, I don't see a worker or any hash rate on the ETC pool page (ethash is mining ETC now). I believe this is because it is going to a hub pool and not the ETC pool. However, it would be nice if there was somewhere to see that. Is there a dashboard/worker page somewhere for the switching pool?
Thanks and looking forward to continuing to mine here (next step will be setting up multi-algo!)
Bump - sorry to be a pest, but is there anywhere to monitor hub worker status, i.e. hash rate, coin being mined, etc.? Everything seems to be working since I can see different coins on the Balances page go from having unconfirmed to confirmed to on exchange and then into my coin of choice, but it would be nice to have a more real time view that things are working. |
|
|
|
|
Hi -
Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I've looked everywhere and can't find it.
I've been mining ETH for the last couple of days and have been very happy with the service. Love the auto exchange feature. I just changed my config to point to the ethash switch pool (us-east.miningpoolhub.com:17020) and added SIA (using Claymore).
SIA is mining just fine and I can see the worker and hash rate on that page. ETH is connected to the pool, showing shares and hash rate in the miner. However, I don't see a worker or any hash rate on the ETC pool page (ethash is mining ETC now). I believe this is because it is going to a hub pool and not the ETC pool. However, it would be nice if there was somewhere to see that. Is there a dashboard/worker page somewhere for the switching pool?
Thanks and looking forward to continuing to mine here (next step will be setting up multi-algo!)
|
|
|
|
someone to share h/s with Claymore 7.0 R7 370 . my hash rate is 520h/s with 6 R7 370 2Gb
thenks.
I get about 85 - 90 on mine. Overclocked to 1125 / 1500 power -15 in Afterburner. One runs at about 80C and the other around 70C (I have it set as -tt 80 - tili 85 -tstop 90) and the fan runs about 60% (I want to improve my cooling, but it is very stable right now). So, it sounds like you are in the ballpark with 87 per card. |
|
|
|
v5.0 is showing ~ 80 H/s for my card (R7 370) but the pool an average of 55-60 during the last 4h or so. The rejection rate is low (< one per thousand shares). Any idea what might cause the diversity displayed? I've not noticed any differences with v4.0.
I guess a 50% boost displayed by the pool is more realistic than 100% displayed within the miner (have had ~ 40 H/s with v4.0)?
I'm getting about 65H/s with my R7 370 2GB. My settings in Afterburner are 1125 / 1500 with -15% for power limit. Lowering the clocks below 1100 seems to impact performance pretty significantly. Lowering the power limit more made things a bit unstable. It's been running for days with these settings no problem. Every new release, I just stop, reboot (seems to like a reboot for some reason), run the new version, and performance increases. Are yours 4GB? What settings are you using to get 80? Well then, looks like I have a display glitch inside v5.0  I did no really tweak much, 1040/1425, power limit not changed. 2GB card with 15.12 driver on Win 10 64-bit. Your 65 H/s seems to match my displayed 55-60 from the pool, considering your higher clocks. Thanks for sharing your settings and hashrate!  Interesting - The only difference I see is that my drivers are 16.9 instead of 15.12. I thought v5 officially made ver 16 drivers cool, but I may have to give it a try when I have time to take down my system. Thanks for the info! |
|
|
|
v5.0 is showing ~ 80 H/s for my card (R7 370) but the pool an average of 55-60 during the last 4h or so. The rejection rate is low (< one per thousand shares). Any idea what might cause the diversity displayed? I've not noticed any differences with v4.0.
I guess a 50% boost displayed by the pool is more realistic than 100% displayed within the miner (have had ~ 40 H/s with v4.0)?
I'm getting about 65H/s with my R7 370 2GB. My settings in Afterburner are 1125 / 1500 with -15% for power limit. Lowering the clocks below 1100 seems to impact performance pretty significantly. Lowering the power limit more made things a bit unstable. It's been running for days with these settings no problem. Every new release, I just stop, reboot (seems to like a reboot for some reason), run the new version, and performance increases. Are yours 4GB? What settings are you using to get 80? |
|
|
|
Claymore - you are CRAZY man!!! 38sol/s from old r7 370\2G!!!! I'm confused! GREAT!
Hi - Relative newbie here, but I've got a beginning rig up running with the same card (Sapphire if it matters, Win10 with 16.9.2 drivers). I've been reading as many threads as I can keep up with, but I still have a couple of questions. I'm getting about 33 H/s according to the miner. How does H/s relate to sol/s? Have you done any tuning? I'm not sure if I'm up to modding the bios in this card, but if there are any memory/temp settings in config.txt that you can share, it would be most appreciated! Thanks in advance for sharing as well as all of the fantastic information on the boards and in the community!! |
|
|
|
|
