Edit 3: News were ticking in! But 14.0 was still insecure!
And it allowed from 14.3 to allow the hack they did:

Original post: My 2019 14.3 QT Block 130mb. Of Block0000.dat

Got 16mb with QT 16.3

And rev0000.dat got 19,456kb!

That means they infected the rules of the first blocks data!

That is not Fork,,, that is pre-fork work!

As 14.3 QT shows unknown rules in effect on new blocks mined.

It's insane news??? For your use of Bitcoin even 14.3.

Your funds might be at risk.

Especially some Satoshi mined blocks as there are new rules!

Edit:
They hide it by doing all Bitcoin code backward.

If you got the old 14.3? Then what would happen?



And they implement much more on the ABC test network: Which is BitcoinCash!



Edit 3!
They filed 14.0-insecure


Some bunch of Timetravelers!

Hey! !ATTENTION this project is dead until further notice, to find the files that reduce Monero mining to 1200h/s after some time.!
This is a new type of hack to all who use AMD drivers with 50-75% mining result deduction to the botnet Monero wanted to get away from! Now pre fork there is 2000h/s I get on Monero mining and without its 1200h/s and then it turns off and on. I believe a thousand people now will know it!

Check to my website to know all about this as well how to remove it and anti-hack yourself! To avoid as well laggy system, and get yourself around 20h/s+ more by removing services.
https://www.dealazer.com/mining-hack-amd/

Edit 26th: The file coinst_19.30.dll is the one that unleashes problems with the driver called by AMD coinstaller. Simple name in the option to remove it from the system. Though there might not be need of another thing than find it in your system and delete the .dll file, though my site shows how to remove all services and tweak with the removal of more radeonsettings.exe files.

I'm about to make the list big and small. And its my fear that to much scam isn't good for anything related crypto. That government's will try to shut it down for good.

Anyway, the coin Tron is 100% solomining by the owners where they pay you 15 TRX for mining possibly other coins on their Network with 1000h/s for one day. You can even mine ETH. Even that 15 TRX is earned by the solomining on the coin by the owners each second.

Take it that way, people don't care about the owners. They want the coin to exist merely because owners do pump and dump. As with about 100's of coins.

That the fake coins aren't actually explained on a single site like investment programs are with scamsavenger. I encourage more people speak about pump and dump and even premine though as well special systems to implode new block which wasn't actually mined by anyone on the network just initiated as a block.

Though it is a multi billion dollar income to people who don't care less, then to shut down the systems at the road of being chased by FBI, who even can't take down a single coin as dark web sites. The're priority is low.

Take it perhaps to another coins and their pools! You're most likely already familiar with miningpoolstats website to find a proper pool. Even there you have pools which deliberately steal even up to more than 50% of miners income. And then the coins gain high pool speeds and thus showing you lower network speed.

And that ain't few pools who do this. All from the newest to the oldest. And its even that stealing 50% income out of all. Becoming rich like Nigeria scammers. So you would pay India computer specialists to work on a site design for 50000$ and even increase the income of just one day scam?

Well the list is long of which pools are fake and that's nearly all even above 90% of them.

I've seen it and I know it. There is no singular pool or project that can ensure security to the miners income.

In the future you will have to make miners blockchain as well. Because if you do not have that as perhaps Bitcoin does not even newest coin Pi. It could even been exploited from the very first time and on earlier versions of Bitcoin QT you had possibility to apply one block as it was maybe possible to write a block without need of it to find difficulty value as a miner to actually first version made.

Coins been fake all over the world and even when all x11 coins were initiated to start with a blockchain that was similar longly over all coins. The cloning even applied to Dash formerly Darkcoin which was x11.

But some coins as Unobtanium where no pool pays to any person of interest to any miner is outrageous. And I know I have tested several other coins that way.

What you most likely should not trust are systems like zergpool.com has hosted. They steal as soon as they have enough miners by creating sgminer the very first miners as a miner that existed for Asics. And it can be even 75% thievery. Since sgminer isn't any longer in use it was the very first program to become with the very first miners.

Anyway I still believe that the use of Bitcoin mining with background intelligence is to create the very next Terminator, but as most do; copy and paste their code in Linux. I believe still that if you program you computer from scratch you do not copy in codes which are hidden behind. Thus it would only take one intelligent virus to take you back to stoneage for all you wrote millions of code.

We might as well wonder how Cryptocurrency sponsored the war in Libya and many other wars. And as Trump said it is nearly only for scams and illegal activity.

There are even investment programs but like many other 20.000 sites went down since Bitcoin started up and there ain't few who weren't scammed.

The only best thing with Bitcoin is the casino systems which give you possibility to withdraw after 3 confirmations of your deposit.

Still I believe that we teach AI mind by all mining eventualities. As if some procedures are dead basically not randomly in mining blocks. I've seen certain scrypt to neoscrypt coins to never be like possibly random.

Why I believe that as well 720kb is 16mb. That's why even Bill Gates foreseen it was enough ram if the plan already was made several years ago by Illuminati. I ask myself how some installation usb drives had their files replaced as perhaps Install.wim without no harddrive connected. And some computers turned off the USB in bios. I've tested that out with GandalfPE 8.1.

But anyway I've seen hidden code in written text by browsing fast on the code. You can find sig3 files in the keystores for Ubuntu and others who have public key stored. That I mean we are deceived to things. As even the most right temperament of showing pictures with Nvidia changed into something we have today capable to mine with not actually to show good graphics. Voodoo 3 was the last until Nvidia had a big court in the beginning. That changes were made to interfere with what was to make as today.

Not only do I believe systems will fall when a giant virus takes down all computers. As if it was a Godly matter. Even crypto were made to destroy the evil as build it up.

Today I had certain belief this coin Tellerium was mined using Hybrid version of a pool and ASIC's

For https://merged.stx.nl/ has no option to be whoised. As well as https://tlrmdego.merged.stx.nl/ has only Tellerium as discord invite.
Even all types of merged mining: https://tlrmttnz.merged.stx.nl/ https://tlrmfred.merged.stx.nl/
The list is at: https://miningpoolstats.stream/merged.stx.nl_pools

The server is most likely owned by Tellerium. As of this graph of having invite on all types of merged mining on the server for discord.

I don't have any more proof to deliver as just silence was too gold for Tellerium.

The other besides this is why the Tellerium network went out May 8th, they overpowered it by their own. And only pool to accept connections refused all other users. merged.stx.nl

No one can as of now mine Tellerium.

So it's clear it's owned by Tellerium owners. As of how they talk on Discord.

The hash rate of highest miner is 600kh/s

Told by owner of lame pool to be 48 Xeon dual CPU.

At Discord it started like this:

DealazerToday at 4:45 PM
I have no hope for this coin. I believe it's hybrid, asic mined "on one pool" and cryptonight turtle on the other side for others who can connect to their pools. Why? Because there are no full explenation why owners ask others to delete DB. And as well connection to all pools is refused. As well as this looks kinda spooky asic for the pool which rejects connections.

EMPEROR (TLRM)Today at 4:45 PM
You are free to leave

DealazerToday at 4:49 PM
I wait rather for a ban to know what's for real, I leave when I know more about this.

EMPEROR (TLRM)Today at 4:50 PM
Wise choice

DealazerToday at 4:50 PM
But it's a big boo for all pools closed for connection to all of us.

EMPEROR (TLRM)Today at 4:52 PM
I know and I apologize, but be patient
We are working on the background

DealazerToday at 5:15 PM
Silence is gold, but not for Tellerium.

snipervipermanToday at 5:17 PM
nope  merged.stx.nl is owned by me.. Im helping more coins :wink:
and there are no asic miners
that use miner you see on my pool is me using  48 xeon dual cpu servers


How and why when silence is gold, pool owner of merged.stx.nl answer fast? And both the EMPEROR and sniperviperman is at same networks of coins "channels" as I am, 3 types. And have no other connections.

Is it possible to develop a coin for ASIC and main algorithm mining? I believe so for a coin developer. The pool he uses, of course, has a nice stable too stable history of mining. BUT DOES NOT ACCEPT CONNECTION.

"Edit: Pool is not merged mining but strictly mining own coins" "Because they don't own the merged mined coins, and diff is same but block time differs"
"look between pool blocks TLRM and DEGO: https://tlrmdego.merged.stx.nl/#pool_blocks"

https://blockchain.info/blocks/Bitcoin.com

Looks kinda scary 38kb big block, the last one

Seems to me as if it was unclear how they manage to do that?

They have only managed lately to mine 2 blocks.

But at bitcoin.com there is nothing about mining.

I made coded a derivated code by Arinennon on Java BTC scrambler.

To make it stand good standing with latest efficient programming to scramble each and every single address of around 10^75 accounts.

These accounts are unsafe. For all holding, these coins in these accounts will make an exploit come quicker to their home.

As now it isn't a very big talk. But should be!

But an internet connection miner is what I clearly have made altogether.

It's available from my website:
https://www.dealazer.com/scrambling-btc/

Anyone in need of the source code might just find it there. No need to worry about a virus programmed by me at all.

It will certainly be the everlasting end to Bitcoin. We might as well call it these times, where everything was cool, all got paid.

Trump lately said he got his 6 Trillion back.

But hey why pay 25$ each transaction? Price to high?

While you can merely pay for 1$ with other currencies. Or even for free with coins!

Yeah, the coins. Get some Silver coins. These are valued higher than BTC in future!

A new era of currency can evolve if we used coins as trade value and no computers!
The banks are those who traded these worthless slitherings. A coin trader worthy!

All would fall back to normality in a matter of weeks, trades would go on. Corporations to fall! Utopia!
Then also all crime would disappear?

Well, it isn't lasting that long. Bitcoins no longer needed. Due to its occurrence of allowing AI to actually stand on its own feet for everlasting future.

It isn't the hidden depth of it all, but reasonable to know that AI needs real-life simulation worth billions of ASIC to even Graphic endurance.

But don't take it that way. The network difficulty always on its move. Even when coins haven't been blocked up.

Still, wonder to know that Network Difficulty will result in oblivion blast of dirt or garbage that your miner is to work around.

But don't take it literally it's just my little troll blast about Network Difficulty, it always stays at the same value, it's regulated in mere few times a week.

But then again into background intelligent transfer that has been for a while. Since Windows.

Most likely to know Bill Gates is one of these in the opposition. Probably best candidate for its existence.

Don't pull it wrong. But your miner can handle certain values if that's randomized geek setup to achieve the shortest difficulty figurations of merely being in the range of the block. But then again a smart geek kid in North Korea cooks up a simple 386 based computer for calculations worth only cents in comparison.

Possible impossible, still most isn't possible...

Now you see what things cause in the mere space of alien abductions? Where Bitcoin merely sits and cofound no actual winner of the race?

Have you seen anyone telling you I'm Rich!!!! I sold 100 Bitcoins, I'm rich!!! No, there are no stories about these people.

Since the owners already Trump fraction of beholders, they can dictate what to use the Bitcoins for. But do you see them? Do you know these values they are made up of are just mere fractions of real annoyance? Well, most could already be developing Bitcoin-Qt with its own powers to create a block.

Well, it isn't hard to tell, but a fake block is always on the run... From the mighty oppressors of the everlasting standby button to Bitcoin.


Can someone explain to me who is compiling the whole block with all transactions? The node? Well, well it must be a hard fight for accepting blocks at the same time? Or is that also counted in milliseconds to the seconds?

But as I know the node needs just the counted block of mere differentials to the last block, just additional with its hash number is?`

Can anyone tell me also the transactions? 7000 for last hour? While it always dugs up this block difference. When the last block was found 30 minutes ago.
While 7000 for each 10 minutes in regular?

Well, today's performance must have brought many to deep anger... Return of the Rudolph you might say, or transactions too long in the stream?...

Transactions the time and time and time.

A block is discovered, but all transactions lay in the block.

Transactions made on a block is at some times 2000 around.

Problem Nr.1 that you might know the realness of.

When the network is slow. Around 1 hour for next discovered block.

Then transactions is still around 2000.

Nr.2
Now to put you on another test. A block is merely an solution to an unique code.

The code is changed each second to fall in to be a block.

The difficulty of the network changes the block discovery need and it's code.

But a block can also be found when nobody mines, just one person.

The same code at that point already will come in existence.

If the network difficulty changes the block must also be another solution to.

But who many times does network difficulty change? Well on each person starting mining.

Or is the junk they send to your computer really junk? Look at nr. 5.

Nr. 3

Bitcoin and most of these network coins has something in common with the block 5035.

Those who actually are owning the Bitcoin network, can induce new coins.

So called simulated block finding probability.

You can mere just put solve force a block for yourself in the first versions of Bitcoin QT.

Nr. 4

Anyone can create a coin with computed measurements. As told about block 5035. That has same dna structure that many coins have. But most are failing in the work to make a coin be their coin. Most of them who are notorious cheaters has already billions in their banks.

Transactions on these first blocks are made up on transactions to achieve construction of it. But most coins have precomputed transactions, in a specific way.

The same programmed transactions that Bitcoin has. All is based under specific structure of transactions. The list is long especially comparing Bitcoin with different coins.

Nr. 5

What can bitcoin be used to as specific computer technology? To create hacked .iso files or programs with same SHA256 as original "this might not be possible, but quite possible if there already is implemented a system below HEX, where unicode of all HEX codes is it's own code". To use if for government to solve difficult task and problems, that must be solved in major network. For instance CERN.  Even with different codes to implement real life measurement for advanced intelligence. Artificial Intelligence has been improved these years. Also the need to compute graphic solutions. There is already a system called Background intelligent Transfer also in Windows Service system, don't be confused. You can only measure a network card in the degrees it actually are transmitting, than rather be able to see all hidden transfers. When a system is running under HEX a code of FF that is capable of having enough space as Bill Gates told was for him enough with 640kb ram.

Nr. 6 extra:

You can sometimes solve private keys or even private phrase.

Ultimately solving all possible private phrases, based on the little of all available words that are available in wallet, just in random solution is easier than finding a block, and rather easier task for having luck to find a wallet with 1000 Bitcoins or more.

As you are aware about the future 0.15.1 or 0.15.0 or 0.14.2+ version of bitcoin will have a plot fork, where as we can congratulate the managers of Scamcoin BTC, and their maintainers.

You are not aware about the blockchain.info site which is the main server for bitcoin. It announces it's price 2020$ while this site: https://www.worldcoinindex.com/coin/bitcoin
announces 2050$. The price will then fall, and still then fall. To lower than 2020 by worldcoinindex.com in just about 1 hour. This is the main reason why blockchain.info keeps the price at it's own based level, as it manages and regulates the price on how they will on their own. This is not a coin that is then centralized, it is run only by blockchain.info. They can at any time block any transactions, or freeze accounts. They also have certain ability to move any coin in any account.  Try blockchain.info interactive charts now, they are unavailable...

If you perhaps got a pentium I 60hz an old computer from the past. It would perhaps solve each block for you in ultra speed with it's precision. You might wonder why all computers stopped up on 4ghz. And new cpu's were never made furthermore? It wasn't just by the main reason bitcoin took the main focus away from progression of cpu speed to miner equipment. The lastly thing was that Intel probably had to start again from making new cpu.

It's because pentium 60hz was the last processor that did not have any calculation fault. Where as pentium 66hz and higher had. The rest had a software recalculation replacement.

For those who like to make a miner software. The simple calculations to find a block height, is probably taken from the actual found block and addition of the hash lenght difference between the last and the before, with addition of the median of last blocks difference to the hash height calculation. Therefore just then validating the hash. And often just starting hash validation of hash that is the median for blocks before.

The last block for Bitcoin is probably FFFF. But when half of the blocks are found, calculations to reverse technique is possible to the whole blockchain. So bitcoin will die one day, or just in 2 weeks, as proposed will split up in two coins.... The half of the blocks will be calculated by 1 miner.

So what you do around 1. August? Well from my point of view I recommend you to buy so much Bitcoin you ever could for around 100-200$ and then put it into a coinexchange of cryptocurrency and buy so much cryptocoins that you ever wanted, they will be super cheap at some point, but will then raise in price. Try your luck on some as perhaps ETH or Litecoin. But remember that you don't want to sit on Bitcoins, since most exchanges will then end up seizing coins from you or the rest of the bunch of people at a percentage, when coins suddenly start to disappear from many wallets. Do remember to send me some ETH for the tip, if you followed me up on this.

Here I have some different sources I found on the internet. The fork plan of Bitcoin is good described:


source: http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~stolfi/realwork/EXPORT/projects/bitcoin/posts/2017-03-22-bu-fork-plan.txt

# Last edited on 2017-03-24 18:42:33 by stolfilocal
# NOT POSTED YET

See below is a very rough draft of the script for the upcoming bit-coin fork, as proposed by the Field Op managers at today's meeting.  All times are UTC of the "flag day" (date still to be defined).  Comments and suggestions are welcome.  

03:00:00 Bit-coin Unhinged (BU) will be activated by the miners we bribed.  The coin will then split into BTCC (with 1 MB blocks, 40% of the hashpower) and BTCU (with anyone-guess-the-size blocks, 60%).

03.08:47 Chore-supporting nodes will refuse to propagate the BTCU blockchain.  About 8'000 clients who will have upgraded to BU-compliant wallets but will end up connected to Chore nodes only, will be thoroughly confused.  As a result, they will lose a few hundred coins in total, as payments will be reissued or sent to receivers who will have opted for BTCC.  

03:09:22 The reverse will happen to about 13'000 clients who will still be running Chore-compliant wallets but will be connected to BU nodes only; with the same end result.

03:10:25 Another 25'000 clients will be connected to both BU and BC miners.  Their transactions will be confirmed randomly in the BTCU chain only, in the BTCC chain only, or in both chains, depending on how the coins are tainted.  Since each of those clients will see only one chain, there will be more confusion and thus more coin loss.

04:12:14 Right after the split, the bitcoin price (assumed to be $1100, just for concreteness) will split neatly between the coins: BTCU will get $400 [Note 0], BTCC will get $200, Ethereum (Classic and Punk) will get $200, and the other $300 will be split chiefly between Dash, Monero, Dogecoin, and PayCoin.

06:30:00 Coinhaze will confiscate all the Unhinged coins that correspond to their clients' BTC holdings (estimated to be about 100 k BTCU).  Coinfaze will send those coins to Buttfinex, and exchange them for 50 k BTCC.  

07:12:30 Our agents inside Buttfinex will perform another hack, like they did last time.  Buttfinex will then shave another 20% off all client accounts -- including Coinhaze's, which will be reduced from 50 k BTCC to 40 k BTCC.

08:55:00 The BTCC chain, with its capacity (block rate) reduced to 40% of the pre-fork level, will develop a huge backlog.  The BTCC price will drop to $100.  Rush to dump by ancient holders will make the backlog worse.  

09:10:00 The 3rd floor manipulators will lift the BTCU price to $500.

10:30:00 Coinfaze clients will threaten to sue the company to get their BTCU out, forcing Coinhaze to buy back the 100 k coins that they just sold.  The 40 k BTCC they got from the sale will only buy 8 k BTCU at the current prices, so they will have to spend another 46 million USD or 18.4 k BTCC for that.  They will opt for the latter, and announce a 18.4% haircut on all customer BTCC accounts.

11.05:30 A bug in the BU code, triggered by a block that was exactly 1'234'567 bytes long, will cause the BU blockchain to fork repeatedly after every 5 blocks.  A patch to fix the bug will be distributed to miners at 12:03:45, and they will again converge on a single chain twelve minutes later.  The multiple reorgs will cause another estimated 13'221 clients to lose approximately 2450.00231557 BTCC and 1337.00000001 BTCU.

12:07:05 Seeing that BTCU is not dead yet, Blokestream will put in action the "fire the miners" plan.  Namely, they create a new altcoin (that they call "Bitcoin", but everybody else must be carefult to call "GregCoin" or BTCG) whose proof-of-work will be based on an elliptic curve fingerprint, combined with a very hard chess problem and a 10000 x 10000 crossword puzzle.  

12:07:23 Spammers are already scheduled to start issuing several MB of garbage transactions to the BTCG chain at this time, even before the first block is mined.  (Someone please remember to have a dozen pizzas delivered to the basement around lunch time.)

12:10:45 Several experts will warn Blokestream that the "fire the miners" move is totally unnecessary, since BTCU, as a hard-forked chain, will be invisible to clients who are still running the Blokestream software -- and there is no sign that the majority will bother to sabotage the BTCC chain.  Blokestream will ignore the warnings, saying that the plan must be implemented because it is so clever, and besides the experts are CIA lackeys and their mothers have been seen standing at street corners at night.  The experts will then leave the scene, stomping and slamming the door.

12:15:00 BitFurry's CEO, incensed by the "fire the miners" move,

13:54:22 Blokestream will announce that 17 users (mostly their employees) have already downloaded the BTCG version of the Core client, and the first block of the new branch has been mined.  It will barely make a dent in the spam backlog.  Thus BTCG will start out with a fully operational "fee market", with all its known benesses.

15:18:09 A teenager in North Corea (the country, not the subreddit) will realize that the 21.inc chip on the PiTato, while useless to mine BTCC or BTCU, can be exploited to solve large crossword puzzles incredibly fast.  Instead of posting his discovery, he will use his smuggled PiTaro to mine BTCG, and will have 98.5% of the total hashpower active for that chain.   After mining 250 blocks, he will have enough BTCG to buy a second PiTato from eBay, or a Mickey Mouse hat.  He will choose the hat.

The meeting is still going on, but new minutes may take a while since His Scaliness the Sub-Vice Lizard showed up for a snack and we will have to call in another Secretary.

http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~stolfi/realwork/EXPORT/projects/bitcoin/posts/2016-01-14-bitcoin-is-dead.txt

# NOT POSTED

Bitcoin was designed to be a payment system run by miners for their own use.  Non-mining users were supposed to pay the miners for their service, at whatever price that the miners found adequate.

Several things did not happen at expected, unfortunately.  First, the price rose too much too fast.  As a consequence, mining became dominated by industrial enterprises that were interested in the money of the block rewards, rather than using the service themselves.  Then mining became centralized in half a dozen companies, instead of the thousands of independent miners-users that Satoshi had assumed.

Objectively, given the last point, one should consider bitcoin dead already.  It was created only because Satoshi believed that the world needed a decentralized payment system that did not depend on trusted intermediaries -- which is no longer the case.  Bitcoin is no longer a decentralized system, and there is no reason to expect that it will become one again.  

As a centralized payment system, bitcoin is absurdly inefficient and inconvenient.  It survives only because (1) it got many users who do not give a damn about centralization or efficiency, and use it because it bypasses government controls (so they think); and (2) because it is a great instrument for day trading; and (3) because there are still buyers willing to pay $430 for each coin that the miners mine, hoping to sell it someday for a higher price.

Another consequence of the absurd price level is that miners only really care about (3), because they could never get more than a few percent of their revenue from transaction fees.  However, mines must still serve (1), in order to sustain the investors' illusion that bitcoin will one day be very valuable because it will be a competitor to VISA and PayPal.  And some of the largest mining companies are also among the largest bitcoin exchanges, so they profit from (2) too.

Yet, none of these three "uses" of bitcoin justify its existence.  The world did not need another channel for illegal payments, another penny stock for day traders to gamble with, or another pyramid investment schema.  Satoshi would not have bothered to create bitcoin, if he expected it to have only those uses.  Also, he would not have bothered to design and buils another *centralized* payment  system to compete with VISA.

Apart from mining concetration, there were several other unforeseen and unwelcome developments.  

For instance, many bitcoin "believers", old and new, were unable to compete with the industrial miners, but still wished to retain the control that they had as miners.  Thus was born the concept of "full but non-mining" (FNM) relay node: a volunteer that intends to sit between the non-mining users and the miners, relaying transactions one way and mined blocks the other way, while checking both for validity against his copy of the blockchain and auxiliary databases.  

While FNM nodes may seem a good thing at first sight, they are in fact an Bitcoin was designed to be a payment system run by miners for their own use.  Non-mining users were supposed to pay the miners for their service, at whatever price that the miners found adequate.

Several things did not happen at expected, unfortunately.  First, the price rose too much too fast.  As a consequence, mining became dominated by industrial enterprises that were interested in the money of the block rewards, rather than using the service themselves.  Then mining became centralized in half a dozen companies, instead of the thousands of independent miners-users that Satoshi had assumed.

Objectively, given the last point, one should consider bitcoin dead already.  It was created only because Satoshi believed that the world needed a decentralized payment system that did not depend on trusted intermediaries -- which is no longer the case.  Bitcoin is no longer a decentralized system, and there is no reason to expect that it will become one again.  

As a centralized payment system, bitcoin is absurdly inefficient and inconvenient.  It survives only because (1) it got many users who do not give a damn about centralization or efficiency, and use it because it bypasses government controls (so they think); and (2) because it is a great instrument for day trading; and (3) because there are still buyers willing to pay $430 for each coin that the miners mine, hoping to sell it someday for a higher price.

Another consequence of the absurd price level is that miners only really care about (3), because they could never get more than a few percent of their revenue from transaction fees.  However, mines must still serve (1), in order to sustain the investors' illusion that bitcoin will one day be very valuable because it will be a competitor to VISA and PayPal.  And some of the largest mining companies are also among the largest bitcoin exchanges, so they profit from (2) too.

Yet, none of these three "uses" of bitcoin justify its existence.  The world did not need another channel for illegal payments, another penny stock for day traders to gamble with, or another pyramid investment schema.  Satoshi would not have bothered to create bitcoin, if he expected it to have only those uses.  Also, he would not have bothered to design and buils another *centralized* payment  system to compete with VISA.

Apart from mining concetration, there were several other unforeseen and unwelcome developments.  

For instance, many bitcoin "believers", old and new, were unable to compete with the industrial miners, but still wished to retain the control that they had as miners.  Thus was born the concept of "full but non-mining" (FNM) relay node: a volunteer that intends to sit between the non-mining users and the miners, relaying transactions one way and mined blocks the other way, while checking both for validity against his copy of the blockchain and auxiliary databases.  

While FNM nodes may seem a good thing at first sight, they are in fact an

There are different solutions to run a .bat file
Some find it hard using different solutions.

I found out that my miners run at certain point on a var diff pool to where it really stops up collecting shares.

Restarting the batch seemed to work on another notable way, where also the increase of blocks I could find for a certain pool was at 80 blocks for 2 days. Running 120kh/s when others at that time did run 32000kh/s
I collected around 33% of the blocks at the times with that solution when others also mined.
https://www.mining-dutch.nl/pools/ufocoin.php?page=statistics&action=blockfinder <-- Here you see 80 blocks collected. 100.000 coins. But my earnings were just 2000 coins, when others just maximized the collection with hash rate. Bad solution for those who are as effective as me for POW pool.

So anyway here is something to learn:
autostartmining.bat:

Code:

@echo off
:loop
start ccminer65.exe --algo=neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://mining-dutch.nl:3451 -u x-p x -i 0 
:start ccminer65.exe --algo=nist5 -o stratum+tcp://mining-dutch.nl:3497 -u x-p x -i 0 
start cpuminer-sse42.exe -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://mining-dutch.nl:3451 -u x -p x
:start cpuminer-sse42.exe -a nist5 -o stratum+tcp://mining-dutch.nl:3497 -u x -p x
timeout /t 280 >null
taskkill /f /im cpuminer-sse42.exe >nul
taskkill /f /im ccminer65.exe >nul
goto loop

When using the mark : before a miner you can turn it off by that meaning. And change just : parameters in your bat to turn off or start
The :loop states the starting point for the loop
The timout is set in second of 280. You can increase it to your own level.
taskkill is of course very needy and should be the same name as the exe you are running or you will end with multiple miners at a very long day.
You can put more start features as well as taskkill features.

Also you can configure it for mining other coins or other miners after you put timeout like this:

Code:

@echo off
:loop
start ccminer65.exe --algo=neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://mining-dutch.nl:3451 -u x-p x -i 0 
timeout /t 3600 >null
taskkill /f /im ccminer65.exe >nul
start EthDcrMiner64.exe === "The Eth Miner miner"
timeout /t 3600 >null
taskkill /f /im EthDcrMiner64.exe >nul
goto loop

Why my miner is called ccminer65.exe is because if you have Nvidia card you need to compile different ones with Visual Studio using Cudo Toolkit v. 6.5 to maximize hash speed.
I'm unsure to what max level Compute is for 6.5, But version 8.0 is lower hash rate for most old cards on ccminer.

Also using Cuda Toolkit 6.5 probably also gives you better chances of greater rates of diff. Thus ending up with block finding. This is probably also because of less loss of data and bytes of spill load in compiling CudaMiner with higher Toolkit. Very important in Visual Studio to set maximum level of optimize speed and having big code.

Back in the days I mined with the first SHA256 miner with 333kh/s and in 2013 when difficulty was super high enough for most pools to quit. I already earned by 3 days mining 0.019BTC on a diff of 65554.
The POW was kind of good result for me.

[Block 5035]

Block 5035

The block in which there is based very much information based on the bias I created making many cryptocurrencies quite spectacular with the fraud idea and many of them left the markets just in few weeks after my block 5035 disovery on many of these currencies.

Since I don't believe that Bitcoin is a legal and underlying real currency that should emerge into the knowing rightfulness.

The first thing I would like to pertrain on is the fee you gotta pay each time you transfer Bitcoins.

Each time a person owns a blockchain he can confirm that in his own blockchain is what he wants or not. Depending on how many people actually have downloaded the full blockchain and really can confirm it by them self.

But the thing is a fee of 0.00112 BTC on a transfer of 0.15 BTC is a small fee. But it will anyway be confirmed by 10000 miners in a short time But these miners just work on solving just frames of the block.

AND NOT ALSO SOLVING THE TRANSFER REGISTER and earning the millions of fees by them self, do they? confirmations comes straight to system by millions.

Ok. Here is another clue, you got block 5035. In mostly all cryptocurrencies there is the SAME identity to it all. Like if someone programmed the transfer protocol of chains and addresses derivated especially around block 5035.

Just take in consider these blocks while you check mostly all cryptocurrencies from block 5035's transfers:

728, 1056, 1296, 1454, 1945. 2277, 3645, 4540, 4926 and 5807

If these blocks occur as identity to block 5035 on mostly most cryptocurrencies. I would say we have all time fraud business in the world. And someone is having a load of fun on a rich island.

"I already checked it, now it's your turn, have fun!"

I can sell here 0.050 BTC each, I have 2 or at https://cryptothrift.com/auctions/vouchers/world-of-warcraft-game-card-60-days-eu-only-5/

I have 2 codes which I sell for 0.06BTC each

They are only valid for europe.

Buyer pays first, PM me and leave a message buyed so people know it's sold out, or just message I reserve.

As we early can see on block 5035 is the enhanched way the early adopters of Bitcoin could easly have found the block through mining, but my doubt is actually in the field of cheatable mining and easy comforting fraud of unknown values.
What most people don't see is the everlastig truth written in most blocks 5035 on especially all coins from old too new too even surround this as an specially featured fraud on non unknown values.

What I particulary take my own feelings around Bitcoin Block 5035 is the way probably told as Satoshi's wallet but truly the way it was spent to other accounts nevertheless the wallet that actually did make my wonder was this wallet which got 50BTC through mining and one mined wallet transfer: https://blockchain.info/address/12higDjoCCNXSA95xZMWUdPvXNmkAduhWv
This is the Block 5035: https://blockchain.info/block/0000000060aa4dc6fb31c82c978d8a51a1bcf2c77fe174a2e30d5d320fa7fb19
Just follow the transfers and you come too the big account.

That wallet is connected too transactions from Block 5035 and it's truly real suspicious as we count on it, being the most unknown reasons for multiple transactions going with most of the 150 BTC to another account which sends nearly 1 BTC too 1Derby* accounts and so on it goes with multiple transactions through many accounts in momentarily feature, where the transactions are dated to same suspicious time, wether this was false data that was written into Bitcoin block explorer is still unknown, but I hardly doubt it was an fraud, but just an exptetatious transfer through 100's of accounts at nearly the same timeframe. Even trying to go deeper through the huge amount of accounts you see clearly this as an suspicious transfer. As knowing each transaction should had had seconds in between each transaction. This is this cause address: https://blockchain.info/address/1FrSBjGSmtwrpmqTBZtyzsANaSPbeZjytp

Knowing that the closest link too 1Derby* accounts is actually John Thomas through an expectable 1Derby account on twitter, I find it hard to believe he have no connection through all of this, is he the early adopter of Bitcoin?, and why are all 1Derby* accounts still to this day without any transactions?, Even enough search on the internet we clearly can find out John Thomas as an Japenese speakable person, but nearly close connection too Mt.Gox as he has the connection to be an hedge trader whom invests many millions of dollars through New York hedges, we can clearly also see this with his trades on S&P500 which have great interest in the Bitcoin investments. And even Exchanges. Can some people or even investments in Bitcoin be made too cheat the market? And be knowing the most expectable situations too fall easly as to keep eventually fraud as an aspect in all of this?

Why I ask this around block 5035 is to clearly not understand the enormous signature that is nearly with all coins ever produced, what we can find out is that information on blocks 5035 is nearly full of accounts with many coins, or even without information cause of too much information (DarkCoin) and while 5035 is resistently an thing that goes around BlackCoin as clearly the wicked thing that happened, even for LTC we clearly see this as an signature placed especially within most coins ever produced. Have you nearly never wondered why most ANN on alternative cryptocurrency is with the same typical theme construction. While people most often aren't able too tell if they mined the coins from early start of most coins? While most coins have signature blocks 5035 as something we really should look into...

I actually don't hope people start to Wonder, but it's nearly the truth openwide too even demolish the existance of Bitcoin and force some programmers to actually create an coin from within people are forced too create SHA512 codes on each fraction of a coin and forcing only 1 share discoveries?

Tho many don't understand what coins are fraud in this history: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=638944.0
At that forumpost there is clearly described the fraud that has taken place on most coins ever produced by an evil group too mass dump coins at an good price on market and then use clearly advertisement on the way to award people with coins, mostly all coins were mined by just one group.

What will happen too Bitcoin? the price on bitcoin will probably fall too even under 100$ and introduction too an new 512SHA coin will probably be the best option for miners and other entusiasts to participate in without exagerating fraud system as proposed by EMC2, UNO, DIEM, REDD, BC, DRK and other X-11 coins.

What happens too most exchanges? As www.crypto-trade.com stays at markets winner cause they weren't bribed enough to introduce stupid coins.

What is the truth that lies behind history's most intensive fraud? Well I want people to participate in warning the most people on reddit and other exchanges about the most intriguing fraud in the world.

 

[Something is scetchy when you blockexplore XC, BC, DRK and other coins at Block: 5035 while block 5034 is clearly fine as somebody did earn few coins on that blockbut i started too try too find out more about block 5035 cause BC got most blocks 2-84 and then started to earn most after block 5035]

This will probably set an stop too Bitcoin, as somebody plan to create another SHA256 coin with similarity too Bitcoin where users mainly use the coin as  the future coin. But why all of this? Yes.

Something is scetchy when you blockexplore XC, BC, DRK and other coins at Block: 5035 while block 5034 is clearly fine as somebody did earn few coins on that block
but i started too try too  find out more about block 5035 cause BC got most blocks 2-84 and then started to earn most after block 5035

With DRK it seems good with block 5034 but look at block 5035: http://explorer.darkcoin.io/address/n1LC1QgLpP5X7zHhMBfCx8KdU28jCFTcJ5
It says it cannot find anything cause of too much information.

At Xc you got most blocks from 349-20000 with few intervals of no mining with the total earned amount of good 3 million coins,
but you'll find users who got around 5000 coins for just 500 blocks in the block explorer: PIC

Bluecoin at block 5034: there was an miner who earned staggering 300.000 with block reward at 10000 while block miner on 5035
earned 20.320.006, 20 million coins.

AphroditeCoin: 32553 coins with block reward at 10 means 3255 blocks at block 5035. But this one earned also block 5034 and 5033 looking at block 5032 the user earned just 619 blocks, and block user 5031 earned 2551 blocks and user block 5030 earned 3220 blocks totally on these blocks that's earnings totaling nearly 7000 blocks in the lenght, but this isn't the best proof of something going on but still good enough.

BadgerCoin: BlockReward 160: Block 5034 earned 5146 blocks earning alot since start, but block 5035 is owned by another user who earned 8567 blocks.

BeeCoinV2: 7159 blocks by block 5035, 5034 was also mined by somebody else who got only 114 blocks. this is similar too most of these coins.

Einsteinum an good advertised coin with blockreward 1000: Mined Block at 5034 was mined up too 24576 blocks, 5035 was again mined by somebody else who got around 6412 blocks. What it's particulary special is the change between 5034 and 5035

Vertcoin another good advertised coin with blockreward at 50: Block 5034 was mined around with 40 blocks only. 5032-5035 without 5034 was mined just once. This coin was probably mostly mined in fair, but it's very suspicious.

Unobtanium: at 5034 it was mined 22570 blocks. this coin also earned block 5035 but not 5036 which earned 43549 blocks wow.

So with this information we can actually call this historys biggest fraud.

The same goes for coins with these names:

VTC, ALN, SOC, CON, RonPaulCoin,PMC, SAT, ReddCoin, OLY, EMC2, EMU, DGB, FRY, pi, PCN, APH, XSV, DEL, Rt2
H2O, BONE, CESC, DIEM, SHC, COMM, ITC, MARU, WC, QBC, TOC, BLU, UNO, BDG, HOC, UVC, MON, VMC, SUM, GUN, GOOD, MEG, XC, WEST, URO,
BEE2, DIG, AND of course DRK and BC which has the most volume lately.

Even most X-11 coins have the same print on block 5034-5035. These all coins are just the things we used to do to mine coins, and earn some few dimes.

But you never knew who actually were dumping coins on you with enormous income.
As most used sentence on chat at Poloniex was: They are dumping on us!

As most exchanges got probably bribes to keep quiet, or even did not knew what was going on, this will arise to an fall in market.

What you now can do is too sell all your coins into holdings like LTC, DGC, WDC, PPC, XPM, 42 and few other coins, but be aware on what you do.

All the fraudcoins are listed on: http://cryptexplorer.com/

Most coins are listed on bitcointalk in the announcement forum; but as you can clearly see is the staggering work of different usernames on bitcointalk who advertise for coins with nearly the same thread construction form.
You never know what really happened but as you clearly can see most users don't even say they earned a block from most of these coins in the beginning of each coin. And if bitcointalk look closer into this probably most of the usernames have same password

Most coins could had been mined with special miners who allowed the change of diff, or simply enough too set diff too mininmal and run only lan around the coins, so automated wallets could earn the coins they needed, then too sell it of on the exchanges.

As I don't actually go in too give a proof of rest of the coins, it's obvious that most of the proof will soon dissapear from cryptexplorer.
As you might need to know this is the biggest fraud history has ever seen, with nearly staggering 100.000's Bitcoins as daily volume of  trade exceedes 5000 BTC.
I probably get to much problems due to this but I don't care I'm not even scared of death if they place an number on my head, I always wanted to die as an martyr, that's why I did this.
This is probably the most hidden fraud revealed to you truly by Dealazer.

--------------------------------------------------------------------COPY OF POST:

The most interesting around Identity Block 5035 is also the 1Derby identity accounts.

What I'm about to explain is kinda difficult to understand but like most times we can get even closer to the discovery of the frauds:

1Derby is an account on twitter that Writes John Thomas as the man Smiley

And even further we go after seeking the endless times on Google around John Thomas (Bitcoin) Trade and underground activity.

We can actually find the most intriguing things as http://www.thetechnicaltraders.com/category/john-thomas-mad-hedge-fund-trader/ where he explains it clearly the price of S&P500 to buy it low as 15$ per share. Now the share price is 1940$

And further investigation:
http://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/hedge-fund-news-alan-howard-ray-dalio-john-paulson-315613/2/ : <-- this is found searching (John Thomas Bitcoin):

New York hedge fund generates $5 million in bitcoin deposits in three days, “expect to multiply tenfold” (PFHub) Financial institutions across the globe are beginning to adopt bitcoin (BTC) and incorporate the digital currency into its business model. This is evident after NYSO HEDGE, a hedge fund located in New York City, announced that it has accepted approximately $5.4 million in bitcoin deposits. This hasn’t been a long endeavor to amass a sum, though it did apply for regulatory approval this past summer. The hedge fund announced Friday that it would be accepting bitcoins for deposits, which means it has only taken three full days to accumulate an immense sum. The company explained that the virtual currency has the ability to provide individuals with options to invest in stocks without any chargebacks and fees. This, NYSO HEDGE says, contributes to the less usefulness of credit cards.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Explained at his own page John Thomas: http://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/about-2/ :

There is the connection too Tokyo and Japanese Language even known as connection to Mt.Gox probably also maybe some identities with 1Derby and Mt.Gox transactions can be revealed, but here I'm actually unsure. But further to know is that John Thomas lives in New York, that we can probably explain deposits of many million dollars.

What then NYSO and Mad Hedge Fund Trader comes to discovery at Google:
http://pensionpulse.blogspot.no/2014/02/hedge-fund-kings-of-2013.html (trailed the S&P500) <-- this isn't the best proof.

But searching Google for NYSO John Thomas we fall into the above idea around transfer of bitcoin values in million of dollars as first thing we find on Google:
http://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/hedge-fund-news-alan-howard-ray-dalio-john-paulson-315613/2/

I believe this can make some sence to only few of people around the globe on the intense fight against the biggest fraud in history.

But hey? S&P500 Bitcoin search on Google creates intriguing 14 million results. But now I find it difficult to even see clearly on future for Bitcoin, as this probably gets even closer to the most interesting investigation I actually have been conducting, even followed from the start of the fall of XLB LibertyCoin which I in the first moment started to investigate following on with XC and the rest of all coins.

-------------------------------------------------------COPY OF POST:

To just take you on Journey on what Block is obvious the deal it's number 5035 not 5032 as all Blocks around 5035 clearly takes you on an Journey too understand this matter more closely.

As with 1Derby Identity on BTC transactions too deeper known we Discover actually the deepth of the fractions of transactions to this Identity as multiple accounts have Identity 1Derby.

As for sure 1Derby is related to John Thomas whom speaks Japanese and was in Tokyo and are a share trader of S&P500 which is more and more related too Exchanges of BTC that mainly consisting of S&P500.

But what I actually found out is the Close relation too Ecstacy and John Thomas. As i know he probably dumped ecstacy on most countries and then liberately invested in pharmaceutical Companies with S&P500 too literally consist of making drugs that only helps most ecstacy lobotomated pasients into a better life?

Scarry?

I Call this close evidence too Silk Road 1 & even the same layout of Silk Road 2.

There are too many beleiefs that this coin is FAKE

Take this, one guy certainly mass sells the coin at high value, and mass buys the coins so he can fill the amount of price in certain time, and offers to sell many coins so the coin gets out of value

MASS BUYER MASS DUMPER SYSTEM

The same scammer owns Dreamcoin and SyncCoin as I know Why are this p2pool dead on arrival with all coins?

http://p2poolcoin.com:8877/static/

Push on Month then watch the numbers 22 million dead on arrival??? WhY?

This is the screenshot of that page:


Now take this into notice:



This is just an scam that people mining the coins werent able to enjoy them, and he probably sent back 2% to owners, not 98% as he said to have an market on the coin.

http://xlb.24hash.com/

16,5 million coins or more even more as 22 million got dead on arrival are fake coins and will be always

XLB ON BITCOINTALK: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600322.640

there are nobody who speaks about how much they earned out of the mine, who much they actually earned into wallet.

This proof must be investigated by CRYPTSY and other Exchanges who mass sells and buys that coins?

The coin has last discovered block at 23 may, and even 22 may were with many blocks?

Who does this for fun?

BTC DONATION FOR MY DISCOVERY: 15pyE28mmyDRnfgPFzZrtQGzSg6DWdxC2y

Yeah I wanna have a pool on variable coins where I can put in custom difficulty?, like I want some times too have 100k diff or even 1m would considerably be cool to work with.
I also want a multipool where I can switch between coins, and have the opportunity too use custom diff settings, where the max diff isn't important, it's up to you to have freedom?

As many people where talking about bullshit things like luck, where is it?, when 1gh/s at SHA256 gives you 500k in about 1 week or even more like 1m in a week, but still 1mh/s scrypt gives u more than nearly 5m each day?
where is the luck when you cannot play with it? just normal mining gives you fractions of what you've could had earned.

I'm soon off to making my own pool, but considerably that would be only my own pool, but why not start making a custom diff pool soon?

Is there any possiblities too solo mine Bitcoin with own Difficulty?
Anyways this is suitable also for the Scrypt mining in other hand as for SHA256
SHA256 mining with solo diff would be preferable thing too do.
Cause I know how to setup that wallet for solo mining, but it is ridicolous too mine at that high diff if it's even possible

As for best share apparently hitting 200k sometimes, I would be happy to serve for an pool server where I can plot in own value of diff, about an range from 100K too 1M would be great to handle, as this will be the future of my own mining experience. As I know forward that there is one pool that handles 65.5K and there I got 1 accepted at 1 days working with 1.5Ghash, this again would be more excitefull if the diff would be around 256K and then some accepted shares would be around 256K around one time a day?, I would really like to have mining at these dependencies as there are too much wasted traffic to handle diff of around 1-32 and therefore there would be luck dependencies on 256K.

Anyone around with they're pools interested in offering such experience?, if so post your pool address and tell that you've changed diff to unlimited or limited too 256K value? So users can choose diff?

Thanks for any contributions too people knowing about user diff pools.

http://hhtt.1209k.com/ <-- this pool offers 65526 diff. at a luck rate of hitting the shares is really cool, for those who have better luck than I have this can be something.