He escrito un user script que ayuda a eliminar las citas ("quotes") múltiples al responder a alguien. Es molestoso dejar varias citas anidadas ( ejemplo), por lo que generalmente es necesario eliminar manualmente las citas anteriores. Este script lo hace automáticamente. Por ejemplo, al hacer click en "quote" aquí: 
el script elimina la cita más antigua y deja solo la última:  además, muestra 3 enlaces: "Full text" vuelve a mostrar el texto completo:  "Latest quote" deja solo la cita más reciente (opción por emisión). Mientras que "~snip~" deja la última cita pero elimina su contenido:  Estos botones reemplazan el contenido, por lo que deben ser usados antes de escribir nada para no perder el trabajo realizado. Cómo instalar: Demo: Esta captura gif fue tomada en un teléfono Android. Funciona igual que en un computador. Código fuente para revisión y edición: https://openuserjs.org/scripts/EcuaMobi/Quote_plus/source// ==UserScript==
// @name Quote plus
// @namespace ecuamobi
// @author EcuaMobi
// @include https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=post;quote=*
// @require https://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jQuery/jquery-3.3.1.min.js
// @version 1.0
// @license MIT
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==
(() => {
var full_text = document.forms.postmodify.message.value;
var regex = /\[quote author/gi,
result, indices = [];
// Find second [quote]
var i = 0;
var start2 = 0;
var end2 = 0;
while ((result = regex.exec(full_text))) {
i++;
if (2 == i) {
start2 = result.index;
break;
}
}
regex = /\[\/quote\]/gi, result, indices = [];
var last = 0;
while ((result = regex.exec(full_text))) {
if (last > 0) {
end2 = last + 8;
}
last = result.index;
}
// Are there several quotes?
if (start2 == 0 || end2 == 0) {
// Abort
return;
}
// Get text to use for every option
var latest_quote = full_text.substr(0, start2).trim() + '\n' + full_text.substr(end2).trim() + '\n';
var snip_quote = full_text.substr(0, start2).trim() + '~snip~[/quote]\n';
full_text = full_text.trim() + '\n';
// By default use the latest quote. REPLACE THIS BY snip_quote OR REMOVE IF DESIRED
document.forms.postmodify.message.value = latest_quote;
// Add buttons to manually use full text, latest quote or snip
const $links = $("<span style='margin-left:35%'><a id='full_text' href='#'>Full text</a> | <a id='latest_quote' href='#'>Latest quote</a> | <a id='snip_quote' href='#'>~snip~</a></span>");
$links.insertAfter($("#postMoreOptions"));
$("#full_text").click((e) => {
e.preventDefault();
document.forms.postmodify.message.value = full_text;
});
$("#latest_quote").click((e) => {
e.preventDefault();
document.forms.postmodify.message.value = latest_quote;
});
$("#snip_quote").click((e) => {
e.preventDefault();
document.forms.postmodify.message.value = snip_quote;
});
})();
: - El script no se activará si no hay citas anidadas
- Solo se activa con citas normales de la forma [ quote author=username link=.... No con citas simples (sin author o link)
- Podría comportarse de forma extraña si la cita no está al inicio, o si hay varias citas mezcladas con respuestas a esas citas. Aún estoy trabajando en eso
- Siempre revisa si el script funcionó correctamente, y haz clic en "Full text" de no ser así
Seguiré mejorando este script. Agradezco que publiquen sus comentarios en este thread (en español), o aquí, en inglés, que seguramente será actualizado más frecuentemente. |
|
|
|
I always have to manually edit my post when quoting someone else and getting several nested quotes like this:  This has also been recently discussed here. So I've written a small user script that removes all the extra quotes, leaving only the latest one:  It also shows 3 links to use the whole text, only the latest quote (default), or just a "~snip~":  Here's what the snip button does:  Important: You should use these 3 buttons before making any editions. You may lose your work otherwise.
To install this userscript you need to: Here you can see the source code: https://openuserjs.org/scripts/EcuaMobi/Quote_plus/source// ==UserScript==
// @name Quote plus
// @namespace ecuamobi
// @author EcuaMobi
// @include https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=post;*quote=*
// @include https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=pm;sa=send;f=inbox;pmsg=*;quote;u=*
// @version 1.1.1
// @license MIT
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==
(() => {
var full_text = document.forms.postmodify.message.value;
var regex = /\[quote author/gi,
result, indices = [];
// Find second [quote]
var i = 0;
var start2 = 0;
var end2 = 0;
while ((result = regex.exec(full_text))) {
i++;
if (2 == i) {
start2 = result.index;
break;
}
}
regex = /\[\/quote\]/gi, result, indices = [];
var last = 0;
while ((result = regex.exec(full_text))) {
if (last > 0) {
end2 = last + 8;
}
last = result.index;
}
// Are there several quotes?
if (start2 == 0 || end2 == 0) {
// Abort
return;
}
// Get text to use for every option
var latest_quote = full_text.substr(0, start2).trim() + '\n' + full_text.substr(end2).trim() + '\n';
var snip_quote = full_text.substr(0, start2).trim() + '~snip~[/quote]\n';
full_text = full_text.trim() + '\n';
// By default use the latest quote. REPLACE THIS BY snip_quote OR REMOVE IF DESIRED
document.forms.postmodify.message.value = latest_quote;
// Add buttons to manually use full text, latest quote or snip
const $links = "<span style='margin-left:38%'><a id='full_text' href='#'>Full text</a> | <a id='latest_quote' href='#'>Latest quote</a> | <a id='snip_quote' href='#'>~snip~</a></span>"
document.querySelector("textarea").insertAdjacentHTML('afterend', $links);
document.querySelector('#full_text').addEventListener('click', function(e){
e.preventDefault();
document.forms.postmodify.message.value = full_text;
});
document.querySelector('#latest_quote').addEventListener('click', function(e){
e.preventDefault();
document.forms.postmodify.message.value = latest_quote;
});
document.querySelector('#snip_quote').addEventListener('click', function(e){
e.preventDefault();
document.forms.postmodify.message.value = snip_quote;
});
})();
: Capture taken on Android. It works the same on PC/Mac/Laptop. Notes and limitations: - It will not run if there are no quotes inside your quote (no nested quotes)
- It only considers regular quotes ([ quote author=username link=...), not other simple quotes
- It may behave strangely if the nested quote is not at the beginning or if there are several quotes mixed with inline responses. I'm still testing these scenarios
- You should always check whether the script did a good job and click "Full text" otherwise
Version history: - 1.1.1
By minifrij. jQuery has been removed
- 1.1
It now works when quoting from 'Show the last posts of this person.' or a PM (more info) - 1.0:
Initial release
I'll keep testing and improving it. Let me know your comments or any bugs you find.[/list] |
|
|
|
Today LoyceV posted a thread about "Trust Selfscratcher": "someone who received positive feedback from a user, and has included said user on his Trust list". This is especially important when 2 conditions are met: - The user who makes the inclusions is DT1
- No other DT1 user made the same inclusion
In this cases the DT1 is effectively changing their own trust by making those inclusions, either on purpose or otherwise. o_e_l_e_o asked LoyceV to publish how DT1 users are really modifying their own trust. I was going to ask the same thing, but I read LoyceV said no.... So, I decided to publish this list myself. Some important notes: - I have included every DT1 user on LoyceV's top 40
- I have also considered excluded DT1 users, that is they're here but are not on DT1 because other DT1 users excluded them
- For DT1 users I am comparing their DT trust vs the trust they would have if they weren't DT1
- For excluded DT1 users I am comparing their DT trust vs the trust they would have if they were DT1
- This is done manually. I had to use a new account with DT settings and check everyone's trust. Then I re-checked the trust after excluding that specific DT1 user (or including them if it's an excluded DT1 user)
- I've doubled checked but because this is manual I may have made some mistakes. Let me know if you find anything is wrong
| User | DT trust | Trust without their influence* | Difference (unique users) | | Dabs | 410: -0 / +42 | 50: -0 / +6 | 36 | | greenplastic | 437: -0 / +47 | 370: -0 / +40 | 7 | | minerjones | 926: -0 / +102 | 926: -0 / +102 | 0 | | BitcoinPenny | 379: -0 / +41 | 369: -0 / +40 | 1 | | anonymousminer | 167: -0 / +25 | 73: -0 / +12 | 13 | | buckrogers | 254: -0 / +26 | 134: -0 / +14 | 12 | | TMAN | 238: -0 / +26 | 238: -0 / +26 | 0 | | hedgy73 | 250: -0 / +25 | 220: -0 / +22 | 3 | | ezeminer | 214: -0 / +22 | 214: -0 / +22 | 0 | | Lafu | 49: -0 / +6 | 29: -0 / +4 | 2 | | Hhampuz | 373: -0 / +47 | 372: -0 / +46 | 1 | | monkeynuts | 280: -0 / +28 | 260: -0 / +26 | 2 | | bill gator | 0: -1 / +15 | 0: -1 / +15 | 0 | | dazedfool | 222: -0 / +28 | 222: -0 / +28 | 0 | | Anduck | 3: -1 / +18 | 3: -1 / +17 | 1 | | owlcatz | 366: -0 / +39 | 376: -0 / +40 | -1 | | SebastianJu | 253: -0 / +26 | 220: -0 / +22 | 4 | | vizique | 242: -0 / +27 | 242: -0 / +27 | 0 | | Lauda | 303: -0 / +31 | 303: -0 / +31 | 0 | | LFC_Bitcoin | 60: -0 / +10 | 30: -0 / +6 | 4 | | yogg | 199: -0 / +25 | 199: -0 / +25 | 0 | | DarkStar_ | 268: -0 / +32 | 275: -0 / +33 | -1 | | The Pharmacist | 182: -0 / +22 | 182: -0 / +22 | 0 | | qwk | 130: -0 / +15 | 130: -0 / +15 | 0 | | Lesbian Cow | 331: -0 / +37 | 331: -0 / +37 | 0 | | TheNewAnon135246 | 258: -0 / +27 | 258: -0 / +27 | 0 | | krogothmanhattan | 437: -0 / +53 | 437: -0 / +53 | 0 | | phantastisch | 119: -0 / +12 | 69: -0 / +7 | 5 | | hybridsole | 192: -0 / +20 | 192: -0 / +20 | 0 | | Ticked | 258: -0 / +28 | 218: -0 / +23 | 5 | | gmaxwell | 140: -0 / +14 | 110: -0 / +11 | 3 | | Kryptowerk | 140: -0 / +24 | 140: -0 / +24 | 0 | | Vod | 1: -2 / +27 | 1: -2 / +26 | 1 | | suchmoon | 69: -0 / +11 | 79: -0 / +12 | -1 | | ICOEthics | 58: -0 / +14 | 58: -0 / +14 | 0 | | Avirunes | 85: -0 / +10 | 85: -0 / +10 | 0 | | EcuaMobi | 164: -0 / +17 | 164: -0 / +17 | 0 | | Mitchell | 370: -0 / +37 | 370: -0 / +37 | 0 | | lovesmayfamilis | 9: -0 / +5 | 7: -0 / +4 | 1 | | philipma1957 | 208: -0 / +21 | 188: -0 / +19 | 2 | | OgNasty | 21: -6 / +64 | 23: -6 / +73* | 9 | | TECSHARE | 284: -0 / +30 | 356: -0 / +38* | 8 | | willi9974 | 43: -0 / +5 | 201: -0 / +21* | 16 | | zazarb | ???: -1 / +23 | ???: -1 / +39* | 16 | | HostFat | 0: -0 / +0 | 40: -0 / +4* | 4 |
*Excluded DT1 users. The third column shows the trust they would have if they weren't excluded. Edit: I made a mistake calculating these numbers for excluded DT1 users. Thanks LoyceV for noticing this. This is now fixed by using a second account.
The users who have modified their own trust the most (or would modify their own trust the most if they weren't excluded) are: Dabs: 36 unique users, up to 360 extra trust points zazarb: 16 unique users, up to 160 extra trust points willi9974: 16 unique users, up to 160 extra trust points anonymousminer: 13 unique users, up to 130 extra trust points buckrogers: 12 unique users, up to 120 extra trust points OgNasty: 9 unique users, up to 90 extra trust points TECSHARE: 8 unique users, up to 80 extra trust points greenplastic: 7 unique users, up to 70 extra trust points |
|
|
|
This has been suggested several times and I think it's extremely important. I see it as essential for the forum's funds security and I don't see any disadvantages at all. Current treasurer OgNasty agrees multisig should be used. I would suggest choosing several very trustworthy users and creating x-in-y addresses, where x is at least 3 (to avoid collusion) and y is at least x+2 (to avoid an accident to lock the funds). 4-in-7 addresses could be a good option. Theymos, is there any reason this hasn't been implemented yet? What are the disadvantages? Funds have been lost and more could be lost in the future. Local rule:Vod can't quote or mention OgNasty, directly or indirectly. OgNasty can't quote or mention Vod, directly or indirectly. |
|
|
|
I'm auctioning these .com domains, which are perfect for altcoin blog/news: ● altcoinguardian.com ● globealtcoin.com ● altobserver.com ● altherald.com ● altguardian.com ● globealt.com All of them are registered on Namesilo and will be pushed for free to the winner's namesilo account. Starting bid for each domain:BTC0.004 for each domain. Each domain has an independent auction. Minimum increment:BTC0.001. Bids must be multiple of BTC0.001 Buy it now:BTC0.012 each domain. BTC0.02 for any 2 unsold domains End date and time:72 hours after the first bid of a particular domain or 24 hours after the last bid of that domain, whichever is later. Every domain has its own auction and ends independently. Newbies:Users with less than 28 activity can't bid, unless they BIN and pay immediately, or send to me the amount they're bidding for (to be returned minus TX fees if they don't win) Payment:Bids must be made in BTC. Payments can be made in BTC, ETH, LTC, GBYTE. I may take other crypto-currencies. PM me before bidding. The payment must be sent to me or the escrow less than 48h after the auction is closed, otherwise I may leave negative trust and may sell it to next higher bidder who must complete the deal according to their bid. After an auction is closed I'll send a signed message (to be verified here, or here) with the payment address. If you prefer to use escrow instead PM me right away. |
|
|
|
I'm auctioning these four gram.* domains: gram.cheap gram.claims gram.gratis gram.kaufenAll of them are registered on Namesilo and will be pushed for free to the winner's namesilo account. Starting bid for each domain:BTC0.003 for each domain. Each domain has an independent auction. Minimum increment:BTC0.001. Bids must be multiple of BTC0.001 Buy it now:BTC0.01 each domain, or BTC0.03 for all 4 (valid if no auction is closed yet). End date and time:72 hours after the first bid of a particular domain or 24 hours after the last bid of that domain, whichever is later. Every domain has its own auction and ends independently. Newbies:Users with less than 28 activity can't bid, unless they BIN and pay immediately, or send to me the amount they're bidding for (to be returned minus TX fees if they don't win) Payment:Bids must be made in BTC. Payments can be made in BTC, ETH, LTC, GBYTE. I may take other crypto-currencies. PM me before bidding. The payment must be sent to me or the escrow less than 48h after the auction is closed, otherwise I may leave negative trust and may sell it to next higher bidder who must complete the deal according to their bid. After an auction is closed I'll send a signed message (to be verified here, or here) with the payment address. If you prefer to use escrow instead PM me right away. |
|
|
|
One of my posts on this thread in Scam accusations got deleted by the starter of the thread. However the thread is not marked as self moderated and it's actually not allowed to create self moderated threads on that Board as shown in this capture. It seems the started of that thread made it self moderated on another board, then it was moved to Scam accusations (either by him or a moderator). That made the thread to sop being self moderated and the warning to be removed. Since OP didn't like what I posted on his thread it seems he moved the thread to any other board, deleted my post and moved it back to Scam accusations. That's the only explications I could find. Let me know if you can explain it otherwise. Other Boards have their own limitations, like not editing posts on Auctions. So I've tried this on one of my posts. I moved one to Digital Goods and, as expected, I was allowed to edit or deleted my posts. Then I was able to move it back to Auctions and the limitations were back in place. This represents an issue because: - Any user can be censured by the started of a topic without being aware that's a possibility, like it happened to me
- Users not aware of this issue can be mislead into thinking no post could have been moderated by the started of a topic on Scam accusations; or no post could have been edited or deleted if the thread is on Auctions. This can be easily exploited by the started of those threads
I see 3 options to solve this problem: - The option to move the thread to another board should be disabled on Boards with this kind of specific limitations,
- The thread should be marked somehow so that those limitations are kept even after moving them to another board, or
- Threads moved from a Board with limitations should not be allowed back if the corresponding limitation was broken (if a post was moderated or edited for example)
|
|
|
|
Lately a lot of new accounts have been posting direct buy links or external contact information to trade gift cards or similar digital goods. These links are published on self-moderated and locked threads so no comments are possible other than fake vouches by their alt accounts. As a result a lot of people get scammed and the sellers launder money. I've been trying to fight this by leaving negative trust to those accounts. Hopefully a red warning will help. However since they try to sell off-forum, either on auto-buy external sites, skype or similar, it seems their main target are non-registered users finding the threads using Google. Exactly those users are the ones who don't see any red warning on the sellers' accounts (in case you didn't know, trust is shown to registered users only). At the moment it's not possible to warn them in any way. The result is bitcointalk is helping users to be scammed and sellers to launder money. What I'm asking is those non-registered users to see the default trust. It wouldn't add any significant load to the server because it can be cached since the same information would be shown for every guest, web crawler et al. Although I think that's the best solution, I see other options too: - Making the whole Marketplace board available only to registered users. Guests would be forwarded to the registration form when trying to reach it.
- Showing red trust for everyone until they register and set up their trust list. Something similar to what theymos is thinking about for registered users with DefaultTrust only.
|
|
|
|
I just set up my own full node running Bitcoin Core 0.16.0: node.ecua.mobiIs there any list of full nodes run by bitcointalk users? I can't find it if there is. It could help to: - Encouraging donations and, therefore, more nodes to be run
- Connecting to nodes held by users you trust
- Knowing whom to talk to about some project developments, or to ask for a node to be updated
|
|
|
|
Trust is not moderated, but trust spam with no intentions other than spamming is forbidden: Trust spam isn't allowed. If I see anyone posting dozens of fake trust ratings (from one account or many alt accounts), I will delete all of their ratings
What's the best way to report this kind of spam? I want to report trust spam left by Moseas79 on my profile: 19 trust left, 81 lines each. Total: 1,539 lines of fake trust  2,430 lines of trust spam nowEdit: Also Buzzlieve1992, who left trust spam to other users (and probably to me too very soon as I'm leaving negative trust to him now).
Also, I think there should be some limits regarding trust, something like for example: - Not more than 1 trust left on an account per account and IP per day (I know this can be fouled, but it could help a little at least). At the moment it seems newbies have much more limits on posts and PMs than on leaving trust
- Not more than 300 chars per feedback at most. Not more than 5 new lines. If more is required, a post on Reputation can be opened and linked on the reference
Trust should be informative and readable, not intrusive. While less annoying than Moseas79, several other users intentionally add extra blank lines or leave spammy "previous versions" of left trust with repeated information with the sole intention of making it longer and use more real estate, like TheButterZone or Engg.Chaks did on my profile. |
|
|
|
Does this rule apply to Currency exchange only? 2. Do not have more than one active sales topic. If you need more visibility, you can bump your thread every 24 hours. Or does it apply to every subcategory of Marketplace? I really think it should, or there should be a limit, even if it's not just 1. Let me explain my point this way:  At least users should be allowed to bump every 24h only one of their threads and link all the others from there. |
|
|
|
I'm auctioning these three Lite* domains: LiteMarketplace.comLitePricing.comLiteStore.netAll of them are registered on Namesilo and will be pushed for free to the winner's namesilo accoun. Starting bid for each domain:BTC0.005 for each domain. Each domain has an independent auction. Minimum increment:BTC0.001. Bids must be multiple of BTC0.001 Buy it now:BTC0.04 each domain, or BTC0.1 for all 3 (valid if no auction is closed yet). End date and time:72 hours after the first bid of a particular domain or 24 hours after the last bid of that domain, whichever is later. Every domain has its own auction and ends independently. Newbies:Users with less than 28 activity can't bid, unless they BIN and pay immediately, or send to me the amount they're bidding for (to be returned minus TX fees if they don't win) Payment:Bids must be made in BTC. Payments can be made in BTC, ETH, LTC, GBYTE. I may take other crypto-currencies. PM me before bidding. The payment must be sent to me or the escrow less than 48h after the auction is closed, otherwise I may leave negative trust and may sell it to next higher bidder who must complete the deal according to their bid. After an auction is closed I'll send a signed message (to be verified here, or here) with the payment address. If you prefer to use escrow instead PM me right away. |
|
|
|
Update:
I've closed this and let the domain btct.ws expire because of lack of demand and use.
bitcointalk URL shortener
+ Tampermonkey/Greasemonkey script Several times I've needed to shorten bitcointalk URLs, especially when including more than one link on trust I've left, "Reference link" is not enough and I don't like posting things like " https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3001846.msg30865584#msg30865584" on other users' profiles. So I've created a simple service which takes the topic and msg parameters from that URL, base-62 encodes them and writes a short URL like: btct.ws/cAUS.25vy0 for this post, or btct.ws/~I67 for my profile No database is ever used. It's basically just a URL re-writer. The creation of these short URLs is done offline on your browser using JS. The forwarding is done on the server (for convenience and to increase compatibility) but nothing is stored and no DB is used. There are 2 ways to create these links: 1: No installation required, recommended to use it once or a few times only- Copy the full URL of a post or a topic
- Go to https://btct.ws/ (make sure JS is enabled on your browser)
- Paste the full URL
- The short URL will appear, ready to be copied
Supported formats are: • https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3001846.0 => btct.ws/cAUS• https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3001846.msg30865584#msg30865584 => btct.ws/cAUS.25vy0• https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=169515 => btct.ws/~I67• https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=169515 => btct.ws/t~I67• https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=169515 => btct.ws/m~I672: A simple installation is required to make everything automatic- Install Tampermonkey on Chrome, Greasemonkey on Firefox, or Violentmonkey on Opera (Read more here: https://openuserjs.org/about/Userscript-Beginners-HOWTO)
- Install this user script: https://openuserjs.org/scripts/EcuaMobi/btct.ws_shortener (for my convenience, it's based on grue's Merit script)
- Make sure it's enabled and open any thread on bitcointalk.org
- Click on #msg (for example #1) shown on any post (see image)
- A popup will appear showing the short URL, along with the original one (so no functionality is lost). Just copy it. Click the same link again to close it
 - A small (Link) will appear next to every poster's name
- Click it to show short links to the user's profile, trust and merit
Notes:- To make the URL shorter, it is shown without any protocol. If you want you can use http or https, both will work.
- The alphabet used to convert topic and msg to base-62 is 0-9, a-z, A-Z, in that order
Releases: 0.2- Added support to shorten users' profiles, trust and merit
- Improved design to make it look like part of the forum
- Fixed an issue that prevented it from working correctly when clicking any link and goign back
0.1Post here if you have any question or suggestion, or if something's not working fine.
|
|
|
|
5 domains on auction. All of them are registered on namecheap and can be pushed to another namecheap account for free. This is a single auction for all listed domains. The winner gets them all. Starting bid:BTC0.007Minimum increment:BTC0.001. Bids must be multiple of BTC0.001 Buy it now:BTC0.025, or BTC0.005 more than the last bid, whichever is greater. End date and time:72 hours after the first bid or 24 hours after the last bid, whichever is later. Newbies:Users with less than 28 activity can't bid, unless they BIN and pay immediately. Payment:The payment must be sent in bitcoin to me or the escrow less than 48h after the auction is closed, otherwise I may leave negative trust and may sell it to next higher bidder who must complete the deal according to their bid. After an auction is closed I'll send a signed message (to be verified here, or here) with the payment address. If you prefer to use escrow instead PM me right away. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
