How can I find out or read the act itself? How can I find a reference to this law?

Does anyone know what exchange like binance is that doesn't ask for KYC?

Who plays dota 1? Let's organize a tournament or share usernames.

Who do you think is the most honest forum user? And why?

After not getting a response from Harkorede, this is why I am writing here to find out

Hi, can anyone tell me why Harkorede is getting paid in the Shuffle campaign but is wearing the livecasino signature.

I don't want to believe that Little Mouse didn't notice that the user is not wearing the Shuffle signature.

Bech32 address: bc1qaxtu60ryrd0sy9v4478ll0t2wjlvmhya23hh3n

Harkorede because your bitcoin address appears in every payment week.

If you had to unilaterally choose a Bitcointalk user to marry, who would it be? Who do you think is the most suitable candidate among users?

This is just from the realm of fantasy, and you should only evaluate the user by the qualities that you know.

For example, I would choose Loyse. And I think I would also become popular if I were his wife.

By the way, gender is not taken into account. You, as a male user, can choose another male user... it doesn't matter because we evaluate forum accounts, not gender.

How did this newbie get around the posting restriction?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3639153

The title of the thread fully describes the essence of the issue.

I tried to apply to one campaign, but my attempts were unsuccessful. I decided that it was better to know where not to apply so as not to be in a party with spammers.

Royse777 will not pay anyone for the last week, but the Sinbad Bitcoins will still be in his possession.

If this manager does not pay the participants of the campaign, then one of the participants should bring charges of fraud against him. Otherwise, on what basis does he decide for others what and to whom to do with his payments? If he is concerned about the safety of others, just let each campaign participant send a new Bitcoin address to which the debt will be paid.

People, do you want your money to be kept by Royse777? Just because he cares about you.

The case is serious and I am considering not to touch any funds that is in the escrow address right now unless I speak to a lawyer. This means no one is going to receive anymore payments unless I have a direction from the lawyer. It's for the safety of everyone.

I noticed one injustice and I think that Royce, as a member of DT, should be more responsible in approaching the feedback he leaves.

I believe in LoyceV religion, I believe that the Trust System should not be used as a weapon.

Marcel, Marie.

What he accuses the other user of is complete nonsense, since even if he warned someone about something, it was correct, but since Royce at some point had a lot of red marks. Any adequate project would refuse to cooperate with such a manager in order to maintain its reputation.



I also warned Sindban that Royce has quite a few red marks, and I think I'm not the only one.




Here's another good example. Royce is running a signature campaign that has an open allegation of fraud and a clear connection to the fraudulent 1xBIT casino.

I noticed that Cygan green rating has increased dramatically. I realized that he adds everyone to his list of trust. The reason for adding such users to his trust list is that they left him positive feedback and in order for it to be displayed, he, as a member of DT1, makes them DT2.

I suggest throwing him out of DT if he doesn't immediately stop doing this shit. He not only needs to stop this, he must also remove from his trust list all those whom ONLY he trusts.

Discussion! I just saw this news and freaked out.

Source: https://hub.elliptic.co/analysis/has-a-sanctioned-bitcoin-mixer-been-resurrected-to-aid-north-korea-s-lazarus-group/

Like Blender, Sinbad is a custodial mixer, meaning that its operator has full control over the cryptoassets deposited within it.

Elliptic analysis indicates that Sinbad is in fact highly likely to be a rebrand of Blender, with the same individual or group responsible for it. In particular:

• Analysis of blockchain transactions shows that, before it was publicly launched, a “service” address on the Sinbad website received Bitcoin from a wallet believed to be controlled by the operator of Blender – presumably in order to test the service.
• Analysis of blockchain transactions shows that a Bitcoin wallet used to pay individuals who promoted Sinbad, itself received Bitcoin from the suspected Blender operator wallet.
• Analysis of blockchain transactions shows that almost all of the early incoming transactions to Sinbad (some $22 million) originated from the suspected Blender operator wallet.
• The on-chain pattern of behavior is very similar for both mixers, including the specific characteristics of transactions, and the use of other services to obfuscate their transactions.
• The way in which the Sinbad mixer operates is identical to Blender in several ways, including ten-digit mixer codes, guarantee letters signed by the service address, and a maximum seven-day transaction delay.
• There are strong similarities in the structure of both services’ websites, as well as in their use of language and naming conventions.
• Both services have a clear nexus to Russia, with Russian-language support and websites.

Blender may have been motivated to re-brand in order to avoid sanctions, and OFAC could now seek to impose further sanctions on Sinbad. It may also have done so in order to gain trust from users, following Blender’s abrupt closure last year, and the disappearance of significant amounts of funds from the mixer.

Isn't it forbidden? Can someone clarify this?

I think this is a veiled call that should be banned as the thread will be filled with non-organic posts.

10% bonus for providing support on Hunnyplay Ann thread in absence of the forum representative.

[In no case do not connect your ETH wallet to this site!]

This verified twitter account is hosting a giveaway posing as the LooksRare project.



Coinmarketcap says that the domain name of this project is different (.org).



When you go to this phishing site you see a countdown but when you refresh the page you have the timer set back to 13 minutes.



In no case do not connect your ETH wallet to this site!



I have already reported this to twitter support.

In my seven years of existence on this forum, I have seen many people, and in my opinion Lauda was one of the most influential people here. I take into account only ordinary users, those who are not related to Bitcoin Core. I'm talking about those people who have influence on the public.

Tell  who you think is influential and why.

https://bpip.org/Report?r=mostmerit

Users from this list best fit the description.

[Ratimov:]

1. Ratimov is an inveterate liar who publishes deliberately false facts.

Ratimov: More than 8 months have passed between these cases, where is the connection? Your saying would be true if I created a topic about airfinex a few days after he accused me.
The Pharmacist: The timing says it all, IMO, and I'm talking about the timing between airfinex's post here and the creation of this thread.
LoyceV: Just last week, airfinex posted in "~", which you responded to several times. The 8 months are irrelevant, you posted this just half an hour before you created this topic:

2. There is no more egregious case of text-spinning with the help of Google translator than the case of Ratimov.

—if Ratimov did not deny in principle, that publishing something in the form in which he publishes it is a bad example.
—if Ratimov had not chosen to reply with an ad hominem attack against an accusation brought with evidence.

3. Constantly demonstrates extremely arrogant and devil-may-care attitude towards the community, he deleted posts but there is an archive.

Thanks to RapTarX, suchmoon, icopress, The Pharmacist, Poker Player for constructive answers ON THEME. The rest of the speculation and blah blah are not interesting to me.

4. Ratimov regularly resorts to mutual exclusion on the basis of revenge, eddie13, DireWolfM14 expressed his opinion and he added him to the list of distrust.

3000+ merits for using Google translate eh? What a great method of distributing DT voting power ..

To me this looks like a blatant attempt to attack some one who called you out.  I know you've developed a few supporters here, but I suspect that they too will cease their support if you keep making these obvious retaliatory attacks.  Deflection and "What-About-ism" doesn't absolve you of your sins.

[he facts of this case:]

I see that JGood has started to leave red tags to everyone in a row, and it doesn't bother me at all as long as he does it with an open mind.

Therefore, I want to check whether he will mark those who deserve it or ignore this thread?

The facts of this case:

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue)

1. GeorgeJohn
2. Ebede

Proof:

[snip]

Miscellaneous:
If you look on their applications Ebede was send earlier before Georgejohn so the person controlled both of this accounts are hurry up when he want to drop the application of the bounties. Both of the accounts already deleted their applications, Ebede was known promoting scam casino 1xbit. Even both of the accounts doesn't cheat a bounty or signature campaign, it's worth to note he's greedy promoting scam sites with alt accounts to make a lot money.

Thank you for understanding that some persons  developed enemies with me just like that, and they want my account to be ban, which i don't know their reason, yes of course i know the know vividly the owner of ebede account, and it's my course mate in University, the same course and the same department, and i introduced him to bitcointalk community then before we separated, the ebede normally use my system to do almost his academic work both graphics design and other works, so on that day of April fool he used my laptop to login bitcointalk community, before i could notice he has dropped a Post that contains all my information..so when i noticed i deleted it. I'm not denying the fact that i don't know the user ebede i know him in person and is a course mate. I want to know if i will be penalize because of a newbie mistake using my laptop do work. I know many some people want to kick me out from bestchange signature campaign i join.

Challenge accepted.

1 Using Delta symbol to list an item, how can you prefer to choose Delta symbol while this forum had insert list BBcode or you could use number / alphabet list.

∆ understanding
∆ observation
∆ passion to overcome issues

∆ Through Twitter publication
∆ Through Telegram publication
∆ Through Instagram publication
∆ Through Facebook publication
∆ Through newspaper publication
∆ Through Television such as BBC's and satellite

2 Very like to create multiple unnecessary thread about forum rules, rank, quality post, motivation, guideline seeking for merit. You're a newbie why you guiding to newbie too?

The quality of our work attracts good response and also make us not to be fearful, because the first time I login my account I was unable to understand the forum because I don't know the direction to follow untill i observed these group, despite that am not too good to understand everything in the group now but believing that with time i will follow up, but the little research i made  i understand that good quality contributes for the growth of user, and also reading of work like twice before posting also create good impact of quality post.

I understand that many starters in forum their primary concerns is to ranked up without knowing the criteria of the group or forum, I think many people are once a newbie before getting to certain position, I think what should help all new members is to study the environment first before looking for uplift, understanding the rules and regulations of these honourable forum perfectly and it will enable us beginner's to create a positive solution's in future through the community.

making a quality post
 Making a quality post does not required long paragraph, it's based on how meaningful the work is, so write a post especially newbie like me, I think we have to pass through processes, which is adequate research, observation and something that are different from the work of others.
From my observation I foun that most of the topic in Bitcointalk community we discuss today has already been treated, discussed for long time. People framed or interchange the words in a modern form.

A quality post :are one of the major criteria to earn merit and well recognize to the forum, a beginners  most know  how to make a quality  post both from local  board and public  board, because  good quality  of post attracts a campaign to hire a member and to be merited.

Beginners are conscious to ranked up in the forum without proper research and observation and hardworking.

Hardworking is the activation energy of begginers to make quality post without obstruction.
A begginer most follow the full steps of the seniors like the following @suchmoon,@ loycev,@welsh, @loyce777, @ upgrade. And other members who are highly intellectual in order to propagate.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5262255.msg54797349#msg54797349

A quality post is a post that is answerable to a question, and also a post that brings a solution to a question even though it's a two lines stanza of an article that's well arranged, coordinated, constructed, understandable and also meaningful, but from my perspective some user's misunderstood what we meant by a quality post or a quality article, i have come across of some varieties of post's in the community and it trigger's me to put it in writing, i seen some user's making an ambiguous articles And taught that a large numbers of articles is granted or guarantee making of a tangible or nice post, [No]

This is what you called you and @Ebede are different body?

[But so be it, I will accept your offer on the following conditions:]

I missed the discussion in which Ratimov was caught in a lie, after which he removed his thread, but nothing. Therefore, for myself, I decided that I want to put an end to all these senseless disputes, and this will happen when Ratimov agrees to the counter terms of the dispute (a bet that he offered and not me).

Here are some topics to search for:

Here he selected a list of 30 threads and offered them for verification, considering me a brainless guy (since, apparently, before his proposal, he checked them for plagiarism). Therefore, I made him a counter offer.

A bold statement. I'll give you $5 000 if you can find the source of these threads that I recently created, since you boldly claim that all my threads are translations of other people. You can archive this post, and any trusted member of this community will confirm it.

Even if you really are the author of a couple of threads, then against the background of hundreds of translations you have published, it seems like a drop in the ocean.

But so be it, I will accept your offer on the following conditions:

1. You will use escrow and deposit $ 5,000 to DarkStar_ , Royse777, DireWolfM14 or Nutildah, (I think you will not be charged a commission).
2. I will not rely only on those that you published, I will look for plagiarism in all the threads you created.
3. For everything, as you suggested, a week will be enough for me.
4. If anyone finds plagiarism and publishes evidence before me, that person will receive the award.
5. If I find plagiarism, I will win the bet, but I will send you proofs in PM so that you can correct your mistake.

You have the right to refuse the bet, I and everyone present here will understand this, (I hope you haven't lost your courage). He has already publicly refused twice (veiledly changing the topic of conversation) if not, write simply "Agree" or "NO". I want to note that most likely he will begin to find fault with words and write in this thread that the subject of the dispute is not at all what he had in mind, so stock up on popcorn.

[What happened:]

What happened: A certain exchanger (bithub.im), which usually does not accept applications from 0 to 8 am Moscow time, unexpectedly started working at this time and went to the top in bitcoin directions.

It's easy to guess what happened next: users went to change at a "favorable rate", receiving nothing in return.

The administrator of the exchanger, having come in the morning, turned off the site and wrote standard unsubscriptions for 15 days, offering nothing to anyone or promising. Best_Change does the same, suggesting "wait for a solution to the situation" and "wait for new information." In fact, they limited themselves to removing the no longer working exchanger from their "reliable" monitoring, and all their real actions ended there. A lot of people were deceived, Balthazar counted about 30 people:

We told users that we were also held hostage to the situation. Due to the actions of cybercriminals, many users were affected for a large amount. The exchange office does not have such reserves to pay to all the victims. Therefore, we turned to lawyers and filed a statement with the police. Also, we are trying to find a way out of this situation that will satisfy all parties to the conflict. Our lawyers prepare recommendations for affected users. Unfortunately, all this takes time.

Both bithub.im and BestChange received a significant number of requests containing information about unpaid orders.
Unfortunately, due to the fact that a significant part of these requests contains false information and comes from scammers, which hosted the bithub.im site, we still cannot start actions to resolve the situation. BestChange apologizes to users for the long waiting period, however, for objective reasons, we are forced to conduct a full analysis of the incoming information. Unfortunately, this process takes a long time. Regarding the removal of reviews, we inform you that the policy of the BestChange service is aimed at preserving positive, negative and neutral reviews left by real users. In cases where we receive requests from exchange offices to remove reviews, we always ask to provide full information about the situation.

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5343984.0 Balthazar (с)
- https://www.bestchange.ru/bithub-exchanger.html Use the Google translate

Reality: bithub.im and BestChange have not been able to resolve the situation with payments for about two weeks, in addition, BestChange removes negative reviews on its website, saying that these reviews are bogus. BestChange is running a signature campaign on the forum so I doubt any of the DTs will create a flag or leave a red feedback.

[Make a minimum of 25 eligible (constructive) posts each week that you participate to receive a payment.]

Can someone explain the difference to me? In addition to the fact that the Moderator of the Russian Local protects people who abuse Google translations, he himself does not hesitate to informal plagiarism. Xal0lex adds quotes only to a small part of the copied text, and then adds a hidden link. In addition to the fact that Xal0lex does not publish such messages in the form of a full quote, it also places them in different threads to create the impression of authorship.

    - I marked the text that the moderator claims to be his own
    - I marked quotes
    - Before posting stupid reasoning, please first check the source, by copying and pasting the text that I have highlighted in red.

• Informal plagiarism is my definition of when a user publishes almost all posts as clippings from news sites. Thus, verbatim copying and adding a hidden link allows this moderator to fulfill the sig campaign quota without any problems.

Make a minimum of 25 eligible (constructive) posts each week that you participate to receive a payment.

When Hhampuz published the rules and talked about constructive posts, he meant constructive posts made by a campaign participant and not by a journalist of one of the news resources. Here's an example, or just check the post history of this moderator as it consists entirely of such posts!

Зapплaтa в кpиптoвaлютe. Boзмoжнo ли этo в Poccии?

Зaкoн «O финaнcoвыx цифpoвыx aктивax» пpямo нe зaпpeщaeт выплaчивaть зapплaтy цифpoвыми мoнeтaми. Ecть ли тaкaя вoзмoжнocть y poccиян и мoжeт ли oнa cтaть пoпyляpнoй cpeди житeлeй cтpaны.

C нaчaлa 2021 гoдa кpиптoвaлютa в Poccии пoлyчилa oфициaльный cтaтyc имyщecтвa. Этo пpoизoшлo пocлe вcтyплeнию в cилy зaкoнa «O финaнcoвыx цифpoвыx aктивax», кoтopый oфициaльнo зaпpeтил иcпoльзoвaть кpиптoвaлюты для oплaты тoвapoв и ycлyг. Ho в зaкoнe ничeгo нe гoвopитcя o вoзмoжнocти пoлyчaть зapaбoтнyю плaтy в кpиптoвaлютe. Oпpoшeнныe PБК-Кpиптo экcпepты oбъяcнили, мoгyт ли paбoтoдaтeли выплaчивaть зapплaтy цифpoвыми aктивaми и бyдeт ли тaкaя вoзмoжнocть пoльзoвaтьcя пoпyляpнocтью.

Teopeтичecки — вoзмoжнo

Житeли Poccии мoгyт пoлyчaть чacть зapплaты в нeдeнeжнoй фopмe, oбъяcнилa экcпepт Moscow Digital School Иpинa Mypaщeнкoвa. Пo ee cлoвaм, фopмa oплaты ycтaнaвливaeтcя в кoллeктивнoм или тpyдoвoм дoгoвope, нo ecть oгpaничeниe — дoля зapaбoтнoй плaты в нeдeнeжнoй фopмe нe мoжeт пpeвышaть 20%.

«Tepeтичecки, c yчeтoм тeкyщeгo cтaтyca кpиптoвaлюты в PФ, пpи coблюдeнии ycтaнoвлeнныx ycлoвий и oгpaничeний, выплaтa чacти зapплaты в кpиптoвaлютe вoзмoжнa и ceйчac», — oтмeтилa экcпepт.

Пocкoлькy зaкoн oгpaничивaeт paзмep нeдeнeжнoй чacти зapплaты, пoлyчaть вoзнaгpaждeниe пoлнocтью в кpиптoвaлютe нe пoлyчитcя, дoбaвилa Иpинa Mypaщeнкoвa.

Кpиптoвaлютa в Poccии нe мoжeт быть cpeдcтвoм плaтeжa, ee oбopoт cyщecтвeннo oгpaничeн, нaпoмнил члeн Кoмиccии пo пpaвoвoмy oбecпeчeнию цифpoвoй экoнoмики Mocкoвcкoгo oтдeлeния Accoциaции юpиcтoв Poccии Пaвeл Лaвpeнкoв. Пo eгo мнeнию, чтoбы зapaбoтнyю плaтy мoжнo былo выплaчивaть кpиптoвaлютoй, y нee дoлжeн быть cтaтyc, эквивaлeнтный нaциoнaльнoй вaлютe. Bpяд ли тaкoe бyдeт вoзмoжнo в ближaйшeм бyдyщeм, дoбaвил экcпepт.

Кoмy интepecнa кpиптoзapплaтa

Haибoльший интepec — y coтpyдникoв кpиптoвaлютныx cтapтaпoв, кpyпныx кoмпaний цифpoвoй cфepы, кpиптoбиpж. У пepcoнaлa или пpивлeчeнныx фpилaнcepoв тaкoгo бизнeca нeт cтpaxa пepeд кpиптoвaлютoй, тaк кaк oни пpeкpacнo знaют ee плюcы и минycы, и пoнимaют, чтo мoжнo cдeлaть c пoлyчeнными цифpoвыми мoнeтaми, yтвepждaeт Иpинa Mypaщeнкoвa. PБК-кpиптo